Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Adoption rates plunge - so is abortion a factor?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 April 2008
THE number of adoptions in Scotland has dropped dramatically over the last four decades, especially of babies, it emerged yesterday.
Figures reveal the number of adoptions of children in Scotland in 2006 was just 418 compared to 2,162 in 1967. The comparison is even greater with children aged under one, with only 16 babies adopted in 2006 and 1,279 in 1967.

The figures were rev
ealed in a written answer to Jackson Carlaw, Tory public-health spokesman, who has called for a debate on a link between the drop in adoptions in Scotland and the rise in the number of abortions.

He has queried if the 1967 Abortion Act is linked to the fall in adoptions. There has been a 750 per cent increase in abortions in Scotland since 1968, from 1,537 to 13,081 in 2006. But experts dismissed this as too simplistic an explanation.

"I'm not issuing a moralising polemic against the principle of abortion," said Mr Carlaw. "I am merely analysing the trends that have followed the passing of the Abortion Act, seeking to bring them to public attention and hoping to encourage public debate about whether we are comfortable with the direction in which we are heading.

"It seems to me that, however worthy, sex education has failed. I would argue that there should be a fresh public discussion."

He went on:

"We must surely move away from the current position where adoption is viewed as being in some way inhumane. It is just as moral and ethical an option for pregnant women who – for whatever reason – feel unable to become mothers."

Barbara Hudson, the director of the British Association of Adoption and Fostering (BAAF) in Scotland, warned against a simplistic approach to the issue. "It would be hard to push through the argument that there is a link between abortion and adoption to any final meaningful conclusion," she said.

"That is partly because abortion is about women making choices about their lives and because giving birth and then giving up a child is a very different and difficult experience."

She added: "Adoption of babies was at its height in the 1960s and 1970s, when people had different views about having children out of wedlock and when social-security support for young and single mothers was very different from today.

"What we have now more often is children being adopted by a step-parent, somebody who has married a natural parent, or cases of children being adopted out of a fostering arrangement."

She continued: "The real problem we have is a mismatch between would-be adoption parents and the children.

"Usually, the would-be parents come with aspirations of a healthy, very young child, when the reality is that the children concerned are older and either have special needs or come from troubled backgrounds."

The interpretation from the BAAF was supported by the Scottish Government. A spokesman said: "The fall in adoption levels reflects societal changes and increasing focus on supporting families to stay together.

"

Features, pageS 24-25





The full article contains 513 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 April 2008 10:28 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 25/04/2008 01:15:21
Barbara Hudson, the director of the British Association of Adoption and Fostering (BAAF)

"QUOTE"

"She continued: "The real problem we have is a mismatch between would-be adoption parents and the children.

"Usually, the would-be parents come with aspirations of a healthy, very young child, when the reality is that the children concerned are older and either have special needs or come from troubled backgrounds."


This is a Total, 'NON TRUTH'!

We asked especially to adopt or give care for on a 'part-time' basis to look after a Baby or Child with,

'Special Needs'!

We were told,

"Cant do while, your on an IVF programme"

Which is rediculous!,

Because our IVF treatment would, in 'NO-WAY' affect the Love and Care we would give to a 'Special-Needs' Child!
2

Guga II,

Rockall 25/04/2008 04:53:50
The adoption rate has probably dropped as so many people now see fostering of kids as a good way of making easy money. They give people around £180, per child, per week for fostering kids. That is why, when asked if they would like to adopt these kids, they refuse, as they lose out on all that money.

Apart from that, of course, when petty bureaucrats are involved with their many stupid, irrational and nonsensical rules and regulations, people who want to adopt are not allowed to. See #1 above as an example of bureaucratic stupidity.
3

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

25/04/2008 16:37:01
1....Charles...Thats sheer stupidity...what is the reasoning behind that? Do they think that if your IVF is successful that you will hand back the baby you are caring for with a "No thanks, we've got our own now"???
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/04/2008 02:23:04
Cankers,
Sorry I missed your post, yes basically I think that is what we were being told, its absolutely crazy!

Suzanne has always had and has a special place in her heart for 'Special Needs' Children, in 'NO-WAY' would our IVF treatment, would affect the,

'LOVE AND CARE'

That we would give to any Child, Special Needs or Not!

Suzanne has been working with Babies and Small Children now for 10years, I help her with all her course work, we both know plenty about Babies/Children and the care they need and would be brilliant part time or full time carers!

But NO, is that not pure stupidity,? and bureaucratic nonsense,?

OUR LOVE WAS REJECTED!

Soo "Barbara Hudson" does not have to state,
"The real problem we have is a mismatch between would-be adoption parents and the children."

IT IS A TOTAL NON-TRUTH!

Or does She not realise what is happening,?

If Not! she should not be in the Job she is in!!!

(very angry for us would be an understatement, when reading this article)

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.