Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


An ocean of green opportunity as UK's first seabed opens up to energy firms

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 November 2008
THE first stretch of water off the UK will today be opened for business for the development of marine renewable energy, The Scotsman can reveal.
The Pentland Firth off Orkney – the area of sea that gives Scotland the potential to be "the Saudi Arabia of renewables" – will become the focus of attention of dozens of renewables firms across the world.

The Crown Estate, which owns the seabed out to the 12-nautical-mile limit, will begin the process of inviting developers to express interest in building marine energy schemes in the area.

As The Scotsman revealed on Saturday, renewables companies from across the world have already shown interest in the potential of the site.

Alex Salmond, the First Minister, wants to see marine energy sources help turn Scotland into Europe's green energy capital. The Crown Estate has predicted that 700 megawatts of power could be generated from marine energy projects in the Pentland Firth by 2020. It believes the Firth and surrounding waters contain six of the top ten sites in the UK suitable for tidal power development.

Rob Hastings, the Crown Estate's director of marine estate, said: "Today's announcement is an important step because the quality of renewable energy in existence, particularly in the north of Scotland is vast.

"To start that process of being able to get access to these resources is a really important step. We are really excited about it. It's a great opportunity."

He described the Pentland Firth as "a very energetic place" and said one of the reasons it was chosen as the first area to open up to marine renewable projects was because the Scottish Government had shown support by carrying out an environmental assessment of the site. "There's a very strong desire within Scotland to explore these types of energy resources," he said.

Mr Hastings said he was already aware of interest in the site from across the world, including from firms in North America, Europe, the Far East and Australia as well as in Scotland.

As a result, he thinks Scotland has the potential to lead the way in the marine energy field.

"There's going to be a need for some very clear strategic thinking for that to happen," he said. "That will largely have to be led by the Scottish Government.

"It's clear that the resources are there. There's also a fairly strong skill set and capability with regard to offshore construction that comes from the oil and gas sector. If these skills could be transferred that would give a degree of advantage to Scotland."

He thinks Scotland's economy, ability to achieve its emissions reduction targets, and security of the country's energy supply can all benefit.

"In the current world we have some severe economic difficulties and some potential difficult times coming to do with energy and how you secure the supply of it. If Scotland is making strong moves to effectively become self-sufficient with an energy resource which is low in carbon and emissions, it suggests we are heading in the right direction."

However, he said there was still a huge barrier to development due to the lack of grid capacity to transmit electricity from the remote locations in the Pentland Firth to the rest of the country.

Under the Round 1 leasing programme, the Crown Estate will check what local community benefits each developer can incorporate into their scheme, and all commercial development will be subject to an environmental impact assessment.

The process will take into account the wide range of stakeholder interests including international shipping routes, ferry traffic, fishing, defence and environment.

The initial devices to be installed are expected to be full-size demonstration devices deployed in small arrays.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

drunken proffet,

Tassy 17/11/2008 02:58:25
I preferred the design of the one they tried out on the West coast, a bit like a large torpedo with a propellor on each end. The one in the photo looks like a seaweed harvesting machine.
2

drunken proffet,

Tassy 17/11/2008 04:57:17
As an afterthought, since this technology is relatively new, why does the Scotsman not open a website on the internet asking for designs, offering a small prize each month for the most viable. Not to say that the present website is not fine and dandy but having only basic broadband I do find it tiresome to wait until each page is fully loaded.
3

scotsdoc,

NANAIMO 17/11/2008 07:14:24


Don't count your chickens before they are hatched.

To my way of thinking there is no way that power production will be economic! The environment is excessively harsh and the costs of the constant fight against corrosion, leakage and vibration damage points to extremely high maintenance costs.

Add to that the damage a passing whale or floating abandoned fishing gear can do and the owners of the project will have their hands full!
4

drunken proffet,

Tassy 17/11/2008 07:26:50
#3 The question must be, do you think we should drill for oil in the North Sea?
5

Unimpressed one,

17/11/2008 07:35:20
"An energy resource which is low in carbon and emissions"

WTF does that statement mean?

#2, The clear winner in such a competition would be the suggestion of heating a boiler to make steam - simple and well proven.
6

Honest Opinion 2,

Clamecy 17/11/2008 07:40:06
Look on the bright side people. Could be a massive step forward in the long run - provided they can install the relevant transmission and distribution connections economically. BTW the stated 700 MW by 2020 seems a very low target: equivalent to around 16 medium sized or less than 4 larger gas turbine generators! Can anyone clarify/confirm?
7

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 17/11/2008 08:23:05
The Crown Estate - is that something similar to the Ex-Regio territory in the North Sea that it is in Scotland but not a part of the Scottish economic system? Are its not inconsiderable revenues accredited to Scotland, or are they simply "exported" to London, like the vast Ex-Regio oil taxes? Does the GERS report even take account of the Crown Estate revenues? Seems to me there is a bit of tidying up to be done here before the subsea generation income starts to roll.

8

Honest Opinion 2,

Clamecy 17/11/2008 08:32:54
No 5 - steamies fuelled by what???
9

Char91,

England 17/11/2008 09:17:13
Of course the term 'renewable' will be subsumed by small print, when the various wave/wind harvesting machines are found not to work.

The small print will say, any firm having demonstrated that its machines cost it money and do not work, will be allowed to deep drill for oil. Interesting things, flexible drilling lines. When they writhe loose, who will be able to stop the flow?

Now that's where the fun will really begin. And what will we be able to to against legal corruption, international companies and small print?

Beg for jobs as the shore line turns black? Beg our political parties not to deal, as they dealt with Scottish Power in my area? And they'll listen?

Please join the dots.
10

The Strategist,

17/11/2008 09:28:02
#7 Yes - Crown Estate income goes to the Treasury.
11

SimonHurrll,

South 17/11/2008 10:17:12
Yet again the availablity of excess electricity production in Iceland could be called up to balance the immediate needs. Yet no one wants to consider connecting into the link from the UK. With the Icelandic Krona and the economy seeking a small bail out it would be a good buy now!

With regards to this renewables debate theSottish Government is right and it must be modest.

Why not go for this idea anyway?

With all the furore over wind turbine tidal has to be a way forward.

The trials in Strangford Lough Co. Down have already shown what can be done on a small scale there. So think in broader terms rather than the narrow.

12

Mallory,

Edinburgh 17/11/2008 10:32:51
Low carbon energy?
Isn't that what nuclear is all about?
13

The Strategist,

17/11/2008 10:56:43
There is no opportunity for Scotland. To benefit from this requires investment. We don't do investment. We do waiting for others to build the stuff we need!
14

Embra Don,

17/11/2008 11:58:10
#11 sm753,

The average tidal flow through the Pentland Firth is approximately 2million tonnes of water per second at about 7knots. The potential for extracting tidal energy is mind boggling. Something of the order of 250gW has been suggested from tides alone.
15

ricky40,

17/11/2008 12:08:01
20 Rulesbutnorulers

Why spoil an otherwise good post by generalising about SNP voters? Do you really, really, think all SNP voters are dim, were you being provocative or do you think that this comment added to the value of your posting?
16

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

17/11/2008 12:21:20
I have severe doubts about this. It sounds like an environmental catastrophe waiting to happen if they let this go ahead - not to mention being a hazard to shipping.

These so-called "green" alternatives are anything but green - it's about time people realised that.

Tidal power plants reduce tidal flow in their immediate vicinity. This can severely disrupt ecosystems which depend on being periodically covered by water; resulting changes in fisheries or shellfish beds may result in adverse economic effects. Tidal flow elsewhere along the coast increases - thus causing it's own environmental concerns.

There are already large-scale tidal plants in the Bay of Fundy between the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The Annapolis Royal Generating Station has been studying the different effects. Some of the problems include accelerated shoreline erosion as well as increased siltation and heavy metal and pesticide contamination due to lack of regular river/tidal flushing. Their studies also show that tidal power plants can cause a change in tides of +/- 1m. That is enough to cause a major change in the ecosystem along the coasts in the vicinity of the power plants.

Before any scheme of this size is implemented a full environmental audit should be carried out on its possible impact on the ecosystem.
17

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

17/11/2008 12:24:48
#15 Surely some mistake - but I find myself in complete agreement with you here Hen.

The problem with the energy debate is that it has been hijacked by the vested interests of the pro-nuclear and pro-renewables lobbies.
18

ricky40,

17/11/2008 12:41:02
25 Rulesbutnorulers

Quite frankly, your posts do not make or spoil my day. I was only pointing out that such remarks spoil any constructive messages and make those, like me, with no political allegiance tend to ignore your otherwise interesting posts.
19

subrosa,

17/11/2008 12:49:47
# 25 'I was searching for an appropriate analogy and as I really do think that SNP voters do so from the heart rather than the brain I used the word 'dim'. I could have been far more brutal!'

Are you therefore suggesting union party voters are 'bright'?

It's obvious you have little or no contact with SNP voters to class them as more emotional than intelligent.

Using your analogy I could refer to my unionist friends as 'dim' and I also could be far more brutal!
20

Red Dykes,

Tain 17/11/2008 13:31:44
I think they should stick Frank Hadden in the Pentland Firth - Hot air and wind - its a winner!
21

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 17/11/2008 15:02:33
#31 Hen Broon

"Where is Slioch who normaly gallops to the recue of nuclear"

You are misinformed. I have never supported nuclear power generation.

You also show your lack of scientific literacy by your wholesale quoting (without quotation marks) of Christopher Booker's usual nonsense from the Sunday Telegraph. Readers wishing to read something sensible about this non-event, to which Booker devoted his whole worthless column, would be advised to visit this site instead:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/11/mountains-and-molehills/#more-620
22

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 17/11/2008 15:13:06
#31 Hen Broon wonders what I will say about the temperature records.

I assume you mean the recently released October 2008 global average temperatures, in which NASA GISS initially posted a figure that was in error (since corrected) because of erroneous figures from Russia. Why anyone should get exited by such a non-event is more a question for psychologists studying the mental processes of denial than for a scientist. But here is the data:

The October temperature anomaly since 1990, from the UK HADCRU series (one of four global series, of which NASA GISS is another) is as follows:

1990 +0.285 deg C (above av. for 1961-1990)
1991 +0.134C
1992 -0.083C
1993 +0.060C
1994 +0.236C
1995 +0.245C
1996 +0.082C
1997 +0.494C
1998 +0.418C
1999 +0.226C
2000 +0.192C
2001 +0.378C
2002 +0.359C
2003 +0.565C
2004 +0.477C
2005 +0.513C
2006 +0.481C
2007 +0.367C
2008 +0.440C
See link

From which it is obvious that October temperatures vary from year to year - in this series of 19 Octobers there are 10 Octobers which were cooler than the previous year. Similar variability is found in other months and indeed for the average temperature for years.
October 2008 is the sixth warmest on record.

23

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 17/11/2008 15:15:10
I forgot to put in the link for #34. It is:
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh%2Bsh/monthly
24

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 17/11/2008 22:21:27
#36 Hen Broon

Thanks for the info. about Tinyurl - I've often vaguely wondered what it was all about ...

So, here we go: Another source of comment about the dishonesty of Christopher Booker, well worth a read:

http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008/11/mountains_out_of_molehills.php#more

or, to use Tinyurl :

http://tinyurl.com/5bv6ac

BTW, I wouldn't characterise climateaudit or wattsupwiththat as raving loonies. I haven't spent much time looking at them, but my impression is that they are amongst the more clever forms of misinformation.
25

Stewart_in_Oz,

Alexandra Hills 18/11/2008 23:14:44
Warm Octobers.
In the good old days of the 1950's when the schools in Angus used to have 'tattie holidays' in October for 3 weeks, I remember frequently, after the overnight frost had melted, stripping to the waist to enjoy the sunshine while struggling up the 'bit' before the 'cart' came along. It wasn't quite so bad with the elevator digger compared to the spinner.
I think the 'younger' generation are missing out of some of the 'joys' we had. Far off fields were green.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.