Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Was Lockerbie suspect working for US?

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 October 2008
CAMPAIGNERS yesterday renewed calls for the United States to answer fresh questions over a Lockerbie bombing suspect.
Former Labour MP Tam Dalyell and Edinburgh law professor Robert Black urged the Scottish and UK governments to answer reports there is evidence Abu Nidal was a US agent.

They have long believed Abu Nidal, who died in Iraq in 2002, and his Popula
r Front for the Liberation of Palestine General Command were responsible for co-ordinating the bomb that blew up Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie on 21 December, 1988 with the loss of 270 lives.

Intelligence reports, said to have been drawn up for Saddam Hussein's security services, said Kuwaitis had asked Abu Nidal, whose real name was Sabri al-Banna, to find out if al-Qaeda was present in Iraq.

The reports referred to Abu Nidal's "collusion with both the American and Kuwaiti intelligence apparatuses in co-ordination with Egyptian intelligence".

And campaigners said the latest evidence adds weight to the claims that Libyan secret agent Abdelbasset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi – who was found guilty of the atrocity in 2001 – and the Libyan government were scapegoats to cover up a wider plot.

Mr Dalyell said the reports added weight to the theory that Lockerbie was a "tit-for-tat" attack for the shooting down of an Iranian passenger airliner by the warship USS Vincennes in 1988, and was allowed by the US administration.

He said the claims that Abu Nidal was working for the Americans would explain some of the mysteries that surrounded the Lockerbie outrage. These included a notice that went up at the American embassy in Moscow warning diplomats not to travel on Pan Am flights, and senior South African figures being "hauled off" the plane before its final flight.

The diplomats were replaced by students, who lost their lives.

Added to that is the mystery over why then prime minister Margaret Thatcher overruled her transport secretary, Cecil Parkinson, and stopped a public inquiry into the attack. It has been claimed this was because the US administration did not want an inquiry.

In a joint statement issued yesterday, Mr Dalyell and Prof Black said: "If the American public had known of a link with Abu Nidal, and had known that the US government knew enough to pull VIPs off the plane and let home-going students take their place, there would have been fury at a time of transition between the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Snr.

"The fact that the Iraqi government either executed Abu Nidal or forced him to commit suicide suggests they had discovered he was an American spy."

Mr Dalyell and Prof Black – who with Lockerbie relative Dr Jim Swire persuaded the Libyan government to hand over Megrahi for trial – said they were "deeply and personally concerned" about the Libyan, who is suffering from cancer.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 October 2008 9:16 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Lockerbie
 
1

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 27/10/2008 00:10:56
It should come as no surprise as the US has demonstrated that when their (questionable) interests are involved, other country's human lives count for nothing.

2

,

27/10/2008 00:34:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Postmark-55,

China, 27/10/2008 04:30:49
What, the US guilty of dirty tactics? NEVER.
4

Mallory,

Edinburgh 27/10/2008 04:32:49
Why was PANAM 103 carrying a supply of needles?
5

Guga II,

Rockall 27/10/2008 06:49:28
It is to the eternal shame of the Scottish legal system, that they allowed the English and American governments to totally corrupt the system, in the case of al-Megrahi, in order for them to have a scapegoat.

The truth will come out eventually. It may not be fully revealed for a very long time though, given that the English government in particular is very good at concealing it's dirty secrets for in excess of a 100 years.

6

suchaparcelofrogues,

27/10/2008 07:13:08
Suspicions of CIA involvement with flight 103
Suspicions of CIA involvement with 9/11

Have the CIA lost control of all their "ex" assets? or is there something else going on?

The implication of Megrahi allowed the US to make a personal attack on Ghadafi and only failed to assassinate him by a fluke.
The 9/11 attack gave GWB the excuse to invade Afganistan and he pushed it to illegally include and invation of Iraq.

Are we now going to see an "ex" CIA Iranian asset attack somewhere in the US or UK in order to allow the US a mandate to invade Iran?
Watch this space.
7

dba,

Haymarket 27/10/2008 07:27:58
This story is somewhat lacking in credibility - ABU NIDAL was NEVER in command of the Popular Front for the Libersation of Palestine - General Command!

The PFLP-GC was and is the 'creature of Achmed (or Achmid depending on the transliteration) JIBRIL!

Jibril has always operated under 'protection' of the Syrian Intelligence Services and had many innocent vitims blood on his hands.

In respect of Abu Nidal during the latter stages of his blood-stained life there were many rumours (even at the time of the Lockerbie Bombing) that he had, indeed, been a long term deep agent for either the CIA or the Israeli Mossad. He certainly seemed to have a charmed life escaping detection and apprehension in several Western countries including (on one occasion) a visit to a branch of the infamous Bank of Credit and Commerce International IN LONDON!

In respect of (7) Mallory's question: 'Needles' the items in question were made by a Ferman sewing machine needle manufacturer in Soligen (Germany) and were being shipped to the USA for distribution through their dealer networks. As several search and rescue dogs serious cut their paws (The bundles of needles had 'scattered' on impact) I did (as one of the first jounralists into the town of Lockerbie) investigate the situation and went to visit the manufacturer, wh9o showed me the consignment details: the consignment was shipped on PA 103 as part of the normal practice in airlines of squeezing as much airfreight on civilian flights as possible. The needles were air-freighted as the packages were relatively small.
8

eric,

27/10/2008 07:28:36
Wonder when we will get the truth on the attacks in america!
9

Guga II,

Rockall 27/10/2008 07:34:23
#10 eric.

I doubt it, at least not for a long time. I still haven't worked out how an aircraft could crash into the Pentagon, yet there were apparently no traces of aircraft parts in the wreckage, not even the engines.

Can someone explain that one to me?

10

Danny the Scot,

Scotland 27/10/2008 07:50:27
Another bad smell emanating from America. Will it ever end. There's going to be so many conspiracies uncovered over the next decade once Obama is elected
11

donald,

glasgow 27/10/2008 08:06:03
Tam the Bam is right on this, but why stop there? What about the US agents in the Labour Party?
12

Covert Action,

27/10/2008 08:52:13
mmm, the article has been up for 9 houts and no mail from that fellow in Zurich. I sense another conspiracy...
13

Matt there,

Somewhere 27/10/2008 12:34:38
More ranting from Tam.
14

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 27/10/2008 13:16:24
There have been many news stories especially from scottish sources that document the Lockerbie bombing may not have been done by quadafi or Libya. it is not pleasant to contemplate that CIA may have orchestrated it purposely.

I note to you that many people like to ridicule the American capabilities in military and/or intelligence matters. yet I tell you the reality is that in all of human history there has never been a military or intelligence function of any nation anywhere similar in effectiveness than the American military / intelligence machine.

from a 'values' point of view I certainly think it out-right evil to do things like the Lockerbie bombing. it gives me no pride or happiness that it happens, the opposite instead. However, as an American I happen to also know that the US military / intelligence system is unmatched in quality out of all human history.

it should be needless to say, but it is not. it will take up to 10 countries each of similar population or more to actually take america down in a real conflict. the americans who flag-wave & support our government should consider that those who rule us are doing everything they can do to bring about such a conflict.

its great to hide behind a big shield. but shields always get lowered for one reason or another. here's a bible quote.

"Matthew 26:52 Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."
15

,

27/10/2008 14:04:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

27/10/2008 14:25:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

27/10/2008 15:26:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

Vinegar Joe,

The usual suspect 27/10/2008 17:12:59
The Americans were also behind the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, June 28, 1914.

American spies dressed in Polish uniforms attacked the Gleiwitz radio station in Germany on August 31, 1939....thus starting WWII.

North Korea's Kim Jong-il is also an American plant.
19

Jock MacSprog,

27/10/2008 20:15:17
you moron 18, your post itself proves how ignorant you are. If you really wanted to boycott the US you would have to start by not posting on the US invented internet, using your US invented Microsoft Windows, and US invented Intel chips. Lets see how far you will get in life.
20

Dr Jim Swire,

Chipping Campden 27/10/2008 20:54:52
I do not know how to tell true from false amongst conspiracy theories. Does anyone? What I do know relative to the theory enshrined in this piece (that America knew what was coming and allowed it to happen)is this:
1. There was indeed a prior warning on the US Moscow embassy noticeboard.
2. South Africans (Pik Botha etc) did indeed transfer to an earlier flight at the last moment. Several well informed Americans did likewise.
3. Lord Parkinson did indeed get handbagged by Thatcher when he tried to allow us an inquiry. Every other UK disaster has had inquiries. Why is Lockerbie the outstanding exception?
4.My daughter Flora was just one of a number on that flight who had been told that there were no seats left across the pond, then within 48 hours of the flight suddenly there were seats on PA103 which was only 2/3 full when it did leave.
5. This concept that the fate of that aircraft was known to some in the West but not others that night, is one of the main factors that enrages us about the whole terrible business and drives my campaigning. Was my daughter treated as expendable in someone's game of politics? We did not nurture her and love her for 24 years to have her treated so. It doesn't come much worse than that.

It is also worth remembering that Thatcher in 'the Downing Street Years' [Page 449](1993) claimed credit for preventing Libya from mounting any further major terrorist attacks, following her support for the USAF bombing of Tripoli in 1986. There had been she wrote "a marked decline in Libyan-sponsored terrorism in suceeding years". That publication date is 2 years after her government joined the US in blaming the atrocity on Libya, by issuing the indictments against the 2 Libyans.


21

Dr Jim Swire,

Chipping Campden 27/10/2008 20:54:58
I do not know how to tell true from false amongst conspiracy theories. Does anyone? What I do know relative to the theory enshrined in this piece (that America knew what was coming and allowed it to happen)is this:
1. There was indeed a prior warning on the US Moscow embassy noticeboard.
2. South Africans (Pik Botha etc) did indeed transfer to an earlier flight at the last moment. Several well informed Americans did likewise.
3. Lord Parkinson did indeed get handbagged by Thatcher when he tried to allow us an inquiry. Every other UK disaster has had inquiries. Why is Lockerbie the outstanding exception?
4.My daughter Flora was just one of a number on that flight who had been told that there were no seats left across the pond, then within 48 hours of the flight suddenly there were seats on PA103 which was only 2/3 full when it did leave.
5. This concept that the fate of that aircraft was known to some in the West but not others that night, is one of the main factors that enrages us about the whole terrible business and drives my campaigning. Was my daughter treated as expendable in someone's game of politics? We did not nurture her and love her for 24 years to have her treated so. It doesn't come much worse than that.

It is also worth remembering that Thatcher in 'the Downing Street Years' [Page 449](1993) claimed credit for preventing Libya from mounting any further major terrorist attacks, following her support for the USAF bombing of Tripoli in 1986. There had been she wrote "a marked decline in Libyan-sponsored terrorism in suceeding years". That publication date is 2 years after her government joined the US in blaming the atrocity on Libya, by issuing the indictments against the 2 Libyans.


22

Dr Jim Swire,

Chipping Campden 27/10/2008 20:55:01
I do not know how to tell true from false amongst conspiracy theories. Does anyone? What I do know relative to the theory enshrined in this piece (that America knew what was coming and allowed it to happen)is this:
1. There was indeed a prior warning on the US Moscow embassy noticeboard.
2. South Africans (Pik Botha etc) did indeed transfer to an earlier flight at the last moment. Several well informed Americans did likewise.
3. Lord Parkinson did indeed get handbagged by Thatcher when he tried to allow us an inquiry. Every other UK disaster has had inquiries. Why is Lockerbie the outstanding exception?
4.My daughter Flora was just one of a number on that flight who had been told that there were no seats left across the pond, then within 48 hours of the flight suddenly there were seats on PA103 which was only 2/3 full when it did leave.
5. This concept that the fate of that aircraft was known to some in the West but not others that night, is one of the main factors that enrages us about the whole terrible business and drives my campaigning. Was my daughter treated as expendable in someone's game of politics? We did not nurture her and love her for 24 years to have her treated so. It doesn't come much worse than that.

It is also worth remembering that Thatcher in 'the Downing Street Years' [Page 449](1993) claimed credit for preventing Libya from mounting any further major terrorist attacks, following her support for the USAF bombing of Tripoli in 1986. There had been she wrote "a marked decline in Libyan-sponsored terrorism in suceeding years". That publication date is 2 years after her government joined the US in blaming the atrocity on Libya, by issuing the indictments against the 2 Libyans.


23

,

28/10/2008 05:12:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Covert Action,

28/10/2008 09:38:35
#25

re 1 what other options are you alluding to? Linux and Mac OS are both variants of the unix kernel which is DARPA through and through. Ot maybe you have your own?
25

,

28/10/2008 19:20:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

St Nicholas,

Walton-on-the-Naze 28/10/2008 21:43:24
The report by David Maddox is wrong: "senior South African figures were not 'hauled off' the plane before its final flight."

A Reuters news agency report of 12 November 1994 confirmed what actually happened: with confirmed bookings on Pan Am Flight 103, a 23-strong South African delegation - including Foreign Minister Pik Botha, Defence Minister Magnus Malan and Military Intelligence Chief C J Van Tonder - were travelling by South African Airways from Johannesburg. Their inbound flight inexplicably cut out a stopover at Frankfurt, and arrived early at Heathrow. The London embassy re-booked Botha and five of the party on Pan Am Flight 101 to New York for the signing of the Namibia Independence Agreement at UN headquarters on 22 December 1988. The remaining 17 members of the party returned on the SAA aircraft to Johannesburg.

UN Commissioner for Namibia, Bernt Carlsson, had been booked to travel by Sabena from Brussels to New York for the same signing ceremony. Carlsson was, however, persuaded by the South Africans to stopover at Heathrow and became the most high profile of the 270 Lockerbie victims.

Apartheid South Africa is thus intimately involved. Abu Nidal, the CIA, Libya, Syria and Iran are all a smokescreen to hide the truth behind the Lockerbie bombing!
27

,

29/10/2008 16:21:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

,

29/10/2008 19:44:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.