Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Climate-change threat to top holiday spots



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 April 2008
SOME of the top holiday spots favoured by UK travellers will feel the effects of climate change within the next few decades, a United Nations report has warned.
Destinations in the Caribbean, Mediterranean, Indian Ocean, Australia and New Zealand are among the most vulnerable to changes in the weather.

The report claims countries, such as the Maldives, which are likely to be hardest hit, have "poor" info
rmation about the implications of climate change and are especially vulnerable given their high dependency on tourism.

The report warns the tourism sector will face increased operating costs given the likely higher frequency of extreme weather events and the cost of clearing up after them.

Dr Murray Simpson from Oxford University's Centre for the Environment, lead author of the report, said: "Tourism is both a victim and a contributor to climate change. One of the greatest concerns is that some of the most acute impacts, environmental and socio-economic, are being experienced in developing countries and small island developing states, affecting the livelihoods of already impoverished communities.

"We have a responsibility to assist in building capacity in these destinations to meet the threats and opportunities presented by climate change."

The study outlines the environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change in some of the world's most popular holiday destinations. It also gives advice on ways that destinations can adapt.

For example, it recommends ski resorts can provide "four season" attractions that do not rely on snow and that new hotel developments should be set back from the coast if there is the potential of coastal erosion. It also recommends a greater reliance on water recycling systems.

The report was jointly developed by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Oxford University, the UN World Tourism Organisation and the World Meteorological Organisation.

Stefanos Fotiou, head of UNEP's tourism and environment programme, said: "The tourism sector, through its major contribution to global development, can influence other sectors by sending important signals to governments, industries and the public that climate mitigation and adaptation measures are not only vital for our future, but also make economic sense today."





The full article contains 357 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 April 2008 9:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 07/04/2008 01:23:42
So finally we are learning to live with any alleged climate change that may or may not happen instead of having the gall to think we can change it.
2

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 07/04/2008 06:31:42
Climate-change threat to top holiday spots
------------------------------------------
What a questionable story with questionable facts, and hear say, and science studies all mixed up.

So that politicians can use and manipulate as they see fit for their own survival.

GC
3

Unimpressed one,

07/04/2008 08:27:30
Would the UN care to put their money where their mouth is and place a bet at Ladbrokes, say giving odds of 20 to 1. I'd take them on any time.
4

Neil,

Glasgow 07/04/2008 10:04:24
Another piece of PR flimflam calling itself a report.

There is no evidence of increased "extreme weather" indeed Lloyds, having a few years ago warned that premiums woyuld have to go up because of global warming has now warned that they risk dropping (oh dear) because to lack of hurricanes etc.

The only problem warming might cause to these resorts is the increased competition from the sunbathing opportunities at Rothsay.

Of course if we actually get cooling......
5

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 10:51:28
Climate change (at least the mythical man-made variety) does not exist.

Why do we have to suffer all this stupid propaganda and lies?
6

eyeswider,

huddled up to my computer 07/04/2008 11:05:42
IPCC reviewer and climate researcher and scientist Dr. Vincent Gray of New Zealand, an expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports going back to 1990, in an April 10, 2007 article. "Global temperatures have not been rising for eight years." In a July 3, 2007 blog post, "I have written many pages of comments on the various IPCC Reports and most of them have been ignored." "The very few comments made by most of the reviewers suggest that there may be very few actual people who ever read the report itself all the way through except those who write it," he added. "The [IPCC] ‘Summary for Policymakers' might get a few readers, but the main purpose of the report is to provide a spurious scientific backup for the absurd claims of the worldwide environmentalist lobby that it has been established scientifically that increases in carbon dioxide are harmful to the climate. It just does not matter that this ain't so,"
7

Neil,

Glasgow 07/04/2008 11:52:32
Issuing the "Summary for Policymakers" (& the press) months before the true report had been concluded on the grounds that the "scientific" results would not differ from what had been decided in advance, shows how divorced from sciencevthe whole thing is.
8

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 13:27:56
'Climate change target is not radical enough':


http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/apr/07/climatechange.carbonemissions
9

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 13:36:26
Funnily enough, Dr Gray can never point to any substantial errors in the IPCC. If I recall correctly, I read about his comments, and most of them were along the lines of pointing out spelling errors or trying to get mention of AGW removed or toned down.
10

George.,

07/04/2008 14:01:02



http://nzclimatescience.net/images/PDFs/unsoundscience3.pdf
11

Neil,

Glasgow 07/04/2008 14:11:00
Since the IPCC pushed the Hockey Stick graph which has been proven a complete lie & one on which theirv entire theory is built, it hardly seems necessary to further disprove them.

Fred links to a Guardian article. They are well matched both relying on assertion rather than fact & assertions repeatedly proven dishonest at that.
12

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 14:17:51
Neil, stop lying. The hockey stick has been effectively updated using a number of studies since then. They all show a hockey stick shape. In fact the latest IPCC report has a page devoted to hockey stick shaped graphs.
13

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 14:21:03
George- that essay is so stuffed full of errors that I don't know where to begin. Unsurprisingly, many of Grays "papers" have been published in E&E, the worst science journal in the world.
14

George.,

07/04/2008 14:34:05
12. Yes true. You would not get Nicolas Cage, Wesley Snipes, Richard Pryor, Luciano Pavarotti and Chuck Berry to investigate Lester Piggott's tax returns.
15

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 14:48:34
GEorge- which planet are you on?
16

George.,

07/04/2008 15:42:01
Solipsist authentication : you vouch for somebody else, they vouch for you, the two of you vouch for another person. Sophistry going in crazy self-referential circles.
17

Neil,

Glasgow 07/04/2008 16:09:00
Guthrie I won't ask you to stop lying. The Hockey Stick was a deliberate fraud, without mathematical validity (or indeed real world validity as the weather proves). As such it & the rection to its disproval by the eco-fascists proves how wholly corrup & deshonest they are.

http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2007-03-04-1.html gives a detailed breakdown of the dishonesty & shows how it could not possibly have been merely a genuine error.
18

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 16:15:13
MMm, a deliberate fraud. You of course have the emails between them when they are conspiring to make it all up...
19

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 16:15:54
George- you established ages ago you don't know about science, and you just confirmed it again. Carry on bleeting if you like.
20

George.,

07/04/2008 16:42:46
When you can't argue the points, just label your opponent's arguments as b*****it. Or libel them as in the pay of oil companies.
21

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 16:43:34
What points George? You didn't make any.
22

George.,

07/04/2008 16:45:39
If I didn't make any explain this then.
"George- you established ages ago you don't know about science, and you just confirmed it again. Carry on bleeting if you like."
Where did I confirm it again?
23

Reckless,

Corrupt EU 07/04/2008 19:34:37
Ooh, I'm so scared of climate change. Why doesn't the UN and IPCC bugg£r off? No one believes their lies anymore. Their motives are as transparent as Gordon Brown's little pink tutu.
24

Reckless,

Global warming myth 07/04/2008 19:39:01
Global warming? I'm sitting here with a blanket over my shoulders, and it's meant to be BST!
25

eyeswider,

getting bored now 07/04/2008 21:31:03
As I just had pointed out to me - "there must be many peer reviewed papers created by all these oil funded people. Papers that prove global warming is false, maybe."

I would love to see a single proof positive on either side of this argument so that one side could crow and the other could go and nurse its wounds.

#17 Neil - that is a good piece of sarcastic de(con)struction - I like. Muchly.







26

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 07/04/2008 21:39:40
24
Reckless,
Global warming myth 07/04/2008 19:39:01
Global warming? I'm sitting here with a blanket over my shoulders, and it's meant to be BST!

------------------------------------
Dude why not turn on Ur air conditioning. Whats the problem.

Just switch it to the HEAT dial.

Stop Ur whining dude.

HHD

GC
27

truthsleuth,

07/04/2008 22:07:31
The Deniers are at it again
Will they ever get their head out of the sand and start thinnking with their head in the air rather than their mouth in the exhaust pipe.
If the earth warms and if temperature rises or even the opposites their will be winners and losers.
If the situation changes rapidly the losers will not take this lying down and will want a share of whats left. Lets hope its the bit that the Deniers occupy.
28

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 08/04/2008 09:55:10
Hmm, lets see. Goerges contribution is an url, some comment on tax evasion, and some mention of solipsism, without any explanation. THis suggests to me that he doesn't know any science.
29

Deuchars,

Edinburgh - FH 08/04/2008 10:33:50
Nutters! The sky is falling...
30

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 08/04/2008 12:57:20
George continues his diatribe on the malaria/climate change story in the International section -->>

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.