Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Parents alerted to high salt levels in sweet foods

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 January 2008
SWEET foods popular with children can mask high levels of salt, a campaign group warned today.
Although parents may think some desserts, sweet drinks and snacks contain no salt at all, a serving of some products contains more than half of the maximum daily limit for youngsters.

Research of products by Consensus Action on Salt and Health (C
ash) found an average 100g portion of Butterkist The Simpsons honey nut popcorn contained 1.25g of salt. This is 63 per cent of the maximum daily limit for children aged one to three and 42 per cent of the limit for four- to six-year-olds.

A 114g Asda fresh roly-poly pudding had 1.1g of salt – 55 per cent of the recommended daily maximum for under-threes.

A Heinz treacle sponge pudding in a tin had 0.8g of salt per quarter of a tin. This is 40 per cent of the daily maximum for a child aged one to three and 27 per cent for a child aged four to six.

The group wants food firms to lower the amount of salt in children's foods and show salt content clearly on product labels. Professor Graham MacGregor, Cash's chairman, said research showed children with high-salt diets had higher blood pressure.

A survey of 2,375 parents by Cash and parenting website Netmums.com found many were unaware of high salt levels in sweet foods.



The full article contains 244 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 January 2008 11:18 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 28/01/2008 00:23:48
Quite honestly, the foods mentioned in this article,
I Would Never Purchase, for my Children once was, and hopefully 'Children-to-be'

What Parent in their right mind, would even contemplate giving their Child, this ..'RUBBISH'.??

'RUBBISH'..'Foods',,even have stupid 'Duff' names!...

.."Butterkist The Simpsons honey nut popcorn"

'Come-on-now' It sounds like something you would give to a..'Teddy-Bear'..for a Child's pretend..'Tea-party'

Unless you have the,...'MUPPET' element,
You cannot be serious to be Soo 'STUPID' To feed your Child theses,.. 'unhealthy'..(NOT-FOODS)

'S**T*'
2

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 28/01/2008 00:29:59
"roly-poly pudding"..For..'Gods-Sake'!!
Even the name, has connotations, of something as being,
Totally Inappropriate, for Children!
3

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 28/01/2008 00:39:49
"Heinz treacle sponge pudding"

'OH-BOY'..Lovely with custard on,..'occasion'

The "Salt" element does NOT surprise me though!
Because,.. 'HEINZ' use natural preservatives in their foods!

Purchase it for my Child or Family Meal..'pudding'.?

A BIG FAT NO.!! 'FAT' being the operative word!
The 'Sugars' content, would scare me, to give to a young child!

Maybe a 'yes',.. when older and as a treat!
4

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 28/01/2008 00:45:34
Whatever happend,..'Pray-tell-Me'..To Common Sense!.?
5

,

28/01/2008 01:08:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 28/01/2008 01:46:44
5 HarderTruth,
I can only agree! and its not a subject matter that really..'bovvers' me, (so to speak)
My kids want a messy, sickly, 'Cream-Egg'..sobeit!
I would moderate though!
When it comes to 'nutty articles' like this one, that I have commented on though, albeit..
'Mr Sensible Hootsman'
Will get my reply! :-D albeit..with..'Darts',
But with a good element of..'Trueisms'!!

Now would you like some..
'Sticky-Chocolate-Rolly-Polly-Pudding'..for your ..
..'Night-Cap'.??
'Brov'.. :-DD
7

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 28/01/2008 09:43:55
Just a load of scaremongering rubbish. The health nazis would have us all eating lettuce leaves with essence of celery if they have their way.

When I was a kid, we all consumed far more than the "recommended daily intake" of salt and sugar and guess what? whith the exception of an unfortunate few who died in motorcycle crashes, we are all still here.
8

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 28/01/2008 12:35:32
7 Alternative Fuel Head

You are TRULY ignorant and uninformed and misinformed.

When I see children stuffing their faces with all manner of junk and fast foods is it any wonder the diabetes plague is spreading out of control and young children are having increasing cases of asthma and even strokes and heart attacks at the age of 10, for God's sake!

Remove the salt shaker from the table, at least, and flavour your homecooking with healthy herbs and spices. Remember, salt is NOT a spice, it is a mineral.

Your taste buds will adapt to the lack of salt with a week and you may survive to live a healthy old age.

Grow your own herbs in your garden or window sill and your culinary creations will astound yours family and guests.

Been there, done that, and the Cordon Bleu School down the street from me has banned salt from their "Signatures" dining room and you have to ask for it. Good!!!
9

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 28/01/2008 13:27:22
Tim,

Before these "guidelines" came out, almost the entire population of the UK consumed more than is currently regarded as sufficient in salt, sugar and fat. the population of Britain did not die out and neither have we all dropped dead from heart attacks at the age of 35.

Therefore, these limits are rubbish and morevoer, what you suggest simply removes freedom of choice whilst achieved nothing.

If you don't want to eat salt, fat or sugar then fine. But you have no right to suggest that others should do the same. What exactly is your arguement? Passive salt-eating?
10

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 28/01/2008 15:36:29
My "argument" is passive boredom from postings such as yours,Alternative Fuel Head.
11

Douglas,

Bathgate 28/01/2008 17:10:51
Condiments of the seasoning to you both.
12

weeshooie1,

Australia 28/01/2008 20:31:48
Douglas #11,

And a 'Happy few Beers' to you Bruv' :o)
13

most things - if in moderation,

28/01/2008 22:17:25
9, your an idiot! just look about you in Scotland, fat, unhealth folks with nothings but beer and fast food in their heads (and gut!!)

salt is the cause of a lot of medical issues, this is not understood by many people, including doctors
14

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 28/01/2008 23:47:33
#13:

For a start, the main theme of this article is salt and sugar, not fast food. McDonalds or Burger King was not even mentioned.

Secondly, according to your theory, people have only just started eating too much salt recently.

All this fuss is just the latest in kne--jerk reactions. "Consensus Action on Salt and Health" indeed. Just who do they think they are? Probably something similar to "Action on Smoking and Health" or the latest bunch of anti-alcohol nazis.

Well they can take a long walk off a short pier.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.