Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Free Capercaillie CD

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Head torn off Hitler waxwork in Berlin



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 July 2008
A MAN tore the head from a controversial waxwork figure of Adolf Hitler on the opening day of the new Madame Tussauds museum in Berlin yesterday.
Just minutes after the museum opened, the 41-year-old German pushed aside two security men guarding the figure before ripping off the head in protest at the exhibit, a police spokesman said. The police were alerted and arrested the man.

The waxwor
k figure of a glum-looking Hitler in a mock bunker during the last days of his life was criticised as being in bad taste. A media preview of the new branch of Madame Tussauds on Thursday was overshadowed by a row over the exhibit.

Critics said it was inappropriate to display the Nazi dictator, who started World War Two and ordered the extermination of Europe's Jews, in a museum alongside celebrities, pop stars, world statesmen and sporting heroes.

Dressed in a grey suit, the figure of Hitler gazed downwards with a despondent stare, his arm outstretched on a large wooden table with a map of Europe on the wall of his gloomy bunker.

About 25 workers spent around four months on the waxwork, using more than 2,000 pictures and pieces of archive material and also guided by a model of the 'Fuhrer' in the London branch of Madame Tussauds, where he is standing upright.

It is illegal in Germany to show Nazi symbols and art glorifying Hitler, and the exhibit was cordoned off to stop visitors posing with him.

Unobtrusive signs asked visitors to refrain from taking photos or posing with Hitler "out of respect for the millions of people who died during World War Two". Camera surveillance and museum officials were meant to stop inappropriate behaviour.

Institutions such as the foundation for Germany's central Holocaust memorial site condemned the idea of the exhibit as tasteless, saying it had been included to generate business.

The wax figure is the latest in a gradual breaking down of taboos about Hitler in Germany more than 60 years after the end of the war and the Holocaust, in which some six million Jews were killed. The 2004 film Downfall provoked controversy as it portrayed him in a human light during his last days.





The full article contains 377 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 July 2008 7:48 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 06/07/2008 07:46:26
Why didn't they put him in the "horror" section, along with all the other criminals and murderers?
2

Yane,

06/07/2008 10:14:03
Is it that easy to rip off the heads? Could have been worse — they coulda had him looking cheery.
3

Miss Pixie,

formerly of Dinleyhaughfoot Cottage, Roxburghshire 06/07/2008 12:36:09
Too little, too late! Someone should have torn off his head while he was still alive and before he could do any damage!
4

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 06/07/2008 13:19:45
That man should get a medal for what he did to that waxwork of the vile monster Hitler rather than being arrested.

ANY waxwork or depiction of that mass-murderer has no place in our world EXCEPT to remind us of the atrocities he inflicted on Jews, Catholics, homosexuals, gypsies, deformed children, etc.

Since he had only one testicle and was notoriously bad in bed and had Jewish heritage about six generations back and was a failed artist is it any wonder that he exercised power the only way he could be trying to obliterate millions and millions of innocent victims.

I spit on his grave - IF it is to be found anywhere.
5

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 06/07/2008 16:48:11
Couldn't have happened to a more deserving guy!!
6

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 06/07/2008 19:01:54
A pathetic protest, it is a wax work and its existence is in no way condoning his actions, some lunatic has ruined many hours of pain staking work and what would have been a popular attraction.
Whether people like it or not, noone changed the face of Europe in history as much as Hitler and therefore he warrants an inclusion. What's next, ban all Nazi documentaries on the History channel?!?
7

MisterN,

Scotland 06/07/2008 20:02:45
6

whoa tricky one. I can understand the emotion behind not wanting to see the likes of Hitler immortalised but then how are we supposed to learn from history if we suppress it? I think this guy should not be prosecuted for what he did but this exibit should remain as long as its accompanied by a clear message as to why he is infamous and its not glamourised or used as any kind of iconic symbol.
Any indication that this can or will be used as iconic should then trigger its removal.
8

danielrober,

06/07/2008 21:02:34
I don't know if its true - but i heard a story that the final site of hitlers grave in Russia was bought by a property developer. Apparently they are going to build a pay as you go toilet on the site. Spend a penny and express your protest - apparently.

But I don't know if its true. Just a rumer.
9

Screed,

USA 07/07/2008 01:46:52
Martyrdom finally comes to Hitler in 2008 thanks to radical street theatre (on a bet) and greedy dumbed down modern media. “Assassination” even a perceived one is almost universally denigrated as a “cowardly act.” So, in a not so subtle way Hitler now has a more sympathetic worldwide reflection.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.