Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

YouTube peps up poll



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 November 2007
FROM gun control to the Bible, and from illegal immigration and the use of torture to flying the Confederate flag, the concerns of the Republican party's rank and file were on full - and colourful - display during the first debate organised by the popular video-sharing website YouTube.com.
The Wednesday-night debate in Iowa, in which the candidates were asked questions submitted on videos by members of the public, followed a similar Democrats' YouTube debate earlier this year, and produced a livelier, more colourful spectacle than show
s organised by professional broadcasters.

Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani, the leading contenders for the Grand Old Party (GOP) nomination, sparred from the beginning, clashing on immigration.

Mr Romney accused Mr Giuliani of running a "sanctuary city" during his time as Mayor of New York, arguing the Mayor had demonstrated no willingness to crack down on illegal immigrants. Mr Giuliani said Mr Romney was being "holier than thou" and that he had tolerated six so-called sanctuary cities in Massachusetts when he was governor and had run a "sanctuary mansion" since illegal-immigrant sub-contractors had worked on Mr Romney's home.

Mr Romney, who leads in the polls in both Iowa and New Hampshire, had a trying night as rivals lined up to take shots at him. He has had to overcome accusations that he is a shameless panderer who has frequently changed his mind on serious issues, and he acknowledged "I was wrong" to have held a pro-choice position on abortion.

The former governor appeared uncomfortable when asked if he supported maintaining the ban on homosexuals serving in the military or if he believed that the Bible was true.

Mr Romney and Senator John McCain also engaged in a lengthy debate over the use of torture. Mr McCain, who was tortured while a prisoner during the Vietnam War, condemned Mr Romney's support of "waterboarding" - the near-drowning of terrorist suspects. "How in the world anybody could think that that kind of thing could be inflicted by Americans on people who are held in our custody is absolutely beyond me," he said.

Mr Romney said that he opposed torture but supported the techniques - which included waterboarding - which enraged Mr McCain.

Mr Romney also clashed with Mike Huckabee a former Arkansas governor who was perhaps the evening's biggest winner. Mr Huckabee, a former baptist preacher who was until recently most famous for losing more than 100lbs on a diet, used his folksy charm and wit to good effect. Asked how Jesus would feel about the death penalty - which Mr Huckabee supports - he won laughter when he said: "Jesus was too smart to ever run for public office."

However, it was his squabble with Mr Romney over Mr Huckabee's support for a scholarship programme for the children of illegal immigrants that confirmed that Mr Huckabee is now a serious contender. Mr Romney attacked the Arkansan, elevating him to the front rank of candidates.

The latest polls from Iowa show that Mr Huckabee is eroding Mr Romney's once-comfortable lead in the Hawkeye state. Drawing support from evangelical Christians in particular, Mr Huckabee is betting that his combination of likeability, religious conviction and economic populism sets him apart from his rivals.

Mr Huckabee demonstrated his nimbleness when Rudy Giuliani was asked if he believed in the truth of the Bible. "Do you want me to help you out?" said a smiling Mr Huckabee, fully cognisant that his surge in Iowa is also aiding Mr Giuliani's campaign to win the nomination. Indeed, speculation is rife that Mr Giuliani would pick Mr Huckabee as his running-mate if he defeats Mr Romney for the nomination.



The full article contains 611 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 November 2007 9:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: YouTube
 
1

Zyskandar A Jaimot,

Orlando, Fl., U.S.A. 30/11/2007 00:55:57

Kow many DEMBHOLE 'SHILLS' can CNN place in a REPUBLICAN debate audience???
ANDERSON COOPER 'moderator' of this so-called REPUBLICAN debate [COOPER failed-actor/failed-personality/failed-anchor/failed-tellall-author/failed weatgerman/soon-to-be-failed-homosexual] claimed he had no knowledge that 5 or 6 of the questioners were DEMBHOLE OPERATIVES!!! UNBELIEVABLE - the man who said he was GAY and a former general works for HILLARY and her GAY/LESBIAN task force!!! THIS DEBATE WAS A FARCE AND SHOWED THE DESPERATION OF THE DEMBHOLES AND the CommunistNewsNetwork - 'plants' as far as the questions were concerned and potted 'plants' in the audience including KERR and others flown to FLORIDA from CALIFORNIA by CNN!!! Watch out ANDRSON COOPER - another of your relatives[a VANDERBILT no less] is committing suicide by jumping from a building!!! DUCK!!!WHAT A YUTZ EVEN FOR A GAY GUY!!! DAN RATHERNOT was waiting in the wings with more cooked-up conspiracy theories!!! Are all DEMBHOLE FOOLS??? OR JUST THOSE ON CNN???

2

,

30/11/2007 01:14:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1187198, Article id was mapped to record!
3

American,

USA 30/11/2007 01:15:11

#1-zyskandar-Not all dembhole are fools, but most are.

4

Michael P.,

Santa Barbara 30/11/2007 01:18:13

Mike Huckabee is now the Republican leader in Iowa with 28% of the vote as of November 28'th (source - Rasmussen daily Presidential Tracking Poll)

5

,

30/11/2007 01:40:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1187249, Article id was mapped to record!
6

,

30/11/2007 01:43:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1187257, Article id was mapped to record!
7

,

30/11/2007 02:20:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1187346, Article id was mapped to record!
8

,

30/11/2007 02:24:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1187359, Article id was mapped to record!
9

,

30/11/2007 02:25:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1187361, Article id was mapped to record!
10

,

30/11/2007 02:33:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1187385, Article id was mapped to record!
11

Support the Scotman all the way,

Stop The Trolls 30/11/2007 02:46:13

7 & 8 are Trolls

Ignore them.

7. BILL and BEN

You go there and stay!

12

,

30/11/2007 02:50:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1187424, Article id was mapped to record!
13

Relaxed Wally,

Aboard Cruise Ship near Cozumel 30/11/2007 04:37:29

12 Suck, you are giving us Lefties a bad name.

14

Boy Wonder,

30/11/2007 10:01:47

Another thread wasted by trolls!!

15

No Blinders,

30/11/2007 12:56:25

14. Boy Wonder

It's too bad you left wingers won't admit it it was because of a left winger "Suck McCrunchie" that was going around using the real name of another poster making offensive comments while using the real name of another poster and mentioning his wife is the real problem.

But that's why you are left wingers, yo never tkae any blame.

16

mike - across the pond,

how bad IS it? 30/11/2007 15:18:08

here's one for you....

background....
each state sets its own "presidentail primary date"
historically New Hampshire was the first, due some simple wording in their state constitution... reads something like "NH primary will be 7 days before the earliest primary"... New Hampshire is really a microscopic state population wise and importance wise too (unless you are Howard Dean... lol) but they wanted to be first so.... big deal...

the state of michigan (heavily democrat, and tired of playing second fiddle to Ohio)... 8th most populous state in the union... was playing around with its "primary date" to become "first"... and get the ball really rolling for the "front runner"...

ok now here is how stupid the democrats are...
the top 5 frontrunners pandering to NewHampshire agree that if Michigan doesnt set its date, they will pull out of the Michigan primary....

Obama pulls out....
Richardson pulls out....
Biden pulls out...
Edwards pulls out...

and Hillary.... "oh, I guess my campaign forgot...."

so hillary is basically running unopposed in Michigan...

how stupid ARE these people?

how manipulative IS hillary?

and why ARE these loons supporting her?

I would ask "how stupid do they think WE are?"... but they've run AlBore (and allowed AlBores minions to drop the ball with his chances in Florida), Kerry, and are apparently letting Hillary run away and hide with their ticket for 08... so I guess that question will go without asking.... wink wink... nudge nudge...

17

,

30/11/2007 19:15:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1189658, Article id was mapped to record!
18

,

30/11/2007 19:34:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1189700, Article id was mapped to record!
19

,

30/11/2007 19:35:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1189702, Article id was mapped to record!
20

Nancy "Stretch" Pelosi,

San Francisco 01/12/2007 05:32:43

17. Big Alan

Sounds like you are spending a lot of time covering for Finnking & Djokkers :)


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.