Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Free Walking Books and Map of Glencoes

Scot who burnt down White House causes a stir again

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 March 2010
A MINIATURE portrait of a Scottish naval officer who helped burn down the White House in a British attack on Washington is being sold by his family 200 years later.


• Sir Pulteney Malcolm, the Scottish naval officer from Dumfriesshire, as he appears in the miniature. Picture: PA

The descendants of Rear Admiral Sir Pulteney Malcolm, whose illustrious career ended with him guarding Napoleon on the island of St Helena, are hoping to find a buyer who will treasure the fragile artefact.

Born near Langholm in Dumfriesshire, Sir Malcolm was third in command of the British fleet which in 1814 set fire to many public buildings in Washington DC, including the White House.

Painted on ivory, the miniature was removed from its locket decades ago, and the paint is in danger of cracking and peeling away.

The family is hoping to sell it to a collector with the specialist expertise to conserve the image properly, Bonhams auctioneers said. It is expected to fetch £10-15,000 in an April sale in London.

The miniature, and a second one of Sir Pulteney's younger brother Sir Charles Malcolm, who also served in the Royal Navy, were painted by George Engleheart. He was a skilful artist who completed 4,853 miniature portraits in the course of his 40-year career, records show, including several of King George III.

The son of a sheep farmer, Sir Pulteney joined the navy at the age of ten as a midshipman. He was promoted to lieutenant at 15.

He went on to serve alongside both Admiral Horatio Nelson, though he narrowly missed the Battle of Trafalgar, and the Duke of Wellington. He was given command of a convoy carrying troops to America in 1813, and later made commander-in-chief of St Helena, where Napoleon was held after he escaped from Elba. Sir Pulteney died in 1838 aged 70.

In letters written to his wife and sister, he would describe the capture and burning of Washington – allegedly in retaliation for an American attack on Canada – and the battles of Baltimore and New Orleans, as well as peace negotiations that followed.

The fire that raged through Washington DC also destroyed the interiors of the Capitol building and the Library of Congress. As British troops advanced, the then First Lady, Dolly Madison, stoically stayed in her home, trying to rescue valuables and documents.

Bonhams specialist Camilla Lombardi said the two paintings were "superb examples" of Engleheart's work. They have been in the Malcolm family since 1806.

His descendants have various items of memorabilia, including a letter from Nelson, she said. "Their children are not terribly interested in carrying on looking after the items," added Ms Lombardi, but there may be interest from collectors with a connection to "a bit of history" that has often been overlooked.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 March 2010 1:43 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Drew Kit,

12/03/2010 00:24:05
The Canadians I know all claim this terrorist attack as their own, so it is interesting to learn a Scot was involved.
2

Huntly loon,

Aberdeenshire 12/03/2010 00:41:19
Maybe President Obama might purchase it for the White House collections. They will need to keep it in a fireproof safe when not on display and ensure to include it in the fire insurance of valuables.
3

,

12/03/2010 00:52:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Gorach,

Oban 12/03/2010 01:44:22
Aye, the burning was in response to the attack on York which is now Toronto - one of the finest cities in the world and well worth a visit.

In those days British/Canadian was the same thing but there were certainly Canadian born lads in the British/Canadian army during the war of 1812.

5

Tom in DC,

Daly City, CA 12/03/2010 02:22:20
The destruction of the enemy's public buildings was considered a legitimate act of war by the rules of the time. The same rules prohibited attacks on civilians and the firing or looting of private buildings.
I'm sure my Maryland ancestors shot at British troops in that war, but I can recognize that an enemy soldier not de facto a "terrorist".
6

Kdv,

12/03/2010 02:23:17
An unprovoked attack by the Americans on Canada. That was the reason why we torched the white house. The Americans pleaded for peace, we gained all the major trading stations. In doing so we missed that chance to take back the thirteen colonies & bring them back to British rule. As well as good old British tax.
7

murren59,

Florida 12/03/2010 02:50:24
Battle of New Orleans - Johnny Horton

The war may have been officially over but...

"In 1814 we took a little trip
Along with Colonel Jackson down the mighty Mississip.
We took a little bacon and we took a little beans
And we caught the bloody British in the town of New Orleans.

[Chorus:]
We fired our guns and the British kept a'comin.
There wasn't nigh as many as there was a while ago.
We fired once more and they began to runnin' on
Down the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico.

We looked down the river and we see'd the British come.
And there must have been a hundred of'em beatin' on the drum.
They stepped so high and they made the bugles ring.
We stood by our cotton bales and didn't say a thing.

[Chorus]

Old Hickory said we could take 'em by surprise
If we didn't fire our muskets 'til we looked 'em in the eye
We held our fire 'til we see'd their faces well.
Then we opened up with squirrel guns and really gave 'em ... well

[Chorus]

Yeah, they ran through the briars and they ran through the brambles
And they ran through the bushes where a rabbit couldn't go.
They ran so fast that the hounds couldn't catch 'em
Down the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico.**

We fired our cannon 'til the barrel melted down.
So we grabbed an alligator and we fought another round.
We filled his head with cannon balls, and powdered his behind
And when we touched the powder off, the gator lost his mind.

[Chorus]

Yeah, they ran through the briars and they ran through the brambles
And they ran through the bushes where a rabbit couldn't go.
They ran so fast that the hounds couldn't catch 'em
Down the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico."

Artist: Classic Country
Song: Battle of New Orleans - Johnny Horton

8

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 12/03/2010 03:47:45
#3 Fred Bundy

Bush may have been president at the time but it was the democrats who were the architects of the ridiculous house lending that created the crisis.

The Republicans tried to put a stop to it but were voted down by the democrats.
9

Wally,

How Can We Sing The Lords Song In A Strange Land? 12/03/2010 05:22:44
That is a beautiful song in #7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R24QLILwdHE

although the song may have been written by Jimmie Driftwood.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmie_Driftwood

here is quote from wikipedia about the final decisive day of 'battle of new orleans' that was the final decisive battle of the war.

"At the end of the day, the British had 2,042 casualties: 291 killed (including Generals Pakenham and Gibbs), 1,267 wounded (including General Keane) and 484 captured or missing.[2] The Americans had 71 casualties: 13 dead; 39 wounded and 19 missing.[5]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmie_Driftwood

I also read an historical account of what happened in that battle. It wasn't pretty. Early in the war the Americans had some amateur soldiers who were ineffective. By the end of the war Andrew Jackson had organized a professional outfit that was very difficult to beat. I find the comment of 'securing trade stations' interesting. does that mean washington agreed to allow trade on better terms? I would suppose.

at the conclusion of the US civil war a wall of protectionism was put up to UK & European exports to America as northern business interests wanted. It is amazing how wars are fought for trade.

I don't think the British held onto the White House. it was re-built.


10

,

12/03/2010 07:33:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Selgovae,

12/03/2010 08:41:26
Didn't it only become the White House after it was restored and painted white. Previously it was known as the Presidential Mansion.

To describe the burning of the White House as revenge for a land grab in Canada is is a shallow interpretation of events. The war was the result of years of interference in US trade by the British.

12

Harp of Midlothian,

12/03/2010 12:31:29
Was this Scottish terrorist ever brought to justice?
13

JCA REID,

Annan 12/03/2010 15:01:53
Re. #3&8. It was Clinton that screwed up the mortgage system. You had folk earning $40,000 per annum & getting mortgages for $600,000 properties!
14

Tobytoo,

Southington, U.S.A. 12/03/2010 17:12:33
#14
A Super Power in 1814?
15

Thrawn,

UK 12/03/2010 17:40:29
It's interesting to read the Wikipedia entry for the British-American War of 1812. The verdict: a draw.

Funny, that's how the Kelvin Klein character in "A Fish called Wanda" described the Vietnam War.

However, let's not forget how many square miles the Americans stole from Canada along the Oregon Trail or how they pushed down from Alaska to grab as much Canadian coastline as possible. Britain gave way on this one.

And they also grabbed the Sandwich Islands from the British administrators. These became Hawaii, which only became the 50th American state in 1960. Never mind: Hawaii has the Union Flag enshrined in its state flag in the top left-hand corner.

As for Sir P Malcolm coming from Langholm, let's not forget that the Father of the American Navy came from Galloway, one John Paul, who renamed himself John Paul Jones, and defeated the Royal Navy on at least one occasion: "We have not begun to fight," he replied, when asked to surrender.
16

Thrawn,

UK 12/03/2010 17:45:58
#4: aye, British and Canadian were the same thing in those days. Quite right.

In fact, they were the same thing until 1947 when Canadian citizenship first became a reality. Like all members of the British Empire, Canadians till then were British subjects.

Australian and New Zealand citizenship followed in 1949.

Let us never forget how all the members of our Empire came to our help in two World Wars.
17

Taz,

The Land of the Free. 12/03/2010 20:22:35
"Let us never forget how all the members of our Empire came to our help in two World Wars"

And their thanks was the UK joining the Common Market (EU) and dumping Australia and New Zealand on their butts. No problem, Australia now has very lucrative Asian markets for their exports.

The White House was not burned down. It was however severely damaged. This was in retaliation for us doing the same to the Canadian parliament buildings. The attack on the White House was not a terrorist attack. It was a legitimate act of war. They paid for it at New Orleans.
18

Jonesy,

rhoon 12/03/2010 21:06:40
#7 Awfie nice sonny but what has this to do with the story of the Scotand the White House. Or is it just you have nothing to say?
19

Jardine,

12/03/2010 23:28:34
"The attack on the White House was not a terrorist attack. It was a legitimate act of war. They paid for it at New Orleans."

The bruning of the White House helped bring the Americans to the negotiating table.
The battle of New Orleans was fought after the war had ended and had no impact on its outcome.
20

,

13/03/2010 01:33:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

13/03/2010 08:35:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

,

14/03/2010 09:23:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

,

14/03/2010 15:23:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Seare,

Burns Corridor 19/03/2010 14:34:55
Sir Pulteney Malcolm, the Scottish naval officer from Dumfriesshire, not too far distant (about 30mls) from the birthplace of John Paul Jones of Kirkbean, Dumfriesshire: the father of the American Navy.
Any chance of donating it to the JPJ Museaum?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.