Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Suicide blast kills 43 people at pet market in Baghdad

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Sign In
Register
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 February 2008
AT least 43 people were killed when a female suicide bomber blew herself up at the main pet market in central Baghdad today.
Seventy-eight people were wounded in the deadliest bombing to strike the capital since 30,000 more American forces flooded into central Iraq last spring.

About 20 minutes later a second bomb tore through another bird market in a predominantly Shia area in south-eastern Baghdad. That blast killed at least eight people and wounded 14, police said.

The attacks happened shortly before the weekly Islamic call to prayer resounded across the capital and were the latest in a series of violent incidents that have been chipping away at Iraqi confidence in the permanence of recent security gains.

The first blast happened at about 10.20am when the woman detonated explosives hidden under her traditional black robe at the al-Ghazl market.

Firefighters scooped up debris scattered among pools of blood, clothing and pigeon carcasses.

Police initially said the bomb was hidden in a box of birds but later determined it was a suicide attack after finding the woman's head, an officer said.



The full article contains 196 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 February 2008 1:33 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: War in Iraq
 
1

Lynne,

USA 01/02/2008 14:31:20
In other news sources it is 65 people dead and many more wounded. Sad.
2

Sam,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 15:14:31
Islam is the only existing religion that accepts the doctrine of human sacrifice. That is, the belief that one can curry favor with a divinity by taking the life of another in the name of the divinity. The suicide bomber devoutly believes that Allah will smile upon him or her for their final acts and speed them to paradise, 70 virgins, etc. This is precisely why there is no great outcry in the Moslem community at the news of each new act of mind numbing violence. At heart, Islam is okay with it.
3

Globetrotter_scot,

01/02/2008 16:19:26
2. Sam.
Are you telling me that Iraqi's are ok having their people blown up on a daily basis?

If you ask me it is all about politics. Pure and simple. These bombers are brainwashed into commiting terrible acts. Although, it takes a fairly stupid person to be brainwashed like this in the first place.

Oh and there are huge outcries in the Muslim communities worldwide. Do you really have the ignorance to claim that a people are ok with this sensless violence?

I really hope Iraq heals herself. It sickens me to see so much death.
4

,

01/02/2008 16:28:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Iain fae Elgin,

London 01/02/2008 17:05:43
Globetrotter, I've seen demonstrations against offensive cartoons and seen filmakers killed for expressing themselves, but I have yet to see any condemnation on the same scale for any act of violence in the name of Islam.

I do realise that fanatics are the loudest, but perhaps they need to be drowned out by the majority to show that Islam is not 'ok' with this.

6

Globetrotter_scot,

01/02/2008 18:11:06
5. Iain.

I think many of the muslim nations are quite touchy-feely on sensitive issues. Many see the invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan and the growing media trend of prejudice as an attack on their religion and themselves. There are cultural issues too which naturally inflames anger.

I can pretty much garantee anyone that the vast majority of muslims want peace. You do get a few a&&holes who seek only power who convince a few, in the name of religion, to strap explosives to themselves. Hence what i said about politics.

I agree, everyone needs to speak up against these acts and put an end to all this violence and anger. On both sides too.
You see you get extremists on both sides of the argument. I have seen many "extremists" post on this forum, mostly out of pure ignorance.
7

57Nomad,

california 01/02/2008 18:36:22
It is likely that the bomber was recruited and trained by the Iranians. As long as they can sneak some misguided soul into Iraq and blow some people up, they can count on a hue and cry raised by the likes of poster #4. Their's is a symbiotic relationship. They are trying to win on the streets of Western countries what they can not win with arms.

The Iraqis no longer favor the activities of the domestic jihadi's and do not support them any longer. The same can be said of the Sunni's in the area of the country where they predominate. They are both at war with Al Qaeda and are inflicting heavy casualties. In fact, the war is won as long as there is no precipitous withdrawal of our troops. This was no doubt the work of outsiders trying to stir up trouble between the Sunni's and the Shi'ites and Sunni's.

If I had to bet my money would be on Iran as the culprit.
8

Finnking,

Lempäälä 01/02/2008 18:42:14
Yet another senseless act.

More worrying are the senseless comments.

The massive, derogatory, generalisations being trotted out against a religion. The demonisation of an entire, and varied, faith. The vocal persecution of the many because of the actions of the few.

--mmm----where in history have we seen this before, I wonder?

From the Romans onwards, we can see that in any occupied state there's tribal, factional warfare. The problem with history books is that they also point out that these events are sometimes created by the occupier. Read about the Brits in 1950s Iran and, more recently, the Brit 'soldiers' dressed as locals driving around with explosives; they were rescued by the Brit army.

What to do? Get western troops out, pay them reparations for decades of abuse, famine, attack, war and let them sort the place out into the three areas they evidently want. Oh, let them sell the oil on the open market.

9

Sam,

Edinburgh 01/02/2008 19:19:57
3-Globetrotter, Oh yes. Please direct me to a "Moslems for Peace" website. What is the position of Islam on suicide bombing? Why, sinner, you save your soul by killing the infidel...be it a nonconformist Moslem sect any one else. And that includes women, children, English, Spaniards, cats, dogs or budgies for that matter. Where are the Moslem demonstrations, the street marches for peace? They do get agitated when a cartoon of Mohamed is published, don't they. But when a suicide bomber kills dozens of innocent it's all quiet on the western front.
10

Globetrotter_scot,

01/02/2008 19:23:10
57.
Nomad, most likely you want to convince yourself that the Iranians are behind this. Otherwise, I fail to see the logic of your assesement.
For one thing Al Qaeda "was supposed to be behind the bombings" (note quotations). They are Sunni, Iran is Shia.
Are you telling me that Iran and Al Qaeda are the same?
This should be good.
11

Globetrotter_scot,

01/02/2008 19:24:27
9. Sam.
http://muslimsforpeace.net/
12

,

01/02/2008 20:28:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

01/02/2008 20:33:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Finnking,

Lempäälä 01/02/2008 20:54:23
13 thewitness

Aye, the bit about "You spew, in your usual, bigoted, Zionazi way..." kind of surprised me!

I wish there was an inquiry about the brit soldiers caught dressed up as Arabs. Lots of docs now being released about the brits dressing up as Iranian communists (1950s) and causing trouble in the streets, stirring up the crowds then disappearing before the brit army was called in to disperse them: by killing them.

Or the IEDs found in Iraq: lots of news about them being Iranian. Er, no, ooops! Bulgarian and made for NATO!

15

Conan the Librarian™,

01/02/2008 20:54:44
Would this suicide bomber get lots of male virgins?
She's aff her heid...
16

The Fly Fifer,

Fife 01/02/2008 21:06:50
coming to a market place neer you soon .................. Enoch was right, just understated .......................
17

Finnking,

Lempäälä 01/02/2008 21:37:05
I wonder if Nomad's view on Muslim women's naked bodies, not to mention his taste in 'top-shelf' video, affect his understanding of the events?

Here's Nomad on the subject of the burqua:

57Nomad,
california 25/01/2008 01:19:07

"As I have mentioned previously we do not long for an empire of date trees and camels. If we were going to be Imperialists we would take part of Europe. Why? Well, to be frank it has to do with women. I used to really feel sorry for those women who are compelled to wear a Burqa. Absolutely degrading and dehumanizing. However, I saw some video of some of the unburqa'd women. EEYOWIE!! The burqas didn't seem like such a bad idea after all."


18

MarkInAlpine,

Alpine, Texas 01/02/2008 21:44:35
The news reports I've read earlier all state that these were two Downs Syndrome (ie, mentally retarded) women, and the bombs were remotely detonated.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8UHNN081&show_article=1
19

lielayer,

01/02/2008 21:44:47
History of American False Flag Operations

http://911review.com/articles/anon/false_flag_perations.html
20

oder,

Scotland 01/02/2008 22:34:31
6 Globetrotter_scot,

"Many see the invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan and the growing media trend of prejudice as an attack on their religion and themselves. There are cultural issues too which naturally inflames anger."

what about before Iraq /Afghanistan? what was the problem then? if you wish to know how to serve god and kill read the Koran! no other religious people shout to kill someone for a teddy being called Mohammed, Muslim have a simply answer how to deal with un-Islamic unbeliever`s (Rushdie for example) a fatwa! all the so called moderate Muslims said he deserved it for his un-Islamic Satanic verse ( by the way if you've read the book you`ll see his description is correct the satanic verse come out of the Koran first used by Muhammad himself)now many moderate Muslims have said the Bin laden/Al Qeada are un-Islamic, why no Fatwa on them?
could it be that, its because the terrorists obey the Koran and kill non Muslims/unbelievers
21

MarkInAlpine,

Alpine, Texas 01/02/2008 22:41:35
Here is another article describing the women as mentally disabled.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511678&in_page_id=1811
22

57Nomad,

california 01/02/2008 22:52:44
#10 G. S.

GS said:

"Nomad, most likely you want to convince yourself that the Iranians are behind this. Otherwise, I fail to see the logic of your assesement.
For one thing Al Qaeda "was supposed to be behind the bombings" (note quotations). They are Sunni, Iran is Shia.
Are you telling me that Iran and Al Qaeda are the same?
This should be good."

You shouldn't be so quick to jump to conclusions. I never said that AQ was behind the bombings. Where did you get that from? I was commenting on the state of Iraq as it is today.

What am I to make of this: "For one thing AQ "was supposed to be behind the bombings" (note quotations)"

Where did that come from? The article didn't say that. I didn't say it. Who did? The only person who said it was you. You seem to be arguing with yourself. Are you sure that you are addressing yourself to the right poster because your comments are not apropos to the article or my post.

You have somethings right. AQ is the brainchild of Sunni OBL. Iran is predominately Shi'a. That's not the point. The question to be asked is this; who stands to gain?

First of all we can rule out one thing, the women involved did not do it because of religious or secular passions. They were someones instrument. The question is whose instrument were they? Since the women can't be asked all we are left with is speculation. Wouldn't you agree? And so we come back to the question of who does this act benefit the most?

A secular, democratic Iraq, allied with the US is a nightmare scenario for the Iranian and they are known to be training suicide bombers.

Here is an excerpt from the Times, London:

"Iran suicide bombers ‘ready to hit Britain’
Marie Colvin, Michael Smith and Sarah Baxter
IRAN has formed battalions of suicide bombers to strike at British and American targets if the nation’s nuclear sites are attacked. According to Iranian officials, 40,000 trained suicide bombers are ready for action."


Here is the link to th
23

MarkInAlpine,

Alpine, Texas 01/02/2008 22:59:37
Here is another article, this one from the BBC, relating how they know the two women were mentally handicapped.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7221639.stm
24

57Nomad,

01/02/2008 23:01:11
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2136638.html

Since Iran stands to benefit the most from a fractured and destabilized Iraq and they have the trained bombers it doesn't seem much of a stretch to make them the most likely suspect. That's the way it looks to me. Who do you think is responsible, and why?
25

,

01/02/2008 23:15:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

,

01/02/2008 23:40:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

57Nomad,

california 02/02/2008 03:06:23
12 tw

tw said:

"You spew, in your usual, bigoted, Zionazi way..."

I spewed? Look, okay, there were a few times in college when I drank too much tequila. And, at those times, I will admit, that, yes, I did spew. But give me a break, I was in College and there was tremendous peer pressure to drink and every now and then I gave in to it, hence, the aforementioned spewing. But that was a long time ago and I don't feel that it's fair of you to dredge up what was nothing more than adolescent hi jinx. Enough.

Embedded in that sentence was another thing that piqued my curiosity. It is this,

"in your usual, bigoted, Zionazi way..."

Now, I gotta say, this comes as news to me, and not all of it unwelcome. You see, I didn't know I had any bigoted, Zionazi in me just waiting to be unleashed. Because if I did I could have used it tonight when I was coming home on Interstate 5. I was in the fast lane kissing 75 miles an hour when this guy starts tailgating me. This went on for a number of miles, from the La Costa exit to Cannon and I was steaming but I couldn't think of what to holler at him. Had I but known that I could have laid down some bigoted Zionazi chops on him I would have been golden. As it turns out a stern look was all I could come up with.

And, lastly, there is this.


"When we take our justice against the Zionists for their 200 year crime wave on humanity, it is going to be swift and it is going to be merciless.
Zionism is fascism!

You failed to mention, and I know that there are many that want to know, just who exactly this "we" that you are referring to, is. After all, if we knew we could do some advance planning, but we don't and so we're stuck wondering. Can you fill us in?
28

,

02/02/2008 03:39:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

57Nomad,

02/02/2008 03:49:57
#25 tw

tw said:

"You say..." The question to be asked is this; who stands to gain? Who does this act benefit the most?"
"Well Nomad, your chum, Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi Yona Metzge has already fessed up!
The Ashke=nazi Rabbi to President George W. Bush...
"I want to thank you for your support of Israel and in particular for waging a war against Iraq," Metzger told Bush, according to the chief rabbi's spokesman."

You know what? You have a somewhat confrontational vibe emanating from your post. Nonetheless I read it carefully and gave it some thought. How could Israel profit from the destabilization of Iraq? I mean, you just got done telling me the the Rabbi was pretty happy about the war. If he was, then why would he be trying to screw up a good thing? Before the war guys were blowing themselves up left and right in Israel and every time they did their families received a check for, at first, 15,000 and later 25,000 dollars, from, you guessed it, Saddam Hussein. After Saddam left the scene and the checkskis dried up, the bombing tapered off drastically. Now, I know what you're going to say, "Hey Nomad, haven't you ever heard of post hoc ergo prompter hoc?? And, you would be well served by asking this question. But, it is an interesting coincidence, don't you think? The Israels think there is a connection and it could that the Rabbi was referencing that fact when he thanked the President.

I don't believe you have addressed the question, though. If you feel that Israel is happy about the war, why on earth would they be trying to screw everything up? What good could that do them? I'd like a more in-depth review because, at least on the surface, it seems to be contrary to their self interest.

30

Jewel of the Forth,

Fife 02/02/2008 04:21:12
17 Finnking,Lempäälä

You are the same troll who has admitted to using more than 10 other names here, you also pal around with Mines's an 80 bob, another mutlti ID using troll. Who in their right mind would believe you on any subject?
31

,

02/02/2008 04:23:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

57Nomad,

california 02/02/2008 04:31:33
#28 tw

tw said:

" "Can you fill us in?"
You can be assured of that, best tel your Zionist chums to inform the leadership, the criminals, to keep their filthy terrorist operations out of Scotland or it's ta,ta, toodaloo, no more rogue state.


Well, I really don't know what to say. I've only got a few close chums but I will pass along your word of caution to them. I'm not sure they are going to be interested, though. One of them is a disk jockey on KIFM, the jazz station. Scotland has cold water and choppy surf, though, and I'm pretty sure he's not interested in it. The other two are brothers who own a motorcycle retail establishment and customizing shop where you can get your new Harley tricked out. But, I'll tell them anyway, just in case they got any Biker Rabbis for customers.

I'll tell who you ought to be looking at. That's Darrin Donnelly of Whittier, California. He's the no good ratbastard who stole my girlfried, Jill Bonvalet, away from me when I was a junior in high school. I think he might be one of those guys you're looking for so if you're interested I would be happy to send you his address, telephone number, and gps coordinates.

When you catch him, and you'd better have a fast car to do it because he might still have that '65 Pontiac GTO thats all souped up and sounding cool (one of the devious tricks he used to turn my girlfriend's head). See what I said: tricks. That's right, tricks. Doesn't that sound like the Mossad to you? I've suspected him of being a Secret Jew since when we were alter boys and he spiked the communion wine. At that time only the priest drank the communion wine and Father McCormack was staggering around the alter. Ha! There's your guy. Just remember something when you catch. Just two little words: Dental Instruments


33

57Nomad,

02/02/2008 04:38:56
#32 tw

tw said:

"The immense influence of this largely Jewish group stems from its close alliance with the extreme right-wing Christian fundamentalists, who nowadays control Bush's Republican party. ..."

Look, tw, you are still not getting down to it. Why, after going to all that trouble to get us into Iraq would they sabotage their own stuff? That's the question. Why, if the are the behind the scenes puppet masters, would they send in suicide bombers. That may make sense to some but you'd think they would be trying to consolidate their gains rather than blowing them up with the possibility of ending up with another Saddam.

34

Dáithí,

San Jose 02/02/2008 04:57:08
#31 - tw

thewitless - after a few months of showing that your links never really say what you proclaim them to say, we see that you don't even bother to use them now.
35

Dáithí,

San Jose 02/02/2008 05:01:57
#31 - the witless

"Better having a Zionist jew explain/brag..."

Huh? I thought that you guys were just supposed to be 'anti-Zionist'. Why do you say 'Zionist JEW'?

Is it because if you just say 'Jew' you appear too racist, but just saying 'Zionist' doesn't allow you the satisfaction of venting your real hatred of Jews?
36

,

02/02/2008 05:09:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
37

,

02/02/2008 05:22:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

Dáithí,

San Jose 02/02/2008 05:56:26
#37 - thewitless

>"I can make a judgement on pie face John Hagee calling himself a christian. He is not a christian, he is a warmonger and a criminal...

Sorry, I'm caught up in a laughing fit because I'm wondering WTF 'John Hagee' has to do with anything, much less who the the hell he actually is.

I'm actually going to give Finnking, Britfree and Roberta Burns a 'free pass' on this one, I don't even think that THEY believe that you have any grasp on reality, much less are some sort of responsible spokesman for their cause!

Hahaha! Gosh, I'm still laughing about this one! John Hagee? Hahahaha, who could have seen THAT one coming???
39

,

02/02/2008 06:23:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
40

Dáithí,

San Jose 02/02/2008 06:25:52
#39 - thewitless

My advice to you is to go to bed, sleep it off - and pray that nobody remembers this thread tomorrow.
41

,

02/02/2008 06:37:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
42

57Nomad,

02/02/2008 08:11:42
#8 Fins

fins said:

"From the Romans onwards, we can see that in any occupied state there's tribal, factional warfare."

How do you account for Japan and Germany?
43

57Nomad,

02/02/2008 08:40:06
#13 wit

wit said:

"Sorry #8, my comment in #12 is for #7, the armchair warmonger coward, Nomad.:"

Wit, where are you? I mean where do you live so I can pay you a visit. Coward? You're half right, one of us is a coward, but it's not me. Any time, any place, Betty Lou. My guess is that you're the kid that got picked last during PE. I'll bet you've got zits and dandruff and chronic bad breath. Your girlfriend is the palm of your hand. Your mother is embarrassed by you. You are never going to get l&%d. You are a bitter and two dimensional thing. Your life is a waste of time and you know it. The only thing that makes you feel good about yourself is when you are trying to snipe at real men from behind cover. Look, Skippy, I've given this forum the the country, state, county, and town where I live and my email address. But you, weasel, don't have the guts to even disclose what country you live in. Why is that, too chicken?? I'll bet that's it. Let me guess.

I'll be you think that your rapier-like mind
and insightful comments have aroused the attention of various intelligence agencies around the world and the FBI, CIA, and NSA all lose sleep because you've got them all figured out. Probably got files on you two inches thick. Isn't that right? So you can't post what country you're in because that be making it too easy for the Nazis to find you.

Look, punk, you would never ever insult me to my face and you know it. If you should ever be so unfortunate enough to run into me, you will be living in a world of wet pants and tears. I will tag you so hard your mother will wake up screaming and your children will be born bruised. Not to put too fine a point on it.

44

57Nomad,

california 02/02/2008 09:08:54
#17 fin

fin said:

"I wonder if Nomad's view on Muslim women's naked bodies, not to mention his taste in 'top-shelf' video, affect his understanding of the events?"

Fins for the past month or so your remarks to me or about me have had curious sexual undertones. What's up with that? You are starting to give off a creepy umpa lumpa vibe. I have a question, how did you get this:

"I wonder if Nomad's view on Muslim women's naked bodies, not to mention his taste in 'top-shelf' video, affect his understanding of the events?"

From this:

"As I have mentioned previously we do not long for an empire of date trees and camels. If we were going to be Imperialists we would take part of Europe. Why? Well, to be frank it has to do with women. I used to really feel sorry for those women who are compelled to wear a Burqa. Absolutely degrading and dehumanizing. However, I saw some video of some of the unburqa'd women. EEYOWIE!! The burqas didn't seem like such a bad idea after all."

You must have some kind of warped imagination to think that Muslim women are naked under their burqa's. Those words, ""I wonder if Nomad's view on Muslim women's naked bodies" were written by you, the fish propeller. Since they were written by you, those are the thoughts that are running around in YOUR head and have nothing to do with my thoughts. The continual sexual remarks you make about me, the contents of my DVD collection, etc., etc., etc. is perhaps a reflection of the intermingling thoughts that you have about sex and me.

This, fin, is unhealthy and needs to be checked at once. I'm not going to out with you or even hold hands. Wrong cowboy, Brokeback.
45

Finnking,

Lempäälä 02/02/2008 12:58:12
Nomad,

If you feel fine teaching Muslim women during the day and posting such sexist comments in the evening, then fine.

If you are stating that your comment regarding the aesthetic of un-burqu'd women was entirely focused upon the facial aesthetic, then I find that equally sexist and racist. Never mind. It's your opinion and you are entitled to it.

Then you use my interpretation of your comment (the nakedness aspect) as a possible indication of sexual desire for you. Most interesting.

Of course, we can go that next step further (three steps too tricky?- checked for autism?) and claim, using your logic, that because you brought up the subject of sexual contact between you and I, it is you that feels that way. Aye? If so.....

I have zero desire for sexual contact with an old man like you. Even in my wildest and most creative fantasies, I wouldn't desire intimate contact with a sexist, racist, aggressive, unchivelrous person like yourself.

Nothing personal, you understand.
46

,

02/02/2008 14:43:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
47

Finnking,

Lempäälä 02/02/2008 19:38:52
Witness

Thanks for the video links. It explains a lot about the mindset of the some US citizens witnessed on this forum.

48

Finnking,

Lempäälä 02/02/2008 19:45:17
Witness

Regarding OBL

Check out the FBI Most Wanted LIst. OBL is not number one and you will see that he is not wanted for 911.
49

,

02/02/2008 20:11:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
50

57Nomad,

california 04/02/2008 06:50:32
#45 fins
fins said:

"If you feel fine teaching Muslim women during the day and posting such sexist comments in the evening, then fine.
If you are stating that your comment regarding the aesthetic of un-burqu'd women was entirely focused upon the facial aesthetic, then I find that equally sexist and racist. Never mind. It's your opinion and you are entitled to it."

First a technical observation. You used the word 'fine' twice in the same sentence. That’s kind of clunky.

Sexist? Look, we've been over this before. What entitles you to label people? Why are you so judgmental? Do have a charter as the Royal Judger?

Do this. Name one single thing you have ever done for women. You've got a lot of godam nerve, you obnoxious creep. You are a guy who never gets his own hands dirty and then inflates his own view of himself by tearing down those who do the real work. I’m going to ask you again. Name one thing you have ever done except shoot your big mouth off. I’m a sexist? I labor day and night, sacrificing my own time and my own money and I have been doing this for years and I can prove it.

I’m a racist? Are you trying to make people laugh? Hey, you’re the guy who moved to FINLAND, the White People capital of the world. What’s the matter? Does living with people who are a different color make you uneasy? Is that it, you racist punk? I’ve spent years working to improve the lives of minorities and continue to do so. How about you? What do you do? What can you do? What is your God given talent that you lavish on others to improve their lives? It will be snowing in Hell before I’m going to sit still for being labeled by a do nothing, no talent jerk like you.

51

57Nomad,

california 04/02/2008 06:55:13
#50 contd.

I’ve told you before and now I’m going to tell you again. You help no one, you create nothing and no one is better off because of you. If you want to call people names and judge them, you have to earn that privilege. You can’t give it to yourself. What have you done? What are you doing? What are you going to do tomorrow to help women and minorities? I don’t think you’ve ever done anything and I don’t think that you are ever going to.

I do. I work everyday for people less fortunate than I and I have for years, and, as you know, I can prove it. You don’t and you can’t. You don’t care enough. Where is your heart? Do you have one? How can you stand to see people who are in need, and turn your back on them the way you do? Those people are our brothers and sisters and how do you treat them? What is it that you do to help? How can you sleep at night?

You can snap at my ankles all you want, you can try to disparage me in your pathetic way. It is meaningless. Why should I care? Fins, I am a better man than you are and you know it. And you know that that is never going to change.
52

,

04/02/2008 11:13:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
53

,

04/02/2008 13:33:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
54

Mine's an 80 bob,

Edinburgh 04/02/2008 22:00:52
53 thatscottishwoman

Hickory Dickory Dock
55

Barbara Bush,

06/02/2008 07:57:22
Hi all,

check it out Lynne has outed tikun and nomad as the same person over on

http://news.scotsman.com/world/Israel-looks-to-cut-Gaza.3710637.jp

at #308 and #317

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
RSS Feed of this article's comments
Delivery formats: RSS, Atom, Javascript & Email
 
  

 
 

More International

More International >>

More War in Iraq

More War in Iraq >>

Features

Free financial brochures & guides Dionami
Paperboy Paperboy Customised news
Scottish Business Briefing Scottish Business Briefing ...Sign up today

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.