Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Road safety measures 'may encourage motorists to take more risks'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 February 2008
NEW road layouts designed to cut accidents may actually be making highways less safe, a report claimed yesterday.
Barriers and divisions on the road could make drivers feel more confident and therefore speed up, it said.

The study, by surveyors' group CSS, said the human response to more in-car and on-road safety "may be to increase risky behaviour". It said:
"We are social animals and there is some evidence the removal of control and the creation of uncertainty can help slow traffic and elicit more considerate behaviour."

The report, entitled Travel Is Good, was compiled by CSS's transport futures group and looks ahead to problems likely to be encountered in transport over the next 40 years – and to ways of dealing with them.

It said transport challenges had to be tackled without leaving people feeling guilty about enjoying travel.

It also warned that Britain faced a gridlocked and polluted existence by 2030 unless there were imaginative solutions, cohesive leadership and sustained investment.

In a preface to the report, Richard Wills, the CSS president, said: "The daily impact of traffic in our cities, towns and villages is of concern to many, but we are deeply attached to the freedom and opportunities offered by our cars.

"These challenges require ambitious responses.

"All too often, however, a gloomy picture of restraint and diminishing choice has been painted as the only solution, which turns ordinary people away from serious consideration of the issues that face us."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 February 2008 9:58 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Reckless,

Fife 13/02/2008 07:52:56
I always speed up to make it past those ridiculous road blocks, before on coming traffic forces me to wait an eternity for no reason at all.

Council planners love the feeling of power it gives them. I've always maintained that road blocks and cameras are there to train us to accept the next level of government control. Just wait, I reckon police/military check points will become a common sight on British roads. NuLabour loves to know what you're doing.
2

Scotland to prosper...,

13/02/2008 08:29:08
The approach to our whole private transport system is scandalous. The current campaigns regarding speeding and pollution do nothing to alleviate the escalating traffic congestion issue.

If they were serious about tackling the problems on our roads:

1) Increase the difficulty of the driving test. Include a minimum 6months training period along with training with regards to motorway driving, driving at night and driving in hazardous conditions. The quality of drivers on our roads would soon improve leading to fewer accidents.
2) Begin to target SLOW drivers. The belief that “speed kills” is nonsense. Speed alone does not kill, it’s the frustration built up by being behind drivers that dawdle along at 40mph on a 60mph road that cause accidents. The single biggest hazard on our roads are these people who insist on going at their own speed, with no regard for others on the road.
3) Mandatory re-testing for drivers over 60-65. This is not ageism but the simple reality that as we grow older, our reaction times get slower and our eyesight deteriorates.

There are also the obvious issues to be addressed like improving public transport and such but the points stated above must also be addressed if they are to be serious about improving our transport system and reducing the number of cars on the road.
3

M.T.,

13/02/2008 08:34:08
If you are able to look at kerbs on many of the traffic calming "road safety measures" you can see that they have a lot of black on them due to tyres rubbing of them. This is not necessary due to careless driving but that they are too narrow for the vehicles to pass round them.
In Lanarkshire, the scrap merchants are inindated with enquiries for wheels due to large number of vehicles which are damaged because of both the traffic calming "road safety measures" and the inevitable potholes.

Road Safety????
4

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 13/02/2008 09:20:35
Speed bumps and such measures to slow down traffic add to congestion as congestion is a measure of the average speed of traffic.
5

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 13/02/2008 10:33:31
It's about time that someone who knows something about roads and traffic took charge of the situation.

So far we've had:

1. Traffic lights replacing roundabouts -- causing congestion where none existed before.
2. Re-phased traffic lights with all kinds of fancy filters -- causes more congestion.
3. Speed bumps -- damage vehicles and affect emergancy services response time.
4. Over-sized traffic islands -- give you nowhere to swerve to should someone walk out in front of you
5. Reducing road width with hatching -- causes congestion and frustration
6. Excessive amounts of bus lanes -- Causes congestion. Encourages vehicles to overtake on the inside.
7. Speed cameras -- Purely revenue raising devices. Have caused to crash statistics to worsen over the years
8. Incessant dumbing down propaganda -- has had the effect of causing a great many road users to stop concentrating.
6

truthsleuth,

South of the Border 13/02/2008 14:00:21
Here we go again the speed crazy we own the roads petrol heads suffering from svere petrol fume addiction continue their whingein, special pleading, we are safe drivers others are idiots etc etc.

1. Speed KILLS - if you hit a wall at 10mph you will almost certainly survive. At 100mph you will almost certainly die (unless you are a member of the petrol head heroes trio on top gear.

2. Speed cameras do reduce accidents or at leat the severityof those accidents. More cameras are needed, no warning should be given of their presence. However I would support replacement by elapsed time type ones.

3. Speed bumps and 'severe' chicanes slow traffic and save accidents. The mre severe the better (the brum brum boys with their low profiles tyres get upset because they damage their suspensiom. They can always slow down or even better change to a 'normal car'.

4. It is frustrating driving behind 'slow' drivers. However if it requires you to exceed the speed limit then YOU are at fault. Also if your frustration causes you to 'break the law or drive unsafely then ou should not be in charge of a motor vehicle and undergo a psychological test before being let loose on the road.

5. Older drivers may have slower reaction times but they are more likely to drive accordingly. Younger drivers believe they are Lewis Hamilton and their father was superman. It would be far better to makeyounger drivers repeat the test every two years or so.

6. With all the problems created by road transport (or rather the users of said it would be a great step forward if
- cars were built for economy and safety not speed ie restrict engine size and top speed
- accumulation of points say 9 led to seizure of vehicle and driving ban for a long period of time. Requirement to retake driving test.

7

Incandescent,

13/02/2008 15:51:05
Ah, how nice it would be to see just one thread on SCOTTISH transport issues that didn't feature truthsleuth's simplistic, totalitarian sh1te!
8

Biker,

Ayr 13/02/2008 18:40:55
#6 truthsleuth
1 Speed does not necceserally kill. It largely depends on what has happened prior to hitting the wall that causes you to hit it. Poor driving or situations outside your control are the usual suspects.
2Speed cameras have resolutely NOT reduced accidents. Acording to police statistics, the AA, The RAC and the institute of advanced motorists. The figures have actually risen over the past 5 years.
3 Speed bumps were introduced in my village recently, primeraly to slow the logging lorries. They do not, infact the only real achievement is damage to the road and numerous clains for compensation to East Ayrshire Council. They would be better repairing the existing road structure.
4 Dont actually dissagree with you here at all, but perhaps more traffic cars monitoring the roads and dealing with congestion might be better.
5 Not in total disagreement with you but every 2 years is perhaps too much. I pay enough in taxes already withoput filling the government coffers any more. More police on duty to catch criminals and idiots in "go faster" cars would be preferable.
6 Do you have any idea how easy it is to accumulate 9 points? Drive from London to Edinburgh up the A1 and you stand a more than average chance of gaining points. Hardly fair on our traveling sales and engineering or indeed transport people is it?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.