Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Is war on drugs just a waste of money?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 July 2008
THE UK police's "war on drugs" has failed seriously to dent the market for cannabis, cocaine, heroin and other illegal substances, according to a report published yesterday.
The UK Drug Policy Commission report found the £5.3 billion drugs market was proving "extremely resilient" to crackdowns by law enforcement agencies, despite hundreds of millions of pounds spent each year on tackling the problem.

It claims even si
gnificant drug seizures and high-profile convictions of traffickers and dealers rarely affect supply or demand, because of the scale of the market and its ability to adapt quickly to disruptions.

For example, in times of short supply dealers often reduce purity, it says.

Despite the increase in drug seizures, the report says only around 10 per cent of drugs imported into the UK are seized by police and customs.

It says law enforcement has kept a lid on the problem without reducing overall levels of supply and demand.

The percentage of drugs seized would have to reach 60 to 80 per cent to put major traffickers out of business.

Tim McSweeney, one of the report authors, said: "There is a consistent call for a better understanding of how drug markets operate and the role enforcement can have in reducing the damage caused by them.

"We were struck by just how little evidence there is to show that the hundreds of millions of pounds spent on UK enforcement each year has made a sustainable impact and represents value for money."

The report calls for more action to reduce drugs' effects on communities, for instance, by tackling drugs-related "collateral damage", such as gang violence and prostitution.

The authors argue that this would have a greater impact than big hauls.

David Blakey, of the UK Drug Policy Commission, said police should concentrate more resources on tackling local drug dealers and reducing harm in communities.

"All enforcement agencies aim to reduce drug harms and most have formed local partnerships to do this, but they still tend to be judged by measures of traditional supply-side activity, such as seizure rates," he said.

"Of course, drug dealers must be brought to justice, but we should recognise and encourage the wider role the police and other law enforcement officials can play in reducing the impact of drug markets."

The report says that Britain's illicit drugs market is regarded as one of the most lucrative in the world, worth an estimated £5.3 billion, with crack and heroin accounting for about half the expenditure on drugs.

In Scotland, the number of drug seizures has increased by roughly 50 per cent in the past decade, from nearly 15,000 in 1996-97 to 21,000 in 2006-7.

Despite this, the price of hard drugs has fallen in recent years and drug deaths have increased, as has the use of cocaine among young people.

Meanwhile, the number of addicts is believed to have fallen only slightly, with about 51,000 people estimated to be "problematic" drug users.

Over the past four years more than £85 million has been spent on the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency, which is leading the crackdown on the supply of drugs.

The agency has scored some notable successes, with £7.5 million worth of drugs seized in 2006-7.

Yesterday, the agency's national drugs co-ordinator, Willie McColl, insisted that tough enforcement remained vital to tackling the scourge of drugs.

He said: "Taking dealers and drugs off the street remains an important element of our overall approach to tackling organised crime and protecting vulnerable people in our society.

"Enforcement activity is also about much more than kicking down doors," he said. "We are forging new partnerships all the time, whether it is with utility companies to help forces detect cannabis cultivation, or road hauliers to gather intelligence on transportation of drugs into Scotland.

"However, it is widely recognised within policing that there is a need to reduce the harm associated with drugs, as well as the demand.''

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Our national drugs strategy has recovery at its core – and communities, as well as individuals, should benefit from that focus."

Overseas, a wide variety of strategies have been tried – from prescribed heroin in Sweden and legalised cannabis in the Netherlands to "zero tolerance" in many south-east Asian countries.

Harry Shapiro, of the charity DrugScope, said tough law enforcement often came at the expense of human rights.

Three key steps to helping Scotland beat addiction

-STRIPPING many more assets from Scotland's drug barons would put a serious hole in the supply of drugs, according to Professor Neil McKeganey.

The drugs misuse research expert at Glasgow University is worried that people will conclude from yesterday's report that enforcement is ineffective.

But he believes police and other authorities have to get much better at hitting drug dealers in the pocket.

"To seriously reduce the supply of drugs into the UK and Scotland, I think we need to be much more successful at seizing the assets of drug dealers.

"Research shows that this causes more disruption to and worry among those involved in the drugs trade than anything else. We need to be seizing in excess of £100 million a year – at the moment we are recovering only a fraction of that."

Prof McKeganey believes that new measures to disrupt drug dealers will also help to reduce supply.

These include not allowing known dealers to own more than one mobile phone, carry more than £1,000 or apply for a loan.

He adds: "We also need a much tougher approach with regards to the countries which produce drugs for the UK: 90 per cent of heroin consumed in the UK is produced in Afghanistan and yet Britain has not made any significant progress in reducing production here."

-THE demand for drugs in Scotland would be significantly lower if every addict was able to receive immediate treatment. That is the view of Dr Jane Jay, who chairs the national drug-related deaths forum.

"We need to get more people into treatment. There might then be much less necessity to have drugs on the streets," she said.

Waiting lists in some parts of the country mean many addicts who want help are unable to get it. "I think we need more resources and better organisation of services. There's no doubt about that."

She says more also has to be done to keep people on treatment. All too often, addicts who begin treatment find help being interrupted when they are hauled into prison for a drug-related offence.

Dr Jay says she supports the Scottish Government's drugs strategy, which focuses on getting people off drugs altogether rather than managing the problem.

Research is under way to find out the number of drug addicts in Scotland, with the figure of 51,000 that is currently used being several years out of date.

But one statistic that is certain is the rising number of deaths from drug abuse: from 244 in 1996 to 421 in 2006. The figure leapt by 85 between 2005 and 2006 alone.


-ONLY by reducing poverty and deprivation will Scotland be able to make serious and lasting inroads into its drugs problem, according to one expert group.

David Liddell, director of the Scottish Drugs Forum, argues that the impact of tough law-enforcement has been minimal.

"The fact that street drugs in Scotland are relatively cheap and easy to obtain, along with the demand for treatment services and care services for children affected by family drug problems, show only too clearly that traditional law-enforcement measures have very limited impact on drug markets in local communities," he says.

Mr Liddell believes police should continue to pursue high-level dealers – but says attention should switch to the causes of drug abuse.

He says: "There is strong evidence that society would be better served by creating a better balance on spending priorities, so more is spent on tackling the root causes of problem drug-use such as poverty, health inequalities and lack of appropriate access to meaningful jobs, education and training.

"Regenerating communities, so that people have a sense of optimism and aspiration for their lives, is what will reduce the despair and apathy lying behind the overwhelming majority of problems associated with illicit drugs."







The full article contains 1387 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 July 2008 9:57 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Drugs policy
 
1

Richardinho,

31/07/2008 00:27:51
Just give up. If people want to take drugs- let them.
2

cynicalm,

Edinburgh 31/07/2008 00:46:45
Let us be quite clear about this.There is a market for recreational drugs and someone is going to supply it. The experience of Prohibition in the USA should have convinced anyone with more than two brain cells that attempting to enforce a ban simply means that the crinimal fraternity will take over, as they have, and use the profits to finance other wrongdoing.
I would hope that a legal supply could be provided more cheaply than the present criminal set-up and this would remove a source of income for the crooks.
If people wish to destroy themselves by taking drugs, alcohol or tobacco, then let them. They will be no great loss.
3

SouthernSkye,

31/07/2008 07:02:04
What fails is all the "War on XXXXXX yyyy ZZZZ". Why not simply cut the trash and spin and get on with policing in all areas. Crimes/criminals usually overlap. Drugs-murders-stolen cars - prostitution go hand in hand. More Police please and less labourite style spin!
4

iain,

edinburgh 31/07/2008 07:04:36
Nothing has done more to foster the growth of organised crime, systemic corruption and political hypocrisy than the huge growth in our use of illegal drugs. Pornography is now largely legal as is prostitution. Aside from VAT fraud , drugs are the main source of income to organised crime.Worse still, much of this is run by foreign gangs and immigrant groups-a fact we are not allowed to mention due to political correctness.If it cant be stopped it should be taxed and regulated.
5

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 31/07/2008 07:12:17
Nothing has done more to foster the growth of organised crime, systemic corruption and political hypocrisy than .. 2 Governments that sent their troops into Afghanistan to get opium production restarted.
6

Proximaking,

Aberdeen 31/07/2008 07:39:23
Legalise all drugs and use the profits Boots, Superdrug etc make from these products to run clean-up clinics, .... problem solved. No more drug fuelled crimes where people steal hundreds of pounds for their next hit, a fiver a week should be all that is required to stay blitzed. Problem is the police would probably spend even more time than they already do now hounding motorists for doing 82mph on a 70mph dual carriageway in the middle of nowhere with no-one else on the road and letting speeding twits whizz by schools and nurseries at 40mph with kids all over the road. PC plod can always be relied on to get it right ...... for him or herself but not for society. Stop listening to "professionals" within the law enforcement "services", stop listening to doctors about the NHS, these people are only out to fleece us and they have done a damn good job of it up to now. llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllll
7

JayJay,

Right here 31/07/2008 08:38:09
The solution would be relatively simple if the cops just rounded up the various gangsters involved in this vile trade. They know exactly who these people are. They don't appear to be too hard to catch given that they seemingly can accumulate and demonstrate great wealth whilst being unemployed, running a tanning salon, taxi firm or site protection business. And given that a 20 year old Daily Record hack can catch them cold, you do have to wonder what the might of the Force is actually doing - other than be utterly hamstrung by their own ineffectiveness, Human Rights legislation or the abject failure of our own justice system.
The sums recovered from these guys ill-gotten gains is similarly risible, and one has to wonder why the Government even bothered with the Proceeds of Crime Act. It is about as toothless as my 90 year old granny, and I feel sure costs more to run than it recovers.
Two simple choices. Either give up, and provide drugs via the state, or go in very hard on the known gangsters. The middle ground we occupy just now is a costly farce.
8

gus1940,

Edinburgh 31/07/2008 08:56:42
If the authorities think they will ever win the war against the illegal drug trade they are in cloud cuckoo land.

There are 2 possible solutions:-

i) Legalise them. End the hypocrisy whereby tobacco and alccohol are legal and each kill and/or wreck far more lives than drugs.

ii) Send teams of agents out to the drug producing countries to outbid the criminals. It would cost quite a lot but I bet it would be a lot less than is currently spent domestically on policing and paying for the anti drugs profession with all its state funded counsellors and other hangers on.
Call the money spent on outbidding the criminals Foreign Aid - it least it would be going to the farmers who grow the stuff and not to corrupt governments and their officials. THe farmers could even be offered even more money to grow food crops instead of drugs.
9

donald,

glasgow 31/07/2008 08:56:49
Cheap drugs were pumped into the radial areas of Glasgow in the 60's. Then they destroyed the city by culling whole areas and moving the able bodied people out.

Cheap drugs were pumped into the black community to dope the rise of black nationalism in the 60's.

The IRA fought the British drug dealers and agents in Dublin and Belfast when they first moved in during the 60's and early 70's. It now looks as if the Brits and their Yankee masters have won that war.
10

Unimpressed one,

31/07/2008 09:27:45
"Is war on drugs just a waste of money?"

Hardly, without it more than half our police force would be laid off.
11

Banana Heid,

Ayrshire 31/07/2008 10:02:37
Of Course it's a waste of money! All wars are a complete waste of money.
12

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 31/07/2008 10:21:42
I would say that a war on (illegal) drugs is far more worthwhile then a war on (legal) smoking, a war on (legal) drinking and a war on (legal) stanley knives purchased from B&Q.

Perhaps MacAskill ought to apply some of his twisted logic to dealing with drugs. Oh no! I forgot, there is no vast majority of people who legitimately use hard drugs on a regular basis that he can target legislation at.
13

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 31/07/2008 10:27:27
(cont)

Oh hang on... Maybe he can propose some legislation that targets people who need medicine on prescription? Maybe he could limit the number of dispensaries in Scotland to five, build them in the middle of nowhere, provide no parking facilities there, ensure they are at least 20 miles away from the nearest public transport service, require at least two people to dispense any given prescription, limit the staff in each dispensary to two and require that enyone getting medicine provides two forms of photo identity, their original birth certificate and signed affidavits from both parents to say that they are fit and proper people.

That would deal with those who abuse drugs!

Errrmmm..... I've got the funny feeling I've just given MacAskill an idea...
14

Yeah1,

31/07/2008 11:38:27
#13

"I would say that a war on (illegal) drugs is far more worthwhile then a war on (legal) smoking, a war on (legal) drinking and a war on (legal) stanley knives purchased from B&Q."

There isn't a 'war' on smoking, drinking or stanley knives. None of them are being banned or abolished.

The 'war' is on those who carry knives with the intention of using them for violence, and those who get drunk and cause trouble (including underagers who cannot legally drink).

"there is no vast majority of people who legitimately use hard drugs on a regular basis that he can target legislation at."

There is no one who legitimately uses hard drugs. Hard drugs are illegal and hence you cannot legitimately use them.


15

RsS,

Edinburgh 31/07/2008 12:14:09
Why are people always looking for underlying and root causes for people taking illegal drugs? And then coming up with poverty and deprivation as a reason. Other than the poor soles who get themselves addicted, people take them because they find it a thoroughly enjoyable experience. It’s not really that complicated.
16

we the people,

31/07/2008 13:25:25
drugs are one of the world's largest industries. there will always be demand, and therefore always willing suppliers (especially when one can make much larger profits than with conventional crops).the mind boggles frankly as to why this massive industry has been gifted to criminal syndicates, rather than taxed and regulated. If the industry in the uk is worth over £5bn, and we spend more than £1 bn barely scratching the surface of it, if one were to divert those resources to other areas of policing, regulate the quality of drugs sold, and tax them, gain to the exchequer at least £2bn (and fewer deaths from impure or improperly administered drugs, less crime and dealers hanging around street corners).It makes eminent sense4, but i suspect one of the reasons the US etc arfe so hostile to bringing the trade into the realm of legality is that producer countries like colombia, bolivia and afghanistan would get a major economic boost (perhaps putting them on a par with some smaller oil producing countries) and the US will always seek to defend its economic hegemony.An international agreement (perhaps through the UN) is urgently needed. As that looks unlikely, legalisation and regulation here sre our best options.
17

Brian Hill,

31/07/2008 14:16:04
When I was in my mid teens in a large Fife town we 'knew' the one place in town where drugs i.e. cannabis could be had. But that was about it. We didn't know about cost or amount given.

The drug 'war' was on then with locals getting their doors kicked in and being dragged out by police or drug dealers depending on who they had upset.

Today your average primary kid could run off a list of drugs, many can name current prices and weights expected and of course many take drugs.

That should answer the question, is war on drugs a waste of money. More people use them and know about them at a younger age than ever before.

Holland copes much better than we do but then of course their society is less judgemental, less holier than thou and far more realistic about drugs and sex.

And amazingly, they are happier than us according to all the polls.

I might add, I don't even smoke far less take drugs but I have lost one very good young friend to a stronger than usual heroin batch and watch another descend into stealing from parents and grandparents (now in a more stable, but still dependent condition).

I just want to see a more humane, realistic and basically more honest approach to the problem instead of the current ringing of hands and locking people up at every opportunity. (Often whilst wining and dining with some of the people who are financing the 'industry' at the highest level.)
18

Neal! Whit? Haud yer Whisht!!,

31/07/2008 14:22:55
Being a long-term cannabis user (25 years to date) I cannot see any way of stopping the supply. The previous poster who mentioned Prohibition in the US is correct.

I wish I'd never started but I have to say if I hadn't I'd have been a heavy drinker.

I use it to stop the dreams and as an emotional crutch.
19

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 31/07/2008 15:43:06
I have stated at a public forum that the 'war on drugs' is a class war, and still hold that view.

Notwithstanding, the current method of enforcement having the primary profile is, as has been pointed out, ineffective and self serving. The best way forward is to licence the importation, distribution and quality of narcotics for regulated public sale (but not at Boots Chemist - that's just too much!)

How do we achieve this? Lobby MPs, MSPs, MEPs, local councillors. Get behind the drug workers and strengthen the Customs at point of entry. Don't leave it up to the Police - they're not getting it right.
20

Allan(handofgod137),

31/07/2008 16:20:01
Just face the facts, and legalise and regulate.
Also #10, in your dreams, the ira were and are major players in the drugs trade.
21

we the people,

31/07/2008 16:46:44
flub, interesting perspective on the class war issue. Despite the fact that drug use crosses social boundaries and is widespread among financial and cultural elites, enforcement is targeted primarily at the poor (those tetra pak heirs,with over two grand of coke in the house, would've been treated differently had they occupied a lower social place). Partly this is because elites can keep it behind closed doors and do not have to engage in street transactions, but undoubtedly it also falls into the general pattern of the spplication of law - it catches small fry in its net, but allows the bigger fish to burst through unimpeded.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.