Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Free Capercaillie CD

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Germany targets 1bn tax return


Government pays informer 4m for disc naming 1,000 who hid money abroad

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 February 2008
A HUGE tax-evasion investigation that has come to light in the past week has shocked many in Germany, not only because it may expose hundreds of wealthy citizens, but also because of the way in which investigators obtained the evidence.
German media said the BND intelligence service, with a green light from Berlin, paid an informant over 4 million for a disc containing Liechtenstein bank data on more than 1,000 suspected tax dodgers.

The finance ministry, which expects a tax wind
fall of more than a 1 billion as a result of the investigation, insists that the money paid was "well spent".

Liechtenstein says the informant, reported to be in hiding in Australia, is a criminal who stole the data and may have tried to blackmail its banks.

In Germany, a poll has shown that 52 per cent of voters say the BND should not have paid for the information, while 41 per cent say the payment was justified.

"Friends from the underworld," the Financial Times Deutschland said in a headline. "The state as a criminal?" asked Westfalenpost newspaper.

The investigation, which targets people suspected of parking money in secret accounts in Liechtenstein to evade tax, has sparked a diplomatic row with the tiny alpine principality and cost Klaus Zumwinkel, the chief executive of Deutsche Post, (national postal company] his job.

The scandal has now taken on the proportions of a witch-hunt, with raids across the country on businesses and private residences.

The chief guardian of the funds in the case is Liechtenstein's LGT Bank, which now has 300 full-time German investigators assigned to it.

It is understood Mr Zumwinkel and others kept the money hidden in Liechtenstein, using foundations that entrust the management to a trustee. Interest and capital gains was then usually funnelled discreetly to other secret bank accounts.

Kurt Beck, the head of Germany's Social Democrats, accused Liechtenstein of "robber-baron" policies and said that sanctions might be needed to force the tiny state to crack down on tax-evaders.

Liechtenstein, a country of 35,000 sandwiched between Switzerland and Austria, depends heavily on its secretive banking sector. It is one of three countries on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) blacklist of unco-operative tax havens, alongside Andorra and Monaco.

Yesterday, Angela Merkel, the chancellor, met Liechtenstein's prime minister, Otmar Hasler, and asked for help in "clearing up the cases of tax evasion that have been discovered", she said.

She pressed for progress towards an anti-fraud agreement between the EU and Liechtenstein and urged the principality to co-operate with the OECD in curbing unfair tax competition.

Mr Hasler said Liechtenstein "is a modern financial centre, and we are also willing and ready to enter into co-operation.

Mrs Merkel brushed aside comments from Liechtenstein's ruling Prince Alois, who argued that Germany should get its own tax system under control.

"I find that such theories… are not sustainable, not right and not helpful for our relations," the chancellor said.

Frank Decker, a political scientist at Bonn University, said that, while many middle-class voters were disgusted by the idea of wealthy people shifting their money abroad, they were also concerned at the way the state had handled the affair.

"It has the after-taste of not being legitimate, of the state having crossed a line," he said.





The full article contains 563 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 February 2008 11:01 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 21/02/2008 01:24:31
Lots to dislike in this one. If the data was stolen and if the German government bought it from the thief, then the German government is an accessory after the fact - a criminal act.

Liechtenstein is a nominally-independent principality that is free to make its own banking rules. If citizens of other nationalities choose to use those banking rules to evade taxes in their own countries, it is up to the government of their own countries to prove that - within the bounds of their own laws.

As for Mrs. Merkels' response to Prince Alois, oh well. Not awfully statesmanlike, was it?
2

,

21/02/2008 06:44:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Arran of Arran,

Isle of Arran 21/02/2008 09:08:30
Yes, bad Germany again. It is unbelievable how tax-evading of the Superrich is still regarded as a gentleman-crime. Earning, better receiving, a few millions every year mainly by exploiting the public ressources which should actually benefit the whole population and not just the few, and then not paying the taxes is still looked at favourably, and the state who has to resort to methods, perhaps a bit out of the box, is looked at as a the criminal. this is turning the glove inside-out.

I think there are in Lichtenstein about the same number of UK-Clients with their banks as Germany based clients. If that came to light how would we all react? Accepting the «right» of the exploiters to syphon their wealth away from paying taxes here? O rapplauding the governement to have realised additionalincome through taxes and lessen consequently the burden of the less well-off?

4

Joe Freeman,

California 22/02/2008 10:34:39
All these struggles to harass people for so-called taxes, which are the equivalent of armed robbery, are primitive, wasteful, destructive, and could be ended easily if governments around the world were only able to anonymously tax bank account transfers at a uniform rate of 1. percent per transaction, including any transfer by people, corporations, government and churches etc. within their jurisdictions, no exceptions allowed. The expenses of collection greatly reduced. The privacy and freedom of individuals restored. Banks are the gatekeepers of money flows. It's only common sense to engineer revenue collection at the point it is always flowing. Think of windmills and waterwheels energy is extracted but the flow is not destroyed. why are we still using the same primitive and violent methods of the Pharaohs and Romans to collect tribute, when money is fiat abstract credits and the modern digital technology could automate all tax collection through the national banking systems?
5

Big V,

World 22/02/2008 13:54:04
Who cares where the rich put money. I am broke and don't envy them at all... But I'd set the Reichstag on fire once again if someone from Germany would chase me to pay tax where I don't live...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.