Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

At least 20 killed as rebel cleric's Mahdi militia battles Iraqi troops for control on streets of Basra



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 March 2008
IRAQI forces yesterday faced their toughest challenge since taking over security in Basra from British troops, battling with Shiite militia for control of the southern oil port.
The violence, in which at least 20 people died, was part of an escalating confrontation between the Iraqi government and Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's followers.

About 4,100 British troops are still based outside the city at its airport although they were not involved in yesterday's operation.

Sadr declared a unilateral ceasefire last August which, along with a US troop building and a Sunni alliance with the American forces, has contributed to a steep drop in violence over the recent months.

But the truce frayed as Sadr's allies grew increasingly angry over US and Iraqi raids and detentions and demanded the release of followers rounded up in recent weeks.

The cleric recently told his followers that although the truce remains in effect, they were free to defend themselves against attacks.

Sadr's headquarters in Najaf also ordered field commanders with his al-Mahdi army militia to go on maximum alert and prepare "to strike the occupiers" – a term used to describe US forces – and their Iraqi allies.

Politicians from Sadr's movement announced in a Baghdad press conference that a civil disobedience campaign – which began in selected districts of the capital and included the closure of businesses and schools – was being expanded across the country.

Stores and schools were closed in several other predominantly Shiite neighbourhoods in the capital, apparently in compliance with the civil disobedience order. Armed Mahdi army members were seen patrolling the streets in some Shiite neighbourhoods of the capital.

Formed after Saddam Hussein's overthrow in April 2003, the Mahdi army is loyal to Sadr, a fiercely outspoken cleric who is popular among Iraq's poor, urban Shiite majority.

Sadr led rebellions against US-led forces in 2004. In August 2004 the army took refuge in Iraq's holiest Shiite shrine, the Imam Ali Mosque in Najaf, during fighting with US forces. A three-week siege was ended after a compromise under which the Shiite militiamen agreed to leave the shrine and US forces pulled out of the city.

Since the bombing of the Golden Mosque in Samarra unleashed a wave of sectarian bloodletting in February 2006, the Mahdi army has grown more powerful. Sunni Arab leaders and US officials blamed it for death squad killings.

Sadr ordered the Mahdi army to freeze its activities for six months in August 2007 after gun battles among rival Shiite factions killed dozens of people in the holy city of Kerbala. Sadr undertook the move to weed out rogue elements which have splintered from the militia and to reassert his control. He extended the ceasefire by six months on 22 February.

The fighting yesterday erupted a day after prime minister Nouri al-Maliki flew to Basra and announced the security crackdown against the militias.

Iraq's second-largest city accounts for most of its oil exports, but an oil ministry official said production and exports had not been affected by the fighting.

Curfews were also imposed in the Shiite cities of Kut, where a large number of Mahdi army gunmen were seen deploying on the streets, and Nasiriyah.

In Baghdad, suspected Mahdi army gunmen exchanged gunfire with security guards of the rival Shiite Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council.

Security in Basra had been steadilty declining well before Britain handed over security to the Iraqis on 16 December.

INQUIRY 'WILL MAKE SURE IRAQ WAR MISTAKES ARE NOT REPEATED'

AN INQUIRY into the Iraq war is needed to ensure mistakes are not repeated while British forces remain in the country, the Tories said yesterday.

William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary said that the war, which began in 2003, had almost lasted as long as the Second World War, and that the case for a Privy Council inquiry was now overwhelming. An inquiry would also inform operations in Afghanistan, he said.

However, the government repeated its belief that an inquiry would be premature while UK troops remained in Iraq.

Around 4,200 troops are in the country and plans to begin a phased withdrawal in spring appear to have slipped.

Mr Hague said that while the initial 23-day operation to invade Iraq and topple Saddam Hussein had been successful, the government's failure to plan for post-war reconstruction and the outbreak of civil war had been disastrous, and 175 British troops had lost their lives.

He said a delay would mean asking key players to give evidence – and find documents – after almost a decade.

Mr Hague added: "What is proposed here is not a trial or impeachment. It is an effort to learn for the future, for those of us who voted for or against the war in Iraq.

"The need to learn from what has happened is serious and urgent."


The full article contains 819 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 March 2008 8:52 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iraq , War in Iraq
 
1

The Daleks,

Longmen 26/03/2008 01:39:42
What an absolute debacle.

The answer is simple. If you're going to do a war, then do it properly.

Release the dogs of war, crush the Mahdi Army and the rest of these militias with extreme prejudice, then set up a strong, properly trained Iraqi army and withdraw.

Although, I have to say I don't believe we should have invaded in the first place.
2

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA...bye Bush -Cheney..u. evil leaders. 26/03/2008 04:50:32
Mr Hague added: "What is proposed here is not a trial or impeachment. It is an effort to learn for the future, for those of us who voted for or against the war in Iraq.

"The need to learn from what has happened is serious and urgent."
-------------------------------------------
Hey Dudes, this Hague dude needs a backbone and common sense.

he suggests more time wasted, on blowing hot air and bull sh*t meetings.

Here in the States, almost 1 million Americans have signed up to impeach Bush . But so far have got nowhere with it.

The powerful forces of crime and corruption, inside the Beltway in Washington DC . Still protect this war criminal, our Pres. Bush.

Happy dreamers Day Dudes

GC
3

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 26/03/2008 06:45:25
If Saddam had been left alone I wonder how many deaths wouldn't have ocurred?
4

Rabhairt,

Cannons Creek AUSTRALIA 26/03/2008 07:39:10
NUMBER 1 YOU HAVE HIT THE NAIL RIGHT ON THE HEAD
NUMBER 3 SADDAM RULED WITH VIOLENCE , TERROR AND MURDER, HE WOULD HAVE WIPED OUT THE KURDS IF HE HAD NOT BEEN STOPPED.
5

Rabhairt,

Cannons Creek AUSTRALIA 26/03/2008 07:41:47
NUMBER 3 OF COURSE NO ONE WOULD HAVE GIVEN A DAMN IT NOT FOR THE OIL !!!!!
6

Silence of the Yams,

26/03/2008 08:10:32
Iran is behind all of this, they also control the Shia government.
7

shivago8,

livingston 26/03/2008 09:01:39
This is not the end,just the beginning of the end.
When will they ever learn,that is our government.
Bring them home,build a wall around ourselves and spend our money in making our own country great,not turning it into bombs and killing strangers.
8

,

26/03/2008 09:18:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

,

26/03/2008 10:06:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 26/03/2008 10:57:43
Can no one rid us of these meddlesome and murderous Islamist clerics SOONEST?

They are an abomination unto the Lord and the spawn of Satan.

These followers of Mohammed may consider this:

Christ Alone Is God and Needs No Prophet
11

Siroos,

UK 26/03/2008 11:15:24
#- 10, Tim; This has nothing to do with Islam. Please stop preaching. This is about what is going on in Iran. The Mahdi Army is the proxy of the Mullah in Iran. As long as there is unrest in Iraq, the Mullah in Iran is relatively safe. You must look at the map of the area and know the areas where the Allies / US forces are present before understanding what I am saying.
12

Audrey,

26/03/2008 12:07:06
The truth about the “Religion of Peace”

http://www.masada2000.org/islam.html
13

Audrey,

26/03/2008 12:11:03
One or two bigoted Islamic apologists have been going around deleting posts because the truth hurts! Too scare to learn of the truth?? No matter how many times you pathetic coward press the report button, the truth and facts still remain intact as visibly quoted in the Qu’ran book itself. Read the Qu’ran to get the true picture! The truth is all there.
14

Audrey,

26/03/2008 12:14:51
Infidel

Please carry on posting, to show us the truth.
15

Lithgyman,

26/03/2008 12:20:16

What happens if the Militia wins? Will the British army have to go back into the city or will they let Sadr rule? and if they do go back in, how long will it be before they can pull out again?

It strikes me that this is a mess that will be with us in some form or other for a long long time to come regardless of what happens in the next few days and weeks.
16

Mcsnagpile,

26/03/2008 12:36:41
I remember drinks with the USA marines on a Thursday evening , Aussie embassy on a Wednesday—large basin full of ice and beer, Friday afternoon UK embassy G&T, Canadian Embassy Tuesday for Volley ball. Bunny girls at the Sheridan club, Iraqi Scherazade and Farida beer, Raki. Sunday Christian church services; trip to Babylon before destruction by the US Army; trip to the tower of Babel, Barbies on the beach at the lakes. Smiling Iraqis in adversity. The Baghdad hashers. Contract bridge with wine and cheese. Them wur the days UAE Condo?? A wee farm on the banks of the Tigris is more like it. No KFC, No McDonalds.

Like a snowflake in the river a moment there, then gone for ever.
17

bluehead,

edinburgh 26/03/2008 13:21:31
more proof of how wrong the brittish were to get involved with this madness
it does not seem as if this goverment will ever realise that the troubles in those places will go on forever,that is why other countries don't send troops
for they know it will never end
18

Silence of the Yams,

26/03/2008 13:28:41
17. As soon as you put Mohammed and Oil in the same equation you are gauranteed warlords and militants.

We should have entered into negotiations with Saddam Hussein and suffered his regime. Five years of lives and money for nothing!
19

stan102,

26/03/2008 13:37:51
Just nuke iraq and get rid of the lot
20

,

26/03/2008 13:37:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

larry b,

ottawa 26/03/2008 14:38:10
Hey there mcjihadis a bit slow on the uptake here. Isn't the Zionist imperialistic imperative the basis of all this? Arabs being such peaceful, life respecting people. Only the existence of Israel could explain this violent aberration. Connect the dots for those of us not so inspired to see the real plot here.
22

Shaken,

26/03/2008 15:17:50
#7

Yet another reason for Independence - disassociation for this illegal war and the ramifications which will be felt for years to come.

23

yockel,

26/03/2008 15:47:33
They obviously just can't cope with all the peace, stability, freedom and democracy we sent them. Silly people, fighting when they could be building paradise from the rubble we gave them.
At least we are still winning hearts and minds; aren't we?
24

Infidel,

Dar ul harb 26/03/2008 16:37:42
Audrey 13 & 14:
I will try to keep telling the truth, but as you say posts keep getting deleted. Like mine (8 & 9). My posts were not even particularly harsh. Comments above like "spawn of Satan" and "nuke them" are allowed to remain (and I would not dream of reporting them), yet my mild remarks about posts on Islam being deleted, and that this is censorship, get promptly removed. Someone is desperate to conceal the truth it seems. Whether this is the administrator, or someone else (and the administrator doesn't bother to read what is being deleted) I do not know. It has been particularly bad in the last few weeks. As I said in my posts we are not allowed to say that the emperor has no clothes. Now how long do you think this post will last? And the tone is no harsher than the ones that were removed. Someone really can't take criticism it seems.
25

Infidel,

Dar ul harb 26/03/2008 16:40:09
# 18:
"As soon as you put Mohammed and Oil in the same equation you are gauranteed warlords and militants"

No. Mohammed alone is more than enough! Look at Afghanistan.

There, I've said something critical about Mohammed. Expect this post to be deleted.
26

Black Beard,

26/03/2008 16:55:18
Afghanistan is the site of a future oil pipe line.
27

American,

26/03/2008 22:28:14
They should have arrested al sadr long ago.
28

Cyril,

New Zealand 26/03/2008 22:56:17
When the Second World War was on we welcomed the help given by Islamic servicemen as for instance the then Indian Army had over three million members and a large number were Moslems. Too many armchair warriors today and I have great pity for the poor servicemen in Iraq and Afghanistan. My four relations in The Australian Army are much better paid and looked after than other servicemen fighting for the likes of Bush and Cheney for oil etc.
29

diadhaire,

NC - USA 27/03/2008 02:29:34
Several points:
1) The US, UK and allies went to war based on faulty intelligence. We didn't have a sufficient understanding of the Arab Muslim world and even today, our view is limited. In the past two decades, we reduced the number of intelligence gathering agents and relied too heavily on electronic surveillance. That is a mistake that the West must admit. Bush and Blair should have been forthright and admitted that they proceeded on faulty intelligence.

2) In a perfect world, we could easily pick the correct parties to align with in foreign policy issues. However, in most cases, we choose the lesser of the evils. Somoza, the Shah of Iran, Sadaam, etc. are prime examples

3) The US and allies did not have an acceptable plan for the aftermath of the “shock and awe” campaign resulted in a significant policy failure. Reconstruction and jobs would have significantly reduced the insurgency and unrest. Parents need to provide for their families.

4) The global economy is so fragile that we could ill afford to withdraw from Iraq and reap the whirlwind that would result in the destabilization of the world oil supply. may choose to be idealistic about oil but the truth is that many millions of people throughout the world will be adversely affected by a worldwide depression brought on by a significant petrol supply disruption. The world financial markets have been adversely impacted by the failure of the US banking regulators to do their jobs. Their oversight has been a miserable failure.

5) There appears to have been more progress in the last six months than in the entire period since the invasion. Gradually shift the resources from Iraq to Afghanistan while requiring the Iraqis to become more self-sufficient.

6) Increase the foreign aid to the Palestinians and provide most favored nation status to encourage foreign trade. Men with jobs are much less likely to foment violence.

30

Audrey,

New Zealand 27/03/2008 02:58:47
Infidel

Correct to say someone (Islamic apologist) is desperate to conceal the truth. What are these jihadist cowards afraid of?? The truth must have hurt them in so much that they have to resort to pressing report button to remove post! That is really pathetic. The whole truth can easily be found in the Qu’ran itself, visibly laid down right there in black and white for all to see.
31

Audrey,

New Zealand 27/03/2008 03:02:04
Infidel

If you ever lose your old ID, feel free to create new one again. I and some others do enjoy reading your posts very much; full of information and the truth. So please keep on posting. Other posts have also been removed before, yours are not the only one. Thus, don’t feel discourage about it but carry on to show us the truth about this "Religion of Peace".
32

Audrey,

New Zealand 27/03/2008 03:04:20
Cyril

Don’t be mistaken, we are talking about today radical Moslems and not your past Moslem servicemen. People used to say, not all terrorists are Moslems but unfortunately, majority of today religious extremists and fanatics are made up of believers belonging to Islamic faith. Plain and simple, they are still referred as Moslems.
33

Siroos,

UK 27/03/2008 07:32:58
#-32, Audrey; I come from an Islamic country - Iran. Please do not categorise ALL Moslems as Terrorists. It will not be fair.
As for your readings about Islam, yes it is true. Islam can not be a "religion of Peace " no matter how much they try to sell to you as one.
Can you post ME a timeline of when it all started please? I will see how much people like you take notice and maybe we can find a solution to rid the world of extremism. Who knows what is around the corner?
34

Audrey,

New Zealand 27/03/2008 11:24:41
Siroos #33

If you have taken a good look at my posts above, you will notice that I have never suggested all Moslems are terrorists. I used the word majority and this does not apply to mean the whole lot. Furthermore, some of my colleagues are devout practising Moslems. They carry on with their own beliefs while I have mine. We don’t apply pressure of forced conversion where religion or cult is concerned. We stay friendly and help each other for smooth operation at work.

Timeline? In fact, all this started since the birth of the “Religion of Peace”, when Muhammed went on rampage, conquering lands beside forced conversion of infidels. The holy verses in Qu’ran and its strict principles ruling the believers are also to be blamed. Hence the extremism bred and violence started, continue to this day.

I am more interested in women’s problem and oppression of women in Islam rather than politics. So if you need to know more, Infidel of Dar ul harb is the right person to approach. It is already very late now and I’m not working on night shift at present. Night.
35

Siroos,

UK 27/03/2008 12:14:51
#- 34, Audrey; OK, so far so good, but really I was talking about the rise of extremism in the recent history. Maybe you would help a little more.
Women in Islam? They are regarded as chattels. Unpaid house keepers and baby breeding machines. In some backward Islamic societies, they are also circumcised to be denied the enjoyment of sex. Two women witnesses are equal to one man witness in a court. In essence she is worth half of a man.
If a woman is raped, she can be flogged. If she kills the rapist, she can die as a result.
36

Miller,

27/03/2008 15:46:58
Siroos - Only those who take a keen interest in Islamic terrorism, politics and Islamism are in a position to answer your curiosity. But seeing that you come from Iran, you should be the best person to have some knowledge of the timeline after having stayed in the Middle-east and exposed to Islamist groups in your country. Due to the fact that the Islamic world is becoming increasingly fundamentalist, more and more Muslims have been potential jihadists today.
37

Siroos,

UK 27/03/2008 19:40:57
#- 36, Miller; Yes, I may know a lot about the problem, but I do not want to impose my understanding of the situation. That is why I have asked Audrey.
Anyone is welcome to input their - unbiased - thaughts on this matter.
There are no clear answers I must warn you first.
38

Siroos,

28/03/2008 05:09:38
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7d9_1206624103

Well, see it for yourselves. Keep being politically correct.
39

Conan,

Chile 28/03/2008 08:17:21
Indeed, #1, they should have snuffed that poisoned dwarf, Muckti, when they had the chance a few years back.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.