Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Back to work … defiant Somali pirates seize four more ships

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 April 2009
ONLY days after five of their number were killed in French and American hostage rescues, Somali pirates brazenly hijacked four more ships in the Gulf of Aden yesterday.
Nato spokeswoman Shona Lowe said the Sea Horse, a Lebanese-owned cargo ship, was captured yesterday. A few hours earlier, the Greek-owned Irene EM was seized in a rare attack at night.

Somali pirates also hijacked two Egyptian fishing boats
in the Gulf of Aden off Somalia's northern coast, which maritime officials said had 36 crew.

Another gang fired automatic rifles and rocket-propelled grenades at the Liberian-flagged 21,887-tonne Safmarine Asia but the vessel escaped.

Nato Lieutenant Commander Alexandre Fernandes said the Portuguese warship Corte-Real had received a pre-dawn distress call from the Irene EM, which carries the flag of St Vincent and the Grenadines, in the Gulf of Aden.

"There was only three minutes between the alarm and the hijack," Lt Cmdr Fernandes said. "They attacked at night, which was very unusual. They were using the moonlight as it's quite bright."

The Greek merchant marine ministry said the Irene EM's 22 crew were Filipinos. The East African Seafarers' Assistance Programme, which tracks piracy, said they were all unharmed.

The bulk carrier was sailing from Jordan to India.

Hours later, Nato officials on the Corte-Real said a second ship, the Sea Horse, had also been seized about 77 nautical miles off Somalia.

Nato officials said a Canadian warship had sent a helicopter to scout out what was happening on the Irene EM.

"There are hostages so now we will shadow and monitor the situation," Lt Cmdr Fernandes said.

The Gulf of Aden, which links the Suez Canal and the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean, is one of the world's busiest and most vital shipping lanes, crossed by more than 20,000 ships each year.

Warships from nearly a dozen countries have patrolled it and nearby Indian Ocean waters for months. They have halted many attacks on ships this year, but say the area is so vast they cannot stop all hijackings.

The latest seizures come after US navy snipers rescued Captain Richard Phillips, master of the US ship Maersk Alabama, on Sunday by killing three young pirates who had held him captive in a drifting lifeboat for five days.

Two more pirates died on Friday when French commandos stormed a yacht that had been seized. A French hostage was also killed.

The United States is considering new options to fight piracy, including posting navy gunships along the Somali coast and launching a campaign to disable pirate "mother ships," according to Pentagon officials.

"Piracy is far more complex than any naval patrol," said Madison University analyst Peter Pham. "It will require more than just the application of force to uproot piracy from the soil of Somalia."

Some US military strategists believe it may ultimately be necessary to attack the pirates' base in Somalia, much as the British did two centuries ago. But few have the appetite for a land operation in Somalia, where an American military foray in the early 1990s ended in humiliation. And the cost in civilian casualties would probably be extremely high, some warn.

Larry Johnson, a former CIA agent and state department counter-terrorism specialist, said: "That would be nuts. These people are not organised into any military force – they are intermingled with women and children. You're talking about wiping out villages."

Some fear the bloody assaults by Washington and Paris to free their hostages may raise the risk of future bloodshed. The pirates have promised revenge on US and French citizens.

They have generally treated captives well in the hope of big ransoms. Many poor and unemployed young Somalis see the gangs as a dazzling alternative to their hard lives.

Last year, the gunmen grabbed headlines with the world's largest sea hijack – a Saudi Arabian supertanker carrying crude oil worth $100 million of crude oil – and the seizure of a Ukrainian ship with a huge military cargo including 33 Soviet-era tanks.

They still hold about 260 other hostages, including nearly 100 Filipinos, on 17 captured ships.





The full article contains 697 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 April 2009 10:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Somalia & Somaliland
 
1

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 15/04/2009 00:37:59
What are the world's navies doing? Don't they have the training and technology to eliminate piracy as the RN once did? If I could put a 500HP outboard on my boat, in the circumstances, in my youth, I'd be into piracy too.

But there's a mismatch. Or are navies just people with buttons firing cruise missiles at civilian targets?
2

southernboy1278,

Georgia, USA 15/04/2009 00:56:18
I refuse to believe that by glorifying terrorist activities, that in someway amounts to responsible journalism... Obviously, this article is far-left hogwash.

How can anyone POSSIBLY feel sympathy for Terrorists? Is there a political-biased prerequisite for such stupidity? Such foolishness? I'm behooved to think so.

I'd really like to know why the author of this article didn't bother to include any praise whatsoever for the recent, and what will obviously lead to future, victorious military action against piracy.

I'm actually quite glad that so-called journalists are NOT the ones who have taken oaths to protect us.
3

,

15/04/2009 01:10:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 15/04/2009 01:19:16
It's far-right individuals that generally run shipping companies, registering the vessels offshore and paying minimum wages to the general crew.

People joined the CIA because you could get away with murder and it was more "fun" than a normal job. If you were dirt poor you'd do piracy for the same reasons and at least have some excuse.

What oaths did they take?
5

,

15/04/2009 02:00:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Jim A,

15/04/2009 06:08:44
Doesn't matter what light it's shown in this is still piracy and kidnapping on the high seas which is still a crime. Time these folks were brought to book one way or another.
7

Mashimaro,

China 15/04/2009 06:25:07
Jim, Southernboy... what do you call it when one government pays and arms the army of another country to invade you? Oh yes . . . US foreign policy, of course. I don't see you guys bleating about that. I don't see you counting the dead in Somalia.
Yok - yes, put an outboard on a small boat and you are in business. Too small to make it on to the radar of the big ships in a huge area of sea. Haystack, needle.
But, conversely, you would have to know that these pirates must be getting intel from somewhere that tells them where the ships are and what they are carrying, no?
8

Mashimaro,

China 15/04/2009 06:26:06
I sense a business opportunity here for someone willing to arm up and provide an escort service.
9

Mashimaro,

China 15/04/2009 06:30:12
#2 In what way is this report gloryfying the crime? It is simply stating the facts. That the facts might not be to your liking are another matter entirely.
10

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 15/04/2009 09:05:44
There must be some merit in setting up convoys along specified sea channels, preferanly fairly far off the coast. Any small craft in these zones failing to respond to security checks could legitimately be blasted out of the water on the basis of suspected piracy. Surely if boat owners are paying massive ransoms it would make sense to both employ Q-boats armed to the teeth with trained marines and for normal shipping to have a trained and armed crew to repel pirates before they get any chance of overpowering the crew.

You'd think these options would have been discussed so why not? Maybe on the off chance they'll reduce costs and get away with it? Seems a risky strategy.
11

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 15/04/2009 10:00:37
The Great Piracy was when the Americans' Congress ceded its right and duty to issue and regulate the nation's currency to the Federal Reserve. Which slunk in Christmas of 1913.

Britains tend to assume that the £ is part of the scenery and inevitable as the weather. It's all part of the 1694 scheme "to creat money out of nothing" and subsequently destroy any Rebublic or Nation State. For mercenaries can always be bought.

There's probably a piracy capitalism to go with disaster capitalism to keep the highjacks on the road.
12

Nice try,

China, 15/04/2009 12:53:29
The problem yet again are the Americans, they've raised the stakes on this and have brought murder into the scenario, what a surprise. The pirates up until now have only demanded money and seldom was there any kind of violence, but the precedent has now been set and look for warfare on the seas now, not just piracy anymore. Another prime example of violence begetting violence, and totally uncalled for. If the US ship had strictly relied on escorted convoys, this would never have happened, but no, with their arrogance they took a chance and got caught, and in the end it ended up with blood being spilled, totally unnecessary.

POSTMARK 55
13

Sgian Dubh,

15/04/2009 14:13:55
#15
I think you are missing the point. The pirates, or armed terrorists if we are being correct, hold loaded weapons to innocent civilians going about their law-abiding business. Now, regardless whether French or American, or any other nationality, other forces with bigger and better weapons have told the pirates (armed terrorists) that enough is enough.
No nation should have to rely on escorted convoys to conduct legal commerce on the high seas and for you to suggest that is the case shows your arrogance.
Pirates live by the sword (for sword read AK47 or Rocket Propelled Grenade) and should, therefore, be prepared to die by it!
Piracy on the high seas is NOT a victimless crime.
14

Mashimaro,

China 15/04/2009 14:48:28
#16 I think you're missing a lot of points. When you arm soldiers and send them into a country that is not a victimless crime either. Capiche?
15

Sgian Dubh,

15/04/2009 15:36:50
#17

'Capiche' ? Your arrogance shines through as does your friend 'nice try's
16

,

15/04/2009 19:24:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.