Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Airports on high alert after fears of a further attack

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 December 2008
AIRPORTS in India were on high alert yesterday following warnings of a new terrorist attack.
The threat of an airborne attack focused on three major airports – New Delhi, Bangalore and Chennai – but security was stepped up across the country. No further details were released.

"This is a warning. We are prepared as usual," India's air fo
rce chief, Fali Homi Major, said.

Heavily armed guards from India's Rapid Deployment Force manned roadblocks outside airports, while others patrolled inside the buildings among passengers.

Several extra layers of security were set up and some passengers had bags scanned before entering terminals.

Meanwhile, officials continued to investigate last week's Mumbai attacks and said the surviving gunman may be dosed with a controversial truth drug to force him into giving information.

Evidence collected so far has pointed to two members of outlawed Pakistani group Lashkar-e-Taiba as masterminds behind the killings.

Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi and Yusuf Muzammil are believed to be hiding in Pakistan. Lakhvi was identified as the group's operations chief and Muzammil as operations chief in Kashmir and other parts of India.

The surviving gunman, Ajmal Amir Kasab, 21, this week told police Lakhvi recruited him for the operation, and the assailants called Muzammil on a satellite phone after hijacking an Indian vessel en route to Mumbai.

During the attacks, he said, the gunmen used mobile phones taken from hotel guests to place calls to Lahore, in Pakistan.

Police officers said they are still trying to get as much detail as possible from Kasab.

"A terrorist of this sort is never co-operative. We have to extract information," said Deven Bharti, the head of the Mumbai crime branch.

Indian police use interrogation methods that would be regarded as torture in the West, including questioning suspects drugged with "truth serum".

Mr Bharti provided no details on interrogation techniques, but said "truth serum" would probably be used next week.

Meanwhile, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari promised visiting US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice that he would take "strong action" against any groups involved in the massacre.

"I have found a Pakistani government that is focused on the threat and understands its responsibilities to respond to terrorism and extremism," Dr Rice said after meeting Mr Zardari. The attack killed 171 people, including six Americans and one British national.

Dr Rice added: "This was a terrible attack. It was a sophisticated attack, a level of sophistication that we haven't seen here on the subcontinent before. That means that there is urgency to getting to the bottom of it. There is urgency to bringing the perpetrators to justice and there is urgency to ... disrupt and prevent further attacks."

Last week's attacks were carried out by 10 suspected Muslim militants against hotels, a restaurant and other sites in Mumbai.

Government security forces have come under intense criticism that they missed warnings and bungled their response to the attacks which took place from 26-29 November.

Yesterday, police said an unexploded hand grenade was found outside a hospital that was the scene of an attack during last week's siege on the city.

The discovery came a day after police detected two bombs at Mumbai's main train station, nearly a week after they were left there by the attackers.

It was not clear why the bags at the station were not examined earlier. The station, which serves hundreds of thousands of commuters, was declared safe and reopened hours after the attack.

And fallout from the attacks widened as the chief minister of Maharashtra state, where Mumbai is located, stepped down. The country's top law enforcement official resigned last week.

"I regret that we could not have saved more lives, that regret will remain with me," the minister, Vilasrao Deshmukh, said.

BACKGROUND

ALTHOUGH extra measures were set up at Indian airports yesterday following the threat of "airborne attacks", security levels are still erratic in Mumbai more than a week after the terrorist atrocities there.

There were armed guards at Chattrapati Shivaji Terminus, the main railway station that was attacked last week. But commuters could be seen rushing through scanners unopposed, even when alarms flashed "Stop".

Policemen carrying guns and accompanied by sniffer dogs cursorily checked bags at random.

At other stations, some policemen in flak jackets were reading newspapers or drinking tea during the morning rush hour, while the police presence on the roads was visibly reduced.

"We Indians tend to think God will protect us," said Pramoud Rao, the Mumbai president of the Fire and Safety Association of India.









Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 December 2008 11:06 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 05/12/2008 00:17:35
"Indian police use interrogation methods that would be regarded as torture in the West, including questioning suspects drugged with "truth serum".

Well look for CIA involvement soon, they've written the book on torture and they will make him sing like a canary and then 'accidently' kill him when they're done with him.
This is where Interpol needs to be called in to handle everything including the interrogations, nobody should ever be tortured regardless of their crime, torturing people makes those carrying out the torture no better than the one(s) they're torturing.
2

2dogs in D.C.,

05/12/2008 00:30:12
Postit-A shot of scopalimine beats bamboo under the toe nails. The hate of all things west seems to be growing in you. What's up with that?
3

Black & White Triumph,

Greenhill road soon 05/12/2008 00:54:17
The attackers in Mumbai gave up all rights to human decency treatment the minute they commenced this outrage.

Use whatever means possible to expose all involved then go after them with all available force.
4

Finlang,

France (and China too) 05/12/2008 02:43:55
#2
Dogs²

I have been meaning to ask that question too. After this post, I imagine PM-55 will also clarify. On the back of a mere three years in China, he consistently refers to OUR government (i.e. the Chinese government), and invokes the personal pronouns US and WE generally in that respect. He even manages to annoy our celebrated fellow western resident Dragonhead. That is some achievement.

I can comprehend a certain defensiveness on account of his having a Chinese wife, but that still doesn't cut it for me. I have a Chinese partner of rather more years than PM's relationship in China and spend a lot of time there, but could never embarrass myself by attempting to pass myself off as a self-appointed governmental spokesman as if to ingratiate. It's wholly unnecessary and serves mainly to demean the person writing while embarrassing his hosts. My partner and her professional colleagues have a view on this. Not altogether complimentary, I might add.

A western resident in China has no need to grovel. Simple respect is all that is required. My advice to Postmark, for what it's worth: just be yourself, and fit in quietly. Over-egging the pudding never did anybody any good - anywhere.




5

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 05/12/2008 04:16:37
#2 2dogs in D.C.,
#4 Finlang,
I don't hate the West, I come from a pretty conservative country called Canada that as a rule only plays the peace keeper part, eventhough that is not the case this time around in Afghanistan. What I am dead set against though is what the American administration and the UK are doing in the Middle East and how so many Westerners just can't get it through their heads how wrong their invasion and occupation of Iraq is, and the garbage war that is waging in Afghanistan under the pretense of capturing bin-Laden. The West is occupying the Middle East strictly through lying about why they are there and so many innocent people are suffering on account of those lies.

I come to China's defence because like Canada, China stays at home and looks after its problems at home and doesn't terrorize globally like The Americans and the Britains are so infamous for. I respect China for not flexing their military muscle all over the globe, China uses its military strictly for defence, whether it's agains man-made or natural disasters.
If you guys codemn me for embracing my new country then go ahead, knock yourselves out, it doesn't bother me, but if you critisize me for taking a stance on how the Americans and British terrorize globally, then my feathers get ruffled. I am dead set against terrorism, regardless of who the terrorists are, and the Americans and British are the worst of the lot.
I also get pretty peeved when that lying scumbucket the Dalai Lama tells nothing but lies about China and you guys swallow it hook, line AND sinker. I live here and have talked to native Tibetans and they agree that Tibet is far better off under Chinese rule than they were under the leadership of the Dalai Lama and his goons.
6

Jim A,

05/12/2008 07:16:48
#5 So Posty, what's it your trying to say mate ;-)
7

Jim A,

05/12/2008 07:22:08
Double Dog, I think Posty's no too happy about something, the boys gonna burst a blood vessel there.
8

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 05/12/2008 07:57:27
#7 Jim A,
Nah Jim, I ain't gonna burst a blood vessel, but it does upset me to see so many innocent people getting killed in the name of Democracy and you guys are OK with THEM suffering but you all supposedly care about Tibet when in fact everything in Tibet is fine.
You all know that your countries are waging an illegal war in Iraq and entered that war strictly through lies and your NATO presence in Afghanistan is a crime all unto its own as well, for many innocent Afghanis are dying and suffering because of your presence there. Why it is that you're all OK with that is beyond me but nobody there has held your governments responsible by casting your so called all important votes which in fact have never gotten you anywhere.
Democracy is just a name which in fact is there to pull the wool over your eyes yet you knock Communism because we don't get to vote. Give me China anyday because it works and things are far more fair here than in the West. Of course China has its problems as well but considering the grossly overpopulated condition and the logistical challenges of the country itself, China has fared better than could be expected.
9

Jim A,

05/12/2008 09:01:15
#8 Posty, China is no better or worse than any other country mate, like most countries it sells weapons and weapons systems that help to fuel the killing that goes on around the world, there are no innocent Governments
10

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 05/12/2008 09:56:20
#9 Jim A,
Actually Jim, I disagree with you saying that China is no better or worse than any other country. I've lived and worked in three countries, and China has gotten them beat by a long shot. I put in a six year stint in the Netherlands, and eventhough the people are nice enough, their government is far too soft on dope and it shows up negatively many a time.
I lived and worked most of my life in Canada of course, some 40 years, but Canada has its fair share of problems, and they sure can't blame it on over population. When in the Netherlands I also crossed over into Germany on many occasions for work purposes and believe me it ain't any place I want to live.
So in my opinion China has those countries beat and I can say that for I've experienced all of them, bringing me to my conclusions.
Yes China sells weapons but it's not up to China to dictate what those weapons get used for, we all know why guns are made now don't we? It ain't for target practice, and if it is, it is to hone our skills at killing people.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.