Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 21st July 2008

Beat the winter blues and get away with bmi regional

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tribes in fight to save sacred mountain



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 December 2007
FOR centuries, members of the Lakota, Cheyenne and other American Indian tribes have been climbing Bear Butte in the famous Black Hills of Dakota to fast and hold religious ceremonies in the silence.
Colourful prayer cloths hanging from trees line the path to the mountain's peak, which rises about 1,300ft above the surrounding plains.

But often, and especially in August, the serenity of the site is disturbed by a deafening roar of thousands o
f motorcycles.

Indians have sought for years to block development of land around the butte into campgrounds, bars and other sites that could interfere with their use of the mountain for religious purposes.

Now, finally, they have an ally who has the power to provide meaningful help.

Mike Rounds, South Dakota's governor, wants to spend more than $1 million (£490,000) to prevent developers from putting biker bars and other noisy businesses on ranch land near the mountain, which lies on the northern edge of the Black Hills.

Saying he wants to protect the beauty and peace of the religious site, Mr Rounds has proposed setting up a fund to buy a perpetual "easement" that would prevent commercial and residential development of some land on the western side of Bear Butte.

The easement is a legal provision which gives the state rights over land owned by someone else.

Indians working to protect Bear Butte praised the Republican governor's plan.

"Any kind of assistance from anybody in preserving the butte is welcome," said Gene Blue Arm. "It's good of him. I think it's a good deal."

A Cheyenne River Sioux tribal member, Mr Blue Arm has been campaigning to limit development near the religious site.

Dean Wink, a member of the local Meade County Commission, said he opposed a perpetual easement that would block all future owners from considering other uses for land.

However, he said he could support an easement that prohibits development for a decade or two. "Forever is a long time," Mr Wink added.

The governor made only a brief mention of the plan in his budget speech to the South Dakota Legislature, which is being asked to approve an emergency special spending measure for Bear Butte.

The easement could help calm some worries about the mountain, Mr Rounds said.

Details will not be available until the legislative session opens in January, but it might cost up to $1 million to get the easement, Doug Hofer, the state parks director said.

Mr Rounds' plan would use state money, private donations and a grant from a federal programme that protects agricultural land.

Named Mato Paha, or Bear Mountain, it resembles a sleeping bear lying on its side. It was formed from volcanic rock exposed when surrounding land eroded.

The butte and the land immediately around it are in a state park, land that was sold to the state of South Dakota in 1962 for $50,000 (£24,600).

The phenomenal growth of the annual Sturgis motorcycle rally in August has caused land values in the area to soar.

In recent years, Indians have gathered at Bear Butte and nearby Sturgis during the rally to protest at the noise from motorcycles and concerts, and alcohol consumption near their sacred mountain.

The 2007 legislature rejected a measure seeking to ban the issuing of drinks licenses within four miles of the boundaries of the state park after members said they did not want to interfere with private property rights. Some have questioned whether tax money should be used for such an easement, Mr Wink said.

However Mr Blue Arm said the mountain must be protected because of its religious significance to native people in the area. "I'm saying yes to anything to stop further development around the butte," he said.

"In a ceremony or in prayer, there needs to be a solitude."

HOW GOLD RUSH COST SIOUX THEIR LAND

THE Lakota Sioux historically described the Black Hills of Dakota as the sacred centre of the world.

When gold was found there in the 1870s, the subsequent rush of settlers sparked the Black Hills War, the last major conflict on the Great Plains. A treaty in 1868 had confirmed Sioux ownership of the land, then, in 1874, an expedition led by General George Custer found gold in a river in the area, and this was reported by journalists who had accompanied the party.

Thousands of miners went to the Black Hills over the next few years and war broke out. Custer was famously killed two years later in the Battle of the Little Big Horn.

After defeating the Sioux, Cheyenne and Arapaho, the United States took control of the area. In 1980, the US Supreme Court ruled the Black Hills had been taken illegally and suggested more than £50 million be paid in compensation. However, this was refused by the Lakota, who insisted on the return of the area, and the ownership of the hills remains in dispute to this day.

The Black Hills include the Mount Rushmore National Memorial, with its famous giant sculptures of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln.

A number of well-known films, including North by Northwest, How the West Was Won, A Man Called Horse and Dances with Wolves include scenes from the Black Hills.



The full article contains 882 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 December 2007 10:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Kipling,

@DoomRay library 18/12/2007 02:54:04
It's easy to feel sympathetic with the Native Americans, but typically the story doesn't convey also the complexity of the history of the ownership of the area:

Qv. Wikipedia:
"Native Americans have inhabited the area since at least 7000 B.C. The Arikara arrived by 1500 A. D., followed by the Cheyenne, Crow, Kiowa and Pawnee. The Lakota arrived from Minnesota in the eighteenth century and drove out the other tribes, claiming the land, which they called Paha Sapa, for themselves.

"After the public discovery of gold in the 1870s, the conflict over control of the region sparked the last major Indian War on the Great Plains, the Black Hills War. The 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie had previously confirmed the Lakota (Teton Sioux) ownership of the mountain range. But with that treaty being contested, they additionally claimed rights to the land saying that in their culture it was considered the axis mundi, or sacred center of the world. Some consider this ad hoc claim of spiritual status a dubious pretension to keep the gold-rich territory since the Sioux tribe had only discovered the Black Hills about 100 years earlier (1765) and that they themselves took the land by force from its previous residents (the Cheyenne tribe) in 1776."

That being said, I hope the Lakota (Sioux) win out here and peace returns to the area in some significant way.
2

Logie Almond,

18/12/2007 09:01:38
I hope Donald Trump doesn't want to build a housing estate and golf course there. But maybe Governor Meade would put up more resistance than our Scottish "Government".
3

Boy Wonder,

18/12/2007 09:36:14
Maybe them Injuns'll go on the warpath t'reclaim the land from the white men who speak with forked tongues?

They got that description right didn't they?

I wouldn't blame the tribes for whatever action they take. The Us and State governments have consistently denied them their rights since the stole the land from them in the first place!

I am reminded of the Native American Chief who, when asked what America would be without the white man, replied "Ours!"
4

Number 6,

Germany 18/12/2007 11:17:48
I hope Donald Trump wants to build a golf course there. I'm sure he won't have to put up with the embarrasing, frothing at the mouth, envy driven opposistion he is currently facing in Scotland.
5

57Nomad,

california 18/12/2007 18:47:25
To everyone:

Kindly dispense with the ridiculous PC term "Native American." Every single person in who was born in North or South America is a Native American. The term that the Indians use is Indian. They tend to smirk at the NA designation as condescending. Also the word "native" carries a "bone through the nose" connotation that they can do without.
6

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 18/12/2007 23:44:18
#5 57Nomad

Are you trying to push your own PC agenda on the rest of us? :-)
7

Aoda,

U.S.A. 19/12/2007 13:57:36
I have visited the Black Hills and it is a beautiful place. I hope that the Indians win this case. Regardless of which tribe occupied the land that mountain was and is sacred to them.

Selgorvae: Nomad is not pushing a PC agenda. They do not like to be called Native American. My wife is part Indian and her ancestor John Ross and his family walked the trail of tears. I also have Indian friends. As you can see I am ussing the word Indian.

8

57Nomad,

california 19/12/2007 20:20:14
#6 Selgorvae

Selgorvae said:

"Are you trying to push your own PC agenda on the rest of us? :-)"

Sels, I noticed the smiley at the end of your sentence. So I will take it as good natured ribbing. It wasn't bad, by the way. The answer is no, I'm not trying to push any agenda regarding the Indians. It is a little annoying to hear the term 'Native Americans' used by those who think that they are oh so very enlightened. It rankles the Indians. It should. It's a nonsense term, meaningless. Indians use the term Indians when referring to the general indigenousness population. For specific groups they often refer to their tribe as 'nation.'
9

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 19/12/2007 23:46:33
#8 57Nomad

It was meant good-naturedly. I agreed with your definition of "native". It reminded me of the song "Native New Yorker".

I smiled when you used the term PC in your post. I always associate PC with women who prefer not to be called girls. (1970s) So suggesting people refrain from using the term Native American to avoid causing offense seemed equally PC. (I can accept this kind of PC. It seems like plain good manners.)

(I wrote a longer piece about recent use of the term PC, but this new site setup seems to have lost it. It's too late to write it again.)
10

57Nomad,

california 20/12/2007 15:33:12
#9 Sels

I like this: "always associate PC with women who prefer not to be called girls. (1970s) So suggesting people refrain from using the term Native American to avoid causing offense seemed equally PC. (I can accept this kind of PC. It seems like plain good manners.)"

Well reasoned, well stated. Very nice.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.