Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Shipyards that gave birth to Solidarity now face the axe



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 July 2008
THEY championed the cause of freedom in the Communist bloc and helped bring an end to the Cold War. But now Poland's shipyards, the birthplace of Lech Walesa's Solidarity movement, face the prospect of closure.

The European Commission is threatening to force the yards in Gdansk, Gdynia and Szczecin to pay back more than £800 million in state aid given to the ailing shipbuilders three years ago.

If they have to hand back the money, then the yards, incl
uding the famous Gdansk yard where a strike in August 1980 sparked a nationwide challenge to Communist rule, face bankruptcy and the loss of at least 15,000 jobs. The government also says that thousands more indirect jobs could disappear as a result.

Faced with the prospect of unemployment, thousands of shipyard workers downed tools last Friday in an effort to persuade the EC to back away from its threat. They also handed in a petition to the government and Poland's president, Lech Kaczynski, calling on them "to take strong measures to save Poland's shipbuilding industry".

The Industrial Union of Donbass, the Ukrainian owner of the Gdansk facility, the only one in private hands, has said it will walk away from the yard, if it has to hand over the money, describing the commission's proposal as "simply impossible".

Late last week, Warsaw submitted additional information to Brussels for its plans outlining the restructuring of the three yards, and the privatisation of the Gdynia and Szczecin facilities. If the commission, which is due to rule this week, accepts the plans, the yards could be saved as the state aid would then be in compliance with EU rules.

But so far, the omens have not been good. Neelie Kroes, the European competition commissioner, has expressed "serious doubts" that the Polish plan will comply with EU requirements regarding state aid.

Her doubts follow Brussels' long-standing exasperation over Poland's apparent failure to produce a clear blueprint for the yards' future, despite having had four years to do so, according to the EC.

Donald Tusk, Poland's prime minister and a former Solidarity activist who lives in Gdansk, has said he will appeal to the Council of Europe, if the commission demands repayment. The government has also pleaded for more time to secure investment.

The fate of the yards has sparked widespread debate in Poland. The irony that the shipyards, which played a crucial role in ushering capitalism into Poland, could be destroyed by a system they helped create has not been lost on most Poles.

"I spent 40 years in the shipyard. First the Communists wanted to destroy it, now this government wants to finish us off too," said Ryszard Paprzycki, 67, who is now retired.

Dariusz Adamski, head of the Gdynia branch of Solidarity, said: "We are going to fight to the end – we are not going to go quietly. This shipyard is all our life, it is our work, our future."

Some economists have played down the fears, pointing out shipyards in Germany and Spain had to go through similar restructuring but survived.

Others argue that bankruptcy could be a blessing in disguise as it would force the Polish government to reorganise the yards.





The full article contains 540 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 July 2008 9:37 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Scullion,

Canada 14/07/2008 02:42:27
Communism was filled with obvious terror and repression. Capitalism, with its "invisible hand" of the marketplace, comes with a more insidious but equally as chilling evil side.
2

W Smith,

Middle East 14/07/2008 04:04:17
It was left to Margaret Thatcher (peace by upon her) to fly into Gdansk and support Trade Union leader Lech Walesa.

It was "illegal" to form a Trade Union in the Soviet Union and yet Scottish communist Trade Union leader, Jimmy Reid, supported Moscow and opposed Thatcher.

His English counterpart Arthur Scargill was writing begging letters to Lech Walesa's enemies in Moscow for financial support.

YOU JUST COULDN'T MAKE THIS UP!
3

hertscot,

14/07/2008 11:00:46
They wanted western style freedom, well now they've got it.
4

Brian the Barbarian.,

Up a pole 14/07/2008 12:34:54

Why don't they just build two giant aircraft carriers at £3.8 billion that nobody needs or wants ?
5

57Nomad,

california 14/07/2008 22:56:17
#2

This is a fascinating story. It does illustrate one of the major differences in the union movements in the US and Europe. The founder of the American labor movement is Samuel Gompers. Among the many reasons that socialism never got a foothold in the US was best stated by Gompers. Here is a quote:

"The biggest sin that capital can commit against American labor is to fail to make a profit."

Now, fast forward to the late '80's and the Solidarity labor union. In a bid to stifle Solidarity, the USSR declared it unlawful and moved to crush it by force. While this met with various reactions in Europe, American labor leader were livid with rage. It had nothing to do with commie/capitalist, Euro/US, or any other overarching concerns, it was entirely pragmatic, a labor movement had been crushed in front of the entire world and their brothers in the AFofL/CIO weren't buying it.

So, besides Margaret Thatcher, the Pope, and Ronald Reagan, Lane Kirkland, the head, at that time, of the AFofL/CIO pitched in. They established relations with Solidarity and within a few months entire freighters full of stuff to maintain Solidarity were being unloaded in Gdansk right under the noses of the commies.

Shipyards may come and go, so what? The important thing is that the Poles, who suffered under 50 years of Russian occupation, have rid themselves of the totalitarian regime and are now free to govern themselves.
6

57Nomad,

california 14/07/2008 23:00:20
#3 hurtscot

hurtscot said:

"They wanted western style freedom, well now they've got it"

Soo right. I'll bet they are longing to return to the days of Russian tanks, high quality Bulgarian shoes, bad haircuts, secret police, and the political domination of the abominable communists, you know, the good old days.
7

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 15/07/2008 10:48:08
"Lech Walesa is believed by some people in Poland to have been a paid agent of the SB (Sluzba Bezpieczenstwa - the State Security Service) for more than 10 years during his rise to the top of the Solidarity movement in the Gdansk shipyards. Walesa, under the codename "Bolek", is said to have been recruited to pass information to the SB, and was bumped into the top leadership position within Solidarity by other embedded agents of the SB in an attempt to control the movement. His subsequent break from SB control is attributed to a new arrangement Walesa made with Reagan/Bush's CIA."
Biographybase.

They now have the freedom to be cast aside and have to look for work abroad.
8

57Nomad,

california 19/07/2008 10:01:02
#7 Klamps

Klmaps posted this excerpt from Walesa's entry in Biographybase:

"Lech Walesa is believed by some people in Poland to have been a paid agent of the SB (Sluzba Bezpieczenstwa - the State Security Service) for more than 10 years during his rise to the top of the Solidarity movement in the Gdansk"

What Clampers fails to mention is that the excerpt came from section of his bio that mocks these conspiracy theories. Here is an excerpt from the very article that Klampers puts forth as truth. Below is that excerpt.

"However, none of these "spy theories" have ever been proven. In fact, his activities during the strike in 1980 and his leadership of Solidarity Trade Union during 1980-1981 suggest strongly against the theory that he was an SB spy, and the theories requires the assumption that the SB would risk destroying their own political system by bumping such a good and effective leader to the top position of a strongly anti-communist social movement."

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.