Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Half Price Tapas with Scotland on Sunday

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

US joins battle to destroy poppies



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 October 2008
THE United States will take its war on drugs to a new level next year, by using its ground troops to help eradicate Afghan poppy fields, in a sign of growing frustration at the British-led efforts to curb opium cultivation.
Just days after Nato agreed to let its 50,000-strong force target heroin labs and smuggling networks, The Scotsman has learned that a handful of American soldiers are also training to take part in eradication missions.

It is the first time foreign troops will put "boots on the ground" to support poppy eradication in Afghanistan. Western diplomats are hopeful it will make it harder for corrupt officials and narco-barons to dodge eradication through bribes or violence, as has happened in the past.

Until now, Nato and the US have refused to get involved with eradication operations as they are seen to target farmers rather than drug lords. Western officials fear heavy-handed missions could "turn the insurgency into an insurrection".

It is also extremely dangerous: at least 75 people were killed in eradication operations last year. But American troops are training about 600 Afghan soldiers whose job it will be to protect the country's Poppy Eradication Force (PEF), when it begins its next wave of operations, in around three months. Together, they will ring-fence poppy fields so eradicators can destroy the crops unmolested.

It is part of a strategy to target land owned by corrupt Afghan power brokers. A British embassy counter-narcotics official said: "There shouldn't be any no-go areas for eradication teams in Helmand, and in order to do that, they are going to need more force protection.

"Land controlled by major landowners, corrupt officials or major narco-figures should be targeted. Having force protection is more likely to make that possible."

In the past, paramilitary narco-gangs have launched all-out assaults on the eradicators. This year, 11 US army mentors are training the Afghan counter-narcotics battalion in Kandahar. The mentors will be deployed alongside the soldiers on operations, a US spokesman said.

General Khodaidad, Afghanistan's counter-narcotics minister, said it would mean there would be nowhere too dangerous for eradicators to work. "We will use this force in Helmand," he said. In 2008, the province accounted for 69 per cent of the 157,000 hectares given over to opium poppies across Afghanistan. It is where most of Britain's 8,000 troops are based and if it was a country, it would be the biggest heroin producer in the world.

Britain's Special Boat Service led Afghan commandos on a series of raids against heroin factories in Helmand and elsewhere last year, but just 3.5 per cent of the country's poppy crop was actually eradicated – 71 per cent less than in 2007.

Eradication was so ineffective in 2008 that the United Nations' top anti-drugs official, Antonio Maria Costa, urged the Afghans to "give up".

The myriad military commands in Afghanistan means the American trainers answer to Nato's top general, but they are not part of the Nato force. The Afghan PEF is controlled by the country's interior ministry, while the counter-narcotics battalion is part of the ministry of defence (MoD).

Gen Khodaidad added: "We have not decided how it will work. Eradication is led by the provincial governors and the interior ministry. This force is from the MoD. But this will be the first eradication season that the MoD has given us protection. It will make a big difference."

The presence of US soldiers will also make it easier to call in air strikes from fighter jets and drones, which have played a key part in repelling Taleban attacks, as well as evacuating casualties in helicopters.

Nato and the UN estimate that the Taleban gets up to 60 per cent of its income from taxing Afghanistan's opium trade.

Afghan government corruption helps to boost Taleban resurgence

RIGHT across Afghanistan, the government is corrupt – and Afghans are fed up. The police organise kidnappings. Justice is for sale. Violence is spreading, and people don't feel safe.

The fact that 175 Taleban fighters tried to storm Lashkar Gah over the weekend, home to Britain's Afghanistan headquarters, is probably more important than the fact they were soundly routed by a combination of Afghan troops and British Apache helicopters.

Even in defeat, the Taleban appear to be signalling that they have reorganised into a formidable fighting force. On many occasions over the past 12 months, they have demonstrated that they can mobilise hundreds of fighters to launch attacks in the east, south and south-west of Afghanistan, on targets that are within a few days' trek of militant hideaways in the border areas of Pakistan.

What happened in the early hours on Sunday was a bold and intrepid attack on a town that is the administrative nerve centre for Kabul and Nato in Helmand.

One British Army spokesman has said that the Taleban operation displayed "a level of co-ordination that wasn't expected".

It would have been almost unthinkable a year ago. And now the symbolism is clear: the Taleban are trying to demoralise Nato forces and Afghanistan's roughly 30 million people by creating a groundswell of opinion that American-led forces are losing their grip.

Recently, the insurgents seem to prefer to score a major propaganda victory by over-running a military base or seizing a town.

Such attacks also suggest that Taleban commanders are organised enough to have hundreds of foot soldiers and other resources at their disposal in order to stage such costly assaults.

Had the infiltration at Lashkar Gah succeeded, then the streets would have seen confused fighting between the Taleban and British and Afghan forces, with western air strikes rendered impossible because of the risk of mass civilian casualties.

General David McKiernan, the US commander of almost all the international forces in Afghanistan, insisted on Sunday that Nato wasn't losing.

So why are civil servants, from towns further up the Helmand valley, who used to keep their families in Lashkar Gah because it was secure, now thinking about relocating them to Kabul?

Officials in Kabul, or at least those who can afford it, are relocating their families abroad.

And the latest Taleban strikes slowly but surely whittle away confidence in the forces charged with protecting Afghanistan.

IN NUMBERS

47,000
troops from 40 countries make up the Nato-run International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan

£1.6 billion
annually is generated by the drug trade in Afghanistan, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

90%
of the world's opium was being produced in Afghanistan in 2005

60
bodies ended up at Lashkar Gah hospital after insurgent attacks at the weekend

100
Taleban were killed in fierce clashes in the ambushes in Helmand

0
British troops were killed or injured during the four-pronged attacks by the Taleban

20,000
troops are participating in the US-led Operation Enduring Freedom against al-Qaeda remnants, primarily along the Pakistan border

300
Taleban prisoners revolted during the Battle of Qala-i-Jangi in Northern Afghanistan and 214 were killed by Northern Alliance fighters, assisted by British and American special forces

The full article contains 1197 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2008 10:29 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Afghanistan
 
1

2dogs in D.C.,

14/10/2008 00:36:04
But, please, no more agent orange or paraquat. Burn the stuff,fine,but no more chemical warfare with it's spillover to humans. I've seen far too much of that, thank you.
2

Postmark-55,

China, 14/10/2008 01:08:34
#1 2dogs in D.C.,
Hey double dog, looks like your catnip will be in high demand and you'll have the market cornered. It's probably your kin going into Afghanistan, ain't it? I'm on to you boy.:)
3

2dogs in D.C.,

14/10/2008 01:47:55
To answer you my friendly foe: I quote the Grateful Dead-"I would not leave you drifting, but whoa it makes me wild, with forty years upon my head,to have you call me child." Postmark, I'm old enough to be no ones boy. You Can call me dogs,and welcome. I've got this thing about "Boy",please understand.
4

Mashimaro,

China 14/10/2008 05:29:13
Police your own borders lah. Why must you interfere in other people's business all the time? Now I can't buy any poppy seeds for my bread.
5

Guga II,

Rockall 14/10/2008 07:13:45
Afghanistan is a total burach, and it is time that all foreign troops were pulled out. Not only is it a waste of time, money and lives, but why should any troops remain to prop up a totally corrupt puppet government; and to protect the oil pipeline for the war criminal Bush and his business buddies.
6

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta Ca for more WAR VOTE McCain 14/10/2008 08:15:10
US joins battle to destroy poppies;

First destroy the Marijuana fields of California . A one $ billion dollar industry here.

As for the Poppie fields in Afghanistan . Their resultant by-produce is injected and snorted by millions of Americans every day . What hypocrisy !!!!!

America is the world's number one country for use of all drugs either legal or illegal.
No one makes or forces Americans to buy drugs . They just do it.
They have the money ... and its all about money. MONEY ..MONEY..MONEY.

So cut off the customers, and the supply vanishes, at least from the US.

GC
7

Boy Wonder,

14/10/2008 08:35:11
#6 GC ... got it in one, my shroom-infected old friend ... but the world is RUN by hypocrites!!! Worse ... RICH hypocrites!!!
8

aljok.23,

the world 14/10/2008 09:15:22
Yeh. Afghanistan should never have been allowed to monopolise the worlds poppy produce. Share is my motto.
9

Selgovae,

14/10/2008 09:27:58
Wouldn't it be cheaper to just buy the crop from the farmers at guaranteed prices?
10

billengland,

14/10/2008 10:02:36
9 Selgovae

"Wouldn't it be cheaper to just buy the crop from the farmers at guaranteed prices?"

Yes, but how would that help Bushco? The excuse for the occupation would disappear, along with the highly profitable drug trade.

11

Mashimaro,

China 14/10/2008 10:57:55
The West should be tied down to Afghanistan and NEVER allowed to leave... ha ha ha ha ha ha
12

Mr. Richard C. Normuss,

14/10/2008 12:13:04
2/1 f, the Americans employ Dioxin. Then send in a couple of vintage McDonnell - Douglas Phantom's fully armed with Napalm. Then play that haunting tune 'The End' by Jim Morrison on your compact Cassette player.
13

Postmark-55,

China 14/10/2008 12:50:28
#3 2dogs in D.C.,
My sincere apologies double dog, I had no idea and I'll try to remember that. No offense intended and no harm intended. Again, sorry about that.
14

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 14/10/2008 14:50:29
"The U.S. joins battle to destroy poppies"
How ironic, indeed.
The Taliban instituted a strict Islamist policy against the opium trade during the final years of their regime, and by the time of their overthrow they had virtually eliminated it.
15

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta CA for more WAR VOTE McCain 14/10/2008 15:51:43
8
aljok.23,
the world

Dude U ain't sharing none of my shrooms...they cost too much .. they are grown wild by nature..non of this manufactured s*hit.

GC

12
Mr. Richard C. Normuss,

Dude U must be a very very oldtimer .. "compact cassette player" WOW dude . what is that ?

GC

13
Postmark-55,
China

Dude,

"Ur sincere apologies "

like Dude do U also offer insincere apologies ????

Try to use the English language without redundant words

Chill Dude

GC

16

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 14/10/2008 17:00:17
here's a story about the Afghan president's brother being involved in the heroin trade.

http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5454

Albanian organized crime has prospered mightily by the large expansion of heroin supply. this has enabled the development & expansion of markets. If some of the supply is destroyed, then this will not reverse these gains to the criminal elements dealing in heroin. They'll simply raise prices or let another supply source replace the afghan suppliers. And let us recall that the Albanian criminal gangs cooperated nicely with the US military & CIA in the 1999 Kosovo war.

The criminals are in charge folks. It is beneficial to them to keep some of the Americans still believing in their leadership and that is why changes in policy like this sometimes occur.

I hope you read the article from 1 year+ ago from the UK paper documenting that the chemicals needed to process the heroin were freely allowed to be imported into Afghanistan. I looked for that link, but didn't find it.

Selgovae is 100% correct in #9. The Afghan farmers can grow things, but getting paid to grow food is difficult for them.

One thing I'd like to communicate to you is that we have the knowledge, expertise & experience to institute wise policies globally that would provide very good prosperity for people all over the world. But this is not done by the global leaders, it is not done because it is not a priority. Another thing I'd like to communicate is that while Americans are among the global leaders who provide poor leadership, in all of the various nations around the world there are also national leaders who go along with this poor global leadership. Therefore, I think it is incorrect to simply blame the Americans for all the problems.
17

billengland,

14/10/2008 19:18:55
16 Wally

Here is a link about the uncontrolled import of heroin processing chemicals into Afghanistan:

http://www.metimes.com/International/2008/05/14/converting_afghan_opium_into_heroin/3696/
18

Tobytoo,

Southington, U.S.A. 14/10/2008 23:12:14
#13 Postmark-55
I was pleased to see you to apologize to 2Dogs as he is a very good commenter and does not insult other commenters the way others do.
19

Postmark-55,

China, 15/10/2008 01:27:28
#18 Tobytoo,
Thank you,
I too have found 2Dogs to be an honest and honourable commenter and he has a great sense of humour as well.
20

Postmark-55,

China, 15/10/2008 01:33:21
#15 GalacticCannibal,
Personally I don't offer insincere apologies but have witnessed many do so, it seems to be quite a common practice. I only apologize when I feel I have done or said something wrong and I feel that I was wrong in what I had said to 2Dogs, therefore my sincere apology.
21

,

15/10/2008 01:58:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Mashimaro,

China 15/10/2008 07:27:15
#14 "The U.S. joins battle to destroy poppies"
How ironic, indeed.
The Taliban instituted a strict Islamist policy against the opium trade during the final years of their regime, and by the time of their overthrow they had virtually eliminated it."

Yeah but it really sucked if you werer a woman.
How ironic if the west had left it to the soviets no one would be having any of these problems.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.