Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Mugabe bid for victory foiled after vote recount


Zanu-PF fails to secure parliamentary majority

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 April 2008
PRESIDENT Robert Mugabe's grip on power slipped yesterday after a recount showed his party had all but failed to secure control of Zimbabwe's parliament, his first defeat in 28 years.
Results of a parallel presidential poll have not been released and Mugabe has been preparing for a run-off against Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).

Tsvangirai says he won outright and his party has
rejected both the recount and any talk of a run-off.

For the first time since Zimbabwe's independence in 1980, the MDC wrested a parliamentary majority from Mugabe's Zanu-PF party in the election, triggering a recount in 23 out of the 210 constituencies.

The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) said that in 14 out of 23 seats recounted so far, the original results were confirmed.

The commission had ordered the recount after Zanu-PF accused election officials of taking bribes to under-count votes for Mugabe and his ruling party and committing other electoral fraud.

A number of election officials have been arrested.

To win back a parliamentary majority, the ruling party needed to win nine more seats than it did in the first count. Only nine are left to be counted – but Zanu-PF had already won three of those in the first count.

Delays in the recount and in announcing the presidential result have brought growing international pressure on the 84-year-old president and stoked fears of vote-rigging and bloodshed in a country suffering an economic collapse.

"This recount was a charade and a flawed process. The attempt was to reverse the will of the people and we rejected the recount from the onset," said MDC spokesman Nelson Chamisa.

"But I can confirm that our earlier majority has been reconfirmed according to information we are receiving."

The ZEC said yesterday it was not sure when the results of a disputed March 29 presidential election would be available.

"I can't say exactly when the results will come," ZEC Chairman, George Chiweshe, announced.

Meanwhile, Britain said it deplored the escalating violence against opposition supporters and called for a UN mission to inspect human rights abuses.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who is seeking an arms embargo on Mugabe's Zanu-PF, said Britain would step up diplomatic efforts ahead of a UN Security Council meeting on the former British colony.

"The coming days will be critical.

"We will intensify international action around a UNSC discussion on Tuesday. We will press for a UN mission to investigate the violence and human rights abuses," he said in a statement.

"The whole international community must speak up against the climate of fear in Zimbabwe."

Brown also insisted on international monitors if there is a run-off for the presidency.

He said: "I welcome the positions taken by the UN Secretary General, by African leaders, by Europe, by the US and by all those who want to see a return to democracy in Zimbabwe.

"We, and others, stand ready to help rebuild Zimbabwe once democracy returns. I pledge that Britain will be in the vanguard of this effort."

On Friday, Mugabe resorted to strong measures used in the past to keep the opposition in check, in what Human Rights Watch said was a stepped-up "campaign of organised terror and torture against opposition activists and ordinary Zimbabweans".

The government denies it is waging a violent campaign.

Armed riot police raided the MDC's headquarters and detained scores of people in the toughest measures against the opposition since the disputed elections.

The MDC said those detained included supporters who had sought refuge with them after fleeing various parts of the country "where the regime has been unleashing brutal violence".

Police spokesman Wayne Bvudzijena said 215 people had been arrested in the raid, and no one had been charged yet.

"We have released the elderly and women with babies. There are about 30 of them. We are still doing profiles for the others and checking with their provinces on whether they have committed any crimes there," he said.

The Zimbabwe Association of Doctors for Human Rights said 62 people had come in for treatment over three days, some with broken limbs and one with an axe wound on the back of his head.

South Africa's UN envoy Dumisani Kumalo said someone from the UN secretariat would brief the 15-nation council, probably on Tuesday, on developments in Zimbabwe.

The Western diplomat on the council said any action in the form of a statement or resolution was unlikely. But the meeting would be useful in increasing pressure on Mugabe.

Mugabe, a hero of the independence struggle, accuses the opposition of conspiring with Western critics to end his almost three decades in power, which began with high hopes that Zimbabwe would become an African model of democratic and economic success.

Today, Zimbabweans face severe shortages of basic goods and an inflation rate of 165,000% – the world's highest.

• The Lib Dems have written to Cabinet Secretary Gus O'Donnell, calling for Mugabe to be stripped of his honorary knighthood, awarded in 1994.

A cross-party group of 19 MPs have also signed a Commons motion expressing regret that the knighthood was ever awarded and calling for its removal.

Last year, Mugabe was stripped of his honorary degree from Edinburgh University following a campaign led by students and Scotland on Sunday.

The Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesman said: "The British public will be shocked and outraged that Robert Mugabe still retains a knighthood.

"It shows how slow Britain has been to use what little power we have against this tyrant."





The full article contains 938 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 April 2008 12:22 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Zimbabwe
 
1

oder,

Scotland 27/04/2008 01:22:31
"It shows how slow Britain has been to use what little power we have against this tyrant"

yes! Britain was slow to listen, it has taken 28 years before they finally understand..... sad really!
2

Dáithí,

San Jose 27/04/2008 05:01:41
Oder -

Do you think that this is because Britain has been paralyzed by a whiny NeoComm minority that is so self-absorbed that the entire nation is unable to give a tinker's tin about anyone except themselves?
3

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 27/04/2008 06:27:47
#2 Dáithí

Since you post on these boards frequently, you will know that the people of Britain (and the people of Scotland in particular) care about a lot of things.
What they don't care about is people who think we can be paralysed by a "whiny Neocomm minority"
4

carrottop,

Dumfries 27/04/2008 09:45:12
Must admire the guts of the people who done the recount, the pressure on them to find for Mugabe must have been enormous.
Still something there worth saving.
5

Helpmaboabie,

27/04/2008 10:19:29
I recommend Chris McGreal's excellent reports. Grim reading but he makes it very clear that the situation is far more complex than neocon inaction.
6

Mashimaro,

China 27/04/2008 10:29:37
#4 Carrottop. I agree with you. I must say I was fulling expecting a reversal of results. These people must have family out there too. They should all get medals or something.
7

oder,

Scotland 27/04/2008 10:46:29
2 Dáithí,San Jose


"Do you think that this is because Britain has been paralyzed by a whiny NeoComm minority"

to some extent yes! but I wouldn't say that most don't care!they do to varying degrees!

British politicians are paralyzed with fear very few if any are concerned about right and wrong!they are morally lost unable to act against the likes of Mugabe for fear of criticism from Africa!
the British Lion no longer roars! it squeaks (or should I say shrieks) and retreats Britain true status in the world....sad!




8

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 27/04/2008 11:35:13
Mugabe will have to be dragged kicking and screaming, or shot, to relinquish power regardless of any poll recount.
9

Alfred E. Neuman,

27/04/2008 11:38:17
Alex Salmond and the SNP write to Robert Mugabe to try and form relationships and understanding on several international issues.

Disgusting.
10

Mashimaro,

China 27/04/2008 12:22:45
#9 Not really Alfred. Has history taught you nothing? If you want to change an ideal don't stand against it, stand with it. Force begets resistance. If the west had only learned this lesson it would have been far more successful in Africa instead of failing so miserably.
11

Reading Public 1,

Wisc 27/04/2008 13:15:32
Too bad as this will probably fall to violence. Mugabe still controls the Military as it is .
12

Dáithí,

San Jose 27/04/2008 16:04:18
#7 - Oder

>"to some extent yes! but I wouldn't say that most don't care!they do to varying degrees!"

Oh, I don't believe that I said that they didn't care, I believe exactly the opposite.

- I said that perhaps they have heard the redundant, mindless whining of the non-interventionist crowd for so long that they have begun to believe them.

After all, if you accept their argument:

1. Zimbabwe possesses no WMD's
2. Zimbabwe poses no threat to Britain (or Scotland)

- then, by their reasoning (NOT mine), there is no morally justifiable reason to intervene!

See?
13

oder,

Scotland 27/04/2008 18:41:24
12 Dáithí,San Jose

point taken!
14

Biker,

Ayr 27/04/2008 19:54:11
Diathi. You said.....Do you think that this is because Britain has been paralyzed by a whiny NeoComm minority that is so self-absorbed that the entire nation is unable to give a tinker's tin about anyone except themselves? I believe that you did imply that most dont give a t@ss about what is happening in Zimbabwe. This is incorrect.
We understand that Mugabi has no WMD ("sadly" the Chinese weapons did'nt make it)but the issue of human rights within the country is appauling, to which most take issue.
I agree that it is time for our politicians to stand up and actualy oppose this man and ZanuPF.
15

Dáithí,

San Jose 27/04/2008 21:27:09
Biker -

>"I believe that you did imply that most dont give a t@ss about what is happening in Zimbabwe. This is incorrect."

Then accept my challenge and prove me wrong. Do something about it.

>"but the issue of human rights within the country is appauling, to which most take issue. "

Do you believe that 'take issue with' substitutes for 'do something about'?

>"I agree that it is time for our politicians to stand up and actualy oppose this man and ZanuPF.

Stand up? Yes. Do something substantial about? Doubtful.

Do you think that your politicos aren't absolutely terrified of doing something substantial because they will expose themselves to the barrage of withering whining that has been leveled at those that what to do something about Iraq and Afghanistan?

Besides, wouldn't 'doing something about him' now make these same politicos look like Tony Blair? Look what you guys did to him - do you think that they will risk their political careers for THAT?
16

Mashimaro,

China 28/04/2008 01:28:37
It looks as if Bob will have his weapons after all

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=84&art_id=vn20080427110147534C924469
17

oder,

Scotland 28/04/2008 09:27:18
one man one vote doesn`t work for Mugabe he falls back on the Maoist way "Power through the barrel of a gun" policy! he knows it works!
18

oder,

Scotland 28/04/2008 10:24:26
16 Mashimaro,China

"It looks as if Bob will have his weapons after all"

Not without the help of the Chinese though eh!

as your compatriot said there are many ways to skin a cat!

you said

"Has history taught you nothing? If you want to change an ideal don't stand against it, stand with it. Force begets resistance. If the west had only learned this lesson it would have been far more successful in Africa instead of failing so miserably."

so the Chinese way is to arm maniac`s like Mugabe,Omar of Sudan, and support Generals in Burma ! while their populations suffer? as for success in Africa one of the first countries to adopted the Chinese way of doing things Tanzania. in the late fifties had the fastest expanding economy in Africa after years under Nyerere it had become one of the poorest in Africa! yes the Chinese have been very successful in destabilising countries in Africa but have failed miserably in improving the lives of ordinary Africans! as Nyerere said if "in looking back he would have done things differently" his judgement on the Chinese way?
notable success of any kind has so far eluded China's efforts in Africa.
19

Mashimaro,

China 28/04/2008 10:38:21
#17 Maoist way? As opposed to "power through a feather duster" like the UKUS uses?

When last were you in Africa, by the way?
20

oder,

Scotland 28/04/2008 14:02:48
19 Mashimaro,China


you recognise the policy?
"power through a feather duster" as opposed to power "through the barrel of a gun" then its easy to see which one is likely to cause the most damage! and has!

I agree with you on that its important to have contact to whats going on in Africa on the ground, at least that's the drift I get from your question,having lived there for 30 years, married to an African,my children born there,have family and friends there,regular trips and contacts! not to mention traveling extensively on the continent that's what I base my opinions on!

whats yours?
21

Mashimaro,

China 28/04/2008 14:28:58
Spent a lot of time down south have good friends in Zimbabwe, Zambia, South Africa, Mozambique. This month I will be in Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya and South Africa. I'm going to catch up with some of the Chinese who have settled in Baoding villages.
If you have been back recently you would have seen the big changes China is making.

Now, I would like you to tally up the dead from the invasions by the capitalist west (I'll do you a favour and leave out South America and Africa) - Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Iraq and total it against the dead caused by Chinese invasion. I think you'l see which policy is the most destructive - thank you.
22

Biker,

Ayr 28/04/2008 17:33:29
Diathi. So come on then , tell us of your involvement in attempting to sort out the problems in the region.
Nuthin I bet. Although happy to pontificate on others comments.
I write constantly to MPs, MEPs, and anyone else who will listen, just like many others. I join marches and get involved. What about you. Will you get out of your armchair, put down the pipe and try to help? I bet not.
But then again armchair warriers are in abundance when it comes to copping out.
23

Biker,

Ayr 28/04/2008 17:35:37
Mashimaro. As you seem happy to bandy figures about the region. Lets look at them again in 10 years and just see how destructive China has been. Why dont they keep their yuen and help the people in the poorest regions of China, instead of interfering in Africa?
24

oder,

Scotland 28/04/2008 18:16:33
21 Mashimaro,China 28/04/2008 14:28:58

OK! lets start with China! how many was it during 50/60s somewhere in the region of 6O million was it Under Mao?you can add South America, Africa, Asia altogether but no one on this earth comes close to the" Great Helmsman" except maybe Pol Pot he only managed between 2 and 2.5 million in relation to the minuscule 150,000 that the the Americans managed to kill in Cambodia,he also attacked the ethnic minorities Chinese,Veitnamese,and the Cham Muslims of the 425,000 Chinese 50% were killed!.... his idol?.... Mao Tsu Dong.

Americans are clearly second best! when it come to numbers killed!

lets wait until the Afghan/Iraq wars are finished then get the correct figures!
25

Mashimaro,

China 29/04/2008 03:45:35
#24 Oder... Ah, see I said INVASION. IN..VA..SI...ON.
Actually, Pol Pot was helped by the Americans in one way through the Chinese and in another way through the US aid agencies.
I think you need to remember - much as I hate Mao - that there was a huge famine going on. His cultural revolution deaths did not reach 100,000 so yeah... back to reality... Let's stack that against the 1 million dead in Iraq alone . . . I think I'd be very very quiet if I were you.
26

Mashimaro,

29/04/2008 03:47:33
#23 If I'm still doing this in 10 years time, someone should shoot me.

"Why dont they keep their yuen and help the people in the poorest regions of China, instead of interfering in Africa?"

They are helping poor people in China by investing heafily in Africa.
27

oder,

Scotland 29/04/2008 11:50:15
25 Mashimaro,China

His cultural revolution deaths did not reach 100,000 so yeah... back to reality... Let's stack that against the 1 million dead in Iraq alone


Yes... back to reality! tens of millions died under Mao`s famine and cultural revolution policy`s, your typical attitude to blame all on the US makes good sound bites for the "party"

one million as opposed to tens of millions! you don't have to be Einstein to work it out!

INVASION is only used as one part of the over all policy, your attempt to use it in isolation brings into question your credibility on the matter! as does you ignoring the numbers who died in the Great famine, the term "great" in this case does not indicate a minor event, China`s policy still lead`s in the death business, where non interference in the brutal regimes of the world is in reality tacit support for those regimes! as the saying goes for "evil to succeed good men do nothing"


"I think I'd be very very quiet if I were you"

I suggest you follow your own advice!
28

Biker,

Ayr 29/04/2008 12:24:30
Mashimaro. Explane to me if you can how selling arms to Mugabi helps the poorest in China. Please dont give me the cr@p about investing the profits because that is just nonsense.
China is spreading its influence around the world with alacrity and with no concern about its home markets. This has been in evidence for decades and to the detriment of the Chinese. Yes you have the worlds biggest economy but instead of investing you are spending outwith your nation.
29

Mashimaro,

China 29/04/2008 14:06:37
#27 The Chinese Famine did kill millions. That was mostly caused by bad decisions. It was not as if Mao wanted that outcome. He was doing what he and his advisors thought was best. Also you have to admit that he did have extraordinary circumstances to deal with. The long years of the war, the revolution and then the disasters of both flood and drought. So I would not say he killed 50 million. His misinformed decisions along with natural disasters led to millions dying.
And before you croak about me being a Mao supporter, I am not. He was a demon.
I've commented on China's foreign policy - so in short, non interference is the policy and that's the way we do business.
30

Mashimaro,

China 29/04/2008 14:28:53
#28 Biker, you surprise me. I would have thought you might have worked it out for yourself.
Let me spell it out for you:

What China needs to sustain it's people:

Water (found in Tibet)
Food (Farmland is shrinking and peasant farmers under produce. As farmland is turned over to industry, farmers are losing their homes. As millions are shifted from rural to urban they become disgruntled and social unrest stirs.)
so it needs ...
Farmland
Fishing grounds
Minerals
Fuel
Space
Employment
Support in the United Nations

Let's take a look at what Africa has ...

Farmland (Your european farms are lying fallow and there's lots more where those came from)
Farmland produces food.
Minerals just waiting to be eased out of the earth.
Rich oil and coal
Loads of space for disgruntled delanded farmer to set up their own farms, using dams that are already there or have been built, using cheap labour that is already there. The system is called hub and satellite.
Employment - Chinese will work themselves to death and far outstrip anything the Africans can do.
Fertile and vast fishing grounds

Oh and loads of grateful country leaders who will support China in the United Nations.

Dude, it's the greatest Chinese take-away in history...

So we dun care what the Africans do to each other. We will deal with the people in power to get what we want.

*this is not the official view of Beijing, just the way I personally work it out.

31

Biker,

Ayr 29/04/2008 17:43:09
Mashimaro. Lets look at your country. Had they not given grazing over goats for cashmere and denuded the area then perhaps farming would'nt be such an issue, along with creeping desetification.
Fishing grounds, now theres a laugh. With thousands of miles of coast I wonder why that is an issue?.
Minerals. What about the deposits in Tibet?
Fuel. I believe China has one of the biggest oil deposits in the world.
Space. Well there is another story. I'll come back to that.
Employment. I suppose the fact that China now has one of the biggest immigration policies should not be overlooked.
With more inner investment China could:-
Employ more of its own people and still sustain the levels of immigration.
Without the dirty rush for space they could also invest internaly
All I see here is China attempting to exerting influence around the world instead of looking after it's own people. Surely a sad state of affairs, ignoring your own people
32

Mashimaro,

China 30/04/2008 02:21:49
#31Your ignorance on China never fails to amaze me. I can only suggest that you do more reading. Have a look at the zombi fleets off Africa, for a start. Then have a look at Baoding villages and look up the Exim Bank.
When you have something to say, come back and we'll talk. Right now you're just barking at the moon.
33

Mashimaro,

China 30/04/2008 03:56:22
But to answer some of your babbling:

"Had they not given grazing over goats for cashmere and denuded the area then perhaps farming would'nt be such an issue, along with creeping desetification."

That's not completely true. The area used to carry animals is not suitable for grains or vegetables. Goats are extremely hardy creatures that will almost survive anywhere. Huge efforts have been made to correct the desertification and are beginning to pay off, but what that land can produce and what China actually needs are two different things.

"Fishing grounds, now theres a laugh. With thousands of miles of coast I wonder why that is an issue?."

1.3 billion people in China, Japan 128 million, India 1.1 billion people - the fish got eaten.

"Minerals. What about the deposits in Tibet?"

What about them? They will help, China needs more.

"Fuel. I believe China has one of the biggest oil deposits in the world."

You believe wrong. The exact size of the field in Tibet has not been announced and it will take a long time before it is accessed.

"Employment. I suppose the fact that China now has one of the biggest immigration policies should not be overlooked."

China has a very large population of peasant farmers. Where Postmark lives, 11 million of these people will be moved off their farms and resettled in the city. They will need employment and training and education, housing, healthcare. The city can't handle it. Better they go to Africa and farm there.

"With more inner investment China could:-
Employ more of its own people and still sustain the levels of immigration."

And where do we get the food for them?

"Without the dirty rush for space they could also invest internaly"

Money doesn't = food. You have to have the actual food out there before you can buy it. This way China and Africa wins. As China becomes more industrialised and moves away from primary markets, Africa will be at a level where it can absorb and take over those markets
34

Biker,

Ayr 30/04/2008 08:59:13
Mashimaro. Again with the obfuscation and spin. The area mentioned regarding the cashmere fiasco was rich in flaura and fauna and was decimated by the introduction of cashmere goats. I understand that goats are hardy creatures but, as any farmer will tell you they eat everything. Also given the huge number of animals introduced to the area, it should be no surprise when it was discovered that the land had been decimated.
Fishing. I understand that China has a huge fishing fleet which operates in protected waters. In fact you are correct, the waters have been overfished with many species being put on the endangered list.
Money = food. Oh yes it does my deluded friend. With money and proper internal investment, food could be in abundance for all. Introduce proper farming and animal husbandry for all regions, not just the favoured ones. Employ proper farming proffesionals and develop your land. Deforestation should stop and well tried and tested methods to stop desertification should be introduced. For the first couple of years food can be bought on the open market until your own farming is running. Simple eh?
But I suspect that this is not an option as China seems intent upon exerting its presence even where not required.
As for shooting at the moon. It aint me mate.
Your primary market is your internal one. While you play away, the home market is suffering badly.
35

Mashimaro,

China 30/04/2008 10:46:39
Byker you don't know you head from you belly button.

"Introduce proper farming and animal husbandry for all regions, not just the favoured ones."
Oh, you man shift around those Tibean nomads, force them look after their animals properly? Give me a break. China's farmers are peasants. Their farms are about the size of your English country gardens. I'm sure you, oh pure one, are not suggesting that the land be forcibly taken from these peasants and turned over to the government.

"Deforestation should stop and well tried and tested methods to stop desertification should be introduced."
Again, you're way behind times, dude. Reforestation started more than a decade ago.

"For the first couple of years food can be bought on the open market until your own farming is running. Simple eh?"

No. Have you noticed the world food crisis or have you been in a coma?

"But I suspect that this is not an option as China seems intent upon exerting its presence even where not required."

Ah, but it is required in Africa.
36

Biker,

Ayr 01/05/2008 09:51:46
More smart ar@e answers from the oriental correspondant.
As your regime seemed happy enough to exploit a complete region for the goats, I rather assumed that they would do the same for farming and food production. Excuse me for joined up thinking.
Deforestation continues unabated in the North of China even as I write, or has that not passed by the local censor? Look into it again.
World food shortage, dont make me laugh. It is available if you are prepaired to pay for it, and China can afford it.
I repeat, the only reason China is attempting to exert its influence is purely financial. Keep your yuen, feed your own people and then give us the benefit of your "Great Chinese Caryout".
Simply ignoring the home market only stores up problems for you in the future.
Loose the sycophancy, it does your posts no favours.
37

Mashimaro,

02/05/2008 11:19:08
#36 It's YUAN ya ignoranus Y U A N R E N I M B I

Yeah, it's quite possible China will turn the whole of Africa into a bigger desert than it already is. But what the heck, it can't do much worse than England's Nile divvy up with Egypt.
I don't know why you imagine that I have anything personally to do with China's policy. I'm just telling you the way I see things. But next time I'm having yum cha with Chairman Hu, I'll mention your ideas. (nutter).
For your information, while there is deforestation happening in some parts of the country, China will plant 2.5 billion trees in this year alone.
I wonder how much European forest will be replanted this year, eh? You know the one I mean, the big black forest that armies would be lost in.
What happened in Shijiazhuang is not an issue of environmental protection, it's a mere 47 hectares. It's an issue of safety. The local government says the trees will be exchanged for fruit trees.
Basicaly try to comprehend. Africa is one big farm and one big mine and a great place to export our unemployment. Hey, England ilegally exports its waste to China so I don't really think you can tell us not to export ours. AT least ours shouldn't cause cancer and birth defects, but we can't be sure.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.