Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Turkey brokers talks on Golan Heights between Israel and Syria

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 May 2008
ISRAEL and Syria yesterday announced they are holding indirect negotiations through Turkish mediators with the goal of reaching a peace agreement.
In Jerusalem and Damascus the two governments said they "decided to pursue the dialogue between them in a serious and continuous way" and thanked Turkey for its role. An Israeli government official said prime minister Ehud Olmert's chief of staff and
diplomatic adviser had been in Turkey since Monday and that their Syrian counterparts were there also.

The two countries have been bitter enemies for six decades and have fought three wars, including in 1967, when Israel captured the strategic plateau of the Golan Heights, which it later annexed.

Walid Mualem, the Syrian foreign minister, said yesterday Israel had agreed to a full withdrawal from the Heights back to the border that existed before the June 1967 war. This would mean Syria getting a foothold on the Sea of Galilee, something Israel has in the past rejected.

But in Israel the announcement touched off strong objections to the territorial concessions that would be required and it remains unclear whether Mr Olmert, who is fighting for his political life in the face of a corruption scandal, would be able to push through a deal. The Golan Heights is home to about 18,000 Israelis.

Asked about Mr Mualem's remarks and charges by Israeli hard-liners that Mr Olmert had also dropped a precondition that Syria distance itself from the militant Lebanese Hezbollah group, the Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev said: "Israel understands what the Syrians expect from peace negotiations and the Syrians understand what Israel expects from peace negotiations."

Proponents of a peace treaty with Syria argue that it will pull Damascus out of Iran's sphere of influence and curtail Syria's relations with Hamas and Hezbollah. Opponents say this cannot be guaranteed and that relinquishing the Golan Heights will leave Israel vulnerable to attack.

"It is distressing to see that the prime minister is ready to rush and sell the Golan Heights in order to save himself from investigation," said Yuval Steinitz, a right-wing Knesset member.

Zehava Galon, a Liberal MP, said she supported a withdrawal from the Heights in exchange for peace but believed that "the prime minister does not have the moral and public mandate to conduct the talks".

Noticeably absent from the announcement was the United States. In Washington Dana Perino, the White House spokeswoman, suggested the US was informed in advance of the Israeli move but was not participating.

"We were not surprised by it and we do not object to it," she said. "We hope that this is a forum to address various concerns we all have with Syria, Syria's support of terrorism, repression of its own people."



The full article contains 464 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 May 2008 10:45 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 22/05/2008 03:03:06
There is no way that the terrorist state of Israel will give up any of the land it has annexed.
2

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 22/05/2008 06:53:38
We can all relax, now, since the Israeli pullout from Gaza has clearly caused peace to break out all over Israel and the Palestinian Arab-occupied territories.
Because they are overwhelmed with gratitude for the opportunity to govern a piece of territory of their own and prove themselves worthy of statehood, Palestinians launched yet another rocket from the Gaza Strip into Israel.

Israel would be foolish not to return the Golan Heights, as it worked out so well with the Gaza Strip!!.


3

Conan,

Seattle, just for a while 22/05/2008 07:39:52
Is it not a fact that israel negotiated and returned the Sinai to Egypt .... or did I just imagine that? And, didn't Israel also leave Gaza and hand it off to the so-called 'Palestinians' .... or did I imagine that too? And, has not Israel pemitted and facilitated UN monitoring of the Leabanon/Syria border region up to and including the Golan Heights area? And, has not Israel withdrawn from Leabanon each time it has 'invaded' same? So, Guga ... hello. long time no argue ... what is this nonsense about there being 'no way that the terrorist state of Israel will give up any of the land it has annexed'? Or, is this just another example of your flaming hatred of all things Jewish/Zionist/Israeli? Just wondering?
4

Winters,

Glasgow 22/05/2008 10:40:25
Conan: Guga's ramblings are all over the place. He doesn't just hate "Jewish/Zionist/Israel" he hates the English even more. I think he dreams of the Scottish regiments invading England with kilts-a-swinging and bagpipes playing "Blue Bonnets Ower the Border".
5

James Donald,

Newbridge 22/05/2008 10:48:22
"Walid Mualem, the Syrian foreign minister, said yesterday Israel had agreed to a full withdrawal from the Heights back to the border that existed before the June 1967 war. This would mean Syria getting a foothold on the Sea of Galilee, something Israel has in the past rejected" - Perhaps the Israelis are finally seeing the sense of the quote attributed to Frederick the Great - “He who defends everything defends nothing.”.
Fanatics who want to retain territory such as the Golan heights and those who still dream of Greater Israel are fools who will end up defending nothing. Israel has made peace with Egypt(returning their land for peace seems to have worked out reasonably well)and Jordan so why not Syria? Worth relocating 18,000 Israeli colonists if it means a lasting peace on Israel's northern front with perhaps a de-militarised buffer zone (policed by Turks under a UN flag).
6

,

22/05/2008 11:02:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

22/05/2008 11:04:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Guga II,

Rockall 22/05/2008 11:26:00
#7 Biker's Moll.

No, Zionist haters, Irgun haters, Stern Gang haters, butchers of Palestinian children haters.

Try and get it right.
9

Guga II,

Rockall 22/05/2008 11:28:26
#4 Winterbottom.

No, I dream of the English suddenly deciding to go back home to Germany. The trouble is, even the Germans wouldn't have them.
10

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 23/05/2008 17:00:15
GugaII has all but lost it. His hatred has blinded him to the truth..Nothing that will be done to further peace, will ever be acknowledge by him or other Israel haters.

11

James Donald,

Newbridge 23/05/2008 19:08:33
#10 Lynne,Palm Beach Gardens - No real comments on the story then, just this mince.
A positive story on the Middle East but you can't find anything positive to say. What is wrong? Are you disturbed by the prospect of Israel handing back land it conquered in war the very land you think they should keep?
12

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 28/05/2008 21:00:30
Since Syria and Iran signed a Defense Pact, I think, and hope that Israel changes its mind about returning the Golan Heights..It would not be in their best interests to return it now.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.