Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Britain to pay £60bn to help poor nations cut carbon emissions

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 June 2009
BRITISH taxpayers will have to stump up their "fair share" to fight climate change, Prime Minister Gordon Brown warned, as he announced plans for a £60 billion fund to help developing countries cut emissions.
The Prime Minister launched the government's climate change strategy yesterday ahead of crunch climate talks in Copenhagen in December.

He announced a proposal to create a £60bn annual fund to help the poorest countries make the transition to lo
w carbon economies.

Mr Brown also hinted that airfares could have to increase to help raise funds to pay for emissions reduction.

"I will commit the UK now to paying its fair share of the global total of such a financing mechanism," he said. "If we act now, if we act together, if we act with vision and resolve, success at Copenhagen is within reach. But if we falter, the earth itself will be at risk," Mr Brown said at the launch at London Zoo.

"We must help the developing countries adapt to the changes in climate which are already now occurring and which over the next few decades, however much we cut emissions, we cannot now avoid."

He said developed countries will likely need to reduce emissions by at least 80 per cent by 2050, in order to achieve an overall global target of 50 per cent.

The £60bn annual fund would smooth the path for developing countries, who are anxious not to stymie economic growth, to make the transition to using less carbon, he said.

But Mr Brown's remarks drew criticism when it was suggested that ten per cent of this money should come from existing aid budgets, and when he warned there could be hikes on airfares.

"It is important that aviation and maritime emissions are brought into the Copenhagen agreement, and the mechanisms for reducing emissions in these sectors could also potentially yield revenues for climate financing," said Mr Brown.

With airlines struggling during the downturn, it is feared they would be forced to pass the costs on to passengers.

Climate and anti-poverty campaigners had a mixed reaction to the speech.

Oxfam chief executive Barbara Stocking said funding of at least £90bn a year was needed and she condemned the proposal to draw on development aid. "Rich countries must now come forward with the necessary upfront funding for a fair and safe deal," she said.

"Climate change is a problem caused by the rich world but borne overwhelmingly by the poor. It is simply wrong that any solution should involve plundering aid money – even if only 10 per cent.

"If Paul needs money it should not be taken from Peter."

Greenpeace chief scientist Doug Parr said of Mr Brown: "By becoming the first major leader to put a figure on how much money is needed he has shown signs of leadership on climate change that have so far been sorely lacking."

About 200 countries will meet in Copenhagen in December to negotiate a successor to the Kyoto Protocol.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2009 10:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 27/06/2009 00:30:55
It looks like the Prime Minister is starting to suffer from decimalism. Decimalism is when you keep moving up the decimal point you eventually reach a point where the numbers become so huge that average person has trouble fathoming just how big a sum that is.

Some recent examples:

UK Government Deficit £175 Billion

UK Government Debt £1 Trillion

Climate Change Fund £60 Billion

Nobody can really understand this until you break it down.

UK Deficit £175 Billion - That is the equivalent of the Government taking out a credit card in your name and running up a £3,000 bill on it this year.

UK Debt £ 1 Trillion - That is the equivalent of a baby being born and before it takes its first breath it owes as much money as it costs to buy the average new car.

Climate Change Fund £ 60 Billion - That is the equivalent of giving every human on the planet a £10 note and then sticking everyone in the UK with a £1,000 bill.

We need an election soon Gordon, the UK simply can not afford you as Prime Minister.
2

redcliffe62,

27/06/2009 00:33:26
if scotland was 2 or 3 degrees warmer i do not see it as a bad thing actually. greenland gets a bit greener.
so an island witn 1500 people in woop woop goes under, those people can be relocated. if there is real dnager to millions rather than tuvalu then i can reconsider the notion.
and i speak as someone who studied climatology in the 80's.
and temperatures do go up and down, in north dakota they just had snow in summer so not much temperature rising there.
let brown pay for climate change solutions by cutting mp's money to 100k a year all in no more paid on top except a railcard for mp's within 200km of wastemonster and airfares to those more than that distance.
that would be a good dent in the figure needed over a 5 year term the way these guys are troughing.
3

Edward,

27/06/2009 01:14:10
Brown is so deluded now!
Where does he get of pretending that the UK economy is rich enough for this largess?
The UK economy is a busted flush, the sooner Brown realises this the better. Then again he will be kicked out within next 10 months
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/06/2009 01:24:49


IT IS RIDICULOUS!, And I am certainly Against this money being proposed to be spent elsewhere, when we need to get our backyard in order first!
We have our Homeless, our Needy, Our now getting 'decrepit' NHS, and the list goes on.




5

Sgian Achlais,

27/06/2009 01:33:31
If I was El Gordo I would not be thinking about saving the world. I would be looking a little closer to home and trying to save the Labour party from utter annihilation.

Stop spending the money you maniac.

I suppose increasing air travel will not affect the political elite who just put it on expenses.
6

Sgian Achlais,

27/06/2009 01:35:15
#5 Charles,

That is your most sensible post I can recall in quite some time and not a single mention of drinking.

Are you off the sauce tonight? LOL
7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/06/2009 01:50:38

7 ~Sgian Achlais,

Maybe I should get angry, more often.


8

Diego Plasma Residue,

USA 27/06/2009 02:31:03
The big news around here is our brilliant , big brained political genuises passed the Kyoto Carbon Cap in Trade bill , with hundreds of additional pages nobody bothered reading about! The thin economy now will be dragged under by more absurd laws based on faulty science that left out the solar maximum & minimum , every 74 to 76 years all the sun spots go on a picinic around Arcturus and things cool off. This is just wonderful! The Chinese must be laughing at US all the way to the central bank stocked full of some 2 trillions of T-bonds and long term notes! Thank you Al-Ghool! D.
9

Evia,

27/06/2009 03:03:57
Gordon Brown, Saviour of the World, is never happier than when he is giving away £billions that we don't have and will have to borrow. He needs to go and without further delay because we can't afford him and we certainly don't want him.

petitions.number10.gov.uk/please-go/

www.gopetition.com/petitions/the-queen-to-dissolve-parliament-and-call-a-general-election.html

Brown, along with Blair, is the worst thing that has happened to this country in many decades. He has done many wrong things since he came to power, the worst being his ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, that sells us to foreign powers for £10.000,000 and, probably, a plum job in the EU. If all member states ratify, as is likely, we will be totally under the control of the EU. If we don't have a change of government soon, we can say bye, bye Scotland because we will be just a region of the EU and we won't be Scottish - we will be European. Have a look at what will happen

strangemaps.wordpress.com/page/8/163 – Europe Wipes Britain off the Map!

Do you want to be European? The Lisbon Treaty will come into effect on the first of the month following ratification by all member states. The countries that have still to ratify are N. Ireland, Poland, Czech Republic and Germany. Sign yourself up for their newsletter (free) and keep in touch with what is happening.

www.eu-referendum.org/english/news/index.html
10

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/06/2009 03:04:54

9 ~Diego Plasma Residue,USA,

All too generous, naive, and quite frankly Stupid, for our own-selves!
None the Wonder the "Chinese must be laughing at US"
None The Wonder 'Bin-Laden' Laughed in His Caves!
None The Wonder 'Al-Qaeda' Laughs, Laughs Laughs!




11

Diego Plasma Residue,

USA 27/06/2009 03:27:59
The Scots have a long tradition of science research. There any bold Scottish climatologist with functioning plumbing under that thar kilt , who will stand up on a mound of heather and bellow across the Atlantic in furious outrage at the foolish anarchistic nonsense your colonial cousins are heading into? Well , is there? D.
12

fat lord prodder,

somewhere in alba 27/06/2009 04:52:42
what ever happend to "charity begins at home",by all means help poorer people ,but start with home problems first
some of these poorer countries were made poorer by the uk/usa policies
guilty feelings maybe?
our country could go to hell in a handbasket,but blair and brown will be "im alright jock,sod you"
13

steve 1511,

aberdeen 27/06/2009 06:08:07
the gibbering eejit broon with the big banana smile for every £3 he collects in taxes he spends £4 how to run the economy broon style, the countrys bankrupt.

STAIGHT JACKET FOR BROON
14

,

27/06/2009 06:56:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Diego Plasma Residue,

USA 27/06/2009 07:21:23
The war is the big racket. The corporations see a conflict , propagandise an enemy and then sell sell sell weapons to both sides of the conflict and then whatever reconstruction is to be done , make more money sub-contracting the repairs to be done after all the ammo is spent. The apathetic voters whom even bother to read about anything that is not about Megan Fox or Shia LeBeefie or super skinny LiLo running around making fools of themselves would not know what the issues are anyways. The fact we still are bank rolling bases in Bosnia boggles the mind , the fact that bombs were dropped on Serbia just because Clinton / Caligula got caught diddling some frumppy office drone is beyond me! The contraction in the job markets here might wake up some citizens , but that won't do much. The way Rome ended up could just as well be the same fate of North America. I look forwards to growing my own vegetables and learning Mandarin in the near future. The Russians must be laughing in their dachas at our expense. Such is life:D.
16

gerryzm,

devon england 27/06/2009 07:45:18
More of our good money being thrown after the bad, by deluded Gord.
17

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 27/06/2009 08:12:27
The union dividend again. Whether we approve of what is being spent or where it is being spent, Scotland's share of the contribution will come to around £8 Billion.
18

sceptic,

livingston 27/06/2009 08:17:46
Och, what is a measly £3000 per household to help the Mugabite type countries of the world. Another 10% on energy bills to sooth the green brigade and so on. As "Unimpressed One" has been regularly telling us the green cult nutters are going to destroy our already foundering economy.
19

Mr Twerp,

At Hame 27/06/2009 08:22:33
£60bn. The man is an even bigger fool than I thought if he reckons this money will be used to deal with climate change. I will be amazed if even one per cent gets to it's intended point. Nah!!! It will join the bulk of all the other aid money in the secret bank accounts of corrupt dictators, politicians and businessmen. It is time to put a stop to this aid nonsense.
20

gus1940,

Edinburgh 27/06/2009 08:51:53
My understanding of this latest Brown gimmick is that the £60Billion would be a total from 1st. World countries NOT just from the UK.
21

Marian,

27/06/2009 08:55:39
This news illustrates brilliantly why New Labour have lost the respect of UK voters.

What they see is a UK almost bankrupted by Gordon Brown still handing out what little dosh we have left to other countries in a vain attempt to be seen as some kind of example for the rest of the world to follow.
22

preddo53,

Leeds 27/06/2009 09:05:20
I think someone should have a word with Gordon's mam, he is now way out of control, he needs chastising. Can someone tell me where he's going to get the money from cos Iv'e nothing left, us English are bled dry, roll on Scotish independence.
23

,

27/06/2009 09:33:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Unimpressed one,

27/06/2009 09:41:16
£60 billion is just for starters. Wait until the droughts, floods, deforestation and famines claims come in, then we'll be pursued for compensation for our 'culpability'. Climate change not a political scam? Only idiots and eco-nuts believe otherwise.
25

drunken proffet,

Tassy 27/06/2009 09:53:00
It is a non event. The majority of poorer countries would be better using it to improve their cropping and sanitation infrastructure. Offhand I have no idea of any other third world country that is polluting the atmosphere in the same way as the advanced nations.
26

Unimpressed one,

27/06/2009 10:06:58
Can I opt out prime minister and just take my £1000 contribution to the hot air fund and spend it on a top of the range plasma TV just like some of your MPs have already done with taxpayers money?
27

Unimpressed one,

27/06/2009 10:22:01
Christ, we'll be getting the likes of Mugabe claiming that 'climate change' has wrecked his country's economy and asking for his share of the pot and the t*ssers at Oxfam agreeing with him.
28

Pa broon,

Edinburgh 27/06/2009 10:32:01
Looks like Gordon and the Labour party have delusions of grandure again. £60 billion why not £160 billion. Lets pile on the tax. I'm sure we in Britain can rescue the world; after all Gordon did save it didn't he! Lets not consider the fact that we are nearly bankrupt and what remains on our industries are struggling and disappearing by the day.
Sorry I forgot, we don't reconcile the countries books anymore we just print more money and call it quantitive easing.
29

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 27/06/2009 10:38:50
How appropriate that this announcement was done at London zoo. The man is gibbering and off on one of his "global" delusions which unfortunately are about to cost you and me a lot of money which a) we don't have and b) if it can't be raised by the ailing air travel business, will have to be boirrowed/printed.

The loonie leadership in Africa and elsewhere will be booking trips to Switzerland to admire their ever-increasing bank accounts, while we slide into third-world poverty.

The best way of dealing with aid is to ensure that existing commitments are honoured by the recipient countries and the almost unimaginable £60bn is consigned to history, preferavly along with Brown and his corrupt cohorts.
30

Davefromoverthere,

27/06/2009 10:46:28
I'm royally sick of this. Labour know they need some headlines to look like they're taking the initiative, and how better to do it than by spending other people's money and doing it on the world stage?

I can't wait for their mandate to expire. "There's a problem, therefore you get taxed" is not the only possible response; it's just the most familiar and comfortable one. Can't we be more imaginative about things?
31

Media at One,

27/06/2009 11:43:51
What a disgrace. Developing nations, or should we call them incapable nations?

Why is it that wealthy, committed, tenacious, hungry, hard working, do what it takes, dynamic nations must continually stump up cash for nations who just refuse to get it right?

You cannot take from the wealthy to assist the poor, it doesnt work.
32

Alan B,

27/06/2009 12:20:35
so fresh from saving the worlds economy; lol (pity he bankrupted the uk) brown is going to save the planet. what a guy.
33

preddo53,

Leeds 27/06/2009 12:21:11
Why give developing nations money to cut carbon emissions then start a car scrappage scheme in the UK. Is this man mental?, yes he is.
34

Alan B,

27/06/2009 12:27:12
UK Labour have done nothing for the environment since getting into power in 97. They have just used it to tax us more and more.

If they were serious about it they would have put in place policies to encourage cars to use less petrol etc. It is under their watch that we have seen the explosion of higly poluting SUVs.

They do not need to throw any tax payers money to solve the issues. Simply bring in a 50mpg min for new cars. And then remove vat or reduce it on electric cars etc and hybrids etc.

Why talk about increasing flight duty which should be removed when they have rejected fast and reliable trains for the uk like glas/edin to london and the other cites. While they do little to open up the channel tunnel to other operator so that trains can start from the midlands, manchester and scotland. And have desinations beyond just paris and brussels.

35

Joe Plaice,

the Nutmeg of Consolation 27/06/2009 12:53:24
Nope, no-way, that's it, I've had enough. I'm not paying another penny of tax to these corrupt Bilderberger quislings as they have no sense of responsibility for the money they get from hard working people struggling to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table. They can try suing me for the money but I will take them to court and they won't get a thing I can promise you that. We have a governmment without a mandate, a Prime Minister without testicles or a spine and a population who are standing by while he fracks us all over the place.

Had enough. Byeeeeee!
36

Geomac 1,

Scotland 27/06/2009 13:06:01
if ever evidence was needed that GB has lost the plot, tis must be it.
Post #1 shows the implications of some of the costs being built up by GB and his cronies but one major cost is missing - the cost to the UK of meeting his CO2 reduction targets here at home - these must run into £ trillions.
I have to ask what carbon emissions he's talking about in developing nations? Most have negligible amounts to reduce!! No doubt, like most previous aid to such countries this too will end up in Swiss bank accounts!!
37

Number 6,

Germany 27/06/2009 13:23:58
Can someone gently explain to this madman that thanks to his financial "Policies" we are no longer a "Rich nation".
38

preddo53,

Leeds 27/06/2009 14:50:34
I don't know why you're all getting so excited, it's only money, you'd only spend it it on frivolities, sugar, tea bags, bread. where's your socialist spirit boys. After all, it's made round to go round, lighten up. I think we should give more, help your fellow man is what I say.


G Brown.
Westminster.
London.
39

Jo'Burg Jock,

South Africa 27/06/2009 14:51:02
What happened to the "hole" in the Ozone layer?

Has it got better yet?
40

Joe Plaice,

the Nutmeg of Consolation 27/06/2009 15:43:17
If you want to see why it makes no sense to vote for the corporation of Wastemonster and its corporate entities, (MPs) or to pay tax to a company who only want to enslave us and keep us working 24/5 for them. If we stop working and stop paying taxes they are seriously farked. The banksters will crucify any government that loses them THEIR workforce of slaves and taxpayers. Bothe the NuLiebore and Conservatives are signed up to the banksters control of the country.
Watch this video to see what a scary world we live in.
http://www.bbc5.tv/news/story/emtv-interview-john-harris
41

yoric,

27/06/2009 17:44:26
Its only public money,
there's plenty of it,
if it runs low,
Gordon will just print some more.

Climate change unproven and brought to you by the same people who brought you the millenium bug, Aids that was going to wipe out most of the world, or how about Swine fever.
Swine fever will wipe out billions this winter, but it's winter now in the Southern Hemisphere and nothing has happened.
Still not to worry, these people are experts and must be right.
42

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 27/06/2009 22:30:27
And the relationship between carbon and climate change is?

Come on, Broon, what is it?

Answer: Tax
43

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 27/06/2009 22:32:13
Forget climate change - tidal change is next.
44

drunken proffet,

Tassy 28/06/2009 09:22:22
#45, no Jock, the English tried it back in the ninth or tenth century and it didnae work. You know, about the same time as the French over ran the country, and stayed.
45

Ephraim,

london 28/06/2009 14:42:30
Instead of hiking up the tax on all airfares, we need to implement an emissions based system where the more you travel, the more you pay!

Already there are people so poor in this country that they have never even been abroad. Do you think they should be charged the same as somebody who holidays 5 times a year? I don't.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.