Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

MPs say US assurances on torture are not reliable



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 July 2008
ASSURANCES from the United States that it does not use torture can no longer be relied on, a report by a group of MPs warned yesterday.
UK ministers have previously been willing to take at face value statements from senior American politicians, including the president, George Bush, that the US does not resort to torture, the House of Commons foreign affairs committee said.

But i
t said that stance should be dropped in the light of CIA admissions it subjected three detainees to "waterboarding", an interrogation technique which David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, said in April this year amounts to torture.

This would have implications for the extradition of prisoners to the US as the UK is a signatory to a United Nations convention barring the return of individuals to states where they are at risk of torture.

During waterboarding, a detainee is bound to a board with their feet raised and cellophane wrapped around his head. Water is then poured on to his face. If uninterrupted, the process would lead to drowning.

In February, Michael McConnell, the US director of national intelligence, told a Senate committee waterboarding was "a legal technique used in a specific set of circumstances".

In March, Mr Bush vetoed a bill which would have banned the practice.



The full article contains 220 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 July 2008 12:24 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 21/07/2008 02:56:37
Finally the English government are waking up to the fact that the war criminal Bush and his government practice and condone torture, in direct and flagrant breach of the Geneval Conventions.

When are the war criminal Broon and Bliar going to condemn the Septics for using torture. Maybe they should do it soon, in mitigation, before they are arrested for war crimes themselves.
2

Neil,

Glasgow 21/07/2008 10:55:08
These are the same MPs who support illegal wars, bombing maternity hospitals, genocide, child sex slavery & the dissection of living innocent teenagers to sell their body parts.

Complete hypocrisy.
3

Number 6,

Germany 21/07/2008 11:33:32
Talk about stating the Obvious. Instead of backing Bush, the UK should be berating them at every turn.
Britain has turned a cowardly blind eye to the USrendition flights , re-fueling on their way to a US torture camp. Unles they want to go down as torture appeasers , the UK goverment will have to keep their distance from the torturers themselves.
4

Gere,

Scotland 21/07/2008 17:07:33
After Iraq if an American happens to greet you with a "Good Morning" you had better first make a prudent check to see if sunrise had indeed occurred before you return the greeting!
5

57Nomad,

california 21/07/2008 20:36:46
Waterboarding was used for sure on Ramzi Binalshibh and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. These men planned the 9/11 actions. Both were waterboarded. Khalid gained some measure of respect from his interrogators by holding out for a couple of minutes. Binalshibh only held out for a few seconds and burst out in tears. Not such a tough guy any more.

These two guys murdered three thousand innocent people and people are complaining because they got water poured into a rag on their face? BFD. People would be less troubled, I think, if they knew this one thing. There will not be two sets of rules, one that they get to play by and one that we have to play by. For instance:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/15/guantanamo.mohammed/index.html

There's a name for people who sit still for that kind of BS. Those people are called "Suckers." Terrorists will be dealt with any way that seems good to us. Don't like it? Tough luck.







6

mike - across the pond,

to the surrender monkeys.... 21/07/2008 22:09:39
the 3 guys 57 mentions...

if this were WW2, they would have been tortured, then killed... nobody would have known the better

if this were during the cold war..... they would have been tortured then killed.... nobody would have known the better....

and when I say tortured.... we're not talking "waterboarding"... we're talking full on, really heinous stuff (like hezbollah and the asians use).... not some "junior high school" scare tactics like "waterboarding"....
7

American,

21/07/2008 23:10:44
#3-six-from germany!!! How many jews do you think would rather have been waterboarded and deprived of sleep instead of starved, oven fried, and chemically showered to death during ww2?

I do wonder what kind of treatment china is going to give anyone who might have info about the bus bombing that recently happened there (2 people killed).
8

MTE,

Edinburgh 22/07/2008 13:40:34
#1 Not sure who the 'English Government' is, but the UK government hasn't woken up to anything just because a few MPs have written a report.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.