Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Zimbabwe election: Opposition wins but a run-off vote is required



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

THE opposition party won Zimbabwe's presidential election, official results showed today, however the lack of a majority outcome will prompt a run-off ballot.
The figures said although president Robert Mugabe lost to his rival Morgan Tsvangirai, the margin was not enough to avoid a second-round run-off vote.

That puts Mugabe, who was unable to control the outcome of the first vote to win an outright maj
ority, in exactly the position his supporters wanted.

Tsvangirai's MDC party says Mugabe has been using the time since the first vote on 29 March for a campaign of violence and intimidation to ensure he wins the runoff.

The country's Electoral Commission gave Tsvangirai 47.9% of the vote and Mugabe 43.2%. Under election law a candidate has to win more than 50% for outright victory.

"No candidate has received a majority of votes counted. A second election will be held at a date to be announced," the commission said in a statement.

The MDC, who insist Tsvangirai did win enough votes for victory declared: "We have been overruled. We are in dispute. It is not fair."

Tsvangirai said previously that he will not participate in any run-off. Even before the results were announced, his party challenged the process, citing 120,000 unaccounted votes that could prove he won outright.

"We just said to the electoral commission we're not moving forward until we understand where these 120,000 votes came from," a party spokesman said hours before the results were released.

He also said the party, which says its calculations show Mr Tsvangirai won with 50.3% of the vote, anticipated needing another three or four days to examine the results as part of the verification process.

Human rights groups said post-election violence in Zimbabwe has made it unlikely a run-off could be free and fair.

Mugabe has been accused of brutality and increasing autocracy. He pledged to accept the verdict of any run-off vote and called on the opposition to do the same, Senegalese officials said.



The full article contains 351 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 May 2008 6:11 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Zimbabwe
 
1

WL,

livingston 02/05/2008 16:50:43
At last they have counted the votes, it took them more than a month. But if Tsvangirai got 47.9% and Mugabe got 43.2% of the votes, who got the remaining 8.9% ???
2

Jock Scot,

East Lothian 02/05/2008 18:38:21

Simba Makoni came third with 8.3% and
in fourth Langton Towungana 0.6%
3

John Blackley,

Florida 02/05/2008 20:30:56
"Mugabe, who was unable to control the outcome of the first vote"

Nonsense. Mugabe did the only thing he could to control the outcome of the first vote and it was extremely successful.

Mugabe presided while a vote count took so long that the result lost all credibility (and may yet declare that a run-off election is unconstitutional). Despite that, instead of having to leave office as he would have - had a more rapid vote count shown a straight defeat, he now has two options. One is, as above, to declare the run-off unconstitutional and therefore he should remain president. The other is to hold the run-off and give his thugs plenty of time for the traditional Zimbabwean voter intimidation.

"unable to control the outcome" indeed!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.