Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Rush for renewable energy will put '£80 on household bills'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 November 2008
HOUSEHOLDS are facing large rises in their electricity bills in the coming decade because of the "dash" for renewables, according to an influential House of Lords report.
Consumers across Britain face an extra £80 a year on their energy bills as a result of the Government's commitment to source 15% of the UK's power from renewables by 2020. In Scotland, the target is higher, with ministers pledging to source 50% of th
e country's electricity from renewables by that year.

The House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee said it was "sceptical" that the UK Government's 20% target could be met by 2020 and warned that the plans could lead to an over-reliance on "intermittent sources" such as wind.

Other sources of energy would be required to back up wind as a result, the committee warned, meaning that the costs of electricity production would rise to £6.8bn a year – or £80 a year more on annual fuel bills.

The report – entitled the Economics of Renewables Energy – comes amid a growing row between UK and Scottish ministers over energy generation. It comes with the EU demanding that all member states boost the amount of energy they source from renewables sources over the coming decade. Scottish ministers have ruled out the use of nuclear energy, insisting that Scotland can rely on wind, wave and carbon capture storage.

The House of Lords committee has now warned that even the UK Government's less ambitious plans are a cause of concern.

It declared that the full costs of wind power "remained significantly higher" than coal, gas or nuclear energy. It also warned that wind power "cannot be relied upon to meet peak demand".

It backed carbon capture and storage – where carbon emissions from coal powered stations are pumped underground to ensure they do not escape into the atmosphere.

Lord Vallance, the committee's chairman, said: "We are concerned that the dash to meet the EU's 2020 targets may draw attention and investment away from cheaper and more reliable low carbon electricity generation.



"Current policies would take the UK into uncharted territory, with a dependence on intermittent supply unprecedented elsewhere in Europe. To guard against power shortages, wind turbines would need to be backed up with conventional generation. Together with the requirement to replace almost a quarter of the UK's older generating capacity by 2020, this represents a massive investment programme. Whether it is achievable in the time available is open to doubt."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 November 2008 9:26 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Unimpressed one,

30/11/2008 09:18:32
Yet here we are suffering subzero temperatures and the bams think this is global warming. We will rue the day we allowed our thick politicians to be swayed by even thicker greens into adopting the insanity of 'climate change' politics. Which political party has the guts to see that the emperor is wearing no clothes and to get back to policies based on common sense?
2

Axl,

Edinburgh 30/11/2008 10:45:47
#1

VERY well said.
3

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 30/11/2008 12:54:47
#1

Absolutely. Apart from the fact that governments "going green" is just a cynical manipulation to look good and up taxes, with evidence staring them in the face the grant-grabbers and unwashed believers in returning to a freezing lack of economic activity actively seek to destroy what's left of civilisation.
4

Scythia,

30/11/2008 17:58:05
Much of the food inflation is a result of the unscientific claim that climate change is caused by human activity. Watch the price of rubbish disposal shoot through the roof in the coming months.
5

Joe Macdelta.,

30/11/2008 18:53:29
We could open a wind farm in Westminster, there is always a lot of wind there, and everyone else in the country suffers.
6

John (Again),

Bury St Edmunds 30/11/2008 23:21:14
In 2050 only 10% of the oil, 15% of the gas and 35% of the coal will be left, so that the government target of 80% less carbon by then will be achieved, not by any policy, but by the depletion of fossil fuels.

So the Kyoto Protocols and carbon trading are essentially useless. The real problem is therefore to get installed as many renewable energy sources as capital shortages will allow. The escalating costs rule out nuclear, but anyway uranium is a dwindling resource as low ore grades become the norm and there is insufficient diesel to dig it up.

Fuel bills will rise anyway as fossil fuels run down - it is a question of having something sustainable in their place - which is wind, sea currents, wave power, tidal lagoons and biomass &c.

The running down of fossil fuels will solve climate change, but ruin the economies of the third world and those countries unprepared. In a way the climate change bill may bring some benefits as an incidental reduction in energy use and the stimulation of renewables building.

Its just a pity the government cannot be straight with us.
7

truthsleuth,

30/11/2008 23:59:15
Only one more expensive solution and thats Nuclear.
8

beaker,

Ayrshire 02/12/2008 11:13:30
It is not all gloom and doom. Do not worry about the extra cost. Last nights BBC 10 o'clock news finished off by telling us that we are changing over to wood burning stoves. Presenter sitting next to a wood burning stove with a wee glass of red wine.

He explained, "Burning wood is environmentally friendly as trees take in CO2 as they grow."

So we do not need nuclear power, we do not need wind power, we do not need tidal power all we need to do to stay warm is cut down all the trees and put them in our stoves.

What brilliance?
Absolute genius!!

I was worried about the fuel cost and future green charges but changing over wood burning stoves has cheered me up.

Any idea where I can buy an axe?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.