Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Czech leader stands alone against the Lisbon Treaty

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 October 2009
FOR years he has been one of the European Union's most vocal critics – now for like-minded Eurosceptics across the Continent, Vaclav Klaus, the president of the Czech Republic, has become their last chance to block the Lisbon Treaty.
Describing it as a "fatal restriction on national sovereignty that would lead to the creation of a European superstate", Mr Klaus has said he is in no hurry to ratify the treaty, despite it receiving the support of both houses of the Czech parliamen
t.

This has infuriated the government, which has backed the treaty. Jan Fischer, the prime minister, yesterday told the head of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, that he remained fully and deeply convinced there is no reason for anxiety in Europe.

But Mr Fischer added that, while he was confident that Mr Klaus would sign up to the treaty eventually, he could offer no real assurances to European leaders.

In an effort to calm fears in Brussels, Jerzy Buzek, the head of the European Parliament, said after talks with Mr Fischer: "We should not press too much on the Czech Republic. We expect the ratification, but it is an independent decision of the country."

But, if not anxious, European elders are getting impatient.

Brussels officials point out that to get the treaty – which requires the ratification of all 27 EU members – absorbed into the legal and institutional framework of the EU requires a huge amount of work, and much of this is now delayed.

Mr Klaus can take some solace in the fact that, for the moment, pressure to ratify the treaty is not solely on him. The Czech constitutional court is now deliberating whether the treaty is compatible with the country's constitution, after a group of senators loyal to Mr Klaus submitted a formal complaint against it.

Few expect the court to strike the treaty down, and thus the weight of European expectation will eventually return to the 67-year-old Czech president.

But for the moment, he has one ally, in the form of the Polish president, Lech Kaczynski.

A fellow Eurosceptic, the Polish leader has so far failed to sign the treaty, making Poland and the Czech Republic the only nations in the EU still to ratify it.

However, unlike his Czech counterpart, Mr Kaczynski has supported the treaty and pledged to put his signature to it if the Irish voted in its favour.

In contrast, Mr Klaus has criticised the treaty as undemocratic and claimed that, by giving more power to the European Parliament, it would contribute to the strengthening of a political system similar to the totalitarian structure that once controlled countries across central Europe.

"Not so long ago," he said in an address to the European parliament, "in our part of Europe we lived in a political system that permitted no alternatives and therefore also no parliamentary opposition. We learned the bitter lesson that with no opposition there is no freedom."

However, Mr Klaus's procrastination has thrown a lifeline to plans by David Cameron, the Conservative Party leader, to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty if he wins next year's UK general election.

Mr Cameron has said he would put the treaty to a national vote if it remains unratified.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 October 2009 9:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 08/10/2009 02:19:02
Ireland's economy tanked very badly, I think much worse than any other european country in the last 2 years. I feel that this is because Ireland was being punished for voting 'no' on the treaty. Its like Henry Kissinger once told the president of Spain (back in 1992). Kissinger was put on the brand new president's appointment calendar on his very first day at work. But the president of Spain did not put him on the agenda, it was a surprise to him. Kissinger told him (reported in Spanish newspaper) that the central bankers who control can cause any nation to prosper or experience economic pain. I think that is what happened to Ireland.

Here in America we've certainly had a bad experience with strong central government in Washington that has become a tyrant that is beyond the ability of the people to influence. I think that having a sort of US of Europe is bad for Europe, and very bad for democracy.
2

Bret,

08/10/2009 06:05:43
Posted: "Here in America we've certainly had a bad experience with strong central government in Washington that has become a tyrant that is beyond the ability of the people to influence."

Spot on!
Absolute corruption and tyranny in DC. Freedoms flushed down the drain whilst politicians bleed the cattle!
"Power corrupts...absolute power corrupts absolutely"
3

Canis Majoris,

TEXAS 08/10/2009 06:38:12
The EU will eventually become the world's biggest bureaucracy led by ex Prime Minister Tony Blair.

And yet his country England will not be a member of the EU.
4

albanman,

08/10/2009 07:25:18
No.3 Canis Majoris: Please stop displaying ignorance whilst making comments. The name of the country which belongs to the European Union is the United Kingdom, not England. Of course, you probably confuse the United States with America.
5

Unimpressed one,

08/10/2009 08:33:43
Were that we in the UK had someone with such backbone as opposed to the pond slime that claim to represent our interests.
6

John Cameron,

St Andrews 08/10/2009 09:09:54
Václav Klaus is an economist of international repute and a graduate of Cornell in the American Ivy League. A disciple of both Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, he was the principal architect of the Czechoslovak economic transformation after the dreadful decades of Communism. Not only is he highly sceptical of the benefits of the Brussels bureaucracy, but he has also expressed doubts about AGW. He questions the value of predictions made by computers set up on the pretence that carbon dioxide causes global warming. As an economist he further argues that, even if the dodgy science underlying AGW is accepted, the horrifically expensive cures advocated by the likes of Stern will be more harmful than anything resulting from a small rise in temperature. This is a point of view shared by many scientists and economists and, together with his corrosive views on the EU's undemocratic, bully boy, tactics in Ireland, make him one of the most interesting of European political figures. He is clearly a jewel in the rag bag of Brown, Sarkozy, and the rest of the usual rubbish.
7

Carolyn 1,

08/10/2009 14:07:47
John Cameron @6
make him one of the most interesting of European political figures. He is clearly a jewel.."

with a 70% approval rating
8

Alan B,

09/10/2009 00:36:52
#1Wally

Irelands problems are nothing to do with voting no to lisbon. Ireland had transformed its economy and was seen in economic circles as an economic miracle. But it joined the euro when growth was very fast and end up with an even greater boom as euro interest rates were even lower and too low for the irish economy.

Ireland is suffering the same problem now as the uk. Far too much consumer debt allied to massive house price inflation. The only difference with ireland is they did not have the stupid level of public debt as the uk.

It is quite simple if you ignore the economic fundamentals and growth the economy on sand ie more and more debt via consumer spending it is not sustainable in the long run.

The US problems have exposed the weakness of not adhering to solid economic foundations both in the uk and ireland.

9

Alan B,

09/10/2009 00:54:39
#1Wally

The eu is very far away from being a single entity like the US.

The eu is borne out of trying to secure peace, democracy and prosperity within europe after the divisions with ww1, ww2 and then the soviet communist era.

The eu can play a big role in breaking down the barriers that exist and have existed within europe. Would spain transition from franco facists have been so smooth without the eu (then eec).

It is a wealthy club that demands democratic standards that encourages such in the new members from the east.

It gives a single market and offers a common currency, and underpins it with social regulation and common health and safety standards. (Obviously it offers a choice of completely free market with the outside world or free market within a protected eu.)

It also helps deal with issue beyond the economic with say crime. The uk crime lords used to just move to spain to stop prosecutions but with the eu its has meant criminals are handed back for trial. Obviously there are issues with crime that go beyond single national boundaries. People trafficing, drugs etc.

The question is how to make decisions on these areas. One part of the eu is the ability of a country to veto changes. This means that a single country can stop the will of the rest. The move to more qualified majority voting will mean it will be the majority of countries that will make the decisions.

It also makes sense for the eu to develop a more cohesive foreign policy. Dealing with russia and other ex soviet states not a member of the eu is an issue. The eu was poor at dealing with the fall our from yugoslavia a foreign minister for the eu would allow a more proactive approach. The eu needs to deal with other neighbours like north africa and the associate issues. Along with the fact if turkey is allowed in the eu will border iran, syria and iraq. The eu has also allowed the us to dominate israel/palestinian relations to disasterous effects. The eu needs to ensure that
10

Alan B,

09/10/2009 00:54:57
cont...

The eu needs to ensure that it economic clout is transfered to its political clout to deal with many issues.

There are also economic issues like should the eu try to get the euro as the world oil currency and challenge the us dollar regime.
11

Wally,

By The Rivers Of babylon (USA) 09/10/2009 03:55:11
thank you for explaining those things Alan B. Personally I'd like to see the euro be the world trading currency. but the europeans would not like it. because it would push the euro to be artificially expensive. this would make your domestic industries less competitive. it would also present the temptation to your bankers to create too much money.

So i think there should be a global trading currency used just for trading. but the big issue would be how it is that each national currency is valued to it. I believe in letting free floating exchange markets do that job. Keep politics out of it.

12

Gerry,

Ballinasloe 09/10/2009 10:06:24
Wally (1), what's all this about Henry Kissinger and the President of Spain in 1992? Henry Kissinger was US secretary of state from 1973 to 1977. There has never been a President of Spain - it's a monarchy with Juan Carlos as king.
13

Boogeyman,

11/10/2009 03:19:48
The Eu is going to have a lot of trouble with the Polish and Czech leaders who are so right wing it's not funny.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.