Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Mugabe's power-sharing deal 'freezes out opposition leader'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 August 2008
ROBERT MUGABE, the Zimbabwean president, has signed a power-sharing deal with a breakaway opposition faction, sidelining leader Morgan Tsvangirai, it was claimed last night.
A senior official from the ruling Zanu-PF party claimed Mr Mugabe had made an agreement with Arthur Mutambara, who heads a faction of Mr Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).

However, there was no official confirmation and confusion surrounded the negotiations in Harare last night.

"No deal has been signed by us," said Welshman Ncube, the secretary-general of the group led by Mr Mutambara.

And Thabo Mbeki, the South African president, who is mediating in the power-sharing talks, told reporters the sides had agreed a deal, but he did not know if it had been signed.

Earlier, Mr Tsvangirai was reported to have left a hotel in the capital after four hours of talks without an agreement on how to divide power.

The Zanu-PF official said Mr Mugabe would form a unity government and convene parliament next week.

"We, and the MDC headed by Mr Mutambara, have signed the agreement. Tsvangirai did not sign the agreement because he is trying to renegotiate issues that we had already agreed on," he was quoted as saying. "We are proceeding, and (Mr Mugabe] is going to form a government of national unity, including members of the opposition."

The official also said that Mr Mugabe had not closed the door on more talks with Mr Tsvangirai, but the ruling party refused to be "held hostage".

The agreement could be a setback to efforts to end the post-election political crisis and may also damage efforts to end an economic catastrophe.

Mr Mutambara was a key player in the power-sharing talks and his small MDC faction's ten seats will give Mr Mugabe sway in parliament.

Tendai Biti, MDC's secretary-general, earlier insisted the talks would continue, but made it clear differences remained. "The talks have not collapsed. It's just a time out," he said.

Asked if there were issues they had failed to resolve, he replied: "There is nothing that cannot be overcome."

Talks began last month after Mr Mugabe's re-election, which was condemned around the world.

Mr Tsvangirai, who won the first presidential election in March pulled out of a run-off in June because of attacks on his supporters.

The talks followed a five-hour meeting on Monday and a marathon session on Sunday that lasted more than 13 hours.

However, a deal with only Mr Mutambara's faction could make it even harder to ease Zimbabwe's political and economic crisis and end western sanctions against the country.

John Makumbe, a Mugabe critic and veteran commentator, said last night: "Morgan Tsvangirai is the main opposition leader, and any agreement that does not include his party will not work for the country. It actually just complicates issues."

Mr Tsvangirai's absence in a new government is also likely to keep investors cautious over a country facing economic ruin, with the world's highest inflation of 2.2 million per cent, chronic food and fuel shortages, and an almost worthless currency.

It is also unlikely to bring an end to western sanctions targeting Mr Mugabe's government.

Western countries had demanded a big role for Mr Tsvangirai, on the grounds that he had won the first round of elections but pulled out of the run-off.

PROFILE

ARTHUR Mutambara, born in May 1966, is a former student leader who is recognised as one of Africa's most prominent scientists.

While at the University of Zimbabwe in the late 1980s, he led the student opposition to the ruling Zanu-PF.

After completing his doctorate at Oxford University he went on to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and became professor at several other universities in the United States.

He is a former Rhodes scholar and robotics and mechatronics professor.

Mr Mutambara was arrested in June this year for criticising Robert Mugabe's handling of the March elections, in an article in a privately-owned weekly, the Standard.

The breakaway faction of the MDC which he now leads was formed in 2005 after a dispute over whether or not to participate in the March 2005 parliamentary election. He was elected its head in February 2006 – a move described by MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai as a "nullity".

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 August 2008 12:53 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Zimbabwe
 
1

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 13/08/2008 05:49:13
Mbeki is denying this deal.....
2

Media 1,

cape town 13/08/2008 07:56:05
Mugabe is the most afraid politician in the world right now. You need to remember that his sole intention for hanging onto power is to save himself from prosecution for crimes against humanity. He is for all intent and purposes, a scared old man.

With regards to Mbeki, he is our President and he has failed at crime, health, housing, electricity supply, safety and security and a host of other simple tasks.

There is a pre disposition for Africans to fail, it can be seen in the state of their affairs throughout the continent of Africa, Haiti and most black communities the world over. There seems to be no attempt to uplift the community!
Whether that is a result of a history that comes with no innovation or invention is up for debate, but the fact remains that most communities governed by Africans are usually littered with problems.
We need to remember that Mugabe and the ANC like most African leaders are not polticians, they are freedom fighters who obtained their freedom and were then put in charge of a monster they and their colleagues had no idea how to manage.
They dont take a position in government for a constitutional term, they take ownership of the country and ignore the constitution and when they do so they usually receive the backing of neighbouring states because they too act in the same manner.

I am not so sure there is a solution to the African problem. And if Africans cannot be bothered to pick themselves up, how can anyone else do it for them?
3

Scotish Exile,

13/08/2008 08:16:44
perhaps if Morgan Tsvangirai hadn't pulled out of the last election...?
4

Derek Emery,

Midlands 13/08/2008 08:39:29
Just how much power will Mugabe actually lose? He's unlikely to agree to any deal that does not give him a commanding position.
5

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 08:45:08
Point of correction, the article states that the MDC split over participation in parliamentary elections in 2005, actually it was contention over SENATORIAL elections.

The fact that there is no agreement with all parties is a sad thing as Zimbabweans were really looking forward to a new dispensation in which political leaders would cease hostilities and direct their efforts at solving the economic crisis in the country.

And this coming together should not have been at the behest of the international community whom I don't think introduced sanctions in sincerity for the Zimbabwean cause.
6

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 08:54:20
#2 Media 1,

"There is a pre disposition for Africans to fail, it can be seen in the state of their affairs throughout the continent of Africa, Haiti and most black communities the world over. There seems to be no attempt to uplift the community!"

Why do you think there is such a pre-disposition for Africans and Blacks to failure Media 1? Please enlighten us, perhaps with such knowledge we can come up with a realistic solution to save Africans from themselves. I'm dead serious.
7

Media 1,

cape town 13/08/2008 09:42:04
Gulliver #6

As I said in my earlier post, I am not sure how one would solve this problem.
There was a psychologist on the radio the other day who said that in South Africa, it is normal for a large number of white people to complain, but that most black people didnt complain. He said that black people should begin complaining because they deserve much better than they are getting.

I think his point was that the white community are so used to their communities and nations running in an orderly fashion, so now that everything is eroding they are complaining, whereas many black people are led to believe that they owe the ANC something for bringing them freedom and therefore, kind of hold back when it comes to demanding more from the government.
The ANC demand respect for fighting for freedom, but do nothing to earn it now that they are in power and it seems that only the white community hold them to task.
It is very difficult to find a solution! Africa was tribal, and very successful at being tribal. When the Europeans arrived they changes all that and we cannot return to such days.
I suppose the question is, " Is AFRICA obliged to run the way the west is run in terms of democracy and economy"?
I dont know the answer to that. But I guess if you have leaders taking oaths in accordance with a constitution they should be mature enough to honour that oath.
8

Griffe,

13/08/2008 10:03:02
There is only one way to deal with this treacherour rat.
9

drunken proffet,

Tassy 13/08/2008 10:26:35
I agree with Media one that the people's future should lie with the Tribal Chief and his elders. There is no problem with developing a Pan African Congress to tackle the problems that have developed from Western influence. Maybe a different way of doing it, but when they invented decmocracy one of the good lads got invited to top himself. What a bummer.
10

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 10:40:36
# 7 Media 1,

Thanks for sharing.

On your point about disregard for upliftment of the community, I can say I AGREE WITH YOU to some extent, especially if you read this article on Mugabe where he spoke at length concerning some of the things that were happening in Zimbabwe. The things he lists as achievements especially in the last paragraph of this article are complete hogwash!!

http://www.africasia.com/archive/na/00_06/cover_story.htm

Coming back to the subject of failed democracies in Africa.. I believe there is something wrong with politics in Africa and it is partly historical (both colonial and pre-colonial), partly religious and partly economic. However, I do not believe it is something PERCULIAR to people of black skin. We have classic examples of failed democracies in the Balkans, Asia, South America, and even parts of Europe.

Different civilizations, societies and races have had their rises and falls, it'a normal cycle the Babylonian empire, The Egyptian Empire, The Roman Empire, The Ottoman Empire, The Samurais etc. The present democracies that are used as icons e.g., the US did not just wake up one day with everything running smoothly for everyone. They have evolved over time, through the fight against Slavery, the American Civil War, fight against racism, etc. Looking at a static snapshot say in 1770 one could say the US was not a good democracy. However, democracy & good governance is a process not a destination. To ascribe certain failures to colour of skin is being oversimplistic at best...
11

Media 1,

cape town 13/08/2008 11:28:29
Gulliver

I agree wholeheartedly that people of colour are more than capable of attaining success, no one race group has a monopoly on intelligence. But as societies are concerned there is a vast difference in the way that each race runs or manages their respective communities.

I also agree that throughout time various empires have risen and fallen, but we live in this era and for the past 500 years Africa has been going backwards. Now I agree that much of that failure has to do with colonisation, but what I cannot excuse is the day to day incompetence that is rife in African governments.

Living in Africa I am exposed to levels of incompetence so drastically ignorant it is difficult to not become frustrated. Our minster of health has told millions that beetroot and garlic are the best cures for aids. Take that same sort of thinking and apply it to almost every ministerial position and you begin to understand the problem..

Living in Africa and reading about Africa are two very different things. It is hell of a frustrating to say the least, but we keep on going in the hope that it will all come right one day.
12

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 12:26:59
Media,

Thank you for that analysis. By and large we are agreed on the fact that people cannot be exhonerated simply because of the Slave Trade and Colonialism. However, I think what explains the "african" patience and tones down their criticism when they look at young democracies led by Mbeki, Chissano, Dos Antos, etc, is that people ask what is the legacy are it is they are inheriting? Did their predecesors (Rhodes, Smiths, Bothas, etc.) do any better for the upliftment of the community?

However, the liberation generations are fading away and they (revolutionary leaders) have to realize that people are being born today who have no idea what life was like under aparthied. They will have possibly experienced a better life post independence which subsequently becomes the standard against which they are judged.

The major problem with these lads is that they tend to be DISHONEST leaders and thus they cannot escape blame on their part in the present scenario despite them inheriting a less than desirable system.

In addition, many of them (leaders) still believe in the precolonial systems of governance where we had monarchs ruling the country. That's why they don't take being elected into office as a mandate to SERVE with accountability, transparency, have an exit plan, etc..but take it as a mandate to RULE perpetually like a king. However, other civilizations have gone through this kind of phase, we still have the hangover of this system of governance even in the UK today from the Feudal-Serf system. Some people are being called Lords in this day and age!! Anyway, so long we have a common understanding that systems are dynamic, with time they will improve.

I like what Media said, there is a world of a difference between living in Africa and reading about Africa, just as there is a difference between living in Zim and reading about Zim. Nevertheless, sometimes reading is neccessary provided one is well-researched.

For those who really want to understan
13

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 12:32:43
For those who really want to understand this "animal" called Mugabe and the issues at play in Zimbabwe's political and economic arena I encourage you to read the article at least and then research a bit to come up with more informed opinions (which may be different from mine, but at least there'll be more facts on the table).
14

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 12:38:37
For those who really want to understand this "animal" called Mugabe and the issues at play in Zimbabwe's political and economic arena I encourage you to read the article at least and then research a bit to come up with more informed opinions (which may be different from mine, but at least there'll be more facts on the table).
15

Media 1,

cape town 13/08/2008 12:45:04
Gulliver

You make your point very well indeed and I thank you for your response.

I guess a lot of my frustrations do go back to the apartheid SA that I grew up in. As whites were not privaleged, we were simply part of an economy that was created by whites. In those days there were rich white people and poor white people and when you went for a job you would get it based on your skills, not your colour.(of course in those days black people did not qualify for positions in white companies so that was shocking, but that rule was not the reason that white SA was so first world in almost all areas. We had clean suburbs, we had law and order and we had good schools and good government hospitals. That is not the case in now, not even nearly. You could get a drivers licence in good time and when it arrived it would actually have the correct name on it. You could walk into a government office and meet the most sour faced people, but they were at least able to assist you. We fired people who were not performing, we didnt protect them because they were white. You could go to a police station and report something and the police man would greet you, then he would fill out a docket and assist you. Today you are met with a black face who cannot be bothered helping you, in some cases you need to fill out your own dockets and sometimes can only report one case at a time because the police person on duty is too tired to fill out two case number dockets.
When you got caught speeding in those days you were taken to jail or fined, nowadays they ask you for a bribe and if you cant pay them they may take your passport or better yet put you in a cell with killers and rapists and leave you there while the inmates do what they want with you. The stories are horrendous!
30 000 murders per annum, a president who protects Mugabe and ministers who are completely out of their depth but still have jobs.
It is not eay Gulliver!
White societies just seem to operate better, which is why mos
16

Media 1,

cape town 13/08/2008 12:46:20
White societies just seem to operate better, which is why most African people in SA will holiday in Paris, London, Sydney, New York, Rome etc before going to Luanda, Lusaka, Akkra or Addis Abbaba.
But as I said, we strive for the day when it all comes right.
17

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 12:48:39
http://www.africasia.com/archive/na/00_06/cover_story.htm

It'll greatly help in understanding what has been going on and how it relates to these negotiations with MDC today. For some of us it doesn't come as a surprise that Mugabe and Mutambara came up with an agreement as much as it doesn't surprise us that Tsvangirai did not sign.
18

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 13:27:34
# 15 Media,

You make an excellent point showing how you have arrived at your conclusion. Your background is relevant in how your opinions have been formed that's good in meaningful exchange of ideas.

I don't know about SA but in Zim things certainly seemed okay for the few who had disproportionate access to resources housing, land (4400 owning 70% of the country's fertile land versus 7,000,000 +/- owing 30%), clean water, education, health (1 doctor for 830 Versus 1 doctor for 8,236), etc. Post independence there was a spirited attempt to make things balanced and service levels did improve for those formerly marginalized, however, something went wrong along the way.

I too am shocked at the sharp decline in service levels in Zimbabwe, part of it has to do with poor remuneration linked do declining resources for financing but a significant portion of it comes down to simple mis-management!

Traditional leadership was based on a lineage system..chief advisors to a king would be uncles, nephews, etc. and key military commanders would be in-laws, etc., that's why we still have a lot of that going around. No wonder why indeed graft, incompetence, etc are being tolerated far too long and people do not always get key jobs based on competence.. the politics of patronage is what is destorying most young democracies (even in companies).

The solution is to keep up the pressure so that people change and move over to a corporate way of running things. When you are running a country you're like a CEO, you should dipense your duties with utmost diligence, due care, transparency and avoid conflict of interest. You hire your team, you've got set targets (as per manifesto), when the company doesn't do well your shareholders fire you. Simple. People should keep manifestos of parties and bring them up for final analysis when it's election time to get feedback! This is what I believe will help opposition politics mature much faster and result in better-run countries.
19

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 13/08/2008 14:06:25
In addressing Guliver, I would have to disagree with you and say yes Smith etc were far better at running countries than the current lot of African politicians; both in economic terms and in law and order.
What we are seeing now is a complete reversal of all the good work achieved during those years.

I agree with Media 1's assessment about the incompetence of African leaders and politicians, unfortunately such rot is starting to creep through into all walks of life: A friend of mine, his Uncle was a Professor of some sort at a university in South Africa who, one day, was told he was losing his job. He was to train up a black girl who only had an undergraduate's degree, train a professorship?!?
As you can imagine he resigned and was subsequently replaced by her (with no training). Such stories are rife throughout South Africa, and in my opinion, there is only two things keeping South Africa from becoming Zimbabwe: Mineral wealth and white expertise in the economy.
If S.Africa experienced a similar exodus to the one seen in Zimbabwe in the 1990's and early 2000's its economy too would collapse.
20

Gulliver,

Harare 13/08/2008 15:01:53
# 19,

Of course you'll disagree, and I don't blame you because if I had your background I would say exactly the same thing. But not when you look at the other side of things and consider the issues which I was raising about disproportionate access to and control of resources.

You just have to look at stats like pupil-teacher ratio amongst the different races and you will see the glaring differences. To ignore or deny such facts about colonial administrations does not help to address present day problems.

I do not think SA can boast about having solved its problems if it hasn't redress the marginalisation issues in health, education, access to housing etc. For as long as a significant number of people live in shacks (like the ones we saw on TV when there were floods a coupla' months ago) then there will continue to be real problems. The crime-rate will not go down significantly, racial and xenophobic attacks will continue. South Africa may have attained first-world status at some point, but it was only for a few of it's citizens, the majority might very well still be living in the developing world.
21

écossais at heart,

france 13/08/2008 16:47:30
How refreshing to read sensible and well defended arguments on this thread - it makes a nice change from the usual puerile name-calling matches which too often pollute and discredit the Scotsman forums.
Well done to all of you for this interesting debate.
22

Media 1,

cape town 13/08/2008 19:19:27
I think Mbeki has failed miserably, he has protected Mugabe when he should have dragged him over the coals kicking and screaming!
Mbeki's response that dialogue and quiet diplomacy is the correct approach is certainly mature within context. But when you are aware that you are dealing with a dictator responsible for murder who has stolen election after election and brought his country to its knees, then quiet diplomacy must always be replaced with instant and decisive action aimed at removing the virus as quick as possible.
Mbeki protects the virus because Mbeki is also a virus and unfortunately Africa is littered with such disease.
23

Gere,

Scotland 13/08/2008 19:34:29
Having lived for some 44 years in Africa I know enough about black Africn leaders to know Comrade Mugabe will never share or relinquish power!

Only a coup or outside military intervention can now save the Zimbabwe people of all races!
24

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 13/08/2008 19:40:55
#22
Much like the 1930's policy of appeasment I'd say.... A sad time for a once prosperous country.
25

Media 1,

cape town 13/08/2008 20:18:20
Stu R 20

My biggest fear is the DA becoming more powerful.
Helen Zille is a white woman who fought against apartheid her entire life. She is staunch supporter of democracy and she is fighting the ANC head on. She sees them as a racist, incompetent, useless and utterly pointless party and she is winning votes. The DA are about to take the whole Western Cape, the Eastern Cape and the Northern Cape. Cape Town is perhaps the only city in SA in which you can walk the streets at night. The rest, all ANC territory, you just cant, you will die.
She is showing the ANC how it is done, she is competent, she is intelligent and she understand politics. She is qualified to be in government and she must shake her head in shameful disbelief at most of the ANC representatives.
But here is the problem. Whereas many South Africans see opposition as a good thing for the counry, I see it as a potential trigger fall all out civil war, because under no circumstances will the ANC relinquish power. It will be Zanu PF all over again and that is fact.
The ANC will not tolerate another party in power, and that is so typical of Africa.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.