Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Obama names treasury secretary

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 November 2008
PRESIDENT-ELECT Barack Obama named the president of the New York Federal Reserve as his treasury secretary today.
Timothy Geithner, whose nomination will need to be confirmed by the US Senate, will take over from Hank Paulson and assume chief responsibility for tackling the most serious economic crisis since the Great Depression.

The statement, which will be followed by a press conference, came just hours after incumbent President George Bush told reporters he had talked with the president-elect over the weekend about rescuing stricken US bank Citigroup.

In the statement, Mr Obama said he and vice president-elect Joe Biden had "assembled an economic team with the vision and expertise to stabilise our economy, create jobs, and get America back on track".

"Even as we face great economic challenges, we know that great opportunity is at hand – if we act swiftly and boldly," Mr Obama said.

"That's the mission our economic team will take on."

Lawrence Summers, the former treasury secretary under Bill Clinton, was also named as director of the National Economic Council.

At a press conference in Chicago, Mr Obama said the US was "facing an economic crisis of historic proportions".

"If we do not act swiftly and boldly, most experts now believe that we could lose millions of jobs next year," he said.

"While we can't underestimate the challenges we face, we also can't underestimate our capacity to overcome them – to summon that spirit of determination and optimism that has always defined us, and move forward in a new direction to create new jobs, reform our financial system, and fuel long-term economic growth.

"We know this won't be easy, and it won't happen overnight.
We'll need to bring together the best minds in America to guide us – and that is what I've sought to do in assembling my economic team.

"I've sought leaders who could offer both sound judgment and fresh thinking, both a depth of experience and a wealth of bold new ideas – and most of all, who share my fundamental belief that we cannot have a thriving Wall Street while Main Street suffers; that in this country, we rise and fall as one nation, as one people."

"The reality is that the economic crisis we face is no longer just an American crisis, it is a global crisis – and we will need to reach out to countries around the world to craft a global response," Mr Obama said.

He said Mr Geithner, who has served in senior roles at the US Treasury, the IMF and the New York Fed, "offers not just extensive experience shaping economic policy and managing financial markets – but an unparalleled understanding of our current economic crisis, in all of its depth, complexity and urgency".

"Tim will waste no time getting up to speed," Mr Obama said.

"He will start his first day on the job with a unique insight into the failures of today's markets – and a clear vision of the steps we must take to revive them."

Mr Obama added that rebuilding the US economy would "require action on a great variety of fronts – from education and health care to energy and social security".

"Without sound policies in these areas, we can neither enjoy sustained economic growth nor realise our full potential as a people," he said.

Mr Obama said work would start immediately because the US did not have "a moment to waste" and its economy was "trapped in a vicious cycle".

"The turmoil on Wall Street means a new round of belt-tightening for families and businesses on Main Street – and as folks produce less and consume less, that just deepens the problems in our financial markets," he said.

"These extraordinary stresses on our financial system require extraordinary policy responses."

He also pledged that his administration would "honour the public commitments made by the current administration to address this crisis".

Mr Obama said a recovery plan was needed "for both Wall Street and Main Street" – "a plan that stabilises our financial system and gets credit flowing again, while at the same time addressing our growing foreclosure crisis, helping our struggling auto industry, and creating and saving 2.5 million jobs".

He went on: "It is my hope that the new Congress will begin work on an aggressive economic recovery plan when they convene in early January so that our administration can hit the ground running.

"With our economy in distress, we cannot hesitate or delay."
He said it "won't be easy" and that there were "no shortcuts or quick fixes to this crisis".

"Full recovery won't happen immediately, he said.

"Despite all of this, I am hopeful about the future. I have full confidence in the wisdom and ingenuity of my economic team – and in the hard work, courage and sacrifice of the American people.

"And most of all, I believe deeply in the resilient spirit of this nation.

"I know we can work our way out of this crisis because we've done it before. And I know we will succeed once again if we put aside partisanship and politics and work together, and that is exactly what I intend to do as president."

In his current post in New York, Mr Geithner has played a key role in the government's response to the financial crisis and has worked closely with both Mr Paulson and Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve.

As a Treasury Department official during the Clinton administration, Mr Geithner dealt with international financial crises and played a major part in negotiating assistance packages for South Korea and Brazil.

Today's press conference was only Mr Obama's second since he became America's first black president-elect by beating Republican John McCain on November 4.

He has stayed away from the cameras, working with aides in Chicago as he sets about establishing his first administration which will take over at noon on January 20.

Earlier, after a meeting with Mr Paulson at the Treasury department in Washington, Mr Bush said: "This is a tough situation for America. But we'll recover from it. And the first step to recovery is to safeguard our financial system."

Referring to the rescue of Citigroup, Mr Bush said: "We have made these kind of decisions in the past, made one last night. And if need be, we're going to make these kind of decisions to safeguard our financial system in the future.

"I talked to president-elect Obama about the decision we made.

"I told the American people, and I told the president-elect when I first met him, that any time we were to make a big decision during this transition, he will be informed, as will his team.

"It's important for the American people to know that there is close cooperation. It's important for the American people to know that we will safeguard the financial system as the first step necessary for economic recovery."

Asked about a rescue package for the nation's troubled car industry, Mr Obama said: "We can't allow the auto industry simply to vanish. We've got to make sure it is there and that the workers, and suppliers, and businesses that rely on the auto industry stay in business.

"What I also have said is that we can't just write a blank cheque to the auto industry. Taxpayers can't be expected to pony up more money for an auto industry that has been resistant to change."

He said he was "surprised" the Big Three carmakers – General Motors, Ford and Chrysler – did not have a better plan when they went before the US Congress and that the Congress did the right thing by asking them to go away and come up with a new proposal.

The full article contains 1283 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 November 2008 5:51 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Barack Obama
 
1

Wally,

Psalm 137 (USA) 24/11/2008 21:28:31
The US government is giving I think $309 billion to Citigroup and is receiving in return about $7 billion in stock. similar deals are made with other leading US banks. and the americans collectively are stupid enough to think this is a good deal. I'm not kidding, I live in America, I talk to the Americans, they actually say this. they watch commentators wearing nice clothes and getting good fees on tv tell them that the government is getting stock ownership this time. and they can't tell that $7 billion is not the same as $300 billion.

the new democrat treasury secretary Geithner and the old republican treasury secretary Paulson are like 2 peas in a pod. both were highly paid executives in some of the leading companies benefiting from the bailout madness. then both are brought into government to orchestrate the thefts on behalf of their former employers. I think Paulson may actually be going back to Goldman-Sachs one of the companies that received billions after he leaves government. No doubt Geithner will get his payoff one day too.

in the US media it is being spoken by Geithner and current treasury officials too that geithner is a big supporter of the bailouts, that nothing will change at all. stupid idiot obama supporters said that Obama would jail these criminals. but Obama is joining them.

Democracy is a fraud. the failure of the Americans to make it work conclusively proves this.

2

Wally,

Psalm 137 (USA) 24/11/2008 21:43:00
Here is a bible verse.

"Psalm 137:8 O daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy [shall he be], that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us."

meaning - the empire of later-day babylon will be destroyed just as all the empires built by man have been destroyed eventually. and many of us Americans will be cheering for this even as it happens. though it will mean the destruction of our nation. We are not loyal to the ones that rule us. The nature of the people that rule us is that they are not in any way normal as we people think what normal is. They are a very evil clique that has been given control. I marvel at how people around the world put so much confidence in Obama. The Americans it is documented put far less confidence in him. That is because we understand the nature of the people who rule us far better than the non-Americans do. Our people are portrayed as fools globally. To a certain extent this characterization is accurate. But in defense of my people I will say that the people around the globe are no different. And we are far wiser concerning the nature of those who rule us than the non-Americans are.

Babylon will be destroyed. Wrath and destruction will come our way and to yours’ as well. A tribulation for the people of the world is being built. The people globally will come to know that they cannot even live without god helping them. And each person will be put to a test. when this happens will you humbly accept your position or will you be stubborn and choose to believe in man or in some idol? Man cannot successfully rule here on earth for long, we are being taught that. Judgement will come for all the people of the earth including the living and the dead. The people will be divided up. A change will come, but not provided by Obama. Our maker will put us to a test and provide real change.
3

,

24/11/2008 23:03:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Tobytoo,

Southington, U.S.A. 24/11/2008 23:22:42
#1 Wally
You are so WRONG, all AMERICANS do NOT think that it is a good deal. By the way your Bible Verse does not belong here, keep it for your Church.
5

Postmark-55,

China, 25/11/2008 00:39:37
#1 Wally,
Hey Wally, how's it going?
What you're saying may well be true, but over 50% of your countrymen/women have voted for Obama, including yourself, so now you have to live with that for the next four years. That's why I don't believe in voting for it really means nothing. You guys didn't have much choice as who to vote for, so the majority went with the lesser of the evils, you hope. You know that elections are won by those who make the most and best promises, but they aren't, by law, expected to follow through on those promises, as you are well aware of. Take China, we don't vote and yet we've got things pretty good here, especially if you take into account our large population. Where China has and is making the mistake though is by opening its doors to the West, for with all the good things many more bad things are entering our country. I can see China eventually end up in the same mess as you guys if our government doesn't control what's coming in. The West knocks us for having restrictions in place but they are there for good reasons, look at your own country where all restrictions were lifted and after that 'free for all' you guys find yourself in a hell of a mess.
6

,

25/11/2008 01:40:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

25/11/2008 02:06:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

First Virginian,

USA 25/11/2008 03:19:32
#1 Wally

Don't forget that Thomas Jefferson was adamantly opposed to Alexander Hamilton's National Bank in 1791 but Jefferson lost out at that time.

Jefferson didn't throw up his hands and give up on the USA.

In "Jefferson's Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank: 1791" he said:

"The incorporation of a bank, and the powers assumed by this bill, have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States [government/Congress], by the Constitution."

"Can it be thought that the Constitution intended that for a shade or two of convenience, more or less, Congress should be authorized to break down the most ancient and fundamental laws of the several States; such as those against Mortmain, the laws of Alienage, the rules of descent, the acts of distribution, the laws of escheat and forfeiture, the laws of monopoly?"

"Nothing but a necessity invincible by any other means, can justify such a prostitution of laws, which constitute the pillars of our whole system of jurisprudence."

"Will Congress be too strait-laced to carry the Constitution into honest effect, unless they may pass over the foundation-laws of the State government for the slightest convenience of theirs?"

(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-tj.asp/retrieved 11/13/08)

Obviously, Barney Frank and the Democrats in Congress were not honest in following the Constitution, but chose to prostitute their powers to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Well-informed public opinion is already forming a backlash against these culprits that will not let them forget what they did.

Impeachment proceedings were part of Clinton's presidency and could very well be the same for the Obama-Clinton term of office.










9

First Virginian,

USA 25/11/2008 05:13:08
#5 Postmark-55,China

Postmark, no one believes you actually live in China.

It is the West that shouldn't have had anything to do with China.

We've already learned how China's products are tainted and shoddy.

The West has also learned that you are conducting espionage into our military computer systems and our financial/banking computer systems.

Who do you think you are fooling?

We have never trusted you any more than you mistrust the West. Big surprise!
10

Postmark-55,

China, 25/11/2008 09:25:15
#9 First Virginian,
If you actually don't believe that I live in China, why is it that you're whining to me about China and its ways?
You say that the West has learned that 'you' are conducting espionage into our military computer systems and our financial/banking computer systems. Now what I want to know is if that 'you' is me or China?
If the Pentagon and all your financial institutions are stupid enough to have their computers hacked into then they fully deserve it.
I know that I don't do any on-line banking and I don't divulge anything private over the computer, but then again, I have common sense, obviously your ever too arrogant Pentagon and financial institutions don't have any common sense.
What location would you like for me to type in the location slot? Is it OK by you if I keep displaying China. That is where I live and work after all and that is also where my very pregnant wife lives. I live in the Kang Qiao district of Shanghai, if that makes it easier for you to believe. It is actually more of a district of Nan Hui but it is all part of the city of Shanghai. I'm not gonna narrow it down any more than that though, for I have common sense enough to know that this info. isn't enough to actually identify me.
11

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 25/11/2008 18:42:46
Postmark, I am doing fine and thanks for your concern. It is very interesting that you live in Shanghai. Shanghai is a huge community. It is beyond our imagination in America. As you know I live in a suburb of Phoenix. We think of it as a big city, but it is small compared to Shanghai. Phoenix community is still very impressive. It is very spread out geographically with a very low population density. We consume more water per capita per day than any other major city in the world. Yet we live in a desert with 5-7 inches of rainfall each year.

Your perception that the votes don't matter is 100% correct in my opinion. So true that the chinese government rules today for the benefit of the chinese citizens more so than the US government. As you know it wasn't always so.
12

First Virginian,

USA 25/11/2008 18:58:49
#11 Postmark-55,China

Quote:

"If you actually don't believe that I live in China, why is it that you're whining to me about China and its ways?"

Answer:

Postmark-55, you probably do live in China.

However, you are probably paid by China's government to converse with Americans in order to learn to simulate being an American at a later date.

You are the one "whining" to me about the USA being so inferior to China.

If Americans enjoy having free speech...as Wally has just shown in Post #12...and can participate on an equal basis in the selection of our elected officials by voting, what is that to you?

If you enjoy living in China and having no choice in your leaders, then why do you not relax and be happy with your situation?

You excuse China spying and hacking into the US computer systems but maintain how honorable the Chinese government is at all times.

It is agreed that the US was extremely stupid to want to trade or to have foreign relations with China because no good could ever come from it.

As private individuals should choose their associates carefully, the US is unwise to trust a communist country because communism is an avowed enemy of democratic nations.

This is only common sense.
13

,

25/11/2008 18:58:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

First Virginian,

USA 25/11/2008 19:15:41
Please excuse the double-posts at #'s 13 and 14.

Have no idea what wrong button got pushed.
15

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 25/11/2008 21:09:04
First Virginian, the double-post thing in 13 & 14 is primarilly a programming flaw. This flaw is very common on discussion boards - though I've seen how some programmers have been able to prevent it.

When you press that 'post comment' button it may go through and post even though you don't have evidence in front of you. and then you punch the button again and it does so again.
16

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 26/11/2008 04:43:44
#13 First Virginian,
You're like the other ones who at first question me living in China, next they accuse me of being a paid informant to the Chinese government.
I live here and I work here, but I am not employed by the Chinese government to state my opinions in foreign newspapers. I cannot read nor can I write Chinese so I read foreign newspapers instead and I comment only in the International sections of foreign newspapers. I defend China for I truly love this country and its great citizens and I will come to its defence whenever necessary. I am married to a lovely woman who is Chinese and we are expecting a baby in about 6 week's time and because I have a family here I love China even more than before. I have a good job, I came here by invitation and I will live out the rest of my life here. I have no intentions of ever returning to Canada, not even for a visit.
I also never excused China for spying on you, so please read my statement again where you claim that I did. You can find my statement at post #11, where I clearly stated that
"If the Pentagon and all your financial institutions are stupid enough to have their computers hacked into then they fully deserve it."
17

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 26/11/2008 04:47:51
#12 Wally,
You are right Wally, the pendulum has swung the other way and China is the country to be in, it is great and it's future is even greater and I hope that China can continue in its successfull development for many years to come.
Best of luck to you over there in the US, you deserve better and I hope that you can ride out the storm.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.