Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Moldovan separatists who still pine for the arms of their Mother Russia

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 December 2008
IN A softly-lit room, teenagers rise and sing a hymn. Then the leader starts a reading of Russian president Dmitry Medvedev's state of the nation address.
But this is not Russia. It's Trans-Dniester, a tiny, poor separatist province in Moldova where the dream of joining Mother Russia is now stronger than ever.

After the Russian army went into Georgia in August and the Kremlin recognised two Georgian
rebel regions, many in Trans-Dniester are hoping they will be next in line – even though Russia is 430 miles away.

"If only we had one centimetre," of border, says Alyona Arshinova, 23, an activist with the Kremlin-funded youth group Proryv, or Breakthrough. "For me, Russia is everything."

Dmitry Soin, the group leader, is no less fervent, praising Russia's commitment to democracy at a time when the West is criticising it for rolling back democratic reforms. "The winds that are blowing in Russia must start blowing in Trans-Dniester," he tells the meeting.

This sliver of land twice the size of Luxembourg is home to 550,000 people – Russians, Ukrainians and Moldovans. It has proclaimed itself an independent republic, but is not recognised as such by anyone else, including Russia.

The mainly Russian-speaking region used to be part of Soviet Ukraine, but became part of Moldova, a region annexed from Romania shortly before the Second World War. Fearful that Moldova would reunite with Romania after the Soviet collapse and clamp down on the use of the Russian language, Trans- Dniester broke away in 1992 in a war that killed 1,500 people.

As with the Georgian regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, the Kremlin supports Trans-Dniester with cheap gas, monthly £7 stipends to pensioners, 400 peacekeepers and perhaps the most prized gift of all – its maroon passports. Every fifth resident holds a Russian passport.

A trip to Tiraspol, the capital, is a step back in time to the Soviet era. Rusty trolley buses carrying tired passengers break the quiet of an otherwise silent central square. Elderly womenline up to fill plastic bottles with milk on a street corner.

Giant portraits of the region's most industrious workers – as well as the regional president and the mayor of Moscow – adorn the streets. Foreign journalists are shadowed by security services.

Black-robed Orthodox priests bless a Soviet-style military parade marking the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, even though it launched 70 years of vicious, state-sponsored atheism.

Since the war with Georgia sent relations with the West to a Cold War low, Russia has cooled to Trans-Dniester. Some experts say Russia backs Trans-Dniester only to torpedo Moldova's prospective bid to join Nato.

If Moldova pledges not to join the western military alliance, Russia might agree to pressure Trans-Dniester to reach an accommodation with Moldova. But many here, such as Galina Antyufeyeva, an MP, are convinced Trans- Dniester's future lies with its eastern neighbour. "Who today can exist without Russia?" she asks.







The full article contains 504 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 December 2008 9:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 31/12/2008 00:56:53
People need to understand that Russia works in its own way, and these people in this article know that and want to be a part of that. Not everyone wants the American and British way of Democracy and the West needs to respect that.
2

Itchy,

31/12/2008 01:25:11
#1 yes, Genocidal communist dictatorship is the way to go.
3

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 31/12/2008 01:28:59
#2 Itchy,
It's not nice talking about Israel that way, you should know better.
4

,

31/12/2008 02:24:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

James Donald,

Newbridge 31/12/2008 08:00:01
From the 2004 Census in Transnistria:
Moldovans: 31.9%
Russians: 30.3%
Ukrainians: 28.8%
Bulgarians: 2%
Poles: 2%
Gagauz: 1.5%
Jews: 1.3%
Russians were always a small (if significant) minority in this region (only 13.7 in 1926) but the numbers of Russians climbed steadily during the Soviet era as part of their "russification" policy. These ethnic Russians are now used as pawns by Moscow to destabilise neighbouring states.
Belarusians: 1%
Germans: 0.6%
Others: 0.5%
6

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 31/12/2008 08:32:11
#5 James Donald,
Try staying up to date Jimmy, your census figures are nearly 5 years out of date, things change, and the people have spoken, isn't that what Democracy is all about?
7

James Donald,

Newbridge 31/12/2008 09:07:55
6 POSTMARK,-55,Red China - I don't suppose they have a census every year to satisfy pedants but if you are so "up to date" and have more recent census information, be sure to post it. Ethnic Russians are still in a minority (their population is unlikely to have increase much if at all since 2004)so it is hardly a case of "the people have spoken" as I am sure that there are plenty of Moldovans and Ukrainians who do not relish the prospect of being re-incorporated to the Russian Empire. Trans-Dniester has no border with Mother Russia so the "dream" of the minority (nightmare for the rest)it is unlikely to come to pass without the prospect of Starnge Uncle Vlad sending in more troops for some ethnic cleansing Russian style.
8

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 31/12/2008 09:44:41
#7 James Donald,
How nice of you to sidestep the Democracy point I mentioned, but that is typical James Donald style.
You're the one that brought up the census numbers, if you can't do any better than 2004 then don't bother at all.
I also didn't see the Scotsman quote what the Moldovans and Ukrainians had to say, so that is just wild speculation on your part.
I quoted what was reported here, you're speaking out of your ass, again.
Speaking of ethnic cleansing, that is more the style of the British and American governments, just take a look at what's happening in Iraq and Afghanistan and take a look what is happening in the Gaza strip thanks to the American backed and American funded Israelis.
9

,

31/12/2008 10:46:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

James Donald,

Newbridge 31/12/2008 12:41:56
#8 POSTMARK,-55,Red China - You made no point to sidestep just so much argumentative blah; that is so typical of your "style".
The 2004 census was the last one in Transnistria and even the UK only holds a population census every ten years. I am not in a position to hold my own census in Transnistria and you quite obviously have no information of any worth so the 2004 census is the most up to date information available.
Moldovans are closer ethnically to Romanians and there is a strong political movement in Transnistria (Partidul Popular Crestin Democrat) which advocates union with Romania. Ukrainians are not know for their love of Mother Russia so I would say that my contention that those advocating union with Russia are in a minority is an educated guess rather than "wild speculation". Someone is "speaking out of their ass" but it is not me.
You will note that the story is about Transnistria (i'd be surprised if your knowledge of this region extended much beyond this article), not about Britain, Iraq, Afghanistan, USA, Gaza or Israel. You don't have to be a plank all your life; take the day off.
11

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 31/12/2008 12:59:19
#10 James Donald,
Still as amicable as always I see eh Jimmy, that's the spirit.
You are the one that brought up ethnic cleansing, both the article and I didn't.
And I'm sure you're just like Sarah Palin eh, you can see Trans-Dniester from your porch, just like she can see Russia from hers.
Remember the article Jimmy, the one that clearly pointed out that the people have spoken, and they have spoken for a reunion with Russia, not some 'educated guess' from the likes of you.
Try to stick to the facts Jimmy, as tough as that is for someone as narrow minded and as biased about Communism as you are.
You won't grant these people Democracy by scoffing at what they want yet you condemn Communism for denying Democracy.
Either sh!t or get of the pot Jimmy, you ain't fooling anyone.
12

James Donald,

Newbridge 31/12/2008 14:46:35
#11 POSTMARK,-55,Red China - No point in me feining amicability when I do not wish you well; you might think I was being sarcastic.
Correction, I mentioned RUSSIAN ethnic cleansing which has a relevance to the subject of the article. Since you claim to be from North America, you have more in common with Sarah Palin than I - I live in Europe and was aware of the situation in Transnistria. Obviously your over-inflated ego will not allow you to admit that you only learned of the existence of this area when you read the article.
The article is flawed but it certainly does not indicate "that the people have spoken, and they have spoken for a reunion with Russia". For one thing, the area might have been part of the Russian Empire in Tsarist times and part of the Soviet Union as the Moldavian ASSR but it was never part of Russia. If they want to become part of Russia then they can vote for a political party that advocates this but, as Russians only constitute less than a third of the population, there is little prospect of this.
Since you are clearly reading a different article to me (onset of dementia perhaps) perhaps you can indicate where you saw that a majority of Transnistrians want union with Russia? Alternatively, you could just admit that you are an argumentative old scrot who does not know his ars* from his elbow.
13

Mcsnagpile,

31/12/2008 15:07:50
The trouble with Russia is- it has a big brain without a body- and a big body without a brain. If they ever get them together perhaps they will be able to stablise the Ruble.
14

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 31/12/2008 15:15:35
#12 James Donald,
We must indeed be reading different articles,
I, the one printed here.
You, the one in your otherwise empty head.
Democracy lets everyone have their say, majority or otherwise, you have already deprived them of that. Besides, you still don't know how the rest of them would vote, you're still only guessing, and you've never been right in your life before, I'm sure that's the case this time around as well.
Step out of your cellar Jimmy and look East, can you see Trans-Dniester? Or do you even know which way East is Jimmy?
And ethnic cleansing is just that Jimmy, no matter who is responsible, and you're the one who brought ethnic cleansing up, again, not me nor the article.
15

James Donald,

Newbridge 31/12/2008 18:12:24
#14 POSTMARK,-55,Red China - Try reading the article again then, thicko and tell me where it states that a majority of Transnistrians want union with Russia?
I do not require a lecture on democracy from a Communist who does not believe in in and lives in a one-party dictatorship but I can base my "guess" on the last election in 2005 where none of the main candidates advocated union with Russia. Since you have not even heard of this region before today, I can understand your total ignorance if not excuse it. As I said, argumentative old scrot.....with no clue.
16

2dogs in D.C.,

31/12/2008 19:59:41
James,Postit,settle down. You don't win converts with insults-New year comeing may need new ways of seeing other points of view.
17

Tobytoo,

Southington, U.S.A. 31/12/2008 20:35:58
#16
Well said 2dogs and a happy New Year to you.
18

2dogs in D.C.,

31/12/2008 21:16:36
#17-Tobytoo-Same back at ya.Have a better year in '09.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.