Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fighting talk on overseas objectives

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 August 2008
If BARACK Obama promised to transform America at home, he was no less ambitious in the foreign policy arena. He promised to end the war in Iraq "responsibly" and "finish the fight" against al-Qaeda in Afghanistan; to "prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons" and "curb Russian aggression". New partnerships will be forged to "defeat the threats of the 21st century: terrorism and nuclear proliferation; poverty and genocide; climate change and disease".
He also promised to restore the US's "moral standing" making it, once again, "the last, best hope of all who are called to the cause of freedom".

In other words, anyone who hopes for a more humble, more modest foreign policy is likely to be disappointed.

Mr Obama challenged John McCain to a foreign policy fight, betting his judgment in opposing the Iraq War would outweigh Mr McCain's experienceand history of service and sacrifice.

Nonetheless, he criticised Mr McCain for the republican's unwillingness to deploy US troops, if necessary, to Pakistan.

An Obama presidency then, is likely to pursue the same aims as the Bush administration, even if those aims are cloaked in more diplomatic language.





The full article contains 193 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 August 2008 9:27 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: US elections
 
1

Mashimaro,

China 30/08/2008 03:25:11
Curb Russian agression? Wouldn't it be nice if he curbed US agression.
2

Scullion,

Canada 30/08/2008 03:40:38
#1 As odd as it sounds, I have to agree with you.
3

2dogs in D.C.,

30/08/2008 03:42:26
Be nice to curb EVERYONES agression,hey? Probably not gonna happen.
4

Boy Wonder,

30/08/2008 07:45:33
Yeah ... let's start by curbing Swiss aggression!
5

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 30/08/2008 09:51:31
Does Obama not realise that Iraq is the staging post for the invasion of Iran? Bit naive really, unless he means what he says about preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons. I just wonder how he proposes to do that without either an invasion or conventional or nuclear attack since Achmadinnerjacket seems hell bent on acquiring them no matter what!
6

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 30/08/2008 15:24:02
#5 Former Angry:

Obama realizes that the bases in Iraq that have been built are valuable as a staging platform for attacking other countries in the area. About 3-4 months ago he changed up his web site's description on how he would handle Iraq. He used to say that he wants to use those bases as a staging platform to attack neighboring nations. Then he went to obfuscation and said he wants to withdraw all 'combat' troops from IRaq, but leave enough to protect our embassy. In other words, he won't commit to a complete withdrawal.

Obama in reality is a war-monger like Bush. He buys the September 11 ideology, he buys the 'war on teror' ideology, he wants endless war.

The FBI issued a statement saying that there was no evidence that Osama Bin Laden attacked the US on September 11, 2001. Yet the US uses that event as an excuse to attack anybody it wants. We should remember history. The USS Maine in 1898 was blown up in Havana harbor by an explosion from inside the ship. About 300 Americans died. The US went to war against Spain, taking Panama, Peurto Rico, Cuba & Phillipines from Spain. Then in 1916 an investigation proved that the explosion came from inside the ship, therefore the spaniards did not do it. September 11 is the same.

The only advantage many anti-war americans see in voting for Obama is that he might be better than McCain and the rest of the world thinks he's better, so we wish to communicate that we would like change by voting for Obama.
7

Gere,

Scotland 30/08/2008 20:35:27
Post#6 Wally, By the Rivers Of babylon

Unfortunately, Israel will never allow America to completely withdraw from Iraq or allow Iraq its independence.

All the aspirant presidential candidates had to publicly grovel in front of an AIPAC meeting and pledge to defend Israel before the people of America!

You are going to have to have a second revolutionary war to gain your independence from a foreign master that is more insidious than the Britsh.

If you win that one you wil able to impliment whatever foreign policy the American people want to and most importantly, pursue a froeign policy that will benefit the people of the USA!

Good Luck Wally!
8

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 02/09/2008 07:44:40
"the last, best hope of all who are called to the cause of freedom".????????????

Then does he believe there are other "Best Hopes" that take precedence? Maybe it's a slip of the tongue.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.