Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Clinton defies polls

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 January 2008
HILLARY CLINTON made a dramatic last-minute comeback to win the Democrats' New Hampshire primary by a narrow margin over rival Barack Obama.
The surprise victory – just days after Obama's triumph in Iowa, where Clinton ended in humiliating third place – has revived the former First Lady's campaign to return to the White House.

The Republican primary in New Hampshire was won by Arizona senator John McCain, who had been virtually written off last summer. He beat Mitt Romney, the Mormon former governor of Massachusetts, who had spent millions of his own money trying to win.

Polls after the Iowa caucuses had shown Obama surging ahead in New Hampshire and even exit surveys yesterday suggested he was on course for a second victory.

But in the end Clinton emerged with 39 per cent to Obama's 36 per cent, with former vice-presidential candidate John Edwards on 17 per cent.

After hugging her husband, former president Bill Clinton, and daughter Chelsea on stage, Mrs Clinton said: "I come tonight with a very, very full heart and I want especially to thank New Hampshire. Over the last week I listened to you and in the process I found my own voice."

On Monday, she fought back tears in a New Hampshire cafe as her campaign looked set for a second defeat in a week.

The New York senator said: "I felt like we all spoke from our hearts and I'm so gratified that you responded. Now together let's give America the kind of comeback that New Hampshire has just given me."

Conceding defeat, Mr Obama repeatedly thanked his supporters and said: "I am still fired up and ready to go.

"A few weeks ago, no-one imagined that we'd have accomplished what we did here tonight in New Hampshire.

"For most of this campaign we were far behind we always knew our climb would be steep.

"But in record numbers you came out and you spoke up for change and with your voices and your votes you made it clear that at this moment in this election there is something happening in America."

Clinton aides claimed her victory was partly down to people seeing her softer side.

Analysis showed she had 46 per cent support among women to Obama's 34 per cent – a reversal of the situation in Iowa.

And Obama's lead over Clinton among young people – which had been four to one in Iowa – was reduced to two to one.

In the Republican contest, McCain won 37 per cent of the votes, Romney 32 per cent, former Arkansas governor and Baptist preacher Mike Huckabee took 11 per cent and former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani nine per cent.

McCain's victory speech at his campaign headquarters in Nashua, New Hampshire, was punctuated with supporters chanting: "Mac is back".

The 71-year-old said: "I'm past the age when I can claim the noun 'kid', no matter what adjective precedes it, but tonight, we sure showed them what a comeback looks like."

Mr McCain said he was "grateful and humbled" by his victory.

He said: "We have taken a step, but only the first step, toward repairing the broken politics of the past and restoring the trust of the American people in their government."

The Democrat race now moves on to Nevada, where caucuses will be held on January 19 and the South Carolina primary a week later. The Republicans' next contest is in Michigan next Tuesday.

The full article contains 576 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 January 2008 2:55 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Barack Obama , US elections
 
1

thatscottishwoman,

The Kirkyard 09/01/2008 12:13:12
Hillary is disgusting and is not qulified for the job.
2

,

09/01/2008 12:13:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Silence of the Yams,

09/01/2008 12:27:15
The Obama lovers can't take it eh!?!? Go Hilary!!
4

Reading Public 1,

Wisc, USA, Fred for President 09/01/2008 12:46:58
Hillary is due to fail, She scares a lot of us with her total dishonesty.
5

El_Kabooko,

Sacramento 09/01/2008 13:32:01
I love this time of year. Iowa, New Hampshire. Yep, let those two twisted states help determine the course of the country!

Out of everyone running, who is truely qualified? Most of the people who have come in first, second, or third fall into this category. Being a US Senator does not qualify you for the highest post in the land!

Besides, what has McCain, Obama, or Clinton done for the country? McCain by default has done some things in the Senate, Clinton is just the former first lady, and Obama, elected by default. (How many of you know about the whole 7-of-9 connection?)
6

Boswall,

09/01/2008 13:34:59
Nice one Hillary!!

Will be a great day for the world if the Clintons move back into the White House.

7

Fenon,

09/01/2008 13:37:06
How can you trust someone who smiles so much, not natuarl. I have tried.
8

Logie Almond,

09/01/2008 13:59:39
Bill Clinton was a good president who could have been a great one if he'd kept his zipper up. Hillary will make an excellent president.
9

mike - across the pond,

logie almond... 09/01/2008 15:03:33
name one thing clinton did in eight years.... that benefitted the US or the world....

(please god, let him float kyoto out there... please?)

the economy? sorry pal, the economy was a function of reaganomics... and the current state of the economy is a result of the mess HE left with a heaping helping of 9/11...

education? it was worse when he left than when he took over... you may not LIKE "no child left behind"... but it has forced the education system to be competitive... and that WILL produce results in the long run...

world politics.... north korea... yeah no.... china.... nope..... afghanistan... yeah the taliban and alqueda blossomed and came to fruition under his careful guidance... somalia.... kosovo.... middle east... wow I cant seem to come up with a single relationship that you can say moved in a direction you would like it to.... before you bring W to the table I would ask you to think of a good personal trainer/coach or a hard nosed teacher from your school days... you may not LIKE him/her while they are running your life, but after its all said and done... you can appreciate the end results... we wont know the end results of W's tenure for 20 years... and if we get an isolationist president in there, we may well NEVER know if what he was attempting would have worked.
10

Fenon,

09/01/2008 15:12:03
well done, but no cigar
11

,

09/01/2008 15:51:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Black Five,

edinburgh 09/01/2008 15:59:16
She`s the next president.She`s the only one who looks the part...heaven forbid.
13

Ghengis McCann,

Edinburgh 09/01/2008 16:10:04
#11 - "Hillary admitted to being part Jewish many years ago"

Eh, your point is, exactly?
14

,

09/01/2008 16:21:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Logie Almond,

09/01/2008 16:25:24
#8

Yes it was the economy, stupid... and what about his commitment to the Northern Ireland peace process.
16

mike - across the pond,

logie almond.... 09/01/2008 16:43:45
wow northern ireland peace process...

Like the irish werent about sick and tired of blowing up each other....

I'd give that one to the irish... but if you want to plop it on slickwillies plate... ok... whats that make it 8 or 9 unmitigated disasters to 1 "success"? still pretty friggin useless...

and the US economy... please do a LITTLE research... gumby and pokey could have run the economy as well as clinton and gore did... and may well have run it better lol...

you have to hope that we elect the LEADER of the free world who will LEAD... that includes making a tough decision once in a while...
17

mike - across the pond,

james donald 09/01/2008 16:48:25
"she's part jew"

and the rest is just plain SCARRY!!!!
18

American,

09/01/2008 17:23:35
I dont know if I should be more concerned that hillary lost iowa & won in NH, or that obama won iowa and lost NH. Makes no difference which one of them wins the primaries, as long as they dont win the white house. Both are big leftylibs.
19

Aye Right...,

09/01/2008 20:38:21
Lucky Adolf Hitler's love child isn't in the running for US president. These braindead morons in America would have him in the White Hoose in a flash..
20

Boswall,

09/01/2008 23:05:58
#17 Mike

We're supposed to listen to the guy that can't spell scary?

In short your previous mails were a babbling mess and you contradict your own arguments - how do you know Clinton did nothing for the economy if by your own words it takes 20 years for an administrations policy to mature?

As you've already admitted, the Clintons did a lot for the NI peace process.

The intervention in Kosovo left the province in a more secure situation than there was before and also led directly to the downfall of Milosovic. I'd call that a success. What's happened there since has little to do with Clinton and more to do with the UN so aim your fire at that useless organistion please.

Also the rise of the Taliban was funded by Pakistan and had f-all to do with Clinton (actually it also had quite alot to do with the US arming the Afghan resistance in the Regan/H W Bush era, no doubt you were going to mention that yourself...). Afghanistan had not attacked and was involved in internal warmongering - the US had no reason to get involved.

As for N Korea, the US brokered the non nuclear development agreement which by all accounts the North abidid by in exchenge for fuel and food aid. It was only after that aid was stopped by W Bush that they developed the bomb.

And what's China done? Were they not to be allowed to develop?
21

Boswall,

09/01/2008 23:08:02
#18 American

It may have escaped your attentin that America is one of the most liberal countries on the planet and most seem proud of it being so.
22

Let's have the truth,

10/01/2008 00:59:35
Let's face it, even Charles Manson would be an improvement over the present incumbent.
23

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 10/01/2008 01:12:34
Ghengis McCann in 13:

JD was responding to what someone said above, I think in #2. She once said that she had some jewish heritage & #2 said she was a jew I think implying he didn't like her for that.
24

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 10/01/2008 01:13:02
Ghengis McCann in 13:

JD was responding to what someone said above, I think in #2. She once said that she had some jewish heritage & #2 said she was a jew I think implying he didn't like her for that.
25

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 10/01/2008 01:25:24
here's the big news from America:

Hilary beat Obama by a close margin in a big primary. But there were polls immediately prior to the primary and exit polls taken at the vote centers that showed that Obama should win. Once again, the official results did not match exit polls. Historically exit polls predict the actual results nearly perfectly. Our mass media is actually telling us that the reason the actual results don't match the exit polls is because Americans are guilty over being racist and thus said they were voting for Obama in the exit polls so that they could appear to be not racist.

In Sutton, New Hampshire the votes were counted by the old paper ballot system. They released official results of 0 votes for Ron Paul. Some Paul voters who live in Sutton called Bev Harris a vote watchdog (BlackBoxVoting.org) and she faced down the Sutton officials getting them to admit that they made a mistake. They restored Paul's votes to 31 in that town. If they hadn't used the paper ballot system, then they wouldn't have been able to identify their error.

Other irregularities were that Obama supporters & Paul supporters designated to observe the vote process were forced to leave so that they could not watch the process in some locations. This is irregular, there is no reasonable explanation or excuse for it.
26

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 10/01/2008 01:25:44
here's the big news from America:

Hilary beat Obama by a close margin in a big primary. But there were polls immediately prior to the primary and exit polls taken at the vote centers that showed that Obama should win. Once again, the official results did not match exit polls. Historically exit polls predict the actual results nearly perfectly. Our mass media is actually telling us that the reason the actual results don't match the exit polls is because Americans are guilty over being racist and thus said they were voting for Obama in the exit polls so that they could appear to be not racist.

In Sutton, New Hampshire the votes were counted by the old paper ballot system. They released official results of 0 votes for Ron Paul. Some Paul voters who live in Sutton called Bev Harris a vote watchdog (BlackBoxVoting.org) and she faced down the Sutton officials getting them to admit that they made a mistake. They restored Paul's votes to 31 in that town. If they hadn't used the paper ballot system, then they wouldn't have been able to identify their error.

Other irregularities were that Obama supporters & Paul supporters designated to observe the vote process were forced to leave so that they could not watch the process in some locations. This is irregular, there is no reasonable explanation or excuse for it.
27

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 10/01/2008 01:26:10
here's the big news from America:

Hilary beat Obama by a close margin in a big primary. But there were polls immediately prior to the primary and exit polls taken at the vote centers that showed that Obama should win. Once again, the official results did not match exit polls. Historically exit polls predict the actual results nearly perfectly. Our mass media is actually telling us that the reason the actual results don't match the exit polls is because Americans are guilty over being racist and thus said they were voting for Obama in the exit polls so that they could appear to be not racist.

In Sutton, New Hampshire the votes were counted by the old paper ballot system. They released official results of 0 votes for Ron Paul. Some Paul voters who live in Sutton called Bev Harris a vote watchdog (BlackBoxVoting.org) and she faced down the Sutton officials getting them to admit that they made a mistake. They restored Paul's votes to 31 in that town. If they hadn't used the paper ballot system, then they wouldn't have been able to identify their error.

Other irregularities were that Obama supporters & Paul supporters designated to observe the vote process were forced to leave so that they could not watch the process in some locations. This is irregular, there is no reasonable explanation or excuse for it.
28

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 10/01/2008 01:31:34
forgive the duplication. software problems, the new update needs work. I kept getting 'did not post' error messages and re-posting.

I can't emphasize enough that vote fraud has become normal in America. Our election system is worthless, yet so many here in America & around the world put so much faith in it. our mass media is worthless at informing the people of things they should know as well. and if you read the banter between Boswall above & Mike across the pond, then you'll see that many of our citizens are pretty much worthless too.
29

,

10/01/2008 03:13:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

Reading Public 1,

Freehootsman-Wisc 10/01/2008 14:04:48
Bottom line she is dishonest and a consummate liar. She scares a lot of us with her big political Machine.
Obama is trying to keep to the issues not handing out hankies and stating "I deserve to win".

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.