Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Obama turns his fire on Republicans as Clinton's bid falters

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 May 2008
BARACK Obama yesterday erased Hillary Clinton's once- imposing lead among superdelegates in their epic race for the Democratic Party nomination and turned his attention to the expected campaign against Republican John McCain.
Barely mentioning Mrs Clinton, Mr Obama said he was open to campaigning with Mr McCain in "town hall" events.

He warned he wouldn't stay away from controversial issues, attacking Mr McCain's proposal for a temporary halt in the federal gasoli
ne tax as a "pander".

And Mr Obama said the election this autumn would be more about specific plans and priorities than questions of political ideology or patriotism.

The turn towards campaigning against Mr McCain came as Mr Obama surpassed Mrs Clinton in the count of superdelegates for the first time this weekend.

Superdelegates are party and elected officials who attend the Democratic National Convention and are free to support whoever they choose, regardless of the results of the primaries. There are nearly 800, and they will vote at the convention in Denver in August. They are key this year because the Democratic race has been so close.

Mrs Clinton started the year with a lead of 169-63. Mr Obama now has 276 endorsements according to the latest tally by US media; Mrs Clinton has 271.5.

In the overall race for the nomination, Mr Obama has 1,864.5 delegates against Mrs Clinton's 1,697, according to the latest polls. A total of 2,025 is needed to secure the nomination.

Reflecting his new focus on campaigning against Mr McCain rather than Mrs Clinton, Mr Obama is visiting states without upcoming primaries.

He said he would soon visit Michigan and Florida, whose primaries were essentially nullified by party disputes. He is set to visit Missouri tomorrow.

During a brief campaign stop in Oregon, Mr Obama took questions about the likely outlines of a contest against Mr McCain.

Mr Obama said: "I think this is going to be a very concrete contest around very specific plans for how we improve the lives of Americans and our vision for the future.

"It is going to have to do with who has a plan to provide relief to people when it comes to their gas prices, who has a real plan to make sure that everybody has health insurance, who's got a real plan to deal with college affordability."

Mr Obama said Mr McCain has received "a free pass" while his own battle with Mrs Clinton for the Democratic nomination has raged on.

And he said that Mr McCain "has a straight-talker image, but it's not clear that lately he's been following through on that image. I mean, this gas tax holiday was a pander."

Although party leaders feel it is only a matter of time before the former first lady must concede defeat, on Saturday Mrs Clinton held a campaign fundraiser in New York.

"Let's keep going, stay with me, this is a great adventure and we're going to make history," she told the crowd.

Mrs Clinton is tipped to win tomorrow's primary in West Virginia, where polls show her leading Mr Obama by as much as 40 percentage points in a state where her strongest supporters – white working-class voters – make up a substantial portion of the Democratic electorate.

However, that will probably be one of her last hurrahs.

Mrs Clinton has struggled to raise money in recent weeks, and was set back further last week when she achieved only a narrow win in Indiana while Mr Obama won convincingly in North Carolina. Mrs Clinton has insisted she will remain in the race until the last of the nominating contests is waged in early June.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 May 2008 9:22 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Silence of the Yams,

12/05/2008 00:08:07
Shoddy journalism! Hillary is going to wipe the floor with him in West Virginia, Kentucky, and Puerto Rico.
2

Scullion,

Canada 12/05/2008 01:48:48
I think the poster above is a bit optimistic about Hillary's future but there's no doubt that she captured some important large states (California, NY and Pennsylvania). I don't think Clinton and Obama have created an unbridgeable gulf with each other. Hillary would be wise to concede if promised the vice-presidential post. This would be an excellent and refreshing change in U.S. politics. I believe it would profoundly shake up the usually politically apathetic American population this November.
3

,

12/05/2008 03:14:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

somerferg,

Perth 12/05/2008 04:36:05

Come on Hillary . Don't like Obama, don't like McCain. Rodham-Clinton will make a better President.
5

LXG,

Oregon, USA 12/05/2008 05:24:08
So Hillary Clinton is going to win West Virginia? Big deal! It is the second poorest state in the U.S., it is white and poor. Obama appeals to many groups, typically in overwhelming fashion among better educated, young voters. Mrs. Clinton, who wants to stay in the contest so she can get her more than $11 million back (from her loans to her campaign) is totally out of funds. She had such a lead in money and superdelegates and could not run her campaign with any concept that there was a challenge. If she can't run a campaign against a young Senator who was literally unheard of, among Democrats, where she and her husband have been icons.....just how could she ever win a general election. The plodding, slow footed, Hillary Campaign, with turnover after turnover in their staff, and superdelegates leaving her because of her lies and racist approach is history, as her delusional campaign goes on.

She has NO chance. Puerto Rico doesn't vote in the election. Oregon will put Obama over the top, but he really will not need any more votes or delegates. Hillary and Bill are toast.
6

Itchy,

Lochgelly 12/05/2008 06:55:31
"attacking Mr McCain's proposal for a temporary halt in the federal gasoliADVERTISEMENTne tax as a "pander"."

Indeed, why 'pander' to the taxpayer, Obama? It's not as if the taxpayer pays your wages, after all.

This is his real achilles heel, his lust for tax-and-spend, not his colour.
7

Alec in Chicago,

Chicago 12/05/2008 12:18:54
6 Itchy

Spend, yes! He and his colleagues have given that lousy Bush everything he's asked for - and more.

On the other hand, tax and spend would be one big step up from borrow and spend.

No, I'm not an Obama supporter. I'm a progressive.
8

Itchy,

12/05/2008 12:24:24
I know what a progressive is. It is a euphemism for fascist.
9

Sandi,

San Diego 12/05/2008 14:53:23
Oregon will not put Obama "over the top". The "top" is 2206 delegates. Neither candidate has that.

"It is the second poorest state in the U.S., it is white and poor. Obama appeals to many groups, typically in overwhelming fashion among better educated, young voters"

This quote shows exactly why Obama will not win. He doesn't care about poor white people, older white people, women. These groups are a huge number of voters in the US. Just as well he doesn't think he needs them and forget "unity", few of them will be voting for Obama in November if he is the candidate.

No Democrat has won the presidency since 1906 without carrying W. Virginia. Bill Clinton carried it twice, then the state voted for George W. Bush twice. Hillary Clinton will win by a huge margin, and also in Kentucky-despite the Obama campaign's efforts at suppressing the vote in W. Virginia by making phone calls to voters telling them the primaries are over.

Both Florida and Michigan will be counted, but Obama can skip both as neither will vote for him in the general election. Florida will vote for Clinton, though.

Hillary Clinton can and would win against McCain, Obama would not.
10

mike - across the pond,

lxg 12/05/2008 15:21:04
from somebody who spent 40 years just north of the "thanks for just visiting" state....

Oregon will NOT put obama over the top... there are not enough ELECTED delegates left... obama cant win outright... it will be the super delegates who turn the trick for him... which means all you subjects of the DNC will be wearing black in mid november, AGAIN... because we CITIZENS of the US will not vote your latest "offering" to a residence on Pennsylvania Avenue....

Hillaries problem wasnt the vote, it was the caucases... where the DNC allowed anything with a pulse to come and influence the "vote"... the US may have its problems, however in november 120 million americans will stand in remarkably silent voting booths, all by themselves and vote... nobody there screaming "o-ba-ma... o-ba-ma..."...

Hillary will not take the VP slot.... she is aware that it is far too trivial of a position for her ambitions... can YOU immagine hillary having her "council" overridden by MICHELLE Obama? she's BEEN there... she KNOWS how quickly her voice would become trivial....
11

Sandi,

San Diego 12/05/2008 17:07:31
#10 Mike,

You're correct that the caucuses were a problem. A lot of irregular, un-democratic activity went on there, plus a much-reported serious amount of bullying by Obama campaign workers and on severa occasions, shutting out of Clinton supporters from the caucus room/hall. I have also heard that in some places, the area for Clinton supporters to gather was almost impossible to find-in one hall!- and that they were told they could leave once they had signed in. That meant that by the time the caucus got to the point of assiging delegates, there weren't enough Clinton supporters left to be delegates.

I totally agree that Hillary should not, and will not, be VP. I don't think she has any interest in it. She has more power as a US Senator than she'd have as VP.

I hope your description of voting in November is accurate. Did you see the You Tube of a voting hall in Indiana?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u22NK8S3t10&feature=related
12

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 12/05/2008 18:36:24
3 It's My Turn

We have MUCH to brag about in Canada and MUCH MORE than you in the Boarders (Borders?).

I won't start because it would take up too much space in this thread whilst your contribution about what to brag about would take a sentence or two - ok, I will GIVE you three sentences to brag IF you could find something to boast about.
13

mike - across the pond,

timmy... timmy timmy 12/05/2008 19:08:52
you have things to brag about? really?

what would those be

the 40K "known" immigrants you cant find? (HINT: they are probably NOT on your side of our shared border...)

maybe its the stellar health care program you have...

1) ignore the fact that you cant afford this stellar health care plan

2) ignore the fact that you cant keep doctors on your side of the border....

3) ignore the FACT that if you catch cancer you get on a waiting list for a treatment that you may not live long enough to actually GET the treatment you need

why do I want this health care system on MY side of the border?

maybe its the wide open spaces.... yeah well, 80% of your population lives within 100 miles of the border... so if its SOOOO great why dont you move further north??? oh, thats right... you dont want to be TOO far from medical care.... lol

you're "bi-lingual"? great they're french spawn... wink-wink nudge-nudge...
14

Alec in Chicago,

Chicago 12/05/2008 19:16:55
8 Itchy

No, those are the neocons.
15

John Blackley,

Florida 12/05/2008 19:46:52
I agree with Obama about the gasoline tax holiday being a pander and nothing short of sheer demagoguery. There is nothing in law to force gas stations to reduce the price of gas by the amount of tax being 'forgiven' and the full tax-amount would never be waived as the cost of working out how to account for the waived amount would have to be collected.

Pure flim-flam and posturing.

Oh, and as for the commenter above who expects Obama to be a bog-spending president, he would have to be prodigious indeed to outdo the current occupant of the White House. At least Obama might spend the money on Americans.
16

John Blackley,

Florida 12/05/2008 20:32:27
I beg your pardon. The comment of mine above should read, "big-spending president".

Although, on re-reading, I'm not sure I was wrong.
17

Itchy,

12/05/2008 20:34:16
#14 No. Both you and the Neocons are Fascist. Progressives think the state knows best and do not differ from the Neocons in principle.

#15 give Obama a chance and he probably will outspend Bush.
18

mike - across the pond,

mr blackley.... 12/05/2008 21:30:21
do you know who sets the budget? or are you just spouting ignorace in hopes that nobody will call you on it...

yeah all THREE of these candidates belong to that club... none are going to fix it...

I cant agree more that the "gas tax holiday" concept is a bad idea... it isnt going to happen... congress wont be in session long enough to take care of this at the pump...
19

Stuart 2,

Pennsylvania 13/05/2008 12:31:32
Doesn't make much difference which one wins the democrat nomination. Both are socialist and will 1. tax, spend, mandate to the states and ensure that the government raises the children, not the parents.

#18 I know who sets the budget. Under our constitution all monetary bills are to originage within the House of Represenatives and passed with the consent of the Senate. In fact the presiden cannot spend a penny with out congressional approvial.

We Americans like to shorten words and names. We all talk about how the president sends the budget to congress and if congress rejects it, we say that congress rejected the presidents budget. That is just how we talk and is confusing to citizens of other countries. The president sends a budget request. He is asking congress to approve the funds he believes needed to run the country and to pay for his programs. We seemed to have not only droped the word request but forgot about it. The house has every legal right to ignore the president's request and rewrite it. It could be political suciside.

So who are the big spenders? Congress is. If the president would veto every bill that has pork in it there wouldn't be any bills enacted into law. I read a lot of those bills, you can too. In each one there is an article for funding the bill. Also you will notice that "and for other funds". That is where the pork fits in. Today we call it tick marks. Those so called tick marks are added when the bill comes up for a final vote. The represenatives and senators don't even know which ones, how many or the cost of them are added when they vote.

Spenders: Obama, I don't know his record. Clinton: Her biggest success in the senate is pork for State of New York and NYC. McCain, He have a very clean record on pork. In fact in all the years of being a senator he has asked for very little if any at all.
20

Stuart 2,

Pennsylvania 13/05/2008 12:34:42
Sorry, looks as if some of my keys are sticking. Not the best speller but I can do better than that.
21

57Nomad,

california 14/05/2008 01:12:56
The article headline says the O is 'turning his fire' on Republicans. But, the article itself shows no such thing. If ridiculing lowering gas taxes is 'pandering' he is certainly out of touch with everyone who drives a car. This is his 'fire'?

He'd better come up with something a little stronger than that. Especially when he follows it up with health care and education because exactly the same charge of pandering can be made in both those cases. If he is concerned about education then he should forget about affordable colleges and try to figure out how to fix the K-12 system or we won't have any students qualified to go to college.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.