Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Obama backtracked on policy praised by Brown, claims McCain blog



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 September 2008
BARACK Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate, has changed his position on the housing policy praised by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the McCain campaign said today.
Michael Goldfarb, a spokesman for Mr Obama's Republican rival John McCain said Mr Brown's "coveted endorsement" was bound to highlight that Mr Obama "seems to have changed his position" last month.

Downing Street denied Conservative accusations yesterday that Mr Brown was taking sides in the US presidential election after he praised Mr Obama's proposals to help families facing repossession.

In a blog entry entitled The Coveted Gordon Brown Endorsement on the McCain-Sarah Palin campaign website (click here to read it in full), Mr Goldfarb said: "Far be it from this campaign to underestimate the value of an endorsement from British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, but there is one slightly embarrassing detail that this endorsement is bound to highlight.

"According to the report, Brown's endorsement was tied to a specific policy ... 'a Foreclosure Prevention Fund to increase emergency pre-foreclosure counselling, and help families facing repossession'.

"Obama had championed a Foreclosure Prevention Fund, but sometime late last month he seems to have ... changed his position."

Mr Goldfarb said that, according to Versionista, a programme that allows the McCain-Palin campaign to track changes to Mr Obama's website, "Senator Obama quietly erased any mention of a Foreclosure Prevention Fund in late August".

He went on: "No new programme was offered in its stead.

"Whether this will cause Prime Minister Brown to rethink his support for Senator Obama remains unclear, but perhaps it will cause the press to ask a few more questions of Senator Obama and his plans to magically solve the housing crisis through higher taxes."

Writing in the Parliamentary Monitor magazine, Mr Brown said the Democrats were the party in America who were developing ideas to help people through the current economic difficulties.

He cited Mr Obama's proposals to help families facing repossession, but did not mention Republican candidate John McCain.

It was reported that a member of Mr McCain's campaign team contacted the British Embassy in Washington DC to express concern about the article.

A spokesman for the British Embassy said they did not comment on their conversations with the campaigns.

Shadow foreign secretary William Hague said the Prime Minister should not do anything which suggested he was taking sides, as he would have to work with whichever candidate won November's election. He called on Mr Brown to explain why he "appeared to be favouring the Democrats".

In his article, Mr Brown said that around the world "progressive" politicians were grappling with the challenges of rising food and oil prices and the changes wrought by globalisation.

He added: "In the electrifying US presidential campaign, it is the Democrats who are generating the ideas to help people through more difficult times.

"To help prevent people from losing their home, Barack Obama has proposed a Foreclosure Prevention Fund to increase emergency pre-foreclosure counselling, and help families facing repossession."

Mr Hague said: "A responsible British Prime Minister needs to be ready to work with either presidential candidate after the US election, and should neither take sides nor be seen to be taking sides.

"Gordon Brown needs to make clear why he appeared to be favouring the Democrats in this article and to explain whether this was his deliberate intention or a careless mistake."

Downing Street denied Mr Brown was taking sides in the US election.
A No 10 spokesman pointed out that Mr Brown had met Mr McCain both in London and the US this year, just as he has met Mr Obama.

"The PM is not endorsing a candidate, and never would," said the spokesman.

"As he has made clear when asked on a number of occasions, the election is a matter for the American people, and he looks forward to working closely with whoever is the next President across a range of areas of common interest.

"This was an article written ahead of the party conferences in Britain and talks about some of the measures being taken around the world by centre-left political parties to deal with the current global economic challenges."

Mr Brown welcomed Mr McCain to 10 Downing Street in March before he was nominated as Republican candidate for the presidency.

The full article contains 721 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 10/09/2008 16:27:24
It's not the first and won't be the last policy Obama has backtracked on.. his position changes with the wind.(the hot air he speaks at every opportunity).
2

Frank Brady,

10/09/2008 17:32:50
Why the British Labour PM (who is heading for the door)should be taking sides in a US presidential election is hardly surprising. Nor is it surprising that Obama is now turning out to be just another conventional flip-flopping politician, frightened to take on the powers that be in Chicago machine politics that, along with Rev. Wright and his black liberation congregation, got him started, or to stand up against Democrat special interests and party bosses. What is shocking, however, is his smear against Palin on Tuesday of this week when he implied she is a pig with lipstick.

No wonder non-college educated working class men, white women, and Catholics (because of his extreme positions on abortion), as recent polls indicate, are fleeing him in such large numbers.
3

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 10/09/2008 18:12:02
Two phoneys ideally suited for each other. I have never listened to a Barack speech without thinking "WTF did he just say? Where was the content? How do I separate out his BS from actual policies?". Ditto Brown. Trying to look good is their raison d'etre.

I'm glad the pig with lipstick is giving OB a rough time. He deserves it.
4

SouthernGent,

10/09/2008 19:19:08
Obama flows with the polls. His policies reflect what he thinks the people want to hear. As the polls change, so does he. His record shows him to be the most liberal senator in the Senate. He talks a good game, but his record shows who he really is. He is no where near the center which is what he is now proclaiming.
5

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 10/09/2008 19:33:01
Please please please Gordon Brown keep praising and supporting Obama; you have the inverse Midas touch so you will turn him and his ridiculous campaign to dust.
6

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 10/09/2008 19:38:02
It seems that the Republican Party publicity machine has really swung into action, brimming with confidence after the latest polls. Palin is obviously the factor, in spite of the respect McCain carries across many political viewpoints. The American public appear to have been put under a spell by Palin despite her many shortcomings and radical views. Image, it seems, is everything. She's like a Big Mac: looks really tasty but is actually really unhealthy.
7

Media 1,

cape town 10/09/2008 20:50:05
So the McCain camp are pointing the finger at Obama!
This is very important, very important. It tells us that McCain is on edge and incapable of focussing on his own agenda. He is spellbound by Obama!

McCain will stumble, we all know that! A week is a long time and pretty soon the wheels will come off the McCain cart. He IS a war monger and that kind of stuff tends to scare people in the end!
8

It's life but not as we know it,

The oort Clouds 10/09/2008 21:15:41
#7 I think the bleeding heart liberals know they have had it now. Without the "redneck" vote NO US presidential candidate has ever won.

Choice: Nice gun slinging looksy white woman or bad mouthing liberal coloured candidate who makes sexist insults against white women. Like it or not, whether it is right or not, you do the maths.

http://tinyurl.com/6gkmbm
9

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 10/09/2008 21:34:41
8

"Coloured candidate"?? Are you sure you don't want to say 'negro' or something more offensive.

It seems you have let the 'redneck' prime directive slip.

God / Allah help us if McCain pops it during the next 4 years.
10

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 10/09/2008 21:45:15
#9 I thought "coloured" was the modern term but if it's something else you now prefer (it seems to change weekly these days with the PC brigade), I have no problem with that. The only thing I said is that I object to a so-called presidential candidate calling a white woman a "lipstick pig" because she happens to disagree with his views. That is a sexist remark and very offensive and Obama needs to make a fast unreserved apology for being so offensive.
11

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 10/09/2008 22:32:04
10 'Coloured' was 1960's. Black or African American would do. Don't you know any?

In speaking about 'hockey moms', I think the Palin remark was more offensive:

A dog (pitbull) with lipstick.
12

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 10/09/2008 22:57:45
Andrew BOD

It was meant to mean the intensity of hockey mothers and fans.. You are a dolt, with no sense of humor.
13

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 10/09/2008 23:13:50
Lynne

It was nothing more than a pre-planned soundbite designed to create an image. The humour was secondary.
14

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 10/09/2008 23:24:56
the Democrats just keep the hits coming. They wonder why women are leaving Obama in droves.
It used to be anything negative would be considered racist; now anything derogatory to women is sexist. Obama and Biden just might watch what they have to say about Palin..how many more women do they want to lose?


Today, on the floor of the House of Representatives, liberal Democrat Congressman Steve Cohen (Memphis) equated Barack Obama to Jesus, thereby furthering liberals' absurd belief that Obama is the Chosen One sent to save the world. Then Cohen outrageously compared Sarah Palin to Pontius Pilate.


"If you want change, you want the Democratic Party," said Cohen. "Barack Obama was a community organizer like Jesus, who our minister just prayed about. Pontius Pilate was a governor."


15

ScotLJM,

MI 10/09/2008 23:29:03
It never ceases to amaze me why so many whites are taken in by Barack Obama's rhetoric, and so called charisma, especially people in the south, when a mere forty years ago, practiced apartheid. Is it guilt complex, or just that Obama is the next best thing to avoiding another Bush Party Regime, regardless of Obama's inabilities?
16

Matt there,

somewhere 10/09/2008 23:51:05
What *was* Gordon Brown thinking of? Oh, wait. Let me rephrase that: "Was Gordon thinking? At all?"
17

Eboneesha,

11/09/2008 12:09:18
Obama has no accomplishments. No narrative of note to share with American voters. He was a law professor and legal editor without a single article or essay of note published. He was a community organizer, with no demonstrable contribution. Obama was a state senator with no signature legislation. He has been briefly a U.S. Senator (less than 160 work days), also with little to show for it, mostly voting present since he can't make a decision. The only accomplishment of significance is authoring a book on his favorite topic - himself.
18

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 11/09/2008 21:15:58
2 books
19

Number 6,

Germany 12/09/2008 12:53:52
The republicans continue to have a policy free campaign. Dirt Dirt Dirt. That's all they have , stupid childish points aimed at resonating with the ignorant and racist vote. As we can see here, in a place like Amerivca, that can actually work.

The Liebour party in Scotland are exactly the same, campaigning on stupid , student politics. The difference is , they are being annihilated in Scotland.
Even with a female of the species in charge, they will still be obliterated at the next election.

PS "loved" the big fat white overall wearing redneck
interviewd in a Mid West town who said he would not be voting for Obama because he had been sworn in on the Koran.

That's the level American politics reaches during an election. Pure racist ignorance.
20

Number 6,

Germany 12/09/2008 13:16:07
#17 and #18 demonstate the huge ignorance in America, concerning Obama's legislative achievments. Of course these morons could fingd out all about Obamas political record, IF they wanted to. But they avoid it at all costs, too cowardly to come out of their comfort bubble, in which Obama is a "nobody" and Old Man McCain is a "War hero", this despite sprending a grand total of 20 hrs in the air., for which he was awarded a mind boggling 28 medals. Only in the US.

Go to "vietnamveterans against john mccain" for the full story on this appalling old man.
21

,

07/01/2009 14:19:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.