Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


I'm not too old to serve a little longer, says McCain

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 January 2008
IN AMERICAN politics, John McCain is living proof that you really are only as old as you feel: if the Arizona senator gets to the White House, he will be the United States' oldest president ever: at 72 two years older than Ronald Reagan when he was elected in 1980.
Yet despite running for office in the world's most youth- obsessed culture, he remains front-runner for today's Florida Republican primary election.

"If you can take the haul of a campaign, you can probably manage the White House," said Nancy Sw
allow, 72, a McCain supporter from Lake Wells, Florida. "I think anybody has got to be off their rocker to run for president, because it's a horrible, gruelling thing to do."

Age can raise its head, as when TV pictures showed president Jimmy Carter collapsing while jogging in 1979 and Republican challenger Bob Dole collapsing in 1996: The images of both men never recovered.

Mr McCain, by contrast, rubs in his vigour by appearing on the campaign platforms alongside his 95-year-old mother, Roberta.

The questions come up again and again because of Mr McCain's age and his three bouts with melanoma, an aggressive and potentially deadly form of skin cancer. They came up on Saturday, even in a newspaper endorsement from the St Louis Post-Dispatch.

But Mr McCain is in ceaseless campaign mode. He answers questions from voters at freewheeling town hall meetings; in between stops, he usually fields questions and banters with journalists on his bus.

"Nobody does this. He's amazing that way," said Senator Joseph Lieberman, who wedged himself into the horseshoe-shaped space at the back of Mr McCain's bus on Saturday for an hour and a half. Mr McCain took questions the entire time.

The 2000 Democratic vice presidential nominee and now an independent who has endorsed Mr McCain, Mr Lieberman said he sometimes couldn't help but doze between events.

Aides try to force Mr McCain to take breaks, but aside from an occasional nap on a plane, Mr McCain almost never rests.

Mr McCain stays active outside politics, too; he hiked the Grand Canyon from rim to rim last summer.

"Age really only becomes an issue when something happens and makes you look old," says Philip Klein, a commentator with The American Spectator. "He's been campaigning very rigorously, and he campaigns with his mother, that pushed the idea of longevity."

Mr McCain is emerging as the most likely man to win in Florida today and take the Republican presidential nomination. Some party faithful even hold the hope that, despite the woes of the Bush administration, Republicans may yet hold on to the White House.

As such, Mr McCain is more Comeback Kid than tired old man. He was all but written off last summer when his poll ratings were in single figures, staff deserted him, money ran out and he was reduced to vacuuming his own office.

His dramatic change in fortune owes much to luck, and a little to a fine political judgment. First, the luck. As chairman of the armed services committee in Congress, Mr McCain appeared to be going nowhere last summer by insisting a surge in troop numbers in Iraq might work.

Then, in the autumn, the White House advocated the surge he had been urging and, at least militarily, the policy began to work.

At the same time, the other candidate running on a national security platform, the former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani ran into trouble. He had been the front-runner with a campaign highlighting his own role in the days after the World Trade Centre attacks, but his polls began to dip when New York firefighters accused him of taking undue credit.

The flaws for the other candidates have also begun to bite.

Mike Huckabee won with support from the Christian Right, but his hardline stance on such things as Aids, has been a turn-off for other Republican voters.

The faith question also causes problems for Mr McCain's main challenger, Mitt Romney: As a Mormon, he draws suspicion from both the Christian Right, who are evangelists, and the nonreligious Republicans who fear his faith is extreme.

Other political players have stayed out of this race, fearing that, after the disasters of the Bush administration, the chances of a Republican being elected to the White House are minimal.

Mr McCain, on the other hand, knows that this is his last chance. He is a veteran in campaigning, having entered the Senate in 1987 and campaigned for the nomination, running against Mr Bush, back in 2000.

And far from wearying him, Mr McCain's age appears to have given him wisdom, most of all in reading the mood of the US.

The electorate is governed by a left-right pendulum so obvious that many pundits simply miss it.

Recent times have seen the rightward swing to Ronald Reagan give way to the leftward swing to Bill Clinton before returning right to George Bush. After nearly eight years of Mr Bush, one of US's most accident-prone presidencies, polls show the country ready to swing left once again, or at least towards a fuzzy liberal centre.

And Mr McCain is well-positioned to take advantage. He is conservative, but parades a series of liberal policies often at odds with the Bush administration.

While supporting the war in Iraq, he nevertheless objects to the torture at Guantanamo Bay, and called for the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld, the former defence secretary, after the horrors of Abu Ghraib.

Despite his tirelessness, Mr McCain seemed weary of yet more questions about his age on Saturday on his campaign bus. He tried to bring the issue around to his judgment.

But how old does he feel?

"I'm continuously surprised that I'm on this earth, and so are people who know my life," Mr McCain said. "I have been the most fortunate person that has ever lived. OK? I am the most fortunate person that you will ever know. I've survived in situations that defy all odds. So I am grateful for every single day, and I know that you can't ever live those days over again.

"And I am grateful for the opportunity to serve. That's why you see my line that I use very often – I'd like to serve a little while longer."



The full article contains 1063 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 January 2008 10:20 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

29/01/2008 00:20:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 29/01/2008 01:25:48
he is an ill tempered, liberal with a wish to let illegals stay ......... he would fit in nicely in Scotland
3

,

29/01/2008 01:34:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Dáithí,

San Jose 29/01/2008 03:31:43
His positions are what should be considered. If you agree with his positions then support him. If not, support the candidate that does.

Age has nothing more to do with things than color or sex.
5

Dáithí,

San Jose 29/01/2008 03:38:34
I just finished watching an interview with Willie Brown, ex-Democratic Mayor of San Francisco and ex-Democratic Speaker of the State Assembly.

He was asked - as a Democrat, which Republican do you NOT want to face?

His answer - McCain. The other Republicans are much further to the right, McCain poses a much bigger challenge in the general election because he attracts independents and moderates as well as his core of moderate Republicans.

ABC, Channel 7 News San Francisco interviews Willie Brown -

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/media?id=5920502

6

britfreee,

falkirk 29/01/2008 04:22:33
I support McCain, he will finally make the US more like Europe.
7

Dáithí,

San Jose 29/01/2008 05:10:44
#6 - bf

Really? So you're pro-immigrant, bf? Shall we send Turkey the invite to the EU now? ;)
8

Dáithí,

San Jose 29/01/2008 05:57:57
bf -

I'll be good and play nice since you support the correct teams! ;)

I can remember every election since 1960 (JFK v Nixon) pretty well. The US swings from side-to-side occasionally, but the pendulum manages to average towards the middle most of the time.

The biggest 'reaction', ie, the desire for change, that I ever saw was when American voters passed on the tricky, scheming Nixon/Ford era and voted in Jimmy Carter - a plain, uninspiring but believably honest man.

A BIG difference. The biggest I've ever seen.

I think the same thing will happen again. Americans will go for the change, be it Hillary or Obama - whatever candidate the Democrats select will win.

I say that as a McCain supporter. I also believe that the Democrat winner, like Carter, will be a four year president.

There will be some major event that the Democrat president will be 'overwhelmed' with, unable to muster the appropriate response to, and be voted out because of.

Republicans will work hard and lose and the Democrats will win - but for only 4 years, IMHO.

9

donald,

glasgow 29/01/2008 08:04:00
He has had his chips.
10

donald,

glasgow 29/01/2008 08:04:29
He has had his chips.
11

,

29/01/2008 11:03:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

RCI,

Lanarkshire 29/01/2008 11:57:02
I can imagine the scene just before his swearing the oath of office.

" DO YOU NEED TO GO TO THE TOILET MR McCAIN? "

Seriously, I think he has missed the boat. The strain of the presidency showed on Reagan, it would show on McCain also.
13

,

29/01/2008 13:03:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Aoda,

Pennsylvania Wilds 29/01/2008 14:01:19
Age can be a factor, young inexperienced or older with experience can be both good and bad. Too much has been said about gender, race, religion and now age. Time to put the toys to bed and get to supstantial things.

#6 brit free, there are things I like and also dislike about McCain. One thing for sure that America should NOT become more like Europe. Read European history and Colonial American history and you will see why the constitution was written the way it was. The heritage of the citizens are come from nations from all nations of the world and we have used the infused those cultures and produced the American culture.

Not saying that Europe's culture or government is bad but it is not for the U.S.A. Our framers knew Europe's political history. Thanks Scotland, during your enlightment era you have produced many ideas that we adopted along with the Magna Carte but we took them a couple of steps further.
15

The Fly Fifer,

Fife 29/01/2008 16:08:48
yer ower late # 14, NAFTA was signed into force on Jan 1st 2008 .......... no going back now and not a single American voted for NAFTA and many do not know how far along the lines it is ............
16

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

29/01/2008 20:19:32
I find it shocking how poor the US media are at scrutinising the candidates or covering negative news on their preferred candidate. The removal of posts that show the true picture seem to happen with a regularity on sites such as CNN's that you have to believe there is another agenda going on.

For example, myself and others tried to post the latest polls that show Clinton will win big on Super Duper Tuesday - yet all of them have been pulled. Another example is the fact they allow comments from Obamaites on the various endorsements he has received from the likes of the Kennedy's but do not allow comment on similar endorsements for Hillary.

By the way those polling figures in the Super Duper Tuesday states do not look good for Obama.

California - Clinton leads 49% to Obama's 33%
New York - Clinton leads 56% to Obama's 28%
Massachussets - Clinton leads 59% to Obama's 22%
Alabama - Clinton leads 43% to Obama's 28%
Tennesse - Clinton leads 34% to Obama's 20%
New Jersey - Clinton leads 49% to Obama's 32%
Arizona - Clinton leads 37% to Obama's 27%
Connecticut - Clinton leads 41% to Obama's 27%
Oklahoma - Clinton leads 45% to Obama's 19%
Missouri - Clinton leads 44% to Obama's 31%

Obama is only ahead in 3 states - and one of those is statistically insignificant.

Illinois - Obama leads 51% to Clinton's 22%
Georgia - Obama leads 41% to Clinton's 35%
Colorado - Obama leads 34% to Clinton's 32%

Unless Obama gets a big mo soon (and these polls don't show it) then South Carolina could turn out to be a pyrrhic victory.
17

Dáithí,

San Jose 29/01/2008 20:37:29
#16 - TF

>"I find it shocking how poor the US media are at scrutinizing the candidates or covering negative news on their preferred candidate. The removal of posts that show the true picture seem to happen with a regularity on sites such as CNN's that you have to believe there is another agenda going on."

I think that the one thing to remember about the media is that they are actively trying to create excitement in a race that, as you point out, 'is not that close'.

There's an agenda there, but not a conspiracy of silence, it's an agenda of common purpose - try to make the race as exciting as possible. This will generate interest, which will generate watchers, which will generate advertising revenues - no matter who the candidate.

I agree with your polls and conclusions, I think that Obama has hit his 'high point' and had his day in the sun. The Democratic Party has their candidate already picked out, she was working on it even when she was in the White House.
18

The Fly Fifer,

Fife 29/01/2008 21:50:01
17 yep look at the way they treat Ron Paul,
19

Dáithí,

San Jose 29/01/2008 23:31:18
#18 - Fifer

>"yep look at the way they treat Ron Paul..."

Who???
20

Tyson J.,

29/01/2008 23:36:56
#18: Ron Paul is exactly where he should be 'nowhere', the same place anyone else who chooses to associate themselves with neo-nazis should be.
21

Lynne,

USA 30/01/2008 04:45:42
Clinton won in Fl..and won't have any delegates at the National Convention because the Dems are shooting themself in the foot again.

McCain won in Fl and gets all 57 delegates for the Convention...also Guiliani will be throwing his support and votes McCain's way.
22

Lynne,

USA 30/01/2008 04:55:19
Ron Paul is an Isolationist..who wants to have nothing to do with other countries and their problems. He came to Florida, and in a debate said he wants to get rid of the IRS...ok I can see that.
But this is a state that has many, many, retirees. It is mainly made up of retirees in many areas.. and as "smart" as he thinks he is, he told the people of Florida, that he wants to get rid of Social Security!!

Do you honestly believe that Florida will vote for him?
23

Dáithí,

San Jose 30/01/2008 16:22:53
#22 - Lynne

>"Ron Paul is an Isolationist."

Who???
24

Thomas Paine,

30/01/2008 17:17:24
"I'm not too old to serve a little longer, says McCain". Yeh? Say it to metastatic melanoma dummy!! The only one who would benefit from his presidency will be his vice!! Didn't this nation suffer enough under Alzheimo Ron and his lunetic administration?!
25

American,

30/01/2008 20:44:28
#4-daithi-Its his positions that make me think he's senile. If he wins the nomination, there will be 2 libs running and I will be forced to vote independant.
26

American,

30/01/2008 22:47:12
#16-Federalist-For some reason the media wants obama to win. He is getting free passes in regards to issues-ex: giving drivers licenses to illegal immigrants (he's for it). I can only think that the media is for obama because he voted against the war, whereas hillary voted for.
27

Dáithí,

San Jose 31/01/2008 00:10:01
#25 - American

>"If he wins the nomination, there will be 2 libs running and I will be forced to vote independent."

I know that he's conservative on Iraq (good) and he's sponsored the McCain/Kennedy bill on immigration (pragmatic, IMHO), is immigration the big issue that you are concerned about, or are there others that are of more concern to you?
28

57Nomad,

california 01/02/2008 20:58:36
#24 Thomas Paine

TP said:

""I'm not too old to serve a little longer, says McCain". Yeh? Say it to metastatic melanoma dummy!! The only one who would benefit from his presidency will be his vice!! Didn't this nation suffer enough under Alzheimo Ron and his lunetic administration?!"

When Ronald Reagan was elected in 1980 the Soviet Union was on the march and the smart money was on the USSR to win the cold war. The American economy was in the grip of an economic vice called stagflation. And, in the preceding two years the staff of the American Embassy in Tehran had been held as hostages.

The Soviet Union had begun deployment of their mobile, accurate, SS 20 intermediate range, nuclear tipped, ballistic missiles and were pointing them at Western Europe. In Nicaragua their Sandinista flunkies had hijacked the revolution that over threw one dictator and replaced it with another that was much more oppressive.

The Soviets and Sandinistas were arming, training, and supplying communist rebels in Guatemala, in line with Charles De Gaul's observation that "Central America is an incident on the way to Mexico." They were driving on our southern border and in 1982 they invaded Afghanistan in their drive to the Persian Gulf.

These are some of the basic challenges that faced Reagan as he began his administration. In his first four years he reversed the economic slide and set the stage for the most massive economic expansion in American history.

The minute he was inaugurated the Iranian's gave up the hostages out of fear of what Reagan would do to them. And you, Tom, may belittle him but our enemies didn't. The Stasi's summation went like this. "Ronald Reagan is a stern politician for whom words and deeds are the same thing. He will not stop until America regains it predominant position." There wasn't a single word in their profile indicating the Reagan was the cowboy fool that the liberal elites said he was.

Despite massive left wing protests all over th
29

57Nomad,

california 01/02/2008 21:02:28
#28 contd.

#24 Thomas Paine

TP said:



Despite massive left wing protests all over the world the US deployed the Pershing solid fuel, hyper accurate, nuclear IRBMS and pointed them right back at the Soviets eliminating the advantage they had gained with the SS 20s.

By the time he left office in 1988, the Soviet Union was nearing collapse, the economy was booming and the
Russians were in full retreat everywhere. Ronald Reagan was, along with FDR, the greatest President in the 20th century and stands in the company of the greatest of them all. He is no doubt the greatest man in the second half of the 20th century.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.