Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 13th October 2008

London from only £11.50 plus, over 50 Other Discounted National Express Train Routes

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Handshake offers a ray of hope for Zimbabwe



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 July 2008
BITTER rivals Morgan Tsvangirai and Robert Mugabe met for the first time in a decade yesterday to sign a memorandum of understanding that provides a framework for negotiations to tackle Zimbabwe's desperate political and economic crises.
Negotiators for the two men will fly to Johannesburg tomorrow to launch the difficult talks on their country's future. The biggest sticking point will be the reluctance of either to accept a position inferior to the other.

Mr Tsvangirai, the leader of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), and Mr Mugabe, Zimbabwe's president, sat on either side of the South African president, Thabo Mbeki, in the Sheraton Hotel in Harare to sign the five-page agreement. The rivals, who last met in 1998, shook hands afterwards.

Mr Tsvangirai refused to have the ceremony at State House, Mr Mugabe's official residence, as he does not recognise the legitimacy of the Zanu-PF leader's victory in a run-off election in June.

In a short speech, Mr Mugabe said it was absolutely essential to keep European and North American powers, who have imposed travel and personal financial restrictions on him and his main allies, out of the negotiations.

He said the two sides had agreed on the need for the country's constitution to be amended on various points. "We sit here in order for us to chart a new way of political interaction," he said.

Mr Tsvangirai said it was important for both sides to work together to achieve answers to a catastrophic situation in which mothers put children to bed without food, inflation was touching nine million per cent and women's life expectancy was down to 34 years. "We want to make sure that every Zimbabwean feels safe, we want to share a common prosperity for everyone and we want a better Zimbabwe," he said.

The memorandum requires a final settlement to be achieved by the end of the first week of August. However, commentators say this target is impossible, given the hostility between the two sides, the extent of their differences and the scale of Zimbabwe's problems. The document, which will be released publicly, does not answer the central issue of Mr Mugabe's future or go into the details of any power-sharing arrangement.

Mr Mugabe insists he must be recognised as Zimbabwe's president. But the MDC says he cannot be rewarded for his use of extreme violence to ensure he won the run-off unopposed.

The MDC wants some kind of interim "transitional authority" to run the country, while new internationally monitored elections are organised.

George Sibotshiwe, an MDC spokesman, said any progress in the negotiations would be conditional on a complete halt to violence by Mr Mugabe's militias and the release of some 1,500 political prisoners.

While Mr Mbeki chaired yesterday's signing ceremony, the breakthrough became possible only last weekend, after his unsuccessful one-man, eight-year mediation was scrapped and replaced by a four-person mediation team. Mr Tsvangirai has accused Mr Mbeki of bias towards Mr Mugabe, and the MDC leader only agreed to talk to his great rival after representatives of the United Nations, the African Union and the Southern African Development Community joined the arbitration.

TIMELINE

• March 2008 Opposition party MDC wins parliamentary poll. Morgan Tsvangirai wins first round of presidential poll.

• June 2008 Robert Mugabe wins presidential run-off election after Mr Tsvangirai pulls out days before the poll, saying a free and fair election is impossible because of violent intimidation of his supporters. Mr Mugabe is sworn in for sixth term of office. After 28 years in power the 84-year-old declared himself president unopposed for another five years.

• July 2008 Britain and the United States spearhead international campaign aimed at persuading Mr Mugabe to step down. Their efforts to dislodge him suffer a setback when a proposed UN resolution to impose new sanctions on Zimbabwe's leaders is vetoed by Russia and China. The 100-billion-dollar banknote is introduced in response to official year-on-year inflation rate of 2 million per cent.

The full article contains 681 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 July 2008 10:47 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Zimbabwe
 
1

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 22/07/2008 06:23:14
..."a catastrophic situation in which mothers put children to bed without food, inflation was touching nine million per cent and women's life expectancy was down to 34 years."

I wonder what Mugabe thinks he can contribute to resolving a the above situation created entirely out of his own self interest?
2

Conan,

Moffat 22/07/2008 07:22:44
Was it this was when the evil 'white' people were in charge?
3

Boy Wonder,

22/07/2008 07:42:03
Who actually thinks this is going to change anything?

I think Mugabe is only paving the way for his getting away with murder and corruption in the face of international condemnation!
4

Gulliver,

Harare 22/07/2008 08:13:05
Congrats to Thabo Mbeki for getting things moving in the right direction. The comments from all parties indicate a sense of urgency and realization of the need to work together. Lets hope there wont be any upcoming international summits or other such events which could provide a real distraction to these talks. The tendency of others to dangle billions of pounds in offer for the assurance that a certain person is removed from office or undermined in some way is an example of negative foreign interference. It doesn't help the opposing parties but more importantly it doesn't help Zimbabweans as it makes it difficult to for either side to make meaningful concessions.
5

Logie Almond,

22/07/2008 09:59:10
You just have to look at Tsvangirai to know he would be evry bit as bad as Mugabe if he had power. All that is happening is a division of the spoils.
6

Media 1,

cape town 22/07/2008 10:53:22
The handshake means two things.

1. Tsvangiari's MDC has the majority seats in parliament.
2. Mugabe earns himself amnesty for his crimes against humanity.

Mbeki was never interested in seeing democracy run its course, he was only ever interested in saving his friend from facing the firing squad. Mugabe has managed to avoid prosecution, but as he begins to loosen his grip on power, there will be a lot of jockeying by the generals for a position within the new regime.
Tsvangiari may yet arrest the lot of them once he is power, it could happen, which is why in Africa there can never be democracy.
The ruling party get the point in which they behave like animals, so when an opposition party challenges them they cannot relinquish power or they will face charges.
And so the wheel turns and turns and turns and turns and turns..Africa people, the fukc up of all fukc ups.
7

Venachar,

22/07/2008 11:53:02
If you believe anything Mugabe says then you believe in flying pigs!!

Anyone remember Joshua Nkomo and his party? Mugabe did the exact same thing then quietly got rid of them.

Don't be fooled by this monster and his thugs.
8

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 22/07/2008 12:07:09
Anbody who shakes hands with Mugabe should wash their hands in boracic acid and make sure it is still their after that jester (false) of friendship.

The sooner Mugabe is murdered or exiled or jailed the better this planet Earth will be AND the people of Zimbabwe.

Where IS a good assassin when you need one?
9

Gulliver,

Harare 22/07/2008 12:30:50
An act does not become more barbaric because of who perpertrates it, it is barbaric because of the evilness of the act. I sure wish one day people could talk about Idi Amin, Hilter, Ian Smith, Ivan the Terrible, Charles Taylor, G W Bush, Jonas Savimbi, P W Botha, Stalin and many others in the same context when it comes to crimes against humanity, a context free from any racial undertones but one that focuses on the facts.
10

Maurice,

Fife 22/07/2008 13:10:04
5 Logie Almond. That was an idioticly judgemental statement. People thought Bliar was such a nice looking man and he turned out to be one of the worlds most dishonest politicians who rained war and destruction on foreign lands and has left a legacy of post war depresion (euphamised as "credit crunch" but it is a direct result of every war in history) And Bush?? Well he does look a bit like an ape.

9 Gulliver,Harare, spot on pal and include the not so well known trash like Mark Thatcher and companies such as Anglo American, De Beers, Shell etc. etc . etc
11

oder,

Scotland 22/07/2008 16:52:02
9 Gulliver,Harare

you forgot to mention Africa`s "Hitler" in your list of baddies the No 1 slot goes to Mugabe he outshines them all! apart from Stalin.
as poster 7 says Mugabe is good and getting rid of competitors, Mbeki only moved because the outside world at the G8 criticized his do "nothing policy" of quiet diplomacy,the world is beginning to understand the hypocrisy of African leaders. Bush Botha Smith didn't starve their countries or wreck their economies, unlike most of the so called African leaders! Africa has yet to produce a politician of any calibre, Smith may not rate very high in your opinion but Mugabe is a complete failure! he failed in the most important area of all, to be a decent human being! and to the shame of Africa who supported him.
12

Neil,

Glasgow 22/07/2008 17:24:18
The sooner Gordon Brown, Cameron, Ming Campbell,, ashdown, Short & most of the rest of the 600 odd MPs are murdered or exiled or jailed the better this planet Earth will be AND the people of Britain.

Of course the comparison with Mugabe is not really fare since he has never engaged in illegal war, genocide, child rape or dissectring living people to sell their organs as our obscene Nazi leaders have.

13

Angus Coull,

San Francisco 22/07/2008 21:26:47
12 - Neil, Glasgow

I've no time at all for the current British government, but sorry but what are you talking about? Ok, the illegal war bit I see your point, but when have they engaged in genocide, child rape or dissecting living people to sell their organs?

By any measure, Mugabe's regime is far, far, far worse than the current British government. And unlike in Zimbabwe, you can freely say how much you dislike the British government without fear of serious reprisals (I know, I have). They are at least a democratically elected and largely accountable government.

Mugabe is a bloody tyrant who stays in power through the violence and intimidation of his hired thugs. Plain and simple. There is no comparison.

The only reason he is talking to the MDC is so that he can eventually leave power immune from prosecution for his crimes. The MDC should not agree to any such amnesty. Mugabe must stand trial.





 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.