Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008

Free Capercaillie CD

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

US missile takes out spy satellite 130 miles up in air



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

A US Navy warship fired a missile which hit an out-of-control spy satellite orbiting 130 miles above the Earth's surface today, the Pentagon confirmed.
Officials said it had been decided to shoot down the satellite – about the size of a small bus – because they were worried about the danger from the its hydrazine fuel if it fell back to Earth.

The satellite is equipped with small rocket "thrusters" loaded with the toxic fuel, which can cause coughing, irritated throat and lungs, convulsions, seizures, and long-term exposure can damage the liver, kidney and reproductive organs. It is not yet known if the fuel tank was destroyed.

But the controversial operation has been criticised by China and Russia.

Russia suspects the operation was a cover to test anti-satellite technology under the US missile defence programme.

The defence ministry in Moscow argued that various spacecraft with toxic fuel on board had crashed to Earth in the past, but this had never before merited "extraordinary measures".

Last year, China carried out a test using a ground-based ballistic missile to destroy a satellite in space, prompting international alarm and fears of a space arms race.

The US denies its operation was a response to the Chinese test.

The Pentagon said the USS Lake Erie, armed with an SM-3 missile designed to knock down incoming missiles – not orbiting satellites – launched the attack from the Pacific Ocean at around 3.26am GMT today.

It hit the satellite as the spacecraft travelled at more than 17,000mph.

The Pentagon spokesman said: "A network of land, air, sea and space-based sensors confirms that the US military intercepted a non-functioning National Reconnaissance Office satellite which was in its final orbits before entering the Earth's atmosphere.

"The objective was to rupture the fuel tank to dissipate the hydrazine, a hazardous fuel, before it entered into Earth's atmosphere. Confirmation that the fuel tank has been fragmented should be available within 24 hours.

"Debris will begin to re-enter the Earth's atmosphere immediately. Nearly all of the debris will burn up on re-entry within 24-48 hours and the remaining debris should re-enter within 40 days."





The full article contains 374 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 February 2008 12:05 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Pmonkey7,

21/02/2008 11:52:26
The US denies its operation was a response to the Chinese test.

Aye right:)
2

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 21/02/2008 12:27:06
"The US denies its operation was a response to the Chinese test".

....Then it must be true. When was the US known to lie?
3

Grumpy,

21/02/2008 12:44:07
Well, Yahoo! Does this mean they'll make a film of it - they could call it Armageddon 2
4

Boswall,

21/02/2008 13:03:15
Good for the US. A bit of harmless muscle flexing - on this occasion no one was hurt and it simply restored military balance.

This was to be expected once the Chinese tested their anti-satelite weapon last year. The Chinese response so far (with their demands for an explaination from the US) has been laughable and exposes their hypocracy.

5

Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia,

21/02/2008 13:23:55
Being uploaded to YouTube as we speak.
6

James (1),

21/02/2008 16:10:11
How many British troops were on board?
7

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 21/02/2008 19:41:46
"Officials said it had been decided to shoot down the satellite – about the size of a small bus – because they were worried about the danger from the its hydrazine fuel if it fell back to Earth."

It is just as well that the US did destroy this unstable satellite, something as big as this would have very probably resulted in parts of it reaching the ground following its 'destruction' on normal re-entry.

I wonder whether it will be the US, China or Russia who first manage to destroy targets in space using laser or other hi-tech 'optical' weaponary?

While the US might well be flexing it's muscles, it lets China no that they are no longer the only nation whole can shoot down satellites (and presumably other space vehicles).
8

Conan,

Chile 21/02/2008 20:19:12
Peter, lest you spend any more time hand-wringing.... Given the FACT that there are indeed weapons systems in space today, actually in existence, that have the capability of making your life in Edinburgh very difficult indeed, who would you rather see have a capability to destroy such weapons systems - the US, the Russians, the Chinese.

The correct answer is 'all of the above'.

The militarism of space is an actual present day fact and a future inevitability.

The issue them becomes - who do YOU with to see being the victor in such a situation - if it comes to that?

This is true reality - not some theoretical pontification.
9

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 22/02/2008 00:37:54
CANADA scared the hell out off me and the dog last night
10

Quiet John,

Tinley Park 22/02/2008 16:47:18
I wish it was in response to the Chinese. Whether it was or not, the message has been sent and received.

I just wonder how many parts on that missile where made in China?

"Buy American!"

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.