Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Medvedev lifts nuclear arms deal hopes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 November 2009
DMITRY Medvedev said yesterday he expected to sign a major new nuclear arms deal with America by the end of the year.
The Russian president said talks were going quickly with the US but other members of the nuclear club, including the UK, France and China, must now join disarmament efforts.

Medvedev said: "We have every chance to agree on a new treaty, determine
new (weapons] levels and control measures and sign a legally obliging document in the end of the year."

Moscow and Washington are negotiating a successor deal to the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty that expires on 5 December. Efforts to slash American and Russian nuclear arsenals have been a major part of US president Barack Obama's push to "reset" relations with Russia, which became tense under the previous administration.

Russian and US diplomats are set to launch another round of negotiations in Geneva tomorrow.

Medvedev made his remarks in a wide-ranging interview with a German news magazine released yesterday. He made a series of noises that will be appreciated in the West, including a heavy hint that Russia will back sanctions against Iran if the Islamic Republic fails to accept a deal designed to prevent it developing nuclear weapons.

While speaking optimistically on a new US-Russian arms deal, Medvedev sounded less upbeat about the prospect of the complete abolition of nuclear weapons.

Obama and Medvedev both said last April they were committed to the eventual goal of a nuclear-free world.

Medvedev told De Spiegel that other nuclear powers have been reluctant to join in disarmament efforts.

"A nuclear-free world is our shared ideal for which we must aspire, but a road to that is difficult," he said. "It takes not just the United States and Russia renouncing nuclear weapons, but other countries as well."

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has also signalled that he would be willing to decommission one of Britain's four Trident submarines as part of multilateral arms talks.

Medvedev appeared to contradict his prime minister and predecessor as president, Vladimir Putin, on Iran.

Putin has warned that the threat of sanctions could thwart talks with Iran.

Medvedev, however, in his interview said it would be better to avoid sanctions, but they couldn't be excluded if there was no progress in the talks.

Russia's communist party, meanwhile, yesterday denounced powerful Putin while cautiously praising Medvedev.

The Communists, who ruled Russia for 74 years, urged Medvedev to come out of the shadow of his premier as they marked the anniversary of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 November 2009 8:15 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

2dogs in D.C.,

08/11/2009 01:47:06
Nuke free world would be nice,but not gonna happen.Treaty's are just paper,nukes on the other hand,tend to burn paper along with everything else.
2

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 08/11/2009 10:09:40
NATO's nuclear missiles (French, UK, US) are no longer targeted on any country, and Chapter 14 of the relevant NATO strategic policy describes their potential use as "very remote". In fact, at a recent high-level conference of NATO and diplomatic representatives I attended it was openly stated that nuclear weapons are now militarily unusable. Their principal remaining uses would seem to be as status symbols or as politico-diplomatic bargaining counters, whether to retain French and UK permanent seats on the UN Security Council or to force concessions in other fields.

Gordon Brown's offer to scrap one the four UK Trident submarines must be seen in the light of that fact that there is no longer any reason why these vessels should put to sea at all. Are we going to incinerate hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in order to teach a rogue government a lesson? To say nothing of a nuclear response to a terrorist attack if they ever get their hands on the technology. Against whom would the response be directed?

We should remember that there is more to WMDs than nukes - the NATO anagram for them is CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear). The United Nations has the progressive abolition of chemical weapons well in hand through a special organisation in The Hague. A similar organisation for biological weapons was prevented by the US Bush administration, but that will come in time. The UN programme for banning all nuclear test explosions as a means of stopping the further development of nuclear weapons has the full support of the present US and Russian governments (see www.ctbto.org). Presidents Obama and Medvedev have stated their mutual goal to be a world with no nuclear weapons at all, and their present negotiations should be seen in that light.
3

Derango,

20/11/2009 06:37:29
#2 Dr. James

Spot on.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.