Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 13th May 2008

Evening News / Sony Centre Reverse Auction

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Italian builders uncover 2,000-year-old tombs



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

ARCHAEOLOGISTS were yesterday celebrating the discovery of 27 2,000-year-old tombs in Italy's "Valley of the Dead".
The tombs, some dating back to the 7th century BC, were found by chance while builders carried out work.

The whole area was sealed off yesterday and put under police guard to prevent anyone from trying to steal artefacts inside the burial chambe
rs.

Grave robbers, or tombaroli as they are known in Italy, make a lucrative living from selling such objects to museums or private collectors.

Archaeologists say there is also a "good chance" that there may well be other tombs waiting to be discovered. The tombs were discovered at Tarquinia, 50 miles north of Rome in an area named a World Heritage Site by Unesco.

Covering more than 400 acres, the area was the burial ground for the Etruscan tribes who predated the Romans. Maria Tecla Castaldi, an archaeologist, said: "This is the most exciting discovery here in decades. There are frescoes of two figures on the walls, but we need to carry out a proper excavation and search.

"The problem we have is that grave robbers have plundered this area in the last few years, so sometimes we find tombs but they have been there before us. I hope that we have found tombs that are still intact."





The full article contains 227 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 May 2008 10:17 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 08/05/2008 20:22:54
Hello All,

The Scotsman is STILL intellectually challenged, but moreso, now they can't even count!

The title declares that the tombs are 2000 years old, and then in the 2nd paragraph, they clearly state that 'some dating back to the 7th century..'.

I see. The Scotsman apparently can't tell the difference between the numbers 2700 and 2000. I take it then, that the current year is actually 2708 rather than 2008.

Wow, I'd always hoped to see what the future several centuries down the road would be like.

Thanks to the Scotsman, now I know.

Cheers from the Rockies
2

Prospector,

Arizona, USA 09/05/2008 09:10:26
I insist that not all USA readers are so impolite.
3

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 10/05/2008 04:32:37
Hello Prospectors,

I wasn't 'impolite', I was factually accurate and sarcastic.

The sarcasm was added because those at the Scotsman are a Politically Correct Lot, touting their 'support' for freedom of speech, all the while actually suppressing freedom of speech and actually oppressing anyone daring to step outside the PC boundaries the Scotsman has set.

The fact that you were more upset with my sarcasm rather than with the shoddy writing and reporting of the Scotsman, says more about you, than my use of sarcasm says about me.

Wake up and get rid of your PC attitude Arizona; I have supported the GPAA for years, have prospected for years, own a dredge, and know for a fact, that successful Prospectors deal with FACTS, rather than mere subjective desires, to get positive results.

Cheers from the Rockies
4

Anselleigh,

Maine, USA 10/05/2008 14:38:35
Uh, Neanderthal... I think it says "7th century BC" in the article, which is indeed over 2000 years old...
5

Jens Fiederer,

Rochester, NY, USA 10/05/2008 22:02:30
Most of us Americans would actually consider calling somebody, even an organization, "intellectually challenged" impolite.

If we were discussing only the oldest, it should indeed have been rounded up to 3000 years old, but perhaps some were a few hundred years younger.
6

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 11/05/2008 04:43:22
Hey Maine,

You really need to pay attention to the Headline and compare it to your post: the modifier 'over' was NOT used. The same is true for the article itself: the modifier was NOT used.

I stand by the statements in my original post: the Scotsman is continuing to promote shoddy journalism, shoddier editorial review, and you are assisting in that shoddiness.

Words and numbers have specific meanings, how about you acknowledge that fact?

Cheers from the Rockies
7

ArtemisDiana,

Ottawa, Canada 12/05/2008 04:22:14
Mistakes can be made, we are all human, and I would like to say that Neanderthal75 though you are correct about free speech, you should know that you could have been a little more polite. If the mistake about the date bugged you so much, then maybe you should not read the articles from here. So get off your high horse and actually be nice to someone.
8

taedetse,

Massachusetts, USA 12/05/2008 17:08:22
Splitting hairs, although a human trait, is not generally one associated with impolite or rude individuals. Having read the article I am satisfied that the author did, in fact, allude to the tombs as being as much as 2700 years old.

I ask the worldwide community to forgive Neanderthal75's impolitic and unkind comments. He/she doesn't represent the average American. The overwhelming numer of us try to be polite.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.