Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Brown: Afghan mission 'our first line of defence' against terrorism

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 November 2009
GORDON Brown today defended Britain's military mission in Afghanistan, saying that the 9,000-strong UK force forms our first line of defence against terror attacks at home.


Gordon Brown at the Royal College of Defence Studies today

The Prime Minister also set out five tough tests for newly re-elected Afghan president Hamid Karzai if he is to retain the support of the international community.

But he warned Mr Karzai's administration will have "forfeited its right to international support" if it fails to root out corruption and improve the governance of the country.

The warning came in a hastily-arranged speech at the end of a bloody week for the British force in Afghanistan, with seven deaths, including the murder of five servicemen by a "rogue" Afghan police officer they were training.

Speaking to an audience of high-ranking military officers in London, Mr Brown said Afghanistan's government has become "a byword for corruption". And he acknowledged flaws in the disputed election which led to the president winning a second term in office earlier this month.

"I am not prepared to put the lives of British men and women in harm's way for a government that does not stand up against corruption," he said.

His spokesman said this should not be seen as a threat to pull Britain's force out if Mr Karzai fails to reform his government, telling reporters in Westminster: "We have no intention of withdrawing troops from Afghanistan until we have completed our campaign."

The spokesman said Mr Brown was "committed to succeeding" and was sending a message to the international community that "we will succeed or fail together – and we will succeed".

In three phone conversations since his re-election – the most recent yesterday morning – Mr Karzai accepted the need for action on five key areas: security, governance, reconciliation, economic development and engagement with its neighbours, said the spokesman.

It is expected that the Afghan president will set out his plans to meet these goals in his inauguration speech on November 19, and Mr Brown made clear that "international support depends on the scale of his ambition and the degree of his achievement".

"If, with our help, the new government of Afghanistan meets these five tests, it will have fulfilled an essential contract with its own people. And it will have earned the continuing support of the international community, despite the continuing sacrifice," said the Prime Minister.

"If the government fails to meet these five tests, it will have not only failed its own people, it will have forfeited its right to international support."

Mr Brown called for the appointment of an international "anti-corruption czar" to advise the Kabul administration, along with the establishment of an anti-corruption commission and special crimes tribunal.

And he warned Mr Karzai: "Cronies and warlords should have no place in the future of Afghanistan."

Paying tribute ahead of Remembrance Day to the 93 British troops who have died in Afghanistan this year, the Prime Minister said: "These men are our heroes today."

He acknowledged that Britain's strategy was not "without danger or risk".

But he said the key to bringing British troops home from Afghanistan was building up the home-grown armed forces and police to a state where they could deliver security themselves.

He dismissed suggestions from former Foreign Office minister Kim Howells that the money and effort expended on the military effort in Afghanistan would be better spent on anti-terror measures in the UK.

"When the main terrorist threat facing Britain emanates from Afghanistan and Pakistan; and when, although the sustained pressure in Pakistan, combined with military action in Afghanistan, is having a suppressive effect on al Qaida, we know that they continue to train and plot attacks on Britain from the region ... this mission must not fail," he said.

"It is not easy. The choices are not simple. There is no strategy that is without danger and risk.

"But that is the responsibility of leadership – of government, and of our armed forces. To do what is necessary, however difficult, to keep the British people safe. We cannot, must not and will not walk away."

He insisted Britain would continue to train Afghan forces, despite this week's deaths.

"We will not give up this strategy of mentoring," said Mr Brown. "Because it is what distinguishes a liberating army from an army of occupation.

"Not an army in opposition to local Afghan people but an army supporting local Afghan people."

Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg described the speech as "a woefully belated attempt to win over public support for a war that has cost so many lives".

"The Prime Minister has finally acknowledged that the British people will always back our brave British troops in the dangerous work they do, but they will not unconditionally support soldiers being sent to fight and die for a corrupt and illegitimate government in Kabul," said Mr Clegg.

"The brutal truth is that we will not succeed in Afghanistan without a new and workable international plan covering everything from our military tactics to political reconciliation."

Meanwhile, a former armed forces chief told the House of Lords that the Government had failed to provide adequate numbers of helicopters to prevent the loss of British lives in Afghanistan.

Former chief of defence staff Lord Guthrie said: "There is a clear need for more helicopters... I have no doubt whatsoever that with additional helicopters, some of these lives which have been lost would have been saved."



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Incandescent,

06/11/2009 13:53:17
There were huge numbers of helicopters in Vietnam...

Oh, wait...
2

Jings MacCrivvens,

06/11/2009 14:12:57
Yet again Gordon Brown sticks two fingers up at the public, saying "up yours" as he pursues, on behalf of his odious and pernicious Labour Party, its relentless spree of killing and maiming hundreds of thousands of innocents. Not content with that and with banrupting the economy he continues to throw billions of pounds at a war in Afghanistan which is clearly being lost.
3

Eugene john,

Borders 06/11/2009 14:19:59
If this so called war on terror goes on for many more years will Brown's sons when they are old enough be enlisting into the military to do their bit for the cause. And what about the sons and daughter of Blair or, for that matter, any other MP; how many of their offspring have served in Iraq or Afghanistan? Just shows how the politicians are self serving in looking after their own and to hell with the rest of us.
4

Guy Wersh,

06/11/2009 15:10:38
Afghanistan's government has become "a byword for corruption"

Pot, kettle, black.
5

Al Ghaf,

06/11/2009 15:11:12
If Brown believes this BS he is peddling, he is an idiot and should not be PM.

If Brown does not believe what he is peddling, people are dying for a lie and he should stand down.
6

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 06/11/2009 15:44:36
>>GORDON Brown today defended Britain's military mission in Afghanistan, saying that the 9,000-strong UK force forms our first line of defence against terror attacks at home.<<

An utterly false statement. Is anyone really stupid enough to actually believe this?

It is about as legitimate to say:
>>GORDON Brown today defended Britain's military mission in Afghanistan, saying that the 9,000-strong UK force forms our first line of defence against the Martian invasion.<<
7

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 06/11/2009 15:50:18
Clearly Brown's speech was hastily arranged. "I am not prepared to put the lives of British men and women in harm's way for a government that does not stand up against corruption," he said.
Then, his spokesperson clarifies and says in effect "well, yes we will continue to do so until we have completed our mission whatever Karzai does".

The the curiously and ambiguously worded "we will win or fail together and we will win"! Duh?!

Facing both ways at once and only succeeding in confusing the message. If this is deliberate he is attempting to deceive the public into thinking we will not put troops' lives at risk and that we will win. Or lose. Depending on which way you look at it. Or, no, we will actually win, kind of.

Just as well Chrchhill did not conduct WWII in this sloppy, confused tangle of illogical thought. Maybe the most powerful factor is that now 75% of the public want the troops returned and he is now seen to be in the way of that goal. Hence the attempt to obfuscate as usual.
8

mk-ultra,

Edinburgh 06/11/2009 16:43:41
"U.S. OK’d plan
to topple Taliban
a day before 9/11"

"WASHINGTON (MSNBC) - After years of delay caused by inadequate intelligence, the U.S. government decided just one day before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that it would try to overthrow the Taliban rulers of Afghanistan if a diplomatic push to expel Osama bin Laden from the country failed, the independent panel investigating the attacks reported Tuesday......"

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4585010/

9

Media for one,

06/11/2009 19:19:20
I would love to ask Brown - If you are really so passionate about fighting terrorism then why do you support Tony Blair?

And I would also like to know if you consider Osama Bin Laden more dangerous to world peace than George Bush and Rumsfeld?
10

Gary Inserik,

Nova Scotia 06/11/2009 20:04:32
So borders thousands of miles away from yours in the UK are the first line of defence for terrorist attacks within your own borders?

Tell me, how does an island manage to have so many homegrown/outgrown terrorists within their own borders?

Rampant and uncontrolled immigration perhaps?
11

crashtestmonkey,

In the rain 06/11/2009 21:12:44
This is getting serious. It looks like Brown is starting to believe his own rhetoric.

How many terrorist acts have their been on UK soil since 2001? How many UK citizens have died from terrorist acts since 2001? That first line of defence is doing a fantastic job Gordon, just like the little orange ducks on the conveyor belt in the shooting gallery at the fair. Knock one down they just pop another one on and give you a teddy or a toffee apple.

I wonder if Tony Blair will be the "anti-corruption czar"? He is middle east peace envoy after all and what a cracking job he is doing with Iran, Israel and Syria. He should be made a(n unelected unwanted) president or something.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.