Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Seven years' work on satellite crashes and burns in 12 minutes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 February 2009
A TEAM of scientists at a Scottish university watched in horror as a Nasa project on which they had worked for seven years crashed just minutes after its launch.
Dr Paul Palmer, of the University of Edinburgh's School of GeoSciences, is part of a global team of scientists who have developed ways to interpret satellite greenhouse gases data from space. But the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, which cost $273 mill
ion to develop, ran into problems about eight minutes into the mission and minutes later crashed into the ocean.

Dr Palmer last night told The Scotsman: "A few of us were watching Nasa TV online at work this morning.

"We watched the countdown and the launch," he said. "Then about eight to nine minutes into the launch they mentioned there was a "contingency", meaning that it hadn't launched properly.

"I felt gobsmacked," he said. "It looked like it was going up and all would be well. We were all gutted at what happened. This has been a very gloomy day for us. There are people who have worked for seven years on this project and we are uncertain about what will happen next.

"The Nasa press conference said they didn't know if they could rebuild it, so it is too early for us to know if it will go ahead."

However, Dr Palmer added: "Despite what has happened, all is not lost. We are also involved in the Japanese project which launched in early February and which is going to measure ."

An investigation was under way at Nasa last night into the crash of the space mission whose aim was to map the Earth's greenhouse gases for the first time.

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO), built by Nasa and launched atop a commercially built rocket, was to have orbited 438 miles above the planet, taking eight million measurements every 16 days to assess levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and determine mankind's impact on global warming.

Instead, it nosedived into a watery grave on the outskirts of Antarctica after part of the rocket failed to separate properly about 12 minutes after lift-off from Vandenberg air force base in California.

Officials at Nasa, which developed and funded the satellite project, and the Virginia-based Orbital Sciences Corporation, which built the Taurus XL rocket, were poring over the launch data to determine the exact cause.

The OCO was the first satellite built by Nasa ever to measure climate change on a global scale.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 February 2009 12:02 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

redcliffe62,

25/02/2009 01:02:50
good job they made a duplicate.
err, did somebody forget?
2

Aileen,

25/02/2009 03:22:35
Ok it didn't go as planned. Why does the media have to be so critical.
3

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 25/02/2009 06:33:01
Standard practice #1. If not a full duplicate, then certainly the key parts to build another.

"Seven years' work on satellite crashes and burns in 12 minutes" - so does no one remember what they did over the seven years? So it'll be another 7-years before they can launch another?

All because a small component that releases the fairing didn't work.
4

Graeme Gibson,

Sydney Australia 25/02/2009 08:41:10
I often wondered where precisely NASA was going.

Did you ever wonder that?

Billions get spent on space and yet...it cant happen. We are are too far away from the nearest world to settle on it.
So why is the time and money being wasted.
Isnt NASA merely just about jobs for the elite few? Financing the dreamers?

Wouldnt it be nice if NASA scientists turned around and looked at a dying planet and extended their expertise to saving the earth?

To colonise even Mars, and build cities to live in, we would have to virtually rape this earth to death of her last remaining minerals just to get there and do it.
5

AJ Fife,

25/02/2009 09:44:43
Let's hope it wasn't anything the boffins in Edinburgh did.
6

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 25/02/2009 09:49:57
Someone in quality assurance should receive a big rocket
7

sceptic,

livingston 25/02/2009 10:11:40
Prophetic really, a satellite designed to investigate CO2 in the atmosphere crashes and burns, rather similar to support for the AGW scaremongering.
8

TSW at the Cyber Shebeen,

25/02/2009 10:14:25
This story is so funny!!!! A bunch of silly chicken littles are upset!!!
9

JWW,

Whitburn,West Lothian, 55.86667 -3.68500 25/02/2009 10:31:54
What does this project and Edinburgh's trams project have in common?
10

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 25/02/2009 10:35:38
Maybe there's a message in this? Poetic Justice perhaps?

"taking eight million measurements every 16 days to assess levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and determine mankind's impact on global warming."

Assuming of course that CO2 is in fact causing "global warming" and that its presence is in fact down to man.

Methinks that it is a good thing that this high-tech propaganda machine ended up at the bottom of the ocean.

Over to you Seeny...
11

sceptic,

livingston 25/02/2009 11:10:47
10
"Over to you Seeny..."
Please be more careful, it is "Seanie", you know how pedantic he is!
We shall be showered with meaningless statistics on how many times you have miss-spelt his name on average in each of the past five year periods. Clearly indicating that your mental faculties are deteriorating at approximately the same rate as the fall in atmospheric mean temperature over the past 10 years.
12

seanie,

25/02/2009 11:35:16
Continental drift.

Hehe, heh, heh.
13

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 25/02/2009 11:39:51
Two different sets of figures relating to exactly the same data set...

Hee! Hee! Hee!
14

Let's have the truth,

25/02/2009 11:44:12
They should have asked China to launch it.
15

Alexander,

Edinburgh 25/02/2009 13:26:57
Hardly surprising that NASA have messed up. Probably had another charlatan in the James Hansen mould in charge of this project.
16

Lloyd,

Nashville 25/02/2009 16:14:01
Alexander:

You're right -- to insure a successful launch, we really should have used a Scot-built rocket instead of some cheapo US kit.

Oh, wait. There ARE NO Scot-built rockets. Why not?

If you'd actually read the story, you might have noticed that the rocket was NOT NASA-built; it was a commercially-built rocket. Built by a company that is still trying to perfect their first flight vehicle.

And Graeme, #4: You also should read the story before commenting; the satellite was an Earth-observing climate researcher. Isn't that just what you said NASA should be doing?

The "rebuilding" they're talking about is of the recovered flight version; if it can't be rebuilt and relaunched, insurance should cover most of the cost and the satellite will be recreated and another launch attempt made, probably in a year or so.
17

Lloyd,

Nashville 25/02/2009 16:19:30
Oh, and Graeme:

The "elite few" include many thousands of machinists, technicians, engineers, janitors, transport operators, cafeteria crew, etc. -- it ain't just a handful of overpaid dreamers and government bureaucrats divvying up the few billion dollars NASA gets each year.

Less than ONE HALF OF ONE PER CENT of the US budget, by the way.

Not even NASA has yet figured out a way to spend a single dollar off-planet yet; it's all spent right here on Earth!
18

S. A. C.,

Edinburgh 26/02/2009 14:40:19
I hope NASA kept the receipt !

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.