Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Half Price Tapas with Scotland on Sunday

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bush in final plea to Nato on troops for Afghanistan



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 April 2008
PRESIDENT George Bush arrived in Ukraine last night in preparation for his farewell Nato summit, which he hopes will salvage a foreign-policy legacy frayed by the Iraq war.
Seeking to reassert himself on the world stage in the twilight of his term, Mr Bush will press Nato for more troops in Afghanistan, try to keep up momentum in the alliance's eastward expansion and attempt to ease strains with Russia.

But with Mr B
ush even more unpopular overseas than at home, he could have a hard time swaying world leaders at this week's summit in Romania as they look to whoever will succeed him in January 2009.

"Many of them are looking forward now to the next president in Washington and are already thinking about what the 2009 summit will bring," said Julianne Smith, a Europe analyst at Washington's Centre for Strategic and International Studies.

Lame-duck status will not be Mr Bush's only obstacle as he ventures abroad for the first in a series of international conferences marking his final year in office. On his first stop Mr Bush will try to reassure Kiev's reform-minded government over its aspirations for Nato membership, but offer no firm guarantees.

European partners are wary of letting Ukraine and Georgia into the alliance because of opposition from Moscow, which sees it as encroachment on the former Soviet sphere of influence.

Mr Bush backs their bids for a road-map for membership, but may not have enough clout to overcome French and German misgivings at the summit, which starts in Bucharest tomorrow.

Another source of friction is Nato's role in the war in Afghanistan. Mr Bush wants a greater commitment from Nato partners reluctant to send troops to areas of heavy combat against a resurgent Taleban. A French offer of more forces has helped to ease the dispute, but it remains unresolved.

Mr Bush's national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, speaking en route to Ukraine, said it was "pretty clear" the summit would produce a strong statement about Afghanistan.

"All of us need to do more in Afghanistan, and I think you're going to see countries coming up and doing more," he said.

Mr Bush will share the summit spotlight with Vladimir Putin. How the two leaders interact may signal whether the West's relations with Russia will improve or deteriorate further. Mr Bush will then fly to Russia for a final round of one-on-one talks with Mr Putin before he steps down as Russian president in May.





The full article contains 425 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 March 2008 10:15 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA........captured from Mexico 1845 01/04/2008 04:00:35
Dudes,
Our Pres Bush is a pathetic lame duck and an evil Pres.

Hopefully this will be his last boondoggle, outside of the US.

He represents all that is wrong with American style democracy. See my next post on how he got elected to the White House.

Bush was elected by the US Supreme Court. after he lost the popular vote to Al Gore.

Bush is the cause of a WAR with IRAQ, and the deaths of thousands of people, and the squandering of one trillion dollars , US taxpayers dollars.

Why any foreign leader would want to be seen dead, with this idiot Bush beats me.

But then again, in my opinion, 95% of all politicians are spineless dudes. The power goes to their heads, once they get elected. The rest of the 5% have backbone

Into that 5% I would put Putin, Castro, Truman, and
Chirac. and the country of New Zealand.

Bush is a disgrace to the USA

GC
2

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA........captured from Mexico 1845 01/04/2008 04:07:52
Hey Dudes, as promised , here is how the US 2000 election ended.

Main article: United States presidential election in Florida, 2000

At approximately 7:50 pm EST on election day, 10 minutes before the polls closed in the largely Republican Florida panhandle, some television news networks declared that Gore had carried Florida's 25 electoral votes.

They based this prediction substantially on exit polls. However, in the actual vote tally Bush began to take a wide lead early in Florida, and by 10 pm EST the networks had retracted their prediction of a Gore victory and placed Florida back into the "undecided" column.

At approximately 2:30 am, with some 85% of the votes counted in Florida and Bush leading Gore by more than 100,000 votes, the networks declared that Bush had carried Florida and had, therefore, been elected President.

However, most of the remaining votes to be counted in Florida were located in three heavily Democratic counties - Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach - and as their votes were reported Gore began to gain on Bush.

By 4:30 am, after all votes were counted, Gore had narrowed Bush's margin to just over 2,000 votes, and the networks retracted their predictions that Bush had won Florida and the Presidency.

Gore, who had privately conceded the election to Bush, now withdrew his concession and announced that he would wait for a recount in Florida before any further action.
After the first recount by the morning of Wednesday, November 8 Bush's margin in Florida had dwindled to about 500 votes, narrow enough to trigger a mandatory recount in that state.

In addition, Gore asked for hand recounts in four counties (Broward, Miami Dade, Palm Beach, and Volusia), as provided under Florida state law. This set into motion a series of recounts (portions by machine, and portions by hand), questions about portions of the Florida vote, and finally lawsuits.

These ultimately resulted in a December 12 7-2 United States Supreme
3

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA........captured from Mexico 1845 01/04/2008 04:10:13
#2 contd:

Court decision. that the Florida Supreme Court's scheme for recounting ballots was unconstitutional, as well as a 5-4 United States Supreme Court decision that ended the Florida recounts and allowed Florida to certify its vote.

The vote was certified by Katherine Harris, the Republican Secretary of State who had been the Florida co-chair of Bush's campaign[30].

Because Bush's younger brother, Jeb Bush, was the governor of Florida, there were allegations that Harris and Bush had somehow manipulated the election to favor the governor's brother.[31][32]

Bush's margin of victory in Florida was officially placed at 537 votes (out of more than 5.8 million cast), making it the closest presidential election in the history of the state.

The nine members of the Supreme Court voted along ideological lines in the split decision with the two usually conservative swing voters[33] (Justices O'Connor and Kennedy) siding with the three conservatives (Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Scalia, and Thomas) outvoting the Court's four liberals (Justices Ginsburg, Souter, Stevens, and Breyer).

Due to all of these factors, the 2000 presidential campaign has become one of the most controversial, and disputed, elections in American history.


This is the US pseudo democracy at its worst

GC
4

bill2,

01/04/2008 09:30:06
Even if some don't support the war in Iraq due to oil for food or other reasons like they still feel guilty for taking bribes from Saddam, they should still support the war in Afghanistan.
5

overton,

aberdeen 01/04/2008 09:42:24
Can a non-muslim please explain to me why passenger planes were flown into the Twin Towers in New York and the Pentagon in Washington?

Perhaps if I can understand those extreme acts of violence and inhumanity then there may be a reason for re-calling our troops.

Otherwise we were unquestionably correct to support our greatest ally, the United States, in Afghansitan.
6

howard sutherland,

bahamas 01/04/2008 10:08:40
1,2,3 GalacticCannibal

For someone who claims to live in the United States you seem to know very little about their election process and seem to favour conspiracy theories over facts.
7

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta 01/04/2008 16:25:28
6
howard sutherland,
bahama-------------
------------------------------

And which conspiracy theory are U referring to Dude.
Be specific.

GC
8

Paloma negra,

01/04/2008 18:15:42
I am sure that the Taliban will love getting Afghanistan back again ...!!

They will probably get Pakistan too ehh???
9

Carolyn 1,

01/04/2008 20:59:48
In my opinion, NATO should welcome Georgia and the Ukraine with open arms, and the sooner the better; Croatia, Macedonia, and Albania asked to join and were accepted.

It doesn't stand to reason to reject the Ukraine- I think they'll be an excellent member, and a desired friend and ally on our side -but I am a biased to any country who cut itself from communist control, was able to develop a democracy and a good economy after Soviet corruption and domination.
We can learn from those countries who succeeded and acknowledge their determination to better themselves.
Above all, the EU should not penalize them for it.

The problem is the bad timing of the Ukraine's request to join a military alliance against Russia. It coincide with the kerfluffle of Kosovo, and the talks with Poland and the Czechs for the missile defense. Plus Poland is getting some military goodies in exchange.

Does it p-ss off Russia? yea- and that's probably not a good thing because they have more military money for build-up than we do. But that's the way it is when people or countries take sides in the natural evolution of progress and change.-
Russia needs to recognize it does not control these countries, NATO, or the EU.

The time is quickly approaching for Putin. He needs to choose between being friends with Iran to the point of selling him nuclear components, or being friends with the west and the western economy.

Somehow, with the illusion that he is in control and doing us a favor, he'll chose the western economy, not because he likes us or the EU, but because he likes the money.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.