Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Bullying affects girls far more than boys

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 March 2008
BULLYING affects three-quarters of school pupils, with girls affected the most, according to a new study.
Significantly more girls than boys encounter bullying and they suffer more psychological distress as a result, says the report, from researchers in Edinburgh and York.

One of the most comprehensive studies of the psychological affect of bullying,
the report assesses 1,993 pupils aged 12 to 19 at 14 schools.

It discovered that 73 per cent had been bullied, had been perpetrators of bullying or had witnessed someone else being bullied.

Professor Ian Rivers, head of psychology at Queen Margaret University in Edinburgh, carried out the study with researchers at York St John University. He said: "It's really worrying to me what's happening with girls in the 12-16 age group."

His research found that girls were 12 times more likely to overreact to comments from others, and nine times more likely to become physically ill because of bullying.

They were also six times more likely to report symptoms interpreted as being of psychotic behaviour.

David Eaglesham, the general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association, said the findings were related to the different ages at which boys and girls mature.

He said: "At the beginning of this age group, girls are becoming particularly aware of differences between each other, while boys tend to herd together. This is something that has gone on for time immemorial, it is not new."

He said almost everyone could say they had been bullied at some stage, which was a societal problem.

He added: "Schools certainly have a significant role to play. But it is also up to society to teach children that they need to respect people regardless of any differences."

Brian Donnelly, director of Respect Me, Scotland's anti-bullying agency, said the impact of bullying was more widespread than previously thought.

Boys traditionally bully physically, he said, while girls will use psychological tactics such as ignoring each other.

He said: "Girls are more emotionally mature than boys and their skills in terms of emotionalising relationships are much better than boys.

"A lot of bullying is fear and imagination and girls are much better at understanding the impact of such behaviour."

For that reason he said girls tend to use cyber-bullying because it inflicts psychologically damage, rather than physically hurt people.

He said children must learn they don't have to get on with everyone all the time.

He also warned teachers to set a positive example: "If you are at a school where the headteacher bullies teachers and teachers bully, pupils are going to pick that up.

"The culture and ethos of a school tend to come very much from the top."







The full article contains 454 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 March 2008 10:31 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Bullying at school
 
1

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 08/03/2008 02:35:23
While boys tend to externalize the results of bullying, girls tend to internalize it, frustrating the efforts of teachers and counselors to help them. In 23 years teaching at an all-girls school, including four moderating freshman (fourth form) class government, the best I can elicit in general comments, never specific accusations. The women faculty manage a little better. The kids just won't talk. If anyone comes up with a ready method, I like to know. Unfortunately, we've had cases of girls who left the school and told us after the fact that the reason was bullying.
2

Samcafe,

Glasgow 08/03/2008 08:16:17
But females don't do abuse; was this story run past Women's aid before being released
3

Robert,

Kirriemuir 08/03/2008 08:58:26
The thrust of this article is old hat; some may recall that Alex Comfort wrote his doctorate thesis on 'The Use and Abuse of Authority' and a tad earlier (in the 50/60s) Erving Goffman wrote the book 'Asylums' where it was shown that bulling and problems in any institution started at the top and percolated downwards and hence the reason why there has been so much rioting in prisons in particular. Interestingly, those responsible appear to get promoted to a higher level of incompetence.

I had three daughters all whom were at the same secondary school but because we were a mobile family and the girls were new and English to boot (I am not) they then became the victims of bullying of which the staff were aware but choose to turn a Nelsonian eye to this problem. I had recognised that my eldest daughter was an extremely powerful girl physically but tender-hearted and I advised her to attack her bullies which reluctantly she eventually did after some cajoling and the result was what I expected as peace reigned thereafter but, my daughter was then accused by staff of bullying the bully! What a crazy world in which we live.

My middle-daughter had a low IQ due to a mild form of brain damage at birth and who struggled to remain in full stream education and spent her time in remedial clases. She was caught climbing through an unrepaired hole in the chainlink fence, which was a regular practice by all pupils and for the first occasion among my daughters she received whacks of the tawse from the Rector! That was the final day before the school dispersed for its summer vacation and probably fortunate too as I would have assaulted that Rector in my almost uncontrolled rage!

As Australians would readily say, 'Advance education backwards'!
4

james 1st,

hamilton 08/03/2008 09:07:22
what a silly study, 73percent had been bullied or wrer bullies or witnwssed bullying this means that each act could have had dozens of witnesses and you would have had high figures
the percentage should consider number bullied and number of bullies, that would be meaningful
genuine advice here bullies only understand getting belted preferably if possible by their victim
5

Crank Parent,

Livingston 08/03/2008 09:33:08
Similar studies have shown that bullying is a common side effect of bringing together large numbers of same age children on a regular basis. Where you have groups of more than 6 children the same age, there is more likely to be anti-social behaviour and this behaviour is more likely to be repeated amongst others in the group. It's not rocket science to see how schools are rife with bullying. Small class sizes, more teachers and a mixed age environment promotes sociability and has the best learning outcome for children. Home education and Montessori schools follow this principle with excellent results.
6

Roy,

08/03/2008 10:34:53
Why is this on the Obituaries page?
7

yockel,

08/03/2008 12:29:06
The reason there is apparently an increasing problem of bullying is there are just so many more fatties to pick on.

It is however a good introduction to modern PC society where you are constantly bullied to conform, hold "accetable" values and believe the latest diatribe.

#3 Robert, I would have willingly assisted in giving that rector a good beating.
8

Stu_R_20,

08/03/2008 13:28:18
"A lot of bullying is fear and imagination and girls are much better at understanding the impact of such behaviour."

You mean they take it to heart. Sling a fist at them, never fails..
9

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 08/03/2008 16:05:47
#6
You are not a Crank Parent, you are very close to the mark. But it is less the number of children than the emotional distance of adults from the children and the resulting impersonal interactions in large schools that allow bullying to go undetected. Be assured some of us teachers want very much to detect it and protect its victims. At my school we have strong mentoring programs, and good level of supervision and lots of activities that bring adults and kids into contact outside of the classroom, plus an alert dean (assistant head for student discipline) who monitors things like MySpace and a good counseling staff. There's only so much we can do without kid cooperation, though.
10

tmccandlish,

USA 08/03/2008 19:06:02
I agree with the findings in this article. Many other studies have found the same results. I just wrote a book about relational bullying among girls. It's a research-backed memoir titled Flying Grounded: My Spiritual Triumph Over Female Bullying. If anyone is interested, my book can be found at www.iuniverse.com, www.barnesandnoble.com, or www.amazon.com.

www.tamimccandlish.com
11

Robert,

Kirriemuir 08/03/2008 23:47:04
Quote from, "Brian Donnelly, director of Respect Me, Scotland's anti-bullying agency, said the impact of bullying was more widespread than previously thought.

Boys traditionally bully physically, he said, while girls will use psychological tactics such as ignoring each other.

He said: "Girls are more emotionally mature than boys and their skills in terms of emotionalising relationships are much better than boys.

"A lot of bullying is fear and imagination and girls are much better at understanding the impact of such behaviour."

For that reason he said girls tend to use cyber-bullying because it inflicts psychologically damage, rather than physically hurt people.

He said children must learn they don't have to get on with everyone all the time". Unquote.

This guy seems to suffer severely from intellectual myopia, of course, males and females differ emotionally but that does not imply that somehow the female is more emotionally mature nor more sophisticated in managing emotional problems. As males tend to be more physical neither does this imply that somehow they are less affected by emotional rejection and one could continue criticising his comments which are themselves peurile.

All of life, even in adulthood, one is subjected to emotional bullying sometimes termed emotional balckmail and what those earlier teenagers are learning, almost in a forced-grown situation, is the realities and responsiblities of adulthood. If they are mollycuddled it might be that they will remian emotionally stunted for the remainder of their lives so the quicker they learn the better able they might be to cope with those social demands and they should be allowed the space and the freedom to learn from this early life experience without interference.

It is only by growing through this process that we all learn something of ourselves and of our own limitations and capacities and the earlier we can comprehend this the more mature we are likely to become and the more
12

Robert,

Kirriemuir 08/03/2008 23:53:52
The last part of my submission above seems to have been truncated so here it is: "the earlier we can comprehend this the more mature we are likely to become and the more able to fit into the world of commerce where the battles of antiquity continue to play their part. Children need support but not protection. They need guidance on understanding why each of us acts in the manner that we do and understanding can lead to forgiveness!

What is at stake here is something more fundamental to human nature which is social humiliation or peer group rejection and it is from those early childhood experiences that children learn to manage those necessary social skills to equip them for adulthood. As in Bopeep let us, "Leave them alone and they'll come home wagging their tails behind them". Let us allow children to develop competently into maturity without undue interference in their lives. The generation into which they are born is the generation that they will follow for the remainder of their lives and those generation's of others is inconsequential to them".

13

Doreen,

The Cyber Shebeen 09/03/2008 10:23:25
"Mollycoddled?"....bullying is a shameful fundamental basic human instinct...weed out the weaker from the pack...not something that we should be proud of...and children can be the worst offenders, due to their immaturity...time to take the matter in hand and challenge it head on, in primary schools....why do we condone it and see it as 'character building?' when some children never recover...those who are the continued targets of bullys ie those from poor family backgrounds, are smaller, wear glasses, have an impediment of some kind...Asperger children?..

Bullying children can go on to become bullying adults....what will they have learned?....whilst others can find their morale badly damaged and even destroyed....
14

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 09/03/2008 16:41:50
#13 Agreed. Sometimes it is better to let kids work out problems with peers, provided we keep an eye on things. We speak in California of "helicopter parents" who do too much for their kids. But bullying is a matter of calculated aggression not "misunderstanding". It's predation on the weak by the strong. The bully knows precisely what she's doing, even if she's not fully aware of the consequences. Stopping it require prudent supervision, constant close communication between kids and adults and credible sanctions.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.