Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Iraqi blogger flees her 'long nightmare'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 May 2007
THE Brontës turned her on to writing. Chaos in Iraq was her subject. But now Iraq's best-known blogger is leaving her beloved land for an uncertain future in an unknown country.
The "long nightmare" of trying to survive amid the "car bombs and militias" has finally persuaded Riverbend - as the anonymous 27-year-old computer programmer calls herself - to follow hundreds of thousands of her compatriots into exile.

Her depa
rture will be missed by many - although George Bush and Tony Blair will not be among them.

She writes in her valedictory entry of the "overwhelming sense of injustice" at having to leave her country "simply because an imbecile got it into his head to invade it".

Riverbend's blog, called "Baghdad Burning", was angrily opposed to the British-American occupation of Iraq.

For four years she chronicled what it was like to live in Baghdad under foreign rule and as her country descended into internecine strife.

She wrote in English with a fluency that would put many native speakers to shame. This ensured that her blog was soon one of the best read accounts of the war among western readers keen for an insider's unvarnished view of a conflict that was much-spun by outside pundits.

Her latest entry fulminates against "a handful of expats who haven't been to the country in decades [pretending] to know more about it than people actually living here".

Riverbend felt that much western media coverage focused on politics and rarely touched on the reality of daily life in Iraq. So, with bitterness leavened by humour, she wrote about the lack of security and the shortage of basic necessities such as electricity and water. She chose to remain anonymous because it kept her secure from retribution - whether from political parties, religious figures or "common thugs".

Born into an upper-middle-class family of mixed Sunni-Shia origins, she acquired her English during a long stay abroad in her childhood and was an avid reader, devouring novels by Charles Dickens and Jane Austen.

More than anyone, though, it was the Brontë sisters who inspired her. It is easy to see why: like her, they had passion, even if they wrote about romantic love while she wrote about sectarian carnage and political folly. Riverbend brought international attention to Iraqi blogging. Her cyber diary has been edited into an award-winning book. A New York theatre company adapted her blog into a play that was performed at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe.

Unsurprisingly, Riverbend, an idealistic Iraqi nationalist, has her critics, with some readers even questioning whether she is an Iraqi woman. Detractors have accused her of being biased, anti-American and lamenting the ousting of Saddam Hussein.

The New York Review of Books recently agreed Riverbend had her limitations, but said the "mistakes of the young Baghdad woman" made her narrative worth reading.

Apparently oblivious of Saddam's chemical weapons attacks on Iraq's Kurds, she wrote at one point: "Some would say that they [the Kurds] had complete rights even before the war."

Answering her critics in an al-Jazeera interview, she said: "One thing that bothers me is that people equate being anti-occupation with anti-American. I'm not anti-American - I know many wonderful Americans and correspond with them. I am, however, anti-occupation."

Her blog takes Washington to task for claiming it wanted to give Iraq a democracy transplant by pointing out that her rights as a woman have been eroded by the rise of Islamic fundamentalists backed by the political parties the US brought to power.

As for bias, she pointed out she is a blogger, not a dispassionate journalist. "That objective lack of emotion is impossible because a blog in itself stems from passion - the need to sit for hours at one's computer ... trying to communicate ideas, thoughts, fears and frustrations to the world."

Her latest blog entry focuses on the pain of joining the Iraqi exodus: the difficulty of choosing what to pack; whether to make the perilous overland trip to Syria or Jordan, or to risk the equally dangerous dash to Baghdad airport and fly.

What awaits after arrival in either of those neighbouring countries, each "overflowing with Iraqi refugees", each a "transit to something else", she wonders. And will the family home and belongings still be there "when and if we come back"?

The Iraq war has spawned the biggest movement of people in the Middle East since the Palestinian refugee crisis in 1948. More than a million Iraqi refugees are in Syria, a million more have fled to Jordan and almost two million have been displaced inside Iraq.

Riverbend ends: "It's difficult to decide which is more frightening - car bombs and militias, or having to leave everything you know and love, to some unspecified place for a future where nothing is certain."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 April 2007 8:52 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Weblogs , Iran
 
1

guero gringo,mexico,

01/05/2007 00:36:13

One future that would be for certain. If she went to the U S, she would be in big demand as a writer and speaker, especially with the´hate America`crowd. Wherever she goes I hope that she can find peace and write another blog.

2

,

01/05/2007 01:07:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 576845, Article id was mapped to record!
3

Angus Lindsay,

Hong Kong 01/05/2007 01:57:42

#2. TSW
What the hell has your catalogue of sick-inducing disease to do with the topic? Forgive me if I have misread. But you have to be obsessed with that stuff to intrude on a forum which has nothing to do with it.

4

Zizzyphus,

Wyoming, USA 01/05/2007 02:28:14

I have been reading Riverbend for a long time and I, too, hope that wherever she lands she will keep in touch with us. Her blog is educational and informative.

5

"Suck"-=-McCrunchie,

Don't vote it just encourages them 01/05/2007 03:12:46

"Iraqi blogger flees her 'long nightmare'"

So they have Pipex there too.

:-(

6

Boy Wonder,

01/05/2007 07:57:03

She's probably right to leave. What with her blog being performed as a play, she must have some money piling up for her in a bank somewhere I imagine. I'd leave too if there was a wad of cash for me at the other side!!! Or am I being a tad too cynical??

7

talllady,

01/05/2007 08:30:44

Well I just had to go look at her blog. Can anybody tell me why she put that girls picture on her blog if she was so shameful in her peoples eyes for being raped. And how old was this girl suppose to be? Hmmm IF this was true, and I say if, I will be the first to say im ashamed for the Americans to be a part of it. Ok OK I will go back and read that again. Im just finding some of her blog a little hard to believe

8

James Donald,

Edinburgh 01/05/2007 08:37:54

#3. Angus Lindsay - this is not the TSW that normally posts here but some nut bar who has posted this same stuff several different places for reasons best know to themselves. Ignore......

9

,

01/05/2007 10:42:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 577942, Article id was mapped to record!
10

Oliver F,

UK 01/05/2007 14:47:56

Wini #6

"When will there be an official investigation as to where and who provided the misleading information that caused Blair and Bush to invade ?

And why did they provide this erroneous information ?"

The answers are Saddam, Iraqi Opposition Groups and maybe US/UK Intelligence services. Why is mostly easy.

Saddam pretended he still had chemical weapons as he wanted to appear strong and appeal to anti-americanism rife in the rest of the middle east.

Iraq Opposition Groups said Saddam still had chemical weapons because they wanted to encourage the US and UK to topple saddam.

The troubling issue is the US and UK intelligence services. Why on earth didnt they know saddam was bluffing? Or.. did they know and just "play along" to keep Bush and Blair happy.....

11

sandy,

USA 01/05/2007 15:11:49

""Riverbend's blog called "Baghdad burning", was angrily opposed to the British-American occupation of Iraq"".........what else would she write, but America & Britain are the evil bad guy's!!!...she's a blogger!! not a journalist!! hollywood will embrace her & make her a star & she'll end up w/the "nobel peace prize"....bet!!.....none of this would happen if she wrote what is actually going on in Iraq..........

12

TSW1,

01/05/2007 17:02:44

#6 Wini: They could try looking in the mirror.

Riverbend: Another number in the ever growing list of Iraqi refugees.

13

mike - across the pond,

wini & that scottishwoman 01/05/2007 18:04:40

looking for the source of the bad data.... try looking at George Tenet... if he isnt the source, it came through him...

"WMD case is a 'slam dunk'"
ha ha ha ha...

Tenet has slickwillies fingerprints ALL over him...

and sadly, as with Nixon in watergate, Bush's major fault was sticking up for the guys who work for him...

what a terrible character flaw for a boss to have, isnt it?

who on earth would want to work for a boss that assumes you are doing the best job you can possibly do...

14

TSW1,

01/05/2007 19:12:29

#15 mike - across the pond: Perhaps then, when listening to Tenet, Bush should have taken this leaf out of the book of good management skills: Never assume it makes an ASS out of U and ME.

15

billy england,

01/05/2007 19:37:07

11. Oliver F, UK

"The troubling issue is the US and UK intelligence services. Why on earth didnt they know saddam was bluffing? Or.. did they know and just "play along" to keep Bush and Blair happy....."

Nothing wrong with the intelligence; Bliar and Alistair Campbell and their gang doctored it. David Kelly's stand against Bliar cost him his life; John Scarlett's compliance gained him a promotion.

In any event, it was not misleading information that caused Bash and Bliar to invade; it was a prearranged plan and they were just looking for excuses. They put the worst possible interpretation on Saddam's swagger, Opposition Groups rhetoric, and dodgy dossiers to suck us into an illegal war for their own nefarious purposes; they should be in the dock as war criminals.

16

Sharlot Graham,

USA 01/05/2007 21:01:33

#12 Sandy. I'm thinking your name is a description of your head when you come up for air. Right or wrong?

How do you think you know better than a person living in Iraq what's going on in Iraq and what the conditions are there? Too much Kool-Aid.

BTW - there was no intelligence supporting an invasion. It was all fabricated. It doesn't matter if you think otherwise. Those are the facts.

17

Macemare,

florida, USA 01/05/2007 22:32:52

The reson why Bush went into Iraq?? The one I like the most--because Saddam tried to assinate Bush -1..Mr. cheny had his own reasons--OIL-...At any rate, with mondays night quarterback eyes...they were both flawed...Bush used Cheny, and Cheny used Bush..Now, they should both be impeached..

18

Not ALL Americans are fools...,

US 01/05/2007 22:53:00

...some of us have been paying attention.

Sandy (#12), your willful ignorance, gall and hubris are as annoying to many of us in the US as they are to the rest of the world.

I'm inclined to trust the writings of a resident of Baghdad, and the conversations I've had with friends who served in Iraq, who all present a completely different story of happenings on the ground than the preposterous statements issued by the felons who currently form our Executive branch.

Sharlot (#18) is quite correct. There was NEVER any real evidence of WMD. And there never will be, since they didn't exist.

And no, Mike (#15), George Tenant can't be blamed, as he asked several times that references to such intelligence be struck from Bush's speeches given the intelligence was considered to be 'highly questionable' at best. The administration simply kept ignoring anything they didn't want to hear, and beating away on intelligence analysts who dared to disagree with their political agenda.

It was known in Intelligence circles well before the ILLEGAL invasion of Iraq that the Nigerian Yellowcake evidence was not only a forgery, but a very poor one at that. (A decent time line of events associated with that can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery ). But, Bush and Cheney wanted a war, so they LIED until they got on, just as they have consistently LIED about anything else of any import.

There was never any connection, for example, between Iraq and al'Quaida until well after the invasion. Even then, that connection has been largely one of changing the name of the Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad to Tan?im Qa‘idah il-Jihad fi Bilad ir-Rafidayn in order to bring together various anti-American factions.

Likewise, there has never been any legitimate legal basis for the ongoing circumvention of the FISA court (even in 'wartime', as there are very expl

19

Lynne,

USA 01/05/2007 23:16:36

I guess most of you people have forgotten about a certain Mr. Chalabi who had come to the US telling us what Saddam had, where he thought it was hidden, and how much he wanted to be the Mayor of Baghdad, and now the President of Iraq.
Convenient of all of you.
Then there is George Tenet, who is now rewriting history to further himself. Where was he in 1993, and during the USS Cole, etc...I could go on ad naseum..but you all know the terrorists attacks before 9.11.
Well, I can remember watching an interview with a man who was working in nuclear facilites in Iraq, and escaped, (now living in the Mid West, I believe), who told all of tv land and the Congress and Senate about Saddam's nuclear plans.
There was no reason not to believe him..either.

20

Jason,

Jason 01/05/2007 23:30:21

Blogger, journalist, Internet correspondent; semantics, semantics.
Fact is "Riverbend" with her "Baghdad Burning" site has made an impact (why else would we be discussing her?). Anyone that embarrasses George and Tony has my respect. The power of the Internet and the alternative media: Be afraid, be very afraid. No wonder governments want it controlled. Mainstream media investigative journalists and their publications are literally establishment lackeys. Instead of calling our attention to the lies, deceptions and omissions of government, they have been full-heartedly decimating government propaganda. Now, starting to sense the wind direction, they are hedging their bets. But where were they when we really needed them? In bed with authority and the establishment.

21

A.S.,

USA 02/05/2007 00:44:50

""Riverbend's blog called "Baghdad burning", was angrily opposed to the British-American occupation of Iraq"".........what else would she write, but America & Britain are the evil bad guy's!!!...she's a blogger!! not a journalist!! hollywood will embrace her & make her a star & she'll end up w/the "nobel peace prize"....bet!!.....none of this would happen if she wrote what is actually going on in Iraq..........

I agree with Sandy post #12

Why listen to someone like Riverbend who as far as we know doesnt even have a Jornalism Degree When We can get all the Cold Hard Facts From Fox And Freinds. Who you going to trust people someone who as far as we know gets their facts from Whats going on around them or a Big News Station like Fox who gets their facts from other News sites Like The ONION Americas Finest News Source !

22

Wally,

Arizona 02/05/2007 05:31:23

15 Mike Across Pond:

here's an alternative answer to the one you provided.

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts04302007.html

Read Paul Craig Roberts who was affectionately known as 'Mr Conservative' inside the conservative movement 30 years ago. He was an editorial writer for Wall Street Journal, regular contributor to National Review & high ranking Reagan Administration official.

Also, you may not be aware, but news reports said that Dick Cheney actually travelled to CIA headquarters, sat in the offices of intelligence analysts and told them he wanted different answers from them, he was encouraging them to find a reason for war. I suppose you'd say that Clinton made him do it too.

23

Wally,

Arizona 02/05/2007 05:56:12

here's Dahr Jamail's site

http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/

Dahr grew up in the US. His parents were Iraqi immigrants. English is his first language, arabic his second. He spent some time in Iraq during the war, but left for safety. He was among the Iraqi people, not in the green zone. He interviewed many Iraqis with the help of a translator and has many contacts there.

Most journalists who report on Iraq either are not there or are embedded in among the US forces. If they're embedded, then it seems they may be compromised in their views. The military has actually discriminated against journalists who have the wrong views. And obviously, journalists who stay in the green zone don't really see Iraq. But journalists who go out of it get killed.

A lot of journalists have been killed in Iraq. Just about all the journalists who actually report from IRaq and are not hiding in green zone are arabic in their background. Here's 2 arabic sites.

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/index.htm

http://www.arabicnews.com/

24

Wally,

Arizona 02/05/2007 06:05:53

It is sad to see Riverbend fleeing. But it seems that so many have fled. There is so much violence in Iraq. Over half the doctors have fled. Many who are staying expect to be killed. There has been for over 3 years been a campaign to kill doctors. Nobody knows who is behind it. Many college professors were killed also very early and nobody knows who is behind that either.

They did not have this violence & chaos before the invasion. If you don't believe me, go to Riverbend's blog and read.

25

sandy,

USA 02/05/2007 15:33:49

#18--Rosie O'Donnell-aka-'Sharlot Graham'....
""how do you think you know better than a person living in Iraq what's going on in Iraq & what the conditions are there?"".......i correspond with 3 adopted troops..1/Navy-in the Gulf, 1/Iraq & 1/w 2tours in Iraq & is now in Afghanistan, so i do know what is going on in Iraq......& you??

BTW---i didn't post that i know better than the blogger! & i didn't post anything about the "invasion". your imagination in overload, me thinks!!

26

sandy,

USA 02/05/2007 15:48:39

#20--naaaf---""your willful ignorance, gall & hubris are as annoying to many of us in the US as they are to the rest of the world""......my my, didn't realize my affect on a troll!!
you are, of course speaking for yourself & how ""many of us in the US""??? wasn't aware of a poll involving little ol me!!.....""the rest of the world""???....is there a world poll too???

i'm surprised my post @12 has energized so many from move-on.org..........isn't this fun??


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.