Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Ross and Brand prank calls 'a serious lapse'

View Video
Download Video

Video

BBC director-general Mark Thompson on the Ross/Brand prank call
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 November 2008
Lewd phone messages from Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand were a "very serious editorial lapse", the BBC's director-general said today.
BBC chairman Sir Michael Lyons said the corporation had "crossed a boundary" by broadcasting the messages left on actor Andrew Sachs's answerphone on Brand's Radio 2 show.

Facing questions by MPs in a Culture, Media and Sport Committee hearing at the House of Commons, director-general Mark Thompson said: "I am very aware that this was a very serious editorial lapse.

"There were errors in judgment."

Sir Michael and Mr Thompson defended the corporations actions in the aftermath of the scandal.

When criticised for "lamentable slowness", Sir Michael replied: "There was no lack of speed. This is something I do not accept.

"I refute and reject any allegations there were more actions the trust should have taken.

"The trust is doing its job of holding the executive to account."

The grilling was the second session held by the Culture, Media and Sport Committee in its ongoing inquiry into the commercial operations of the BBC.

The terms of reference for the inquiry, published in July, include the benefits, opportunities and risks for the BBC undertaking a range of commercial activities in the UK and abroad.

They also include the future of BBC Worldwide and other BBC commercial subsidiaries and how the money returned to the BBC by its commercial operations is invested.

Culture Secretary Andy Burnham previously said the calls to Sachs were a "serious lapse of broadcasting standards" and the BBC management was "too slow" in recognising the seriousness of the situation.

Radio 2 boss Lesley Douglas also quit on October 30 and that was followed by the resignation of David Barber, the Radio 2 head of specialist music and compliance.

It is thought Barber's job would have involved checking that content complied with BBC guidelines.

The BBC Trust will discuss the furore, which saw Brand quit and Ross suspended, when it meets later this week.

It has requested a final, written report on the matter from the director-general.

Earlier this month, broadcasting watchdog Ofcom criticised Radio 1's Scott Mills show, which airs at a time when children are listening.

During the feature the sounds of the beginning and end of the words remained audible, giving the false impression that the bleep was masking a swear word.

The pair were criticised for failing to fire Ross and Brand for "gross misconduct".

Sir Michael said: "Before you bandy around words like gross misconduct, the BBC has a duty of care.

"The BBC looks at the evidence before making its decisions."

He added: "I think that's the sign of a healthy organisation."

Mr Thompson said the BBC had made improvements over the past five years.
He added: "You cannot expect that sometimes we will not get it wrong.

This is a very uncharacteristic."

He added: "It is not typical of the BBC and it is not how our compliance works."

Responding to accusations of "systematic failures", Sir Michael admitted there "were lessons to be learned".

But he added: "It is in the nature of the BBC that it takes risks."

Mr Thompson denied claims that Ross was paid too much.

When asked whether he was worth £6 million a year, he said: "I think, if the BBC has to have top talent, you have to accept that. Even when you grow your own talent, people are on the phone."

He also defended the corporation's commercial arm, BBC Worldwide.
He said: "BBC Worldwide has repeatedly been voted the distributor of choice by the industry."

He added: "The BBC has been able to make programmes it would not have been able to do without BBC Worldwide."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 November 2008 2:29 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The BBC , Video Archive
 
1

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

18/11/2008 13:03:02
Mr Sachs grand-daughter Georgina Ballie earns her living in a burlesque dance troupe called the Satanic S l u t s.

So does this mean that what Jonathon Ross actually said about her was, technically, correct?
2

,

18/11/2008 13:51:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Brodric,

18/11/2008 15:02:08
Vincent W - is right.

No 1 - you are such a nitwit.

Jonathan Woss should resign or be sacked. He is such a prat who adds nothing of interest or importance to entertainment. I personally cannot understand why he has lasted so long. Except that his brand of bad manners and behaviour seem to have grown alongside the generally bad manners and behaviour of many Brits.
4

Broughton Resident,

Edinburgh 18/11/2008 16:24:37
Their behaviour was not acceptable. As Brodric says, Jonathan Ross should have resigned too, or been sacked. The two were probably not sacked because if it was challenged in court a tribunal might have found in their favour and the BBC might have had to take them back. At least Brand had the good grace to resign. It's a pity Ross didn't follow his example.

I also agree with Brodric in that Ross adds nothing of interest or importance to entertainmentand I also can't understand why he has lasted so long. The smae goes for Brand if not worse.
5

Red Dykes,

Tain 18/11/2008 16:51:29
Removing Ross or Brand has had no impact whatsoever - an overinflated, egotistical pair, with little or no redeeming talent or features - Brand is the unfunniest creature I've seen and heard for years - I cannot see any talent there at all. Save the money - bin both and nurture decent talent. Apart from that it was a piece of infantile bullying.
6

,

18/11/2008 21:40:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.