Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Drivers who risk a child's life for sake of a seat belt



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 September 2008
ONE in six drivers is putting children's lives at risk by breaking child car seat-belt laws, according to a survey.
A total of 16 per cent of motorists questioned said they failed to use proper restraints when carrying children.

Relatives and family friends rather than parents were found to be the worst offenders, with more than one in four admitting not using
child restraints.

The survey of 2,100 drivers, for insurer LV, also showed that a similar proportion of motorists failed to check child seats were installed correctly.

In addition, more than a quarter of those failing to comply were unaware of the rules, which were tightened two years ago.

A tenth of those who were aware of the regulations said they disregarded them and did not bother to fit safety seats or boosters, which are compulsory for children under 12 or less than 4ft 5in (135cm) high.

John O'Roarke, LV's managing director of car insurance, said: "It's clear that many drivers are still confused about the law and, for one reason or another, are not following the legislation. We'd urge all drivers to make sure they're aware of the guidelines."

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (Rospa) has called for penalty points to be added to driving licences for the offence, to bolster the current £30 minimum fine.

However, it said the tougher regulations on child car seats had led to a 17 per cent fall in deaths and serious injuries, from 326 in 2005 to 271 in 2007.

Kevin Clinton, Rospa's head of road safety, said: "This shows child car seats work, and when children are using the correct restraint for their size they have a better chance of surviving an accident."

A spokeswoman for Rospa said the new regulations had made a "positive difference" and the survey findings were unsurprising because no law was obeyed by everyone.

She said: "We would encourage parents and other carers to find out about the law."

However, the Association of British Drivers said tougher penalties were unjustified.

Bruce Young, its Lothian and Borders co-ordinator, said: "This is a typical knee-jerk reaction. I don't believe any parent is uncaring about their children's wellbeing. Should a driver who was giving a lift to a mother and two kids be given penalty points for an act of kindness?"

Neil Greig, Scotland director of the Institute of Advanced Motorists' Motoring Trust, said: "This survey is worrying. The law was meant to clear up child seat regulations. But the simple message that every child must be in the right seat every time they get in a car has been lost in the complexity of height/weight and age comparisons."

BACKGROUND

SINCE 2006, it has been compulsory for children aged between three and 12, or measuring up to 4ft 5in (135cm) tall, to use child car seats or booster seats.

However, they can use an adult belt on the rear seat if there are already two other children travelling in child or booster seats which prevent the fitting of a third. They can also use an adult rear belt "on a short distance for reason of unexpected necessity".

Children under three must travel in child seats, where they are available, but may travel unrestrained in taxis which have no child seat. Older children may use adult belts in such taxis.







The full article contains 571 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 September 2008 10:17 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Scullion,

Canada 30/09/2008 01:52:18
Risk management is the control of loss exposure at minimum cost. Not buckling up, whether it be children or adults, is not only stupid from a safety point of view, it is also shows poor financial thinking as with no cost, you eradicate a sizeable amount of risk.
2

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 07:57:22
Trendy nonsense. Silly fuss about nothing.
3

A.A.,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 08:26:54
#Urban Guerrilla, Edinburgh.
No it's not trendy nonsense. You either have kids and don't care about their safety or you don't have kids and you haven't a clue.
It is so stupid not to use seat belts for children, or for adults not to use them at all. I've seen people sitting with a seat belt on, in the front seat of the car, but with a child on their lap. Do they think that because they are strapped in, the child won't go through the windscreen if the driver has to break suddenly or another car hits them?
Sheer stupidity.
4

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 08:36:00
It's a load of trendy, officious rubbish dreamt up by Guardianista zealots to restrict people's freedom and keep health & safety types in jobs. There were no such things as seat belts when I was a child. We sat on adults' laps in the front when we were little and when we were a bit older we all squashed together in the back having a good old giggle and a carry-on, and it was perfectly safe. Happy days!
5

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 10:51:37
Hang on... I thought that if you always obey the speed limit, you wouldn't get hurt in a crash...

Maybe if the propaganda was directed at real road safety issues rather than at those which will make them the most money, people would have a better understanding and would behave in a more responsible manner.
6

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 10:55:52
#4:

Yes. I remember those days as well. A load of boys in the back of a Ford Anglia van taking it in turns to sit on the spare wheel.

We were lucky. We were fortunate in that we were never involved in a crash but if we had been, I dread to think of the consequences. In those days, if you were involved in even a minor car crash you would be fairly seriously injured and possibly killed.

Seat belts have changed all that and not even I am prepared to argue agaist that one.
7

Chris W,

02/10/2008 08:28:05
The safety freak mentality is this country is becoming ridiculous. This is all about the silly imposition of child seats on older kids who don't need them. It was a nice contrast to watching Charlie Boorman's latest TV prog when he was in India, and saw families of three or four riding motorbikes thru chaotic Mumbai streets.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.