Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Obamamania strikes Europe

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 July 2008
THE Barack Obama presidential road show is preparing to roll into Europe this week with the continent's political leaders lining up to bask in the glow of the charismatic Democratic candidate.
In prospect is a series of high profile photocalls in which Obama looks every inch the world statesman alongside Europe's political elite.

"Obama has charisma and glamour in spades and they don't so they will be very keen to be photographed with h
im," said Michael Cox, professor of international relations at the London School of Economics. "We are experiencing Obamamania in Europe."

Obama's itinerary is still officially a secret but he is expected to include a visit to Berlin where he will meet German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Britain to meet Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Paris to talk to President Nicolas Sarkozy. He is also thought to be planning stops in Israel, Jordan, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Obama's European trip will help counter criticism that he lacks foreign policy credentials. In a recent CNN poll, 54% of Americans said McCain would better handle foreign policy, 11 points ahead of Obama.

But the prospect which has European politicians excited is the chance to meet the man himself. "People in Europe want to touch the hem of the king and get cured of scrofula," said Sir Menzies Campbell, former leader of the Liberal Democrats and member of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee.

Obamamania is already in an advanced stage in the US where supporters include Scarlett Johansson, Will Smith, Robert De Niro, Oprah Winfrey and Alicia Keys who was pictured in an Obama T-shirt at a charity event in London last week.

But the European tour is about more than just image. Obama wants to send the message that his election would heal the rift between the US and Europe over the Iraq War.

In a statement, Obama said: "France, Germany and the United Kingdom are key anchors of the transatlantic alliance. And I look forward to discussing how we can strengthen our partnership in the years to come."

Not that it will be plain sailing. Obama has already come in for criticism in Germany for hijacking a national symbol after it was revealed that he plans to make a major foreign policy speech at Berlin's Brandenburg Gate. He would be following in the footsteps of Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan. John F Kennedy gave his own famous "Ich bin ein Berliner" speech just miles from the German symbol of unification.

"If he can get that visual of 100,000 Germans cheering him on at the Brandenburg Gate it will recall the great days of America when it had popular foreign policies and a president beloved by people around the world," said John Hulsman of the German Council on Foreign Relations in Berlin.

But German domestic politics may scupper the coup de theatre. "Merkel is reluctant to give a national symbol away for a campaign speech," said Christoph von Marschall, Washington bureau chief for Germany's Der Tagesspiegel newspaper and author of Barack Obama, The Black Kennedy.

Although his forthcoming trip has the makings of a political love-in, if Obama gets elected, uncomfortable challenges could follow. "As part of his multilateralist approach he will also demand more from Europe. I'm not sure if Europe has fathomed this yet," said Hulsman.

His demands are likely to include greater military support from Europe in Iraq and Afghanistan. But European countries have their shopping lists too. Obama is likely to win Merkel's backing if he addresses climate change. Although Poland is believed to be upset that it doesn't figure on Obama's schedule, its support is thought to be in the bag. Italy's Silvio Berlusconi has made a great show of being Obama's friend, as has Sarkozy.

Ironically, Britain, traditionally America's closest ally, may present Obama with his greatest challenge. Hulsman said: "Dealing with Gordon Brown may be harder than Obama thinks. He needs to reengage with Britain following the political fallout after Iraq."

Europe's political leaders will also be wary of seeming to endorse him during a sensitive time in the election campaign. If he loses, they might then face being frozen out by a President McCain.

Speculation about his forthcoming trip to Europe helped deflect attention in a tricky week for Obama in which black former presidential candidate Jesse Jackson was caught on a microphone saying he'd like to "cut Obama's nuts out" for talking down to black people.

Obama was also criticised for exploiting his daughters. Malia, 10, and Sasha, seven, took centre stage in an interview broadcast on prime-time television. He later said he regretted the decision after being accused of hypocrisy having previously called for the media to respect the girls' privacy.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 July 2008 7:54 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

bilI,

england 13/07/2008 11:52:38
Obama is an empty suit, a racist, and will harm America and the world economy.
2

,

13/07/2008 12:03:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 12:40:51
Obama will NOT create a mess and he must be given the chance to prove himself, if that is what the people want.
Let us all hope against hope that Obama wins, its either that or another 4 years of war mongering chaos.
4

PRR,

Leeper, Pa. 13/07/2008 12:48:27
Big dear. He has no international experience so he takes a grand tour, gets his picture taken and then he is an expert, Bull.....Nothing but grand standing.

He has no experience, a state senator and 143 actual working says in the U. S. Senate and no policy except the socialist agenda of the democrat party. He talks out both sides of his mouth. He is a nobody that is making a lot of noise.



5

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 13:17:35
PRR

And making noise is what gets you voted in..
I honestly hope that Obama wins it, the world needs a man that is prepared to do things differently.
America has had troops stationed in foreign lands for over 60 years and look what it has done to the world.
So maybe, just maybe his approach will be better, lets wait and see it cannot be worse than what has gone before him.
6

2dogs in D.C.,

13/07/2008 13:42:26
And so begins "Baracknophobia" I have to agree w/Media 1, give him a shot at it, it would be difficult to make things worse. Plus this government was established to have certain checks and balances built in. So, hopefully, no one person completly rules.
7

Tourist Guide,

13/07/2008 13:53:52
#4
Wasn't John F Kennedy also a state senator - oops, sorry, could it just be that you're not a Democrat!
8

,

13/07/2008 13:57:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 14:06:48
Guga

hahaha!
People such as you will always try and bring the rest of the world down to your level, but fail you almost certainly will.
There is a democratic process in America, which I realise you detest, but exist it does. And that process and that process alone will decide who the winner will be.
All I am saying, is that I hope Obama wins, and I dont see that as being anti American.
10

,

13/07/2008 14:08:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

13/07/2008 14:11:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

13/07/2008 14:20:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Media 1,

Cape Town 13/07/2008 14:24:29
Guga

I believe that Obama is a man of integrity. I could be wrong, I will give you that. But based on what I have seen and heard of the candidates thus far, I am more inclined to support Obama as opposed to anyone of the rest. When I vote for someone, or when I am in a position to cast an opinion on someone in politics, I can only base that opinion on the way they come across and the ideals they stand for.
On that basis, Obama is the man for me and I hope against hope that he wins the election and becomes President of America. For all our sakes, I hope he wins. Rather Obama than the war mongering McCain.
14

Itchy,

13/07/2008 14:35:01
"I believe that Obama is a man of integrity"

He isn't. He is an extreme lefty who hangs around with racists.

He isn't different at all. Just more big government drivel. I have no idea if McCain will be any different but Obama definitely will not be.
15

,

13/07/2008 14:35:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

13/07/2008 14:48:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 14:59:43
Nancy #15

No, I want Obama to win. And since almost half of America feels the same way, I am in pretty good company.
18

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 15:21:06
Nancy

War is deplorable, but it appears to be something that we as humans have always gravitated toward. Our history books are riddled with stories about conflict and as a species war is something we have done a lot.
In any war there is always two sides and who knows if there is ever a right side and a wrong side, I suppose that depends on what side of the fence you happen to be sitting on.
I know people who call Mandela a terrorist, and if we look up the word in a dictionary it would be difficult to disagree with them, but what the dictionary cannot do is elaborate on why he ended up acting in such a manner. Mandela is a peaceful man, there isnt a bad bone in his body. He is a man that is held in high esteem by most around the world, his fiercest critics coming from within some black communities in SA and from certain quarters within the ANC. But generally speaking he is a man of honour who only wanted a vote. They would not permit him to vote so he knocked on their door and asked them again. They refused him access, so he knocked again. Still they refused him access so he knocked again. Still they refused him. Is it any wonder he eventually blew the door down?
I am not condoning his actions, but at some point in any fight against what is deemed as an oppressive movement something has to give and it did in McGoos bar back in the late 80's.
In America you are in a precarious position in that you need to obtain oil from OPEC nations. You cannot produce the amount of oil that you require and the nations who have all the oil dont like you very much, so you attack them. Which is nothing new its been going on for years as I have already mentioned. At some point something has to give, it is unavoidable.
So the terrorists you are speaking about are indeed terrorists, but it is probably safe to say that they have been forced into such actions by your governments actions..AGAIN, I DO NOT condone such behaviour, it is deplorable, but then so to is the illegal occupati
19

,

13/07/2008 15:31:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 15:43:37
Hattie

If men like Obama were in power then there would be no need for young men and women to defend a country that doesnt give a t0ss about them. Isnt that a better option to constant war and the need to send kids of to their deaths?
I understand the economics of war and I am well aware of how necessary war is in order to maintain the status quo. But that doesnt mean it is the right way to do things now does it?
If Obama wins, then he must be given a chance to show the world what he can do.
21

Itchy,

13/07/2008 15:54:19
#20 Obama is a standard tax-and-spend lefty.
22

,

13/07/2008 15:58:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 15:59:07
Itchy

Ok then. And how would you describe Bush and his pal McCain?
24

,

13/07/2008 16:00:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

Guga II,

Rockall 13/07/2008 16:05:26
#8, #10 and #11 is a troll. He is using my name and location.

How about it Hootsmon censors, why are you allowing him to steal my name? Do something about it.


26

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 16:12:38
Vote SNP

Is it not funny how people tag others to suit their own needs.
Obama is a black politician who is following the same path that all politicians must follow in order to get into the white house. He has won the right to head up his party in the presidential elections and now we have people like Itchy and others saying he is a racist.
hahahahahaha! Man you couldnt make this sh!t up.
I guess I shouldnt laugh though, people like Itchy are serious and I guess that alone is enough reason to worry.

27

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 13/07/2008 16:19:21
#2 is not me.
28

SouthernGent,

13/07/2008 16:22:31
I see several posters here gravitating to Obama strictly based on his stance on Iraq. Please do a little more research on his total platform. Obama will seriously damage the economy of the US and in turn the world with his plans for taxes and social programs. If you think the world economy is suffering now, just wait to see how things will be if Obama is elected. The wars of the world will be miniscule compared to the economic catastrophe that can occur with his tax and spend policies. Economics 101 dictates that you don't revive an economy by raising taxes.

And why does one suppose that 50% of Americans support Obama? Because that 50% know that Obama's redistribution of wealth plan will benefit them - in the short term. Long term - they suffer even more. Too many voters voting for handouts gets Obama elected. Those making the money just go elsewhere.
29

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 16:30:56
Southerngent

All your comments are mere speculation.
But thankfully, the American people will decide! And if they chose Obama then Obama it is.
30

,

13/07/2008 16:37:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
31

SouthernGent,

13/07/2008 16:38:35
Speculation based on historical data. I would say the odds are greater than you might think. Take a look at his tax increases, one by one, and then post to support it. Take a look at France's economical history, or any other socialist countries history and show me the growth. Not very consitent.
32

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 16:48:29
Southern Gent

Time will tell...
33

SouthernGent,

13/07/2008 17:10:05
Media 1

Yes it will, and I truly hope that I'm wrong, but we will all pay if I'm not.
34

Alec in Chicago,

Chicago 13/07/2008 17:28:37
Itchy (and others)

Obama is not a lefty. He is a corporatist millionaire. He did what he had to do to move up in his district in Chicago. He just voted to continue to help Bush continue eviscerating our Constitution with the latest FISA (wiretapping) bill. (He had promised to filibuster.) It was so despicable, even Hillary "the Corporatist Hawk" Clinton voted against it.

I don't think there is a war-funding bill that he voted against. It was so easy to say that he was against the war, back when he was in the state legislature and had no vote on it. Since he's been in Congress, what has he done to end it?

What has he done to protect individual rights?

Nothing done since the period just prior to announcing his candidacy counts: the few things he did then were to fool potential voters.

As a matter of fact, when it comes to voting, he has been absent more often than present during much of his campaign.

Yes, Obama and Clinton got the nod well before the primaries. The real progressives suffered near-complete media blackouts. Obama was asked the weirdest question: just after his keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic Convention, (before he'd been elected to federal office), a reporter asked him whether, if he wwere elected to the US Senate, he would promise to complete his term, no matter how good a run for the presidency might look. (I very nearly dropped my coffee cup. He was nobody!) Exactly whose balloon was being floated?

What's right with Obama? Well, he's not as bad as McCain. (John "Bomb-Bomb-Bomb-Iran" McCain is nuts.)

Tax and spend? Have you seen who he wants to tax? The tiny percentage at the very top - (the ones that got the largest cuts under Bush). Not the middle class, or the working class. All he wants to do is to let the Bush tax cuts expire. If you are against higher taxes, how would you suggest we pay down our massive debt?

Islamofascist a silly word: Islamic countries don't practice fascism - bu
35

Sandi,

San Diego 13/07/2008 17:34:34
Media 1,

"The people" do not want Obama. We want Hillary Clinton, who got more popular votes than any other presidential candidate in history. Just because the Democratic National Committee manipulated the delegate count doesn't change the fact that more people want Hillary Clinton.

Obama is not the nominee yet. With each of his recent changes of heart regarding policies which have been staples of the Democratic Party for many years, he has lost supporters. Independent voters are now leaning towards John McCain and not Obama. His campaign bragged that they would raise $100m in June. They have not "leaked" how much they did raise, but speculation has it at around $30m. A lot of money, but not nearly enough for his goal. Hits on how web site are decreasing by the day. The more you know about him, the less you want him anywhere near the Oval office. He cannot win in November.

On the other hand, even though she is not campaigning, Hillary Clinton's supporters have almost paid off her campaign debt. Eight super delegates moved back to Clinton in the last week alone.

Clinton's name must be put into nomination at the Democratic Convention. There must be a real roll-call vote.
36

Alec in Chicago,

Chicago 13/07/2008 17:35:27
(Got cut off)

but a very large nation that is currently controlled by (phony) Christians does.

Obama: the lesser of two evils.
37

bikewoman,

13/07/2008 18:00:40
35 Sandi

You have to be careful how you phrase your words as you will loose all credibility. Hillary won more popular votes than any other democrat in history as far as the Primaries go. George W. Bush so far holds the record for the most popular votes in a Presidential election from his second run for President.

There are many dim witted Europeans who do not know the facts, the same ho think Obama is qualified to be President.
38

henrymanchester,

UK 13/07/2008 18:02:17
I wonder how overtly racist Obama's policies will be?

Its obvious the man is racist but just how far will he go?

Are we seeing the birth of another Hitler?
39

bikewoman,

13/07/2008 18:04:49
24 Vote SNP

Of course he is a racist! The sad thing is that the media got him where he is. They were brutal to Hillary and never scrutinized Obama. The Democrats are afraid of their own shadows and were afraid to look like racists so they did not ask him tough questions in the beginning, now we are stuck with an incompetent racist on our Democrat ticket.
40

bikewoman,

13/07/2008 18:07:11
38 henrymanchester

Don’t be ridiculous! But he will throw race relations back 30 years and make America a more dangerous place. Not to mention the world a less stable place!
41

bikewoman,

13/07/2008 18:08:16
36 Alec in Chicago

Obama: the worst of two evils.
42

bikewoman,

13/07/2008 18:11:44
#10 Guga lI

Guga wrote - "Kennedy had much more experience in the Senate, he also served in the Navy during WWII. Like Bill says, Obama is an empty suit!"

Correct you are and why is it that intellectually dishonest people want to compare Obama to JFK?
43

henrymanchester,

UK 13/07/2008 18:15:40
What makes you so sure he wont be another Hitler?

Blind hope?

Obama is a very dangerous man, as all racists in political positions are.

I wonder what you'd think a Klansman was in line to be the next president of America?
44

,

13/07/2008 18:24:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

13/07/2008 18:25:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 18:58:16
Bikerwoman

I would be careful about calling Europeans "dim witted" after all, if not for Europeans there would be no America.
And secondly, when you place Bush along side European leaders and you listen to them speak, who do you think is the most dim witted?
47

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 19:04:55
It is impossible to say what Obama will be like. He may turn out to be tremendous, he may not.
But I would rather give him a chance before voting for carnage and massacre man McCain.
48

bikewoman,

13/07/2008 19:07:21
47 Media 1

You must be right, the country that brings most of the medical advances, space travel, and other innovations are just plain stupid!
49

bikewoman,

13/07/2008 19:08:24
Media 1

What a dumb thing to say "But I would rather give him a chance before voting for carnage and massacre man McCain."

Where is your proof???
50

Sandi,

San Diego 13/07/2008 19:10:16
#37, bikewoman,

I see your point, however I did think it was clear that the general election is in November and so has not yet taken place. LOL!

Clinton won more popular votes than any other candidate in any party in the primary season.

Don't forget that six months ago lots of Democratic and independent voters thought Obama was presidential material. Many have changed their minds and wish they could take their votes for him back.

It would be nice if Europeans could try not to feed his already gigantic ego.
51

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 19:22:22
Bikerwoman #49

Where is my proof? Tell me you didnt just say that?
lmfao hahahahahaha
52

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 19:29:35
Bikerwoman #48

I think you may want to visit a medical journal to see which nation brings the world the most medical breakthroughs. You may also want to visit a NASA patent book and look at the names over the last 60 years. You will find that most are European, Germans taking the cake.
That is not to take away from Americans, I am the first to acknowledge what a wonderous nation America is. To think that just over 200 years ago there was nothing there, but now you have what you have, is proof that hard work, dedication and a commitment to advance is all that is needed to progress. Americans must be saluted for their efforts in that regard, but you should not forget that Europeans have been egineering and manufacturing new technologies for thousands of years before America was even a reality.
So some respect where respect is due.
53

Tobermory,

Mull 13/07/2008 19:46:55
#52 Media 1

Once they and or their ancestors have moved to the US they are Americans and no longer Europeans. There must be a reason they choose the US over South Africa!

54

Media 1,

cape town 13/07/2008 19:54:07
#53 Tobermory

You are correct and I agree.
I lived in America for a while when I was younger although it was only for a year. South Africa is the closest thing you will get to America in terms of Entrepreneural opprtunities. Our cinemas and grand casinos are also a leaf out of the American book. Our massive amount of homegrown food chains like Nando's, Spur Steak Ranches, Steers etc are hits around the world. Our middle class and upper class lifestyles are among the best in the world and our beaches and mountains etc hard to beat!
But I think what you are saying is right, an American is an American and I agree. But it is important to note that without Europe none of it would have been possible.
55

Mikey,

13/07/2008 20:52:15
OK, here's the deal. The USA is not a democratic country. Just because you can vote does not make you democratic! Democracy assumes pluralism viz. no pluralism, no democracy!

Ther American people are conned every four years to vote for a stooge put up by big business. Every four years, a whole load of people stand for president and drop out one by one on the way to the conventions. Does this mean that they can't be a good POTUS? Of course not! It just means that they haven't raised enough money to raise their profile.

I'm not sure whether the IRS does an audit of contributions, but if they don't, they should! Anyone found breaking the law on contributions should be banned from seeking public office for life! This should also apply to Scotland, of course!

To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, when it comes to US elections, you CAN fool all of the people all of the time!
56

Silence of the Yams,

13/07/2008 21:30:40
Obama is a complete fraud.
57

Sandi,

San Diego 13/07/2008 21:51:12
#55 Mikey

The IRS doesn't audit overall political donations but the Federal Election Commission does. At their web site - and others - you can easily see who is donating what to whom. I believe the presidential campaigns have to report their June contributions by July 15th, so the numbers should be updated soon.

http://www.fec.gov/index.shtml

58

American,

14/07/2008 01:25:46
Since Europe loves obama so much, let him move there and run for president over there.
59

American,

14/07/2008 01:33:07
#55-mikey-you're a bit clueless. What makes you think big businesses want a liberal, left-winger, tax the rich to feed the immigrants and lazies who dont want to work because it's easier to collect welfare, tax big business even more--with more epa restrictions, and unionize all businesses? The media is the one with the power to persuade, and they are left-wingers!!

However, you are right about (most of) the candidates being stooges.
60

Alec in Chicago,

Chicago 14/07/2008 03:15:14
41 Bikewoman

The worse of two evils? Surely you aren't talking about Obama and McCain?! [If you don't want contacts: don't initiate them.]
61

,

14/07/2008 04:56:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
62

Alec in Chicago,

Chicago 14/07/2008 06:22:54
Guga II

As usual, you have proven that you cannot read - or think. Did you even scan the first part of my post?

I am not only NOT a follower of Obama, but there is much I dislike about him. I have never supported him, and I certainly have never voted for him.

I simply dislike him less than I dislike McCain.

Who is this "bikewoman"?

63

Number 6,

Germany 14/07/2008 09:16:27
It's hilarious watching the Politicians over here try to stop Obama even coming to Germany. They can't be too vocal in their protest because the people really want to see and hear him. Merkel is a suicidal politician anyway. Way out of her depth , she will be gone at the next election, having put "Women in politics" back about 20 years.

Personally I hope he is allowed to speak in the Olyimpic Stadium. The same place Hitler made some of his most momentous speeches. Try as they might to help their republican freinds they are powerless against Obama's huge popularity in Europe.

Only with him as president does America have a chance to be welcomed back into the international community of civilised countries.
64

,

14/07/2008 13:14:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
65

mike - across the pond,

henry manchester 14/07/2008 19:16:31
racist in the whitehouse...

keep in mind, that american government is divided into 3 branches

Legislative.... makes the law (sets the budget) most visable component is congress

Executive... enforces the law... (president, military, etc) spends the money the legislature gives them

Judicial... interprets the law... (supreme court) rules on the applicability and apparent conflicts within the law

separate but equal... obama cannot MAKE racist law, he can order it be enforced in a racist manner, and the Judicial branch can/will strike it down, but he will not MAKE law.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.