Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Evening News / Sony Centre Reverse Auction

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Anger over relaxing of gun law for Olympics



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 May 2008
ANTI-GUN campaigners have warned the Government not to relax firearms legislation in the run-up to the London Olympics, saying: "A child's life is not worth a medal."
UK and Scottish ministers have agreed that from August, sportsmen and women will be given special permission to use their weapons at Ministry of Defence ranges in Britain. At present, competitors have to train abroad.

It is a major breakthrough
for British Shooting, the sport's governing body, which has campaigned for years to exempt its members from the strict laws introduced after gun collector Thomas Hamilton massacred 16 children and a teacher at Dunblane Primary School in 1996.

But Anne Pearston, who led the Snowdrop Campaign that led to the Firearms Amendments Act 1997 banning the ownership of handguns, said she was opposed to the exemption. "A child's life is not worth a medal," she said.

Pearston said while there had been other school massacres around the world, the UK's tough laws had prevented further British tragedies.

She said: "I want us to get to the 20th anniversary without another school massacre. We don't want any weakening of the legislation – if anything it needs to be tightened up. The Government is supposed to safeguard the public, not be swayed by sportspeople."

The UK-wide Gun Control Network, which replaced the Snowdrop Campaign, said it had been pressing ministers to keep the handgun ban intact.

Gill Marshall-Andrews, the network's chairman, said: "We are opposed to any kind of change in the legislation, even for training purposes. Some of those who have taken up the sport are young enough to have done so since the ban was introduced, knowing that it was illegal in this country. Why should we put wider society at risk for the sake of a few sportspeople?"

John Leighton-Dyson, British Shooting's performance director, said: "We are not asking for US-style liberalisation. We just want an opportunity for a small number of sportsmen and women to be allowed to compete in the Olympics and win gold medals for their country. I'm sure that's something that every right-minded member of the public would support."

The UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport said it expected a trial exemption for sportsmen and women to begin in August after the Beijing Olympics.

The exemption would run up to the 2012 London Olympics and, if successful, be extended to the 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow.



The full article contains 413 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 04/05/2008 01:41:49
The knee-jerk reaction in banning hand guns legally held by people in this country did absolutely nothing to stop gun crime. Gun crime has, in fact, increased dramatically since this legislation came in, particularly in England.

As for that Thomas hamilton, yes, he did hold hand guns legally, but that was the fault of the police for not doing proper checks on him. He should not have been issued with a firearms certificate. The incompetence on the part of the authorities, in combination with the knee-jerk reaction from the government, has meant that normal people, going about their lawful business, and enjoying their sport, have been penalised for no good reason.

Guns don't kill, people kill.
2

Dileas,

04/05/2008 09:52:24
Agreed. I used to enjoy target shooting (i.e. at a paper "bull" a measured distance away. It was a very disciplined sport, requiring discipline even in breathing and consistency and nothing at all to do with Rambo!

Hamilton should have been weeded out and I seem to recall that a senior police officer was implicated in the failure.

For this literally thousands of people have had to give up a sport that requires concentration and a temporary detachment from daily routine.

Typical Labour knee-jerk reaction to ban!
3

Newfoundlander.,

Newfoundland 05/05/2008 09:50:09
If Anne Perston has some knowledge that an Olympic shooter is planning on killing a child to celebrate not having to go to Switzerland to train, I hope she comes forward with the details.

Otherwise, please, cut the non-sense. Does anyone take these people seriously?

4

fsilber,

Memphis 05/05/2008 18:28:28
This is why you should never have allowed the legitimate use of firearms to be limited to sport. The need to save your life while resisting robbers, if kept legal, would have balanced the danger of firearms possession -- just like any other emergency life-saving device (e.g. the possession insulin, a potentially deadly drug, by diabetics). Then no one would have begrudged your use of sport as an enjoyable form of training.

Instead of demanding your rights and making your opponents pay a heavy price politically for opposing you, you begged their tolerance! You thought that your enemies would appreciate your "reasonable willingness to compromise" and return the favor. Instead, the treat you with insults and contempt! (So much for the European concept of "soft power".)
5

fsilber,

Memphis 05/05/2008 18:29:14
This is why you should never have allowed the legitimate use of firearms to be limited to sport. The need to save your life while resisting robbers, if kept legal, would have balanced the danger of firearms possession -- just like any other emergency life-saving device (e.g. the possession insulin, a potentially deadly drug, by diabetics). Then no one would have begrudged your use of sport as an enjoyable form of training.

Instead of demanding your rights and making your opponents pay a heavy price politically for opposing you, you begged their tolerance! You thought that your enemies would appreciate your "reasonable willingness to compromise" and return the favor. Instead, the treat you with insults and contempt! (So much for the European concept of "soft power".)
6

Harry Schell,

USA 06/05/2008 00:03:20
It is very clear that Olympic training and general ownership of firearms are not remotely equivalent.

The same can thus be said about this anti-gun "anger" and logical thinking and threat assessment.

Stop emoting and start thinking, please. Your ban on guns doesn't work anyway, if you have any honesty about it. It promotes violent crime because the law-abiding cannot defend themselves, and gun crime is a subset of violent crime, not the meat of it.

Violent crime in the UK is so bad the police could not believe it and underreported crimes by about 2M in 2006. You have the highest violent crime rate per capita in the developed world, and in some areas are closing in on numeric equivalence with the USA, with less than 1/3 the population.

This is an absurd situation made worse by people living in a fantasy world. Good bye UK, nice knowing you.
7

fr8dog,

USA 07/05/2008 01:16:17
I’m a U.S. citizen, a former UK resident, and a survivor of an attempted violent crime. The only reason I survived was that I was armed.. So the answer to the rising problem of violent crime in the UK and the need for self defense was easy for me. I carried a gun in defiance of the law. I continued my “criminal” behavior when I was transferred to a new assignment in Australia, which also prohibits handguns. I’m now back in the USA and am proud to say IM STILL A “criminal”.
8

2ALAGO,

USA 07/05/2008 02:43:54
Let me get this straight, I realize I am just an "ugly American" but somthing just doesnt add up.

The Snowdrop Campaign is worried that the British Olympic Team, will sneak thier target pistols off of a military base, past security,and then search the countryside looking for children to murder?

HOW THE FUDGICLE ARE THESE SNOWDROP PEOPLE OUT WALKING AROUND????? Shouldnt people this crazy be in an asylum where they wont hurt themsleves?????

....Or is shooting children an olympic sport and I just showed my colonial ignorence?
9

Jimmyjet,

Michigan, USA 07/05/2008 06:24:51
Brits and Scots: Go to www.actshooters.com and be prepared to cry, (if you're a shooter)or become righteously indignant, (if you enjoy being a subject of the Crown) or just terribly confused if you are both a shooter and proud to be a disarmed and vulnerable subject of the Crown.
You know us Yanks, we lack a certain "gentility". By the way, don't bother typing any irate replies to this post, because I'm out of hear,...Bye!
10

ydaho,

Idaho, USA 07/05/2008 15:42:07
You poor brits. Thank goodness my Scottish coal miner ancestors came to the land of the free.

Europe is a simulator for american democrats; all of the policies they purport to work here are played out in full view across the European landscape. And we can watch the ensuing circus safely from the across the pond.

Your regulations on guns make you guys look like fools. Your almighty legislators rule your people with total power. Thank goodness for the Second amendment and the NRA.
11

2ALAGO,

USA 07/05/2008 23:47:53
Cant help but notice there dont seem to be a lot of Brits or Scots weighing in on this topic....

Maybe this is how the anti-gun looneys won! Do ANY of you remember this;

"we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the Old"

One crazy guy (who police were already aware was not stable) and up went the white flag! I am glad Winston is not alive to see what as become of the Empire....

We lost over 3000 on 9/11 and we didn't ban airliners, box cutters, or arabs.....

When McVeigh bombed the federal building, we didnt ban children, rental trucks, fertilizer, White people, or diesel fuel...

When the 7/7 Bombings occured no one banned Backpacks, Trains, Buses or arabs.....

but one nut job with a gun and the whole country gets punished?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.