Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

London from only £11.50 plus, over 50 Other Discounted National Express Train Routes

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Women 'should ignore negative hype' over health risks of HRT



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 May 2008
WOMEN should not be put off using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) because of over-hyped fears about its health risks, a panel of international experts concluded yesterday.
The scientists said that for women aged 50-59 in the early years of the menopause, HRT was safe and effective.

The latest support for HRT comes after research linked its use to a greater risk of breast cancer and heart problems, which have led to
thousands of women abandoning the treatment.

The experts, including doctors and national organisations, said HRT alleviated menopausal symptoms, such as hot flushes, and maintained healthy bones without significant harmful effects.

Contrary to what many people had been led to believe, HRT did not raise the risk of heart disease for these women and its impact on breast cancer was "minimal", the experts said.

Although certain types of HRT containing combinations of oestrogen and progesterone could slightly increase the chances of developing breast cancer, their effect was dwarfed by other risk factors, according to the expert panel.

Dr David Sturdee, one of the report's authors, said doctors should be prescribing HRT more freely than they are. The current advice to health professionals is that HRT should be offered only to women with serious menopausal symptoms for the shortest time possible.

After five years doctors are not expected to continue prescribing the treatment without thoroughly discussing the potential risks with the patient.

However, Dr Sturdee said: "We feel women should have it for as long as they need it to maintain their quality of life."

Forty experts from around the world took part in a summit in Zurich to discuss the latest evidence on the health risks of HRT, with their findings presented at the World Congress on the Menopause in Madrid.

The scientists said the health hazards of HRT had been blown out of proportion largely because of misleading results from a major American investigation, the Women's Health Initiative.

After reviewing the evidence, the summit experts concluded that combination oestrogen and progesterone HRT did not raise the risk of heart disease in healthy women aged 50-59.

They said that oestrogen-only HRT, normally reserved for women who have had their wombs removed, actually decreased heart disease risk.

The report said oestrogen and progesterone HRT did slightly increase the risk of breast cancer for women in this group. However, the effect was minimal compared with other risk factors for the disease, such as obesity.

Dr Sturdee, a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist at Solihull Hospital, said that at least one million women in the UK had stopped taking HRT because of unfounded health fears and had suffered as a result.

There were also reports of doctors imposing a blanket ban on HRT, even though this is at odds with guidelines. "Women's confidence has been shattered," said Dr Sturdee. "They are going to take a lot of convincing the initial reports weren't actually a reliable assessment of the data."

Ed Yong, of Cancer Research UK, said: "HRT is an effective way of relieving menopausal symptoms. Large studies have shown HRT can increase the risk of breast and womb cancers, but using it for a few years only has small effects and, after stopping, your risk returns to normal."

Professor Valerie Beral, Professor of Epidemiology at the University of Oxford, said the expert group was only quoting a small fraction of the evidence. "All the regulatory bodies advise that if women need to take HRT they should do so for as short a time as possible," she said.

BACKGROUND

CONCERNS about HRT have grown in recent years, after research suggested increased risks linked to the treatment.

In 2002, a Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study produced data that appeared to show women on HRT were at a heightened risk of breast cancer and heart disease.

This led to large numbers of women shunning HRT and convinced many doctors that the treatment was not safe.

In 2003, the UK's Million Women Study also highlighted a doubling of the breast-cancer risk among patients on HRT treatment for several years. But now experts meeting in Madrid have questioned some of the research, saying it presents an unbalanced view.

In particular, WHI researchers were accused of focusing on the wrong group. The average age of the study participants was 63, whereas most women start taking HRT a decade earlier.

In addition, 36 per cent had high blood pressure, 49 per cent were current or past smokers and 34 per cent were obese – all factors that could contribute to health problems.





The full article contains 765 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 May 2008 9:53 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

celtic4,

USA 20/05/2008 00:18:13
HRT safe and effective, eh? I guess that is why I suffered both a heart attack and a stroke while on it? Don't tell me that hogwash! It is dangerous and the risks do outway the benefits.
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 20/05/2008 00:19:18

Lets rephrase the Headline for the 'real truth'!

"Women 'should believe negative hype' over health risks of HRT"

"Oestrogen's" cause Cancers!,..'FULL STOP'!

I see this is 'played down' in this report as usual and all is made to look like a, 'Garden-of-Roses'.

As usual, 'Women' are the 'Medical Experiments' lets forget giving them Cancer!

'Well-Done',..Who's paying Who,?
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 20/05/2008 00:26:58
celtic4, @#4,

You said it!

And thats only the start of it!

20years ago they may of, 'spun this yarn' (as it were) but,..
NOT NOW!

WE DONT BELIEVE A WORD OF IT!
4

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 20/05/2008 03:17:54
Let's see..my mother ended up with breast cancer from HRT and is suing (along with millions of other women , in a class action suit.) She was lucky, she had a lumpectomy, chemotherapy and radiation..It's more than 17 years and she sees her oncologist EVERY 3 months.
Both my sister and I have taken HRT, but after having a cyst removed...I never went back, and the same with my sister. Beware what these doctors who have affiliations with drug companies say.
5

Boy Wonder,

20/05/2008 09:14:28
Knew I'd find you here, Charles. I'm beginning to think you want to be a woman and have children. The first part is manageable ... but the second is impossible!
6

Charles Linskaill,

On the go on the mobile 20/05/2008 12:19:20
Perhaps your right BW!
Poor Charlie the once was, now is?
And perhaps your ridicule will stop.
And afterall I already have the 'pink bedroom' and becoming slowly womanised by my DYW
Poor Charlie, right enough!
And 'pray tell' who would stand up for our fairer sex?
7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 20/05/2008 19:00:36
Gosh its all very quiet on the forums recently, is everybody on holidays or something,?
:-(
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 20/05/2008 20:36:26
.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.