Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Repossessions rise more than 20 per cent to eight-year high

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 February 2008
THE number of people whose homes were repossessed in the UK jumped by more than 20 per cent in 2007 to an eight-year high.
A total of 27,100 homes were taken back by lenders after their owners failed to keep up with mortgage repayments, the Council of Mortgage Lenders said today.

But the group said the figure, the equivalent of 0.23% of all mortgages, was 10 per cent
lower than it had previously estimated, and it was also well down on the high of 75,540 repossessions reached during the house price crash in 1991.

But Ron Smith, chief executive of the Edinburgh Solicitors Property Centre, said he expected the Capital would fare better than the national figures.

He said: "We have no evidence of increased repossession in Edinburgh. In terms of price and value in the city, we are not as exposed in terms of people over-expending themselves for mortgages. In fact, growth in property prices in Edinburgh has been steady."

He said that Scotland as a whole was seeing a steadiness not apparent in the English market.

Mr Smith said that the UK figures were an indicator of an overstretching of the mortgage market.

He said: "People have been taking out mortgages greater than they can afford. They are in turn finding it difficult to maintain payments. On top of this, we are all paying more to live."

However, he added that the property market as a whole was seeing less turbulence than had been expected.

The latest figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders show that overall, fewer than one in 400 mortgages led to a home being repossessed during 2007 – that's less than half the level seen during the first half of the 1990s.

At the same time, the predicted increase in repossessions during the course of 2007 failed to materialise, with just 13,500 homes taken over by lenders during the final six months of the year, compared with 13,600 during the first half.

The CML said although repossessions had risen from their recent low of below 10,000 a year in 2003 and 2004, they continued to represent a tiny fraction of all home loans.

However, James Jopling, head of campaigns for Shelter Scotland, has blamed lenders for the repossessions crisis.

He said: "These new figures clearly show Britain is moving step by step towards the dark days of the 1990s housing recession. Far too many hard-working families are now struggling to pay their mortgages and stay afloat.

"Lenders must take more responsibility and work with the Scottish and UK Governments to urgently set up a free, confidential advice service to help the growing numbers of homeowners hit by mortgage arrears."

The CML said it was difficult to forecast what the likely level of arrears and repossessions would be in 2008.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 February 2008 1:49 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Mortgage and property news
 
1

Destroy the Planet,

08/02/2008 14:33:57
I was waiting for the usual EEN neanderthal commentaters to say 'serves them right', 'shouldnt have paid beyond there means' etc etc or are they the ones affected, hope so.
2

,

08/02/2008 15:11:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Hector Goodrich (Dr),

Gillin pronounced 'Gullane' 08/02/2008 15:19:13
Serves them right! They should not have committed themselves beyond their means. But every cloud has a single lining, especially for investors who are seeking to improve their domestic property portfolios via the inevitable auctions.
4

it has always been allan,

08/02/2008 17:15:10
Brown has improved the economy so much that they probably did not really need to get repossessed, but just didnt like paying council tax and stealth taxes.
5

Toots - Sheila,

Canada 08/02/2008 17:24:12
I wonder how mnay of these "re-possessions" are related to persons with endowment mortgages who are now staring down the barrel of 43 years of mortgage repayments. (I am and as a single woman I object strongly to being indebted for life due to the theft of my savings / investments so that it could be put into the pockets of staff / management!)
I know the Ec Treaty is supportive of the "freedom of movement" of capital but I would hope that this does NOT mean that "anything goes" and yes we endorse organised crime, fraud and money laundering. To date this would appear to be the case.
6

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

Newington 08/02/2008 17:43:58
I'm shocked that 27,000 people should undertake a debt and then fail to make repayments. People accept such perfidy far too easily. Then again, as a first time buyer, I'm looking forward to the banks being so wrecked they're unable to make new mortgages, because then I'll be able to buy a house at Japanese-level discounts.

To take up the points raised by #5. I counselled anyone who would listen (zero people) back in the 80's not to take endowments - it's nuts to gamble borrowed money on the housing market while gambling the means to pay it back on the stockmarkets. Still, the folks who took the risks should rightly pay the costs of it going awry - losing money through betting is not "theft".

We have been endorsing fraud though - mainly from people lying about their incomes on mortgage forms. It's time to check those forms against tax statements and start jailing those who've been fraudulent. That would undoubtedly free up a few houses too.

Meanwhile I'm beginning to wonder if some US banks are out of reserves. Is it coincidence that Citigroup buys Egg and then embarks on a cash-raising exercise by asking a ton of people to close their credit cards? If things are as I suspect they are, we're now going into a dfelationary depression. Crash helmets on folks...
7

Cappo Del Monte,

08/02/2008 18:16:58
yup, serves them right if they over stretched themselves, unless made redundant from some job or possibly a 1st time buyer trying to get on the ladder.
For those, I feel sorry, the others tough turds
8

Scunner,

Ellon 08/02/2008 18:58:33
It's because the lenders have been slack with their lending terms. High income multiples and allowing borrowing more than the value, at high rates have crippled many first time buyers. They should restrict property ownership to one per person. That would mean less buy to lets and genuine buyers could get on the ladder at more affordable prices.
9

Reckless,

9/11 was an inside job 08/02/2008 21:48:05
Don't expect Labour to keep promises
Thursday, 07 February 2008
The public should not expect promises made in Labour Party manifestos to be kept. That was the astonishing claim made by Gordon Brown's barrister at Brighton County Court in a case brought against him by a member of the UK Independence Party.

http://www.ukip.org/ukip/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=457&Itemid=57
10

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 09/02/2008 00:40:14
number 2 it must be nice to be so perfect/dingbat

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.