Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Delegates fail to sway Kirk on nuclear disarmament



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 May 2008
THE Kirk was forced to clarify its position on nuclear weapons yesterday after linking the possible development of Iran's atomic arsenal to the scrapping of Trident.
A report before the General Assembly yesterday argued it was hypocrisy for Britain to pursue the renewal of Trident while demanding disarmament from others.

However, debating the report on domestic and international political issues, from the infl
uential Church and Society Council, some delegates said it was wrong to link the two unrelated issues. Two representatives from the Iranian Embassy were present during the debate.

The council report said that while it did not believe it was in Iran's interests to develop nuclear weapons, "the position of the UK and US governments in particular is gravely weakened in relation to Iran when the UK seeks to renew Trident".

The Rev Mark Nicholas, of Gorebridge, said the council was mistaken in its beliefs. "My concern is that this ties together two matters," he said. "The Church and Society is right to indicate concern about nuclear proliferation extending to Iran developing its own deterrent.

"But to ally that to unilaterally giving up our own nuclear deterrent is mistaken. I concede that it smacks of fairness and fair-mindedness, but I wonder if it overrides wisdom."

Mr Nicholas called for the two issues to be discussed separately from each other.

Supporting Mr Nicholas's comments, Mr Geoffrey Smith, of Dumfries and Kirkcudbright Presbytery

, said: "In general, I support the government on defence matters. Unilateral nuclear disarmament is naïve in my opinion. I realise we are imperfect human beings, but we have to do what best we can."

However, the criticism received stiff opposition from the assembly as a body.

Former Moderator, the Very Rev Dr Alan MacDonald, gave an impassioned plea for the Assembly to reaffirm its opposition.

He said: "When the world is watching, this of all times is not the time to change a long-standing position."

He added that people around the world were "bewildered" by the UK's "hypocrisy" in possessing nuclear weapons while stating others should not.

Morag Mylne, the convener, said: "Nuclear weapons are nuclear weapons. They are completely wrong wherever they are. They are wrong in this country, they are wrong in Iran and it is the position of this General Assembly for a quarter of a century that nuclear weapons have no place in this society or anywhere else."

Mr Nicholas's move to have the recommendations changed was defeated unanimously.





The full article contains 417 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 May 2008 9:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

sam the god,

21/05/2008 12:30:45
They know that the treat of Armageddon not only fills the seats but also fills the coffers

2

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 21/05/2008 13:08:14
The church should stick to what it knows best---god-bothering and bible bashing. Leave the MoD and the armed forces to determine the best strategy for this country's defence.
3

John Blackley,

Florida 21/05/2008 20:22:25
Let me see if I can get this right first time.

ir-rel-ev-ant.
4

Three Cheers for The Church of Scotland,

22/05/2008 11:14:33
It's good to see the General Assembly speaking up against immoral nuclear weapons as usual. They are in agreement with the majority in this country and recognise the importance of the issue, (unlike the idiots who have posted on here!)

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.