Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The man they couldn't kill: Adulterer survives stoning by climbing out pit

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 January 2009
A MAN convicted of adultery has escaped death by stoning in Iran after dragging himself out of the pit he had been buried in for the punishment – an act that means he is free under Islamic law.
Two other male adulterers were killed by the barbaric method in the same incident, which took place in the north-eastern city of Mashhad last month.

The stonings were confirmed yesterday by a spokesman for the judiciary, which says it is tryi
ng to have the widely condemned punishment abolished. Ali Reza Jamshidi said: "Given that the third person managed to pull himself out of the hole, the verdict was not carried out."

The stonings were in defiance of repeated calls from the international community for the Islamic Republic to abolish the practice.

John Watson, Amnesty International's Scotland programme director, told The Scotsman: "Execution by stoning is a grotesque and unacceptable penalty which Iran should abolish immediately. We urge the authorities to heed our calls and those of the many Iranians who are fighting for an end to this practice."

Preliminary figures from Amnesty indicate that more than 330 people were executed in Iran in 2008.

Under Iranian law the stones must be neither too big nor too small, so that death is neither mercifully quick nor endlessly prolonged. Some stoning victims are said to have taken 20 minutes to die.

Stoning sentences – usually imposed for adultery, which is sometimes penalised by flogging – were widely carried out in the early years after Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, but have been very rare in recent years.

A moratorium on stoning was issued by Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi, head of the judiciary, in 2002. The European Union had made that measure and other human rights reforms a condition for opening negotiations with Iran.

Despite the moratorium, a man convicted of adultery was stoned last year, provoking international outrage. It was the first stoning confirmed by Iran's judiciary in five years, although rights activists said a man and woman were also stoned to death in 2006.

A group of Iranian lawyers, including Shadi Sadr, a prominent women's rights activist, has been campaigning for years to have stoning as a penalty removed from Iranian law.

But eight women and two men are said to be on death row facing stoning sentences. They are mostly illiterate and from underprivileged backgrounds, and were condemned in the absence of a good defence, rights activists said.

The majority of those stoned are women, who suffer disproportionately from such punishment, human rights groups say. "One reason is that they are not treated equally before the law and the courts, in clear violation of international fair trial standard."

Also, men stoned to death are buried to the waist, while women are buried deeper, to stop the stones from hitting their breasts. This apparent regard for a woman's modesty actually has a negative impact for women. If a prisoner manages to pull free during a stoning, he or she is acquitted or jailed, but is not executed. It is easier for a man to drag himself free because he is not buried so deeply.

Capital offences in Iran include murder, rape, armed robbery, apostasy, blasphemy, serious drug trafficking, repeated sodomy, treason and espionage.

BACKGROUND

GIVEN the dire punishment of stoning that is sometimes imposed for adultery, high standards are supposedly set for proving the "crime".

Four witnesses to the sexual act are needed. These should be verifiably just men. All four must have witnessed the "crime" simultaneously. Any giving false testimony is subject to lashes.

Confessions by the defendant, repeated four times, can also secure a conviction, but few confess, knowing they could be stoned for doing so. A confession is also null and void if a person later disavows it.

But Iranian rights activists say confessions have been extracted under duress and later disavowals rejected.

Iranian activists against stoning say it is not prescribed in the Koran.










Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 January 2009 1:09 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iran
 
1

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

14/01/2009 00:16:24
These people are savages.
2

Tracker,

14/01/2009 00:18:47
There are a lot of people who say Islamic law is barbaric, but how many of them know of this magnaminous escape-the-pit clause? It still does seem, however, that women are greatly discriminated against.
3

Rob Bennett,

Byron Bay 14/01/2009 00:32:58
Not a nice way to go however it's not a lot different to the way Saddam Hussein was sentenced to death either.
4

Conan the Librarian™,

14/01/2009 00:46:31
1
Agreed.

"Under Iranian law the stones must be neither too big nor too small, so that death is neither mercifully quick nor endlessly prolonged. Some stoning victims are said to have taken 20 minutes to die."

Would it be like darts do you think?

Extra points for an eye or a tooth?

Minus points for a concussion.

First Virginian, here's a game all you religious nutters can play.


5

,

14/01/2009 00:48:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Conan the Librarian™,

14/01/2009 00:54:22
3
Saddam didn't take twenty minutes.
7

zeno,

www.thinkhumanism.com 14/01/2009 00:55:39
Carolyn 1: I think Rob Bennett was making a point about the method of execution (both barbaric) and not what the crimes were.
8

Anonym,

14/01/2009 01:02:14
Yes, and I suspect death by hanging doesn't take 20 minutes either.

This business of having four male witnesses to the 'crime' is deeply suspect.

As is burying the female victims deeper than the males!

It's all just so very obviously evil and WRONG.

Incitement to religious hatred is a crime. A law inspired by political correct lunacy, to be sure, but I believe the Islamic Courts are themselves guilty as sin...

Anybody care to disagree?
9

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

14/01/2009 01:13:55
'Let he who is without sin cast the first stone' seems particularly apt, in more ways than one, at this moment.
10

Maisie from Morningside,

14/01/2009 01:15:15
Is No3 really Saddam's favourite toady
George Galloway under a nom-de-plume?
I see Galloway is a candidate for Rector of Edinburgh University.
If he campaigns in that pink catsuit he'll probably make it.
Miaow, miaow, as he said to Rula Lenska's merkin.
11

Cassandra,

14/01/2009 01:36:51
#5 Carolyn - why pick on the French? I know many, many men who have committed dadultery (admittedly not all of them with me) right here in Bonnie Scotland!

Where are all the apologists keen to acknowledge the right of people in other countries to practise barbarism (eg. skinning of live animals) as it's 'part of their culture'? This is merely the next step. Humans are the only animals that derive satisfaction in inflicting suffering, always with the excuse that it's justified.

I abhor the barbarity of this practice, but I wonder if it would have aroused as much discomfort in the judiciary if the victims had been female.
12

Cassandra,

14/01/2009 01:37:38
Dadultery? I've invented a new offence! That should read, adultery.
13

pixord1,

uk 14/01/2009 03:32:33
Typical white western racism judging Muslim culture. Muslim traditions and their justice system have served them well for over a thousand years.

Stoning adulterers, hanging homosexuals, genital amputation of women is no ones business except those that are part of the culture. If the culture accepts these traditions who are we to judge?

14

Dan in Alabama,

Confederate States of America 14/01/2009 05:21:11
"Four witnesses to the sexual act are needed. These should be verifiably just men. All four must have witnessed the 'crime' simultaneously."

"Verifiably just men" -- Do they pull down their pants to make sure Hillary! is not masquerading again?

Coming to a Mosque near you...
15

Conan,

Moffat 14/01/2009 08:06:01
Islam started and has continued as nothing more than a dangerous and manipulative criminal cult. Islamic Law? Surely, and oxymoron if ever I heard one. In any case, its alleged adultery - no harm done - adults at play - perhaps not desirable but hardly worthy of stoning to death.
16

,

14/01/2009 08:30:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Anonym,

14/01/2009 08:39:39
pixord1 plays the race card:

"Typical white western racism judging Muslim culture."

My opinion is that burying a man or woman, and lobbing medium sized rocks at them until they are dead, for having sex outside of marriage, is WRONG!

I hold that opinion (not "judgment") regardless of the race, sex, or religious beliefs of either the victims or the perpertrators.

Got it?

Glad we cleared that up.
18

Few Against Many,

14/01/2009 09:11:55
Iran sounds awsome, perhaps the next big tourist destination?
19

Selgovae,

14/01/2009 09:32:17
#13 "If the culture accepts these traditions who are we to judge?"

If the people being stoned accept this as a "cultural norm" you might have a point.

By your own logic, is an Iranian who passes opinion on our lax Western morality also a racist?
20

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

14/01/2009 11:49:00
13...I hope you are not being serious...because if you are you are condoning human rights abuses and violations...these genital mutilations are violent vicious assaults that are carried out on little girls who are unable to give consent due to their age..often they die due to blood loss or blood poisoning...as adults many of the women suffer terribly once married and having their husbands force entry to their scarred vàgina...after childbirth they are sewn up again and have to endure their husbands sexual demands all over again

These 'Cultures' need to drag themselves out of the caves and into the 21st century...

These 'Cultures' barbarically slit a live animals throat and let it bleed to death...marry of little girls to old men...hang the mentally ill and homosexuals from cranes...

These 'Cultures' are sick...ill...psychotic and no decent civilised human being would condone them...unless you lived amongst it and were afraid or brainwashed to accept it!!!
21

,

14/01/2009 14:38:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Ofner,

Scotland 14/01/2009 16:17:26
Post# 19 Selgovae

Not necessarily, from his perspective he is offering a
truthful, if somewhat biased opinion!

From our perspective he is sexually repressed!
23

Rotten Gods,

14/01/2009 17:40:27
Unfortunately it's true. Stoning is very barbaric death penalty.

The difference between men and women is men are buried in a hole to the waist and women are buried in a hole to the shoulders, so women won't have any chance to dig out and escape but men sometimes can escape.

Read more about crime of Islamic regime of Iran in
Stop Torturing Us
http://stop.torturing.us/
24

Rotten Gods,

14/01/2009 17:44:48
No Sir, Iranians don't accept stoning as a form of punishment. Iranain activists and lawyers have been long campaigned to abolish stoning in Iran but it didn't come up as a new law yet and it's before parliament.

Iranians are very moderate people but this is barbaric Islamic punishment that Iranians are against it all the way.

Stop Torturing Us
http://stop.torturing.us/
25

,

15/01/2009 01:01:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Tris,

15/01/2009 17:51:23

Yes, I must admit it's much more civilised here.

Get down the pub, get tanked up, look for someone of the opposite sex who is equally tanked up and not too ugly, and get down to it regardless of silly old fashioned things like marriage vows, etc...... Go home, sleep it off and do it again tomorrow.

Bags more fun than being stoned to death.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.